Changing the "shading" options and you can colour the map by level of earnings:
Or value of foreign visits:
And you can click "world map" to see the countries the MPs visited:
Other shading options reveal which MPs employ family members:
... the level of donations...
Or gifts (a "gift" being for a personal benefit; a "donation" being for political campaigning):
Then you can zoom into the shaded map and click individual constituencies to see all the details for that MP:
And we mean *all* the details - all the information we can find, in one place:
Alternatively, enter text in the "category" box and you can highlight all MPs receiving (for example) trade union funding:
or all donations from "members clubs":
Or enter text in the "donor" box and you can highlight all MPs receiving gifts/donations from one individual (this is Waheed Alli). Note that you may need to zoom in to see small constituencies
This is a brilliant piece of coding for which I can take no credit - it's all thanks to our fantastic collaborator M. He's done something amazing, for no pay or reward of any kind, and doesn't even want to be credited.
Data comes from the fantastic Parliament API and Companies House API. The creation of APIs by government services was a remarkable step in open government for which everyone involved deserves huge amounts of credit. There's a fascinating paper on the history here: instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/…
There are other websites presenting much of the same data differently.
Open Innovations have an impressive hex map, with lots of textual data as well. More sophisticated than ours in many ways, but lacks the Companies House linking. And a different presentation - some people prefer hex maps; we prefer geographical ones. open-innovations.org/projects/RMFI/
First, the underlying data is often poor quality - there are many errors, particularly around company names and donor names, which are frequently misspelt. We'll be writing more about this soon.
Second, thanks to Cloudflare, our server is pretty robust, but there were some slowdowns when we launched. If it doesn't respond, please bear with us and try again later. Our micro budget means our only solution here is to ask people to be patient...
We don't accept donations. But, if you find the map useful, please consider making a donation to the amazing charity Bridge The Gap, which provides free high quality tax advice to the elderly and people on low incomes. bridge-the-gap.org.uk
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
These reports the Government could revalue council tax bands F, G and H don't make sense to me. Here's what could actually be going on:
Here are the English council tax bands.
To work out which band your home is in, you have to play a particularly boring game of "let's pretend" in which your house and everything around it flashes back in time to 1991, and it's that pretend house that you value.
This produces some weird results.
There are areas that have valuable property today but didn't in 1991. These areas are now very undervalued for council tax.
And there are areas that were wealthy in 1991 and haven't got much wealthier since. They're over-valued.
Seems a total slam dunk that owners of private jets should pay fuel duties.
Doesn't it?
The answer is annoying.
In principle this is obvious: of course there should be duty on private jet fuel . Both as a revenue raiser and (more importantly) to deter an inefficient source of CO2 emissions ("properly price an externality"). But.
The problem is EU law EU law exempts aircraft fuel from duties unless it's "private pleasure flying" And in practice most private jet flights are either for business, or (loophole!) rich person pays a commercial rate to fly on a jet owned by their own company. No duty
Shocking article in the Sheffield Tribune. A solicitor, Andrew Milne, buying up freeholds of houses and then making (false) threats to the leaseholders to bully them into buying the freehold at a huge premium.
This goes way beyond a lawyer acting unethically. If Milne knows the statements he's making are false (and it seems likely he does) then it's fraud.
A civil court has already found Milne to be dishonest.
That should have immediately ended his career as a solicitor.
Douglas Barrowman and Michelle Mone made £65m selling faulty PPE to the Government.
HMRC now wants £39m in unpaid tax — and we think we know why: Barrowman and Mone may have avoided tax on their £65m profit.
During the pandemic, Douglas Barrowman's company, PPE Medpro, sold £200 million of PPE to the Government. It made £65m profit, which went into trusts benefiting Barrowman and Mone's families.
Most of the PPE was later ruled to breach sterility standards but, rather than repay the money, Barrowman put PPE Medpro into administration.