Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Sep 29, 2024 • 17 tweets • 8 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

Media Blackout: 10 Stories They Chose to Not Tell You This Week

#10 - Mainstream journalists inadvertently reveal the shocking truth about climate change.

Whoopsie. The Washington Post just published a jaw-dropping report about global warming, and “a funny thing happened” that they weren't expecting.

The report revealed that the “Earth’s temperatures have been sliding for 50 million years.”

In fact, today's average temperature of 58.96°F (14.98°C) is about 38 degrees cooler than the 96.8°F (36°C) average temperature from around 100 million years ago.

This completely destroys the mainstream narrative that we are on the brink of a global heating catastrophe.

And contrary to common belief, Rep. Thomas Massie says that we actually “need more CO2” because it's associated with plant life “doing better” and crop production going up.

Everywhere you turn, the climate change narrative screams “scam.” Watch Dr. William Happer, PhD, expose the truth about it all in our exclusive interview.

See more revealing stories in the thread below 🧵

#9 - “The number of FBI informants participating in the January 6th protest will shock” Americans.

#8 - Tens of thousands of violent immigrants with convictions for sexual assault and murder are roaming US streets, according to ICE data.

While you’re here, don’t forget to click here to follow this page for more weekly news roundups each Sunday.

#7 - FBI whistleblower urges Americans to stock up on food and prepare for hard times.

Marcus Allen revealed the harsh consequences of what happens when you step out of line at the FBI.

He was punished by higher-ups after asking why so many federal informants were in the crowd at the January 6 Capitol riot.

“The FBI questioned my allegiance to the United States, suspended my security clearance, suspended my pay, and refused to allow me to seek outside employment or even accept charity,” Allen testified.

“Since this is a warning to the American people, I say, I personally have no confidence that the FBI will rein in its own conduct,” he continued.

The moment that struck a nerve was when Allen urged Americans to exercise their right to vote and bear arms. “As citizens, you have a duty to vote, and I strongly urge you to do so. Stake your claim, don’t forfeit it. Make your voice heard.”

“Arm yourself, know how to defend yourself, and make three to four friends in your neighborhood," he continued. "Promise mutual aid in times of hardship.”

“During the Great Depression, people stocked up their pantry. That’s a good practice now, especially in today’s economy,” Allen added. “Make sure you have three to four months of food.”

In his final remarks, Allen stressed the importance of faith, saying that advice is for “everybody.”

“As a person of faith, I’d say pray the rosary, go to the First Friday devotions. That’s for everybody... I’m Catholic and read the Gospel of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and live it every day. And that’s all I have to say. Thank you for the time.”

#6 - Jesse Watters notices something strange about the handling of the would-be Trump assassin’s manifesto.

#5 - U.S. lawmakers prepare for mass casualty event.

The implications are chilling.

Congress is considering a Constitutional Amendment that would allow governors to directly appoint House representatives in the event of widespread vacancies.

This proposal, if passed, would fundamentally alter the way the People’s representatives are selected, bypassing the current requirement for elections.

Rep. Derek Kilmer (WA-D), one of the bill’s key proponents, stated, “Congress hasn’t fully considered the implications of a mass casualty event affecting members and the impact it would have on our ability to function in a time of need.”

Under the proposed legislation, each representative would be required to compile a list of potential successors, and in the event of a vacancy due to death or incapacitation, state governors would have 10 days to appoint someone from the list.

The truth of the matter is that this is a way to get unelected representatives who never deserved power to remain in office due to unforeseen “emergencies.”

Don't be fooled. This bill would only further erode the foundation of our republic while doing so under the guise of emergency preparedness.

#4 - RFK Jr. completely destroys the insane push to put every overweight American on Ozempic.

He says, “For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase organic food for every American, three meals a day, and a gym membership for every obese American.”

Even the Danish government doesn't even recommend Ozempic. It recommends “a change in diet and exercise to treat obesity.”

Kennedy asks, “Why are members of Congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children?”

We could literally subsidize healthy food for every American, three meals a day, but the government wants to inject you weekly for double the price instead.

#3 - Ukraine President Zelenksky gets visibly agitated as Trump dominates their meeting, citing a “very good relationship” with Putin.

#2 - Former CDC director Robert Redfield admits RFK Jr. has been right all along.

After more than four decades in public health, Redfield believes the former president “chose the right man [RFK Jr.] for the job” to combat the processed foods industrial complex, which has ignited an obesity crisis across the Heartland.

“For instance, obesity in American children has increased dramatically since John F. Kennedy’s presidency, from around 4 percent in the 1960s to almost 20 percent in 2024,” he said, adding, “The causes of childhood obesity are complex, but a primary origin is clearly the modern American diet of highly processed foods.”

He explained the causes for this obesity crisis are primarily due to “special interest and corporate influences on our federal agencies.”

Redfield pointed out that “Kennedy is right” about the corporate capture problem of federal agencies.

READ MORE: vigilantnews.com/post/former-cd…

#1 - Federal judge rules fluoride poses “UNREASONABLE risk” to children.

The “conspiracy theorists” were right again.

Judge Edward Chen has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) MUST take action on water fluoridation.

