There’s a lot of fear mongering surrounding high purity quartz (“HPQ”) and Spruce Pine, NC following the devastating flooding from Hurricane Helene
The area contains the purest form of natural quartz, but the significance of supply disruptions from the mines is exaggerated 1/8
First - inventory levels for raw wafer companies are currently low, but even then, there’s ~3 months of DIO at Globalwafers and Siltronic and 8 months of DIO at SUMCO. Existing inventory is a buffer.
Can mining activities restart within 3 months?
Probably. 2/8
High-purity quartz deposits are scarce, but purification methods exist even if they are time and resource intensive. 3/8 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
SUMCO’s JSQ division manufactures HPQ crucibles for single crystal silicon (semiconductors). The product is a high purity synthetic quartz crucible. The manufacturing process laid out on its website. 4/8
Sibelco and TQC (sub of Imerys) hold the mining rights for the Spruce Pine deposit and are share leaders
However, Pacific Quartz is a major player in China
Additionally, the Russian Quartz company operates the mine in Kyshtym, Russia with average content of 99.999% purity
4/8
Plus there are numerous mines for HPQ that can be purified further
Homerun Resources has a supply agreement for 99.88% average raw HPQ silica sand - Bahia Silica Sand District, Brazil
HMR also has a HPQ project in Canada working on commercializing upgraded raw quartz silica
5/8
Ferroglobe (GSM) acquired a high-purity quartz mine in SC last year with 300kt/yr capacity and +10 years of reserve life. They supply high-purity silicon metal to the electronics industry.
6/8
Companies like American Elements and Western Minmetals can produce high-purity (5N, 99.999%) quartz powder that can be used to create crucibles. 7/8
In conclusion – existing wafer inventory provides a buffer as mining operations restart, major companies are already using synthetic methods to produce semiconductor-grade quartz crucibles, and there are other sources of HPQ. Spruce Pine FUD is exaggerated.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/4 - Chevron deference has just been struck down by the US Supreme Court. What is it and how does it affect semiconductor companies? ⬇️
Under that 40-yr-old legal doctrine, US federal agencies had the power to create their own rules & regulations when a law is ambiguous. In our industry, this is particularly relevant for technology export controls – agencies were in the driver’s seat and didn’t have to worry about being challenged in Court. This is now over, and the power has been handed back to the Court system after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Loper Bridge Enterprises v Raimondo.
2/4 - The US Commerce Department’s Commerce Control List is a set of items subject to export controls and includes a plethora of Semiconductor products and manufacturing equipment. Currently over 500 pages long, items on the list are identified in exacting detail by Commerce Department officials with subject matter expertise without direct input from Congress, and free from any serious worries of court challenges. Updating the list to close loopholes and adapt to rapidly evolving technology is a perpetual game of whack-a-mole.
3/4 - Now that Chevron has been struck down, it’s open season for Semiconductor product and equipment manufacturers to mount challenges to export regulations in the court system – as long as they can point to some ambiguity in the laws authorizing these export controls. With tens of billions of sales in semiconductor products and manufacturing equipment to restricted destinations and parties at stake – expect companies to at least look into challenging aspects of the current rules – opening up the possibility of some rules being set aside or future regulations being snarled in injunctions and other legal challenges.