Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Oct 2, 2024 • 16 tweets • 8 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

Tim Walz Crumbles as J.D. Vance Dominates VP Debate

Walz thought he was ready for J.D. Vance—he was wrong. What started as a debate quickly turned into a one-sided beatdown.

Here’s how it all went down.

🧵 THREAD

J.D. Vance opened the debate by masterfully introducing himself with confidence, telling the American people that under a Trump administration, the American Dream would once again be attainable.

"I stand here asking to be your vice president with extraordinary gratitude for this country, for the American Dream that made it possible for me to live my dreams," he said. He then made it clear, "If we get better leadership in the White House, if we get Donald Trump back in the White House, the American Dream is going to be attainable once again."

As the debate continued, Vance flipped the script on Tim Walz when Walz attempted to blame Donald Trump for the Iranian threat.

"You yourself just said Iran is as close to a nuclear weapon today as they have ever been. And, Governor Walz, you blame Donald Trump. Who has been the vice president for the last three and a half years? And the answer is your running mate, not mine," Vance fired back.

On the topic of Hurricane Helene, Vance communicated with the American people so well that even Tim Walz nodding in agreement.

He painted a vivid picture of the disaster, saying, "I just saw today, actually, a photograph of two grandparents on a roof with a six-year-old child. And it was the last photograph ever taken of them because the roof collapsed, and those innocent people lost their lives."

Vance expressed his heartfelt sympathy and promised, "I commit that when Donald Trump is president, again, the government will put the citizens of this country first when they suffer from a disaster."

While you're here, don't forget to follow this page for more threads like this one and daily news roundups.

On climate change, Vance didn’t hold back, telling Walz to his face that if Kamala Harris truly cared about the issue, she would be pushing for more manufacturing and energy production in America because it’s cleaner to do so here.

"If the Democrats, particularly Kamala Harris and her leadership, really believe that climate change is serious, what they would be doing is more manufacturing and more energy production in the United States of America," Vance argued. "So clearly, Kamala Harris herself doesn't believe her own rhetoric on this."

Vance got Tim Walz’s head hanging in shame when he exposed the executive orders the Biden-Harris admin signed that upended what Trump did to keep the border safe.

“We have a historic immigration crisis because Kamala Harris started and said that she wanted to undo all of Donald Trump's border policies. 94 executive orders suspending deportations, decriminalizing illegal aliens, massively increasing the asylum fraud that exists in our system that has opened the floodgates,” Vance lamented.

“And what it's meant is that a lot of fentanyl is coming into our country. I had a mother who struggled with opioid addiction and has gotten clean. I don't want people who are struggling with addiction to be deprived of their second chance because Kamala Harris let in fentanyl into our communities at record levels. So you've got to stop the bleeding.”

At one point, Vance’s microphone was cut off by CBS News when he began refuting their fact-check on the subject of Springfield, Ohio, and Haitian immigrants.

CBS News said they had more topics to get to, but the apparent reality is that they were getting uncomfortable with Vance confronting their “fact-check” head-on.

Vance continued to deliver a sharp critique of Harris’s economic policies, pointing out the rising costs of essentials.

"If Kamala Harris has such great plans for how to address middle-class problems, then she ought to do them now," he said, emphasizing the 25% increase in food costs and the 60% increase in housing costs.

Vance then dropped a series of brutal fact-checks on Walz.

“Governor, you say trust the experts, but those same experts for 40 years said that if we shipped our manufacturing base off to China, we'd get cheaper goods. They lied about that.

“They said if we shipped our industrial base off to other countries, to Mexico and elsewhere, it would make the middle class stronger. They were wrong about that.

“They were wrong about the idea that if we made America less self-reliant, less productive in our own nation, that it would somehow make us better off. And they were wrong about it.

“And for the first time in a generation, Donald Trump had the wisdom and the courage to say to that bipartisan consensus, we're not doing it anymore. We're bringing American manufacturing back. We're unleashing American energy. We're going to make more of our own stuff.”