He found that fluoride poses an “unreasonable risk” of reducing IQ in children, especially for pregnant women and young kids, at the current levels.

He dismissed the EPA’s argument that it’s unclear exactly how much fluoride is dangerous and instead pointed to scientific evidence showing that even the so-called “optimal” level for dental health (0.7 mg/L) could be harmful.

This decision could potentially lead to the end of water fluoridation in the U.S. and is a significant blow to the EPA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and groups like the American Dental Association (ADA), who have long defended the practice.

This is a huge win and another step forward to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA).

BONUS #1 - SNL Surprisingly Airs the Truth About Joe Biden’s Exit vigilantnews.com/post/snl-surpr…

BONUS #2 - Bill Maher’s Guest Says Something So Stupid That Even He Thinks She’s Crazy vigilantnews.com/post/bill-mahe…

BONUS #3 - You Won’t Believe How Easy It Is for Scammers to Steal Your Home vigilantnews.com/post/you-wont-…

BONUS #4 - Devastating Footage Emerges From U.S. South Amid Severe Flooding & Potential Dam Failures vigilantnews.com/post/devastati…

BONUS #5 - MSNBC Speaks With Michigan Union Workers – Things Don’t Go as Planned vigilantnews.com/post/msnbc-spe…

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1837975276124262858

Thanks for tuning in. We'll be back with another episode next Sunday at 6 PM Eastern.

Until then, give @Zeee_Media and @VigilantNews
a follow.

Here’s what you missed last week:

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1837975276124262858

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 28

Tucker Carlson admitted he used to make fun of people who believe vaccines cause autism.

He now describes his behavior as “unthinking, stupid, and reactionary.”

Tucker says people are noticing what Robert De Niro noticed about vaccines before he suddenly abandoned the issue: “There’s something there that people aren’t addressing” with vaccines and autism.

De Niro declared this on “The Today Show” back in 2016. Let the clip roll, and you’ll see it.

Fast forward to today, and it’s hard to believe De Niro actually said what he did on mainstream television.

What’s even harder to believe is just how most of the vaccines used today got approved in the first place.

“Placebo” doesn’t mean what most people think it means when it comes to vaccines.

Once you understand what a vaccine “placebo” is, the way evidence gets buried starts making a lot more sense. 🧵

Something strange happens when people first start looking seriously at vaccine safety data.

They do the research. They find the studies. They bring the evidence carefully into a conversation that feels safe and possible.

But nothing moves.

The other person doesn’t adjust. Doesn’t even get curious. They just double down harder.

Nothing about it feels like a normal disagreement. It feels like something else entirely.

Because it is.

And there’s actually a specific reason for that. A reason that goes much deeper than tribalism.

The reason vaccine orthodoxy functions differently from almost every other medical debate isn’t random.

It’s structural. It was designed and built this way.

To understand why the evidence lands differently here—why the same standards of proof that apply literally everywhere else somehow don’t apply to vaccines—you have to understand what vaccines actually represent in Western medicine.

And it’s probably not what you think.

Read 33 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 26

At the height of COVID, a “crazy” doctor was treating patients with a 99.96% survival rate.

Dr. Zelenko’s protocol was so effective, it sparked a war against HCQ.

They mocked his claims, but they kept coming true. Here’s what he said:

#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.”

In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.”

“If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”

Dr. Zelenko’s bold claim was confirmed in March 2023, when a study performed by Schmeling and colleagues found that 4.2% of the batches accounted for a staggering 71% of adverse events.

Read 15 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 25

In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.

He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.

The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.

While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win. He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.

That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵

After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.

Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”

In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.

That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.

Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.

He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.

He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.

The reaction was explosive.

People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.

For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.

Read 33 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 21

This 45-second clip with Dr. Peter Hotez is difficult to watch.

A mom from Texas desperately asks him why she keeps getting “really bad” COVID.

She got three COVID shots, took multiple rounds of Paxlovid, but she keeps “getting COVID often.”

Dr. Hotez tells the woman that her repeated COVID infections are basically her fault for skipping boosters.

WOMAN: “I’m getting COVID often. I took Paxlovid the third time, and then a few weeks later I got it again. COVID was really bad on me.”

HOTEZ: “After you had your first two immunizations way back in 2021, did you get boosters regularly?”

WOMAN: “I got one booster, and then after that I stopped getting them.”

HOTEZ: “Yeah. So that’s the reason why you keep up with the boosters.”

The saddest part about this interaction is that the woman was so convinced by Hotez that getting COVID was her fault that she was eager to get another booster shot after the show.

This is an extreme case of medical gaslighting that is easy to spot.

But what about when it’s not?

What about the times you did everything your doctor recommended—only to find yourself worse off than when you started? 🧵

Something seismic has happened to public health in America—and most people haven’t fully processed its scale.

A 2025 JAMA study surveying pregnant mothers and parents of young children found that only 37% fully trusted the CDC vaccine schedule and planned to follow it completely.

Five years ago, a number that low would have been unimaginable.

So what’s causing the drop? And what does it mean?

To understand the big picture and why it matters, you need the baseline.

