John Jackson Profile picture
Sep 29 25 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Recently, a dispute arose over the Georgian Legion and its fundraising practices. From this focused beginning, the dispute expanded, broadly, into an array of personal attacks, doxing, harassment, and accusations of foreign influence. This thread will address the key issues.
More specifically, I intend to identify in order of importance importance transparency and its connection to modern Ukrainian history, how we can avoid a repeat of this situation in the future, where donation monies are unaccounted for, and how to move forward to victory.
First, why transparency matters. Let me say that any attack upon transparency in fundraising is an attack upon the soul of the 2014 Revolution of Dignity and the Ukrainians' brave struggle for freedom across many decades. Let me explain why.
The 2014 Revolution of Dignity did not occur in a vacuum; it was the culmination of decades, even centuries, of Ukrainians being trampled by the iron feet of Russian oppression. With every totalitarian system, there is a lack of transparency.
Conversely, in every functioning democracy, there exists transparency. It is the essential component by which a government is accountable to its people. Corruption cannot exist when there is transparency, where there is truth. Transparency elevates the person over the state.
This isn't me talking. This is the lived experience of the Ukrainian people, an experience written in sacrifice. Last week, I visited the Bykivnia Memorial, where 200,000 innocent Ukrainians who were slaughtered Stalin's NKVD were thrown into pits from 1937-1941.
The reason we know about this mass grave, this clear evidence of Russia's long history of genocide against the Ukrainian people, is because a brave Ukrainian poet and dissident, Vasyl Symokenko, demanded transparency from the Russia-backed government in Kyiv.
He was brutally beaten to death by Russian security services and died of kidney failure at the young age of 28, in the year 1963. He demanded transparency, and look what happened to him. But he isn't the only one, for there are many others. Image
Alla Horska is a famous Ukrainian painter and dissident. She was the one who reported Ukrainian children kicking around a human skull as a soccer ball near the village of Bykivnia. She was relentlessly persecuted, because she too demanded transparency from the Russians. Image
On November 28, 1970, Alla went to her father in law's home to retrieve a sewing machine. She never returned. Later, her lifeless body was discovered in the home with her head caved in by a hammer. Her father in law's crushed body was found on nearby railway tracks nearby.

Image
Image
Image
For decades, the Russians claimed that Alla had been murdered by her father in law. Nearly 40 years later, government records were disclosed-by Alla's son, who sought transparency-showing that the Russian-backed government had murdered her back in 1970 and covered it up.
These examples are literally a grain of sand in the Sahara desert when it comes to Ukrainians who have fought, suffered, and died for transparency from their government. They show us not just what has been given in sacrifice, but also the tactics used to suppress transparency.
These tactics, of deflecting legitimate requests for information, and harassing and intimidating those who seek transparency, remain today. The US Institute for Peace is a non-partisan institute established by Congress in 1984 to assist with transparency initiatives worldwide.
Below is a summary of their most recent report on the state of transparency reforms in Ukraine. The next to last bullet point reflects that "campaigns" of harassment and violence are a hurdle-one Ukraine is working very hard to resolve-to anticorruption efforts. Image
The final bullet point notes that foreign donors to Ukraine must ensure their standards for donating work in parallel with, and not against, Ukrainian anticorruption efforts. In other words, when foreigners inject money into Ukraine, they must do so responsibly to avoid harm.
Why do I mention this? Because I have witnessed a frankly shocking culture of harassment and intimidation by the online community of Ukraine supporters on Twitter, including even attacks on active-duty Ukrainian soldiers, critical volunteers for Ukraine who I personally know,
and Ukrainians themselves, among others. And to be clear, every person who donates a penny is owed a fiduciary duty by the person soliciting donations. So soldier or not, Ukrainian or not, every donor has the right to know how their monies were spent. They shouldn't have to ask.
The attacks on soldiers gall me, real fucking hard, from a personal level. Until you have written out your final letter to your kids, to your family, in case you get killed, until you have seen the faces of your dead comrades in your dreams, it's hard to understand the pressure.
I hate even having to say that. I hate having to explain it. I hold dear to my heart the belief that soldiers do their duty gladly, without complaint, and with total humility to the cause. I am not special. The Ukrainians are special. But it had to be said nonetheless.
It has to be said for another reason: the Ukrainian soldiers, the foreign fighters, the Ukrainian people, the little kids who run into bomb shelters daily, they are in this struggle for a great--and transparent--democracy. Not one where transparency is shitted on.
The brave dissidents I discussed above who were beaten to death with fists, pipes, and hammers, draw a direct emotional and moral lineage to the 2014 Revolution of Dignity--a Revolution rooted in Ukrainian's desire for transparency: Image
The culture of calling everyone who disagrees with you a Russian agent, moreover, is not only morally and intellectually weak, it reflects a tribalism that Vasyl Symokenko warned against in most famous poem, where he called it chauvinism (translated it equals tribalism):
Image
Image
So I ask, how do you want to contribute to Ukraine's future? Do you want to be against the transparency that is the heart and soul of this struggle for freedom, or for it? I am not here to name or attack people specifically. I am here to problem-solve and win this fucking war.
So how do we move forward? Well, the Georgian Legion will provide its financials or it won't. Unless some one sues the guilty parties civilly or they are prosecuted, nobody can force those person or persons to provide this information. But it can be prevented going forward.
Briefly, I see two options. First, an agreed code of conduct for those who solicit and receive donations. Second, there can be a registry of approved entities that have their records reviewed by a third party quarterly to maintain registration. I will explain in another thread.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Jackson