As the debate wore on, Vance savagely cornered Walz on his economic contradictions.

“Tim, I think you got a tough job here because you've got to play whack-a-mole. You've got to pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver rising take-home pay, which, of course, he did. You've got to pretend that Donald Trump didn't deliver lower inflation, which, of course, he did,” Vance pointed out.

“And then you've simultaneously got to defend Kamala Harris's atrocious economic record, which has made gas, groceries, and housing unaffordable for American citizens... We can do so much better. To all of you watching, we can get back to an America that's affordable again. We just got to get back to common sense economic principles.”

Walz found himself in a tough spot when confronted about a false claim regarding his presence in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre.

After a two-minute rant, Walz admitted that he wasn’t actually there during the tragedy, exposing a major inconsistency in his narrative.

Video: @CollinRugg

Vance continued to dominate, shredding Walz for saying that the First Amendment doesn't protect “misinformation.”

Walz said that claim was false, but unfortunately for him, we got it on video.

Clip: @CollinRugg

As the debate neared its end, Walz awkwardly appealed to viewers who were “still up” and missed “Dancing With the Stars” to watch the debate.

Things got worse when he boasted about endorsements from figures like Dick Cheney and Taylor Swift.

Throughout the entire two minutes, Walz totally fell flat, making his closing statements a complete waste of time.

Vance, on the other hand, ended the night with a bang, delivering a stunning critique of Kamala Harris.

"She’s been the vice president for three and a half years. Day one was 1,400 days ago. And her policies have made these problems worse," Vance said.

He emphasized that the American people would not achieve their full dreams under the current broken leadership and called for a new direction.

"We need a president who has already done this once before and did it well."

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1841226380417044648

@CollinRugg Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go.

And while you’re here, check out these ten shocking stories that the media didn’t bother covering today.

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1841226380417044648

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 19

Doctors removed his testicle and gave him 60 days to live.

But Rick Hill refused to die.

He found a natural cancer protocol so effective, he was off morphine and gaining strength in just three weeks.

What happened next was a wake-up call.

After Rick began sharing his story, the American Cancer Society planted letters in local newspapers claiming he never had cancer because he looked too healthy for someone who had been terminal.

Why would a cancer survivor be treated like a threat?

Discover how Rick beat cancer—and why the cancer industry fought harder to silence his story than they did to cure him.

🧵 THREAD

We’re extremely passionate about bringing you the truth when it comes to your health.

Pharmaceutical companies, the media, and the medical industrial complex have been lying to us for years about wellness. And one of the biggest webs of lies they feed us is about cancer. Fifty years ago, Rick Hill was given 60 days to live by the Mayo Clinic where he was having his cancer treated.

After grueling surgery and morphine for pain management, the cancer spread throughout his entire body. With no real hope left, Rick was told about an alternative treatment that was helping a whole host of people recover—for good.

He took a risk and traveled to Tijuana for something that was not widely available previously and something that the medical industrial complex warns us about. It’s not ivermectin, and it’s not fenbendazole. It’s a combination of Laetrile, enzymes, and a few other key factors. And this treatment saved Rick’s life.

He’s now been cancer-free for 50 years because of it. Rick joins us today to tell his story and explain how this treatment is saving the lives of those experiencing aggressive forms of cancer we’re seeing right now.

Rick Hill was 24, newly married, and terminally ill. The Mayo Clinic gave him just 60 days to live, telling Rick that all of his organs were about to shut down. They offered chemotherapy—and told him to call his family to say goodbye.

Then Rick got a letter in the mail. Just one sentence, from a pastor affiliated with the John Birch Society: “If you want to live, you’re going to need to leave the Mayo Clinic.”

Rick called the pastor in disbelief. “You want me to leave the citadel of modern medicine?” he asked.

“Yeah,” the man replied. “They know all about medicine—but they don’t know much about the immune system.”

The pastor told Rick to fly to San Diego… then cross into Tijuana—as soon as possible. At first, Rick thought it was a joke. “I don’t want to drink tequila,” he said. “You want me to go eat apricots in Tijuana?”

