Joni Askola Profile picture
Oct 1, 2024 15 tweets 6 min read Read on X
1/15 What the beginning of the end of a failed regime looks like: russia is allocating 41% of its public expenditure and 8% of its GDP toward defense and security while its economy is overheating. Will a further increase in the Central Bank's key interest rate be necessary? Image
2/15 russia plans to boost defense spending by a quarter in 2025. This increase marks a new post-Soviet record for the nation as it persists in its unsuccessful invasion of Ukraine. Image
3/15 In last year's draft, the government intended to cut defense spending by 21 percent in 2025. This reversal highlights once again that things are not proceeding as planned; the invasion has failed, and russia is all in. Image
4/15 russia's defense spending has reached its highest level since the Cold War. Overall expenditures on defense and security will account for 8% of russia's GDP. Image
5/15 The russian government intends to allocate $183 billion to national security and defense in 2025, which represents approximately 41% of its annual budget. This is significant, especially given that a substantial portion of the russian population lives in poverty. Image
6/15 Defense spending will be more than double the amount designated for social needs, which encompasses pensions, social compensations, and subsidies, projected to be at $70 billion in 2025. Image
7/15 The government plans to allocate $17 billion, which is 0.7% of GDP, for education, and $20 billion, accounting for 0.87% of GDP, for healthcare in 2025. Image
8/15 All these figures highlight Putin's lack of concern for the russian people and suggest that russia is fully invested in this war economically. He is resolute in continuing the invasion to evade recognition of its failure and to safeguard his regime. Image
9/15 The proportion of GDP being spent is similar to the estimated military spending share during the late Soviet era, when the Soviet Union was engaged in the war in Afghanistan, while also managing a significantly larger nuclear arsenal to confront its Cold War opponents. Image
10/15 russian oil and gas revenues for the state budget are projected to decrease between 2025 and 2027 due to declining commodity prices and tax adjustments, as the country's largest gas producer, Gazprom, is anticipated to experience a reduction in its tax obligations. Image
11/15 With russia's future appearing bleak at best, its dire demographics, coupled with the war, have resulted in a severe labor shortage. This, along with rising public expenditure and sanctions, has contributed to elevated inflation rates. Image
12/15 In order to combat inflation, russia has increased its central bank's key interest rate to 19%, a significant rise from the 7.5% rate recorded in June 2023. Image
13/15 Will they need to raise it further? Although a higher interest rate could help curb inflation, it would also stifle any potential for growth. Image
14/15 russia is expected to raise its key interest rate once more in the coming months. The economic burden of the war will continue to grow over time, increasingly impacting the lives of russians. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joni Askola

Joni Askola Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joni_askola

Apr 27
1/8 The debate over Finland buying David’s Sling from Israel is loud and polarized.

To understand it, we must separate valid concerns from harsh military realities.

Here is why the decision was made and what the critics often miss: Image
2/8 Why buy it?

Our NASAMS batteries cannot stop ballistic missiles and have limited range.

To deter a neighbor like Russia, Finland needs to shoot down advanced threats.

We cannot afford to leave our skies vulnerable Image
3/8 Fair criticism exists.

It is valid to point out Israel's war crimes, illegal border expansions, and lack of support for Ukraine.

Israel is a complex partner with different interests.

These are real moral and strategic risks for Finland that we must acknowledge Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 24
1/5 Trump has made the West incredibly vulnerable.

With the US distracted in the Middle East and munition stockpiles running low, Western deterrence is weakened.

A nightmare scenario of China and Russia launching coordinated attacks is forming.

Europe must step up faster Image
2/5 The blame for this weak deterrence falls heavily on Trump, and on Europe for not doing enough.

Trump is an unreliable, chaotic, and fundamentally weak leader.

His erratic approach to global security and the failed war in Iran have weakened the West Image
3/5 A nightmare scenario is actively forming right now.

Imagine if Russia and China coordinate to make their moves simultaneously.

With Washington absorbed by the Middle East and lacking the missiles for multiple wars, autocrats have a terrifying open window to strike Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 22
1/7 Palantir’s manifesto is a terrifying glimpse into tech-authoritarianism.

They aren't just selling software, but dictating global morality.

Who do they think they are?

Who elected Alex Karp and Peter Thiel to run the world?

Europe should stay away from Palantir Image
2/7 The manifesto openly calls for an AI arms race.

Karp claims the atomic age is over and the new era of deterrence is built on AI weapons.

They argue adversaries will build them anyway so we must do it first.

A tech firm is openly lobbying for an algorithmic cold war Image
3/7 Palantir demands a universal draft so everyone shares the risk of war, and calls to undo the pacifism of Germany and Japan.

Even if you agree, why does a tech company have a say?

A data broker shouldn't be rewriting global security and enforcing conscription Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 21
1/5 You want to minimize casualties and end Russia's war on Ukraine faster?

The only way to do that is to provide Ukraine with more long-range strike capabilities, including both Ukrainian and European ones.

Delaying only costs more innocent lives Image
2/5 We need to fund more Ukrainian missiles and drones and help them scale up production immediately.

At the same time we must produce more missiles of our own to hand over.

We absolutely need to step up the production of cruise missiles like the Storm Shadow Image
3/5 We must mass produce cheap cruise missiles like the American ERAM program.

We should get creative too.

We could pre-order Ukrainian weapons for our own militaries, let Ukraine use them to fight today, and only take delivery after the war is won Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 13
1/6 Will Orbán's defeat stop the rise of illiberalism in the West?

His fall is a massive geopolitical earthquake, but to understand its true global impact, we have to look at why he actually lost Image
2/6 Orbán did not lose because of his pro-Russian, treasonous stances.

He lost mostly because his domestic agenda completely failed.

Hungarians simply had enough of low economic growth, high inflation, and constant lies.

He promised a lot and failed to deliver Image
3/6 Even his signature social programs failed.

His highly publicized, expensive birth rate policies were a total failure.

He built a regime on the promise of national greatness, but regular citizens were left paying the price for his economic ruin Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 9
1/8 The US is facing a strategic defeat in Iran despite "winning" militarily.

Terrible planning and a complete mismatch between military action and strategic goals led to this outcome, but the war may not be over.

A thread on where things actually stand 🧵 Image
2/8 Trump's planning was horrible.

The war started two months too late to help the Iranian people.

He had no troops ready to be deployed on the ground.

What did he think he would accomplish with just a bombing campaign? Image
3/8 You cannot win this kind of war and cause a real regime change without boots on the ground or without actively helping Iran's opposition.

Instead, we saw extremely inconsistent messaging from the administration.

Bombing alone was never going to bring down the regime Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(