John Jackson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hissgoescobra

Jun 27
Why is the Purdue Pharma decision one of the most important pro consumer-protection cases to be handed down in the 21st century, if not decades? How close did we come as a nation to a devastating and dangerous result? I will simplify and summarize, short 🧵
First, a quick primer on how bankruptcy is used by corporations who commit fraud, sell defective products, or otherwise engage in malfeasance that causes broad public harm.
The Bankruptcy Code is intended to give people and corporations who incur debts beyond their means to repay a "fresh start," to collect lawsuits pending in multiple states into one federal forum, and ensure that a debtor's (the person or company who declares bankruptcy) assets
Read 25 tweets
Jun 23
Quick analysis of the attackers in Makhachkala, Dagestan. Just a few quick notes, but some good information here on the weapons used and level of training. Four screenshots can tell us a lot more than you'd expect. Let's dive in. Very short thread:
Dagestan is where the Boston Marathon bombers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev moved to Makhachkala in 2001. Dagestan is one of the most economically depressed areas occupied by Russia and a history of violent uprisings, for example, in the 1999 War in Dagestan.
First, lets talk weapons. This is an AR-15/M16 based rifle. Notable is the use of an LPVO (low power variable optic) in a cantilever mount, the free-float rail system, and what appears to be a mid-length gas system with a 14.5 inch barrel. What does this mean? Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 10
By virtue of power invested in me as a human being with a tiny shred of decency, I announce on behalf of myself and the Selection Committee, the formation of the Baby Killer Hall of Fame & the selection of our inaugural member, Marjorie Taylor Greene: A🧵Image
Selection Criteria: to be eligible, the nominee must be alive, must have either directly ordered the murder of children, or have made significant bad faith contributions to the murder of children, through peddling disinformation, blocking legislation, or other acts that they
knew were substantially certain to cause the intentional or reckless taking of children's' lives. The key criteria for the second category is the bad faith, callous nature of their wrongful acts, done for personal gain, popularity, money, selfish reasons, or just rank stupidity.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 1
This week, major news outlets have reported that Putin is rattling the nuclear saber with respect to Ukraine. Yet again, the reporting has been largely unhelpful, except to Putin. I will attempt to clarify things and show why these threats should be rejected in this 🧵
There are interrelated but distinct issues in play here: the failure of the US and NATO to deter Putin in the past and how, if at all, Putin's threats should impact our current strategy with respect to Ukraine. Finally, I will preview what happens if we don't change course.
First, let's clarify the nature of Putin's threats, express or implied. What he has not said is that he will be using nuclear weapons, tactical or strategic, against NATO or the US. He has instead made qualified statements that are based on the occurrence of several
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(