Changing the "shading" options and you can colour the map by level of earnings:
Or value of foreign visits:
And you can click "world map" to see the countries the MPs visited:
Other shading options reveal which MPs employ family members:
... the level of donations...
Or gifts (a "gift" being for a personal benefit; a "donation" being for political campaigning):
Then you can zoom into the shaded map and click individual constituencies to see all the details for that MP:
And we mean *all* the details - all the information we can find, in one place:
Alternatively, enter text in the "category" box and you can highlight all MPs receiving (for example) trade union funding:
or all donations from "members clubs":
Or enter text in the "donor" box and you can highlight all MPs receiving gifts/donations from one individual (this is Waheed Alli). Note that you may need to zoom in to see small constituencies
This is a brilliant piece of coding for which I can take no credit - it's all thanks to our fantastic collaborator M. He's done something amazing, for no pay or reward of any kind, and doesn't even want to be credited.
Data comes from the fantastic Parliament API and Companies House API. The creation of APIs by government services was a remarkable step in open government for which everyone involved deserves huge amounts of credit. There's a fascinating paper on the history here: instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/…
There are other websites presenting much of the same data differently.
Open Innovations have an impressive hex map, with lots of textual data as well. More sophisticated than ours in many ways, but lacks the Companies House linking. And a different presentation - some people prefer hex maps; we prefer geographical ones. open-innovations.org/projects/RMFI/
First, the underlying data is often poor quality - there are many errors, particularly around company names and donor names, which are frequently misspelt. We'll be writing more about this soon.
Second, thanks to Cloudflare, our server is pretty robust, but there were some slowdowns when we launched. If it doesn't respond, please bear with us and try again later. Our micro budget means our only solution here is to ask people to be patient...
We don't accept donations. But, if you find the map useful, please consider making a donation to the amazing charity Bridge The Gap, which provides free high quality tax advice to the elderly and people on low incomes. bridge-the-gap.org.uk
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seems a total slam dunk that owners of private jets should pay fuel duties.
Doesn't it?
The answer is annoying.
In principle this is obvious: of course there should be duty on private jet fuel . Both as a revenue raiser and (more importantly) to deter an inefficient source of CO2 emissions ("properly price an externality"). But.
The problem is EU law EU law exempts aircraft fuel from duties unless it's "private pleasure flying" And in practice most private jet flights are either for business, or (loophole!) rich person pays a commercial rate to fly on a jet owned by their own company. No duty
Shocking article in the Sheffield Tribune. A solicitor, Andrew Milne, buying up freeholds of houses and then making (false) threats to the leaseholders to bully them into buying the freehold at a huge premium.
This goes way beyond a lawyer acting unethically. If Milne knows the statements he's making are false (and it seems likely he does) then it's fraud.
A civil court has already found Milne to be dishonest.
That should have immediately ended his career as a solicitor.
Douglas Barrowman and Michelle Mone made £65m selling faulty PPE to the Government.
HMRC now wants £39m in unpaid tax — and we think we know why: Barrowman and Mone may have avoided tax on their £65m profit.
During the pandemic, Douglas Barrowman's company, PPE Medpro, sold £200 million of PPE to the Government. It made £65m profit, which went into trusts benefiting Barrowman and Mone's families.
Most of the PPE was later ruled to breach sterility standards but, rather than repay the money, Barrowman put PPE Medpro into administration.
What if there was a consensus on the tax reforms the UK needs?
What if it was backed by policy experts from think tanks across the political spectrum, from the Adam Smith Institute to the Resolution Foundation?
The consensus is real. The question is: will anyone act on it?
Launching today is a series of proposals backed by the Adam Smith Institute, Bright Blue, CenTax, the Centre for Policy Studies, the Institute for Public Policy Research, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the New Economics Foundation, Resolution Foundation, Tax Policy Associates.
Everyone in that list disagrees on the fundamental political question of the size and role of the state.
But we all agree on how the basics of how the tax system should work. The rate is up for debate - but that's the easy bit.
Carter-Ruck, the UK’s most notorious libel firm, used abusive litigation to silence criticism of a former Tory donor.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority is investigating - but Carter-Ruck just filed a judicial review. If successful, they'll have total impunity.
Thread:
The donor is Mohamed Amersi.
Former Tory MP @CharlotteLeslie wrote a private note on Amersi's activities. As @DavidDavisMP said, Amersi then "used his wealth and influence to try to bully Charlotte Leslie into silence".
@CharlotteLeslie @DavidDavisMP Carter-Ruck acted for Amersi suing Ms Leslie for defamation. Carter-Ruck's approach was - in my view, and that of many others - designed to drain Ms Leslie's resources.