Over the last 4 years the Biden-Harris admin has steadily transformed FEMA — the agency responsible for responding to natural disasters like Hurricane Helene — into an illegal alien resettlement agency that emphasizes DEI over public safety.
THREAD:
/2 The Shelter and Services Program is designed to exclusively provide shelter and services to illegal aliens.
Over $1 BILLION in taxpayer dollars have been allocated between FY2023 and FY2024.
/3 For example, of that $1 billion, FEMA gave over $38 million to NYC – a sanctuary city overrun by illegal aliens.
NYC, in turn, is handing out gift cards and hotels to illegal aliens.
/4 Moreover, the Emergency Food and Shelter Program has been reshaped to provide funding to “families and individuals encountered by the Department of Homeland Security” – aka illegal aliens.
This is a SEPARATE program.
$685 MILLION has been allocated to fund illegal aliens.
/5 Beyond allocating billions of taxpayer dollars on illegal aliens, the agency has been entirely captured by the "equity" agenda – a euphemism for discrimination.
The #1 goal of their strategic plan is to “Instill Equity as a Foundation of Emergency Management.”
/6 For example, one of their initiatives to address “equity” is “Prioritizing casework and evaluation for direct housing eligibility for vulnerable populations to include those with access and functional needs or those who have a primary language other than English.”
/7 They even went so far as to publish a “Post-Disaster Guide for Local Officials and Leaders” in November 2023 for “Achieving Equitable Recovery.”
In other words, they are pushing their equity agenda on states and locals as a way of reshaping communities affected by disasters.
/8 In the “Summary of Eight Equity Goals” within the guide, they advocate for “equitable outcomes” and “rebuilt community ‘with justice for all.’”
Effectively, FEMA is factoring race, sex, and sexual preferences into who should receive disaster relief first.
/9 The guide outlines how to “Track and Evaluate Equity Outcomes,” including asking officials to consider if people are receiving “recovery resources” based on “distributive justice.”
“Distributive justice” is just the radical way of saying discrimination based on race and sex.
/10 One of the guide’s goals outlines how to “Overcome Barriers and Ensure Fair Recovery Outcomes" and includes a chart of "barriers to equity," including:
/11 FEMA also identified “People of color,” “Women,” and “The LGBTQ+ community” as “disproportionately impacted by disaster.”
According to the Biden-Harris administration, natural disasters don't have the same impact on white straight men.
/12 In summary, the Biden-Harris FEMA views disaster response as an opportunity to propel their radical "equity" agenda and further resettle and support millions of illegal aliens within the U.S.
The American people are paying for all of it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨EXPOSED — Biden’s HHS funneled millions to Washington University in St. Louis to embed “diversity, equity, and inclusion” into medicine and clinical research.
Yes, your tax dollars are bankrolling racial discrimination and ideological experiments.
Here’s the proof…🧵
/2 Biden’s HHS gave WashU $5 million to run a nationwide “Neurosurgeon Research Career Development Program” to “promote and foster diversity, equity, and inclusion at every level.”
It mandates DEI, builds a “pipeline program” to recruit based on identity, and embeds “diversity” into selection, mentoring, and leadership.
This is taxpayer-funded discrimination — reorienting the medical workforce around ideology instead of merit.
/3 Biden’s HHS gave WashU $3.4 million to “increase diversity, equity, and inclusion” in Alzheimer’s research through 2026.
The project builds a “culturally appropriate” registry led by “diverse researchers” to recruit participants by race, and frames disparities as products of “systemic and systematic racism,” “ethnoracial factors,” and “classism.”
Our tax dollars should fund treatments — not racial ideology in medical research.
🏛️⚖️ NEW — The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has AFFIRMED the President’s Article II authority to remove appointed officials.
AFL filed an amicus brief in this case defending that presidential power.
/2 AFL, with Boyden Gray PLLC and Givens Purley LLP, filed an amicus brief in Robert P. Storch v. Pete Hegseth supporting former U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General Eric J. Soskin.
Soskin was removed by President Trump — yet defended presidential removal power even in his own case.
/3 Eric Soskin is a longtime practicing constitutional lawyer with decades of experience in public service, including in the U.S. Department of Justice and as Inspector General of the Department of Transportation.
AFL filed an amicus brief on behalf of six U.S. Senators led by @SenMikeLee urging the U.S. Supreme Court to rein in the Fifth Circuit’s blatant defiance of federal law and defend federal employees and contractors from hostile state lawsuits.
/2 This case, Chevron v. Plaquemines Parish, deals with whether federal employees and contractors can transfer court cases into federal court when the underlying facts relate to their federal responsibilities.
/3 It’s simple: to keep America safe, federal officers must know they won’t be dragged into hostile state courts for carrying out their federal duties.
Because federal law enforcement often relies on private partners, contractors must also have this protection.
🚨BREAKING — AFL is taking Alvin Bragg back to court.
We just filed a new petition in the New York Supreme Court to EXPOSE his politically motivated prosecution of President Trump.
🧵👇
/2 Last year, AFL filed a lawsuit against District Attorney Alvin Bragg over records requested from his office related to the prosecution of President Trump.
Bragg’s office has refused to provide the records and issued sweeping exemptions to keep the truth hidden.
🚨BREAKING — AFL has filed a federal lawsuit against Shell USA, Inc. for allegedly orchestrating a racially discriminatory reorganization targeting white employees.
This is a major fight against DEI mandates gone wrong.
/2 The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, claims Shell’s radical diversity, equity, and inclusion policies violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Experienced security professionals with top credentials were pushed out to meet “diversity” quotas.
/3 AFL’s clients — loyal, high-performing employees — were forced to reapply for their own jobs, undergo in-person assessments, and compete against less qualified candidates just to “diversify” the workforce.