Later that night, Rick broke the news to his family.

They stared at him in stunned silence. One brother said, “We always knew you were stupid—we just didn’t know how stupid.”

But then something unexpected happened.

“My father-in-law stood up and said, ‘I like it. I’ll take him. And I’ll help pay for it.’”

That moment changed everything.

Read 12 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 19

EXCLUSIVE: Top Forecaster Issues a Chilling War Prediction

Martin Armstrong says the West is baiting Putin, pushing him to strike NATO first so they can justify all-out war.

He calls it engineered chaos.

What he says happens next should terrify every US citizen.

🧵 THREAD

We recently had top forecaster and economist Martin Armstrong on the show, who warned that the fall of Ukraine—and Europe as a whole—is imminent. Many European countries, he noted, are already reinstituting drafts.

“They want war,” he said.

Well, this week we saw President Trump make a stunning reversal on the Ukraine-Russia conflict—and Armstrong is back with another warning.

He says NATO is preparing to send 250,000 troops into Russia, and World War III is an absolute certainty. The reason? Collapsing economies—and a looming push to roll out central bank digital currencies. Despite promises to the contrary, it appears the U.S. is quietly moving forward with CBDCs, just like the rest of the world.

Every nation, Armstrong warns, is preparing for what comes after the war.

He joins us now to discuss.

@zeee_media opened the conversation by asking about Trump’s unexpected shift on Ukraine—and Martin Armstrong didn’t hold back. “I’m very disappointed in Trump,” he said. “I think he’s succumbed to the neocons.”

The first major red flag, Armstrong noted, was Trump naming Marco Rubio as Secretary of State—a move his sources described as a “peace offering to the neocons.”

But Armstrong’s warning isn’t about politics. It’s about your money.

“We’re just in this serious debt crisis,” he explained—and that crisis, he warned, is pushing governments toward reckless, authoritarian measures.

He pointed to Europe, where EU chief Ursula von der Leyen proposed seizing unused assets from private citizens to fund war with Russia. Armstrong said it echoes post–World War I Germany, when the government confiscated 10% of people’s savings—triggering hyperinflation, economic ruin, and paving the way for Hitler’s rise.

“If Ursula is going to just take 10% of people's money,” he warned, “it’s the same thing all over again.”

His message was clear: this war isn’t really about Ukraine. It’s about collapsing economies—and global elites using chaos as cover to plunder the public’s wealth.

Read 11 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 18

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today

#10 - Democrat reveals Jeffrey Epstein received $1.1 BILLION in wire transfers from a SINGLE bank account.

It’s not often you see a Democrat laser-focused on Epstein.

Sen. Ron Wyden dropped the unexpected bomb. He revealed:

“4,725 wire transfers adding up to nearly $1.1 billion flowing in and out of just one of Mr. Epstein’s bank accounts. If you ask me, that is more than 4,000 potential lines of investigation right there. Hundreds of millions more flowed through other accounts.”

Let that sink in.

One account, over a billion dollars. And no one seems to know who was sending it or why.

H/T: @KanekoaTheGreat

SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW

🧵 THREAD

#9 – Johnson & Johnson Lead Regulatory Scientist Admits Company’s Baby Powder Contained Heavy Metals That Caused Cancer

This was uncovered via hidden camera footage from @OKeefeMedia.

Joshua Rys admitted that the company’s baby powder wasn’t dangerous because of the talc itself, but because of toxic heavy metal impurities found in the mined product.

“It’s not the talc itself that gives you the cancer,” Rys said. “It’s the heavy metals that are in it.”

He also revealed the legal maneuver J&J used to shield itself from liability. According to Rys, the company created a shell entity specifically designed to absorb the lawsuits and then go bankrupt, leaving the parent company insulated.

This admission confirms long-standing suspicions about J&J’s legal strategy.

#8 - Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo says mRNA COVID-19 shots are “terrible vaccines” and “not fit for human use.”