In 2000, only 19% of parents had concerns about vaccines. By 2009, that number was 50%. And by 2013, 9% had declined all immunizations, while 32% had safety concerns.

The medical establishment found those numbers alarming. But what we’re looking at today is in a different category entirely.

Read 30 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 20

In the 1930s to the early 60s, Americans were convinced smoking was healthy.

Doctors proudly appeared in cigarette ads. “More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.”

The public was given a clear message: If physicians smoked themselves, how dangerous could it possibly be?

At its peak, more than 42% of American adults smoked, with rates among men climbing as high as 57%.

Business was booming. But behind the scenes, tobacco companies already knew smoking was linked to deadly disease.

Internal research pointed to the dangers early, yet the industry spent years funding doubt, attacking critics, and delaying public awareness long enough to keep the machine running.

Then came January 11, 1964.

The U.S. Surgeon General released the report that changed everything: smoking causes lung cancer and other deadly illnesses.

Almost overnight, one of the most trusted health narratives in America began to collapse.

And it wasn’t the only one.

In the 1940s and 1950s, lobotomies were celebrated as a revolutionary treatment for mental illness. Walter Freeman traveled the country performing thousands of “ice-pick” procedures, sometimes in minutes, sometimes on children.

The technique even earned a Nobel Prize.

Years later, it was widely condemned as barbaric, after leaving countless patients permanently damaged.

Today, we look back at both eras with disbelief and wonder how entire generations came to trust ideas that later proved so catastrophically wrong.

But the more uncomfortable question is harder to escape:

How many medical “certainties” we trust today will future generations one day look back on the same way? 🧵

We hold thousands of assumptions we never question.

Most of them are fine. The dangerous ones are the unquestioned assumptions that aren’t.

This is about what it actually looks like to prioritize truth over being right.

Including when that means publicly correcting something you’ve believed for decades.

Let’s start with a story.

For decades, a widely repeated narrative has appeared in critiques of Western medicine:

That 19th century surgeon James Marion Sims performed experimental gynecological surgeries on enslaved black women without anesthesia—using them as test subjects before performing the same procedures on white women, with anesthesia.

It felt obviously, viscerally wrong. Most people never questioned it.

They just react to it.

As it turns out, what the historical record actually shows is considerably different.

The condition Sims treated—vesicovaginal fistula—was devastating and had no cure at the time. Suffering women were desperate for relief and willingly consented to the procedures.

Ether was brand new, highly controversial, and carried real risks. Sims and other surgeons of the era didn’t believe the pain of these specific operations justified those risks—and applied the same standard regardless of the patient’s race.

The women he worked with helped each other through their recoveries, assisted in surgeries, and pushed him to continue when he wanted to stop. He acknowledged his debt to them publicly. He operated at his own expense.

The narrative most people know about James Marion Sims had been assembled to support a political argument, not drawn from the historical record. And in 2018, after significant protest, his statue in New York City was removed.

Read 30 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 19

REPORT: Across America, farmers are reporting scenes straight out of a nightmare, mysterious boxes of ticks appearing on rural properties while infestations explode at levels many say they’ve never witnessed before.

Now those reports are colliding with documented Bill Gates-funded research into genetically modified ticks, growing fears over Alpha-Gal Syndrome, and scientific papers openly arguing it could be “morally good” to spread meat allergies through engineered tick populations.

Social media is flooding with horrifying footage of animals overwhelmed by massive tick swarms while officials wave the crisis away as “climate change.” Meanwhile, more than 450,000 Americans are already suffering from Alpha-Gal Syndrome after tick bites, a condition with no cure that can trigger severe allergic reactions to red meat.

Even more alarming, Russian biologists are now warning about so-called “mutant ticks” reportedly resistant to conventional methods and behaving far more aggressively toward humans and animals.

So why is nobody in authority seriously investigating the reports, the research, or where these infestations may really be coming from?

@zeeemedia's new report uncovers the disturbing connections raising alarm bells across rural America.

There are two financial systems—one for the connected, and one for everyone else.

While most people struggle to grow their savings, the wealthy have been quietly multiplying theirs through crypto.

Now, that advantage can be yours.

DailyPulseCrypto.com 👈

Animus AI, available through BlockTrust IRA, analyzes market data and executes trades with precision most investors simply can’t match. Since 2022, it has outperformed Bitcoin by 250%.

In 2025 alone, it helped create over 80,000 new millionaires.

Right now, you can get $2,500 in bonus crypto when you open a qualifying account.

Start here: DailyPulseCrypto.com

Meanwhile, young Americans are openly revolting against the billionaire-led AI agenda.

At graduation ceremonies across the country, students are now booing the people telling them “the AI revolution” will reshape society, while quietly threatening the careers they spent years and thousands of dollars preparing for.

In back-to-back commencement speeches, executives took the stage expecting applause for their vision of an AI-dominated future. Instead, they were met with visible disgust from young people completely fed up with the tech elites already reshaping modern life around surveillance, automation, and dependency.

These students don’t sound inspired anymore. They sound betrayed.

See the moment the crowd turns on the AI sales pitch in @zeeemedia's explosive report.