“Fortunately, very few people … are putting these mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in their bodies … And they shouldn't be doing it because they are not fit for human use … They are terrible vaccines.”

Credit: @TheChiefNerd

Read 18 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 18

Big Pharma took a natural part of aging, gave it a name, sold a treatment—and made BILLIONS.

What am I talking about? The condition you know as “osteoporosis.”

It was all built on a lie.

The drugs they push to “fix” osteoporosis? They’re quietly making your bones more brittle—not stronger.

Let that sink in.

This report exposes the fatal flaws in modern medicine’s “treatment” of osteoporosis—and reveals how the diagnosis itself is rigged by design.

🧵 THREAD

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the eye-opening details on the osteoporosis scam, read the full 8000-word report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-os…

To truly understand modern medicine, you must first see that the industry operates exactly like a sales funnel.

Step 1: Screen everyone.
Step 2: Redefine “normal” so millions are suddenly “sick.”
Step 3: Sell them drugs.
Step 4: Treat the inevitable side effects with more drugs.
Step 5: Repeat.

That’s not healthcare. That’s a really effective business model.

Read 26 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 18

This is a TOTAL reset.

America will no longer bow to gloablist health tyranny.

RFK Jr. just fired a warning shot at the W.H.O., flat-out REJECTING the IHR.

No more surrendering U.S. sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats.

Then Kennedy dropped the most chilling truth of all:

“That opens the door to the kind of narrative management and propaganda and censorship that we saw during the Covid pandemic.”

🧵 THREAD

RFK Jr. just fired a shot across the bow of global health tyranny.

Standing in front of an American flag at HHS, he looked straight into the camera and said what no other official has dared to say:

“We are rejecting the World Health Organization’s amendments to the International Health Regulations. And I want to explain why.”

With that, the United States is walking away from a treaty that would’ve handed an unelected global body the power to dictate our pandemic response...from lockdowns to travel bans to forced medical protocols.

“These regulations establish the legal framework that gives countries rights and responsibilities for managing public health events with global impact,” he explained. “And we’re not handing those rights over to the WHO.”

The message was clear: health emergencies will be managed in America, by Americans...not by bureaucrats in Geneva.

What Kennedy laid out next should alarm every citizen.

“The first reason is national sovereignty,” he said.

“Nations who accept these new regulations are signing over their power in health emergencies to an unelected international organization.”

He didn’t sugarcoat it:

“They could order lockdowns, travel restrictions—whatever measures they see fit.”

And the catch?

It doesn’t even take a confirmed emergency.

“In fact,” Kennedy warned, “it doesn’t even need to declare an emergency. ‘Potential public health risks’ are enough for it to initiate action.”

No vote. No checks. Just sweeping authority to act on what they claim “might” happen.

“If we’re going to give the WHO that much power,” he said, “we need a real public debate. Because if this is a treaty, the U.S. Senate needs to vote on it. That’s how our system works.”

Instead, the Biden administration tried to slide it through quietly.

Kennedy and Trump just blew that plan up.

Read 12 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 17

BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt was just FLOODED with questions about the so-called Epstein “HOAX.”

Reporters didn’t go easy on her.

One asked why the DOJ is still holding the files instead of releasing a redacted version.

Her responses today only raised more eyebrows.

🧵 THREAD

Ask Americans how they feel about the handling of the Epstein files, and you’ll hear the same answer from both sides of the aisle: total frustration.

According to a recent poll, just 3% of Americans say they’re satisfied with how the Trump administration has handled it.

Meanwhile, half the country is dissatisfied and believes the administration hasn’t been transparent.

Americans are furious because on February 21st, Pam Bondi told the world the Epstein client list was “sitting on [her] desk right now to review,” explaining it was part of a directive ordered by President Trump.

But on July 7, the Trump Justice Department concluded via internal memo that Epstein actually had no client list, didn’t blackmail anyone, and definitely killed himself.

This walking back of earlier claims has unleashed a frenzy.