Changing the "shading" options and you can colour the map by level of earnings:
Or value of foreign visits:
And you can click "world map" to see the countries the MPs visited:
Other shading options reveal which MPs employ family members:
... the level of donations...
Or gifts (a "gift" being for a personal benefit; a "donation" being for political campaigning):
Then you can zoom into the shaded map and click individual constituencies to see all the details for that MP:
And we mean *all* the details - all the information we can find, in one place:
Alternatively, enter text in the "category" box and you can highlight all MPs receiving (for example) trade union funding:
or all donations from "members clubs":
Or enter text in the "donor" box and you can highlight all MPs receiving gifts/donations from one individual (this is Waheed Alli). Note that you may need to zoom in to see small constituencies
This is a brilliant piece of coding for which I can take no credit - it's all thanks to our fantastic collaborator M. He's done something amazing, for no pay or reward of any kind, and doesn't even want to be credited.
Data comes from the fantastic Parliament API and Companies House API. The creation of APIs by government services was a remarkable step in open government for which everyone involved deserves huge amounts of credit. There's a fascinating paper on the history here: instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/…
There are other websites presenting much of the same data differently.
Open Innovations have an impressive hex map, with lots of textual data as well. More sophisticated than ours in many ways, but lacks the Companies House linking. And a different presentation - some people prefer hex maps; we prefer geographical ones. open-innovations.org/projects/RMFI/
First, the underlying data is often poor quality - there are many errors, particularly around company names and donor names, which are frequently misspelt. We'll be writing more about this soon.
Second, thanks to Cloudflare, our server is pretty robust, but there were some slowdowns when we launched. If it doesn't respond, please bear with us and try again later. Our micro budget means our only solution here is to ask people to be patient...
We don't accept donations. But, if you find the map useful, please consider making a donation to the amazing charity Bridge The Gap, which provides free high quality tax advice to the elderly and people on low incomes. bridge-the-gap.org.uk
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Post Office scandal probably needs no introduction. But, in short, between 2000 and 2017, the Post Office falsely accused thousands of postmasters of theft. Some went to prison. Many had their assets seized and their reputations shredded. bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c9…
Which MP is the highest earner? Who receives the highest donations? Who takes the most foreign trips? We've just launched an interactive map that lets you explore all this and more.
Oh dear. Another high profile tax appeal lost by HMRC due to a simple error.
This time, the story involves a failed accounting "influencer", and HMRC forgetting the obscure technical point that you have to bloody turn up to the bloody hearing. Thread:
The case involved tax rebate claims by failed accounting firm Apostle. There have been numerous reports that Apostle made dubious tax rebate claims for its clients. And worse.
In this case, HMRC alleged there was no basis for the deductible expenses that Apostle had claimed for its client. The client had been "careless" and so HMRC could go back six years and recover the tax.
The National Audit Office has just slammed HMRC for failing to get on top of small business evasion. We've estimated that this failure is costing the UK £15bn/year. Thread:
The difference between the tax that should be paid and the tax HMRC actually collect is the “tax gap”. HMRC say it’s £39.8bn. HMRC’s tax gap work has a v strong international reputation. (The IMF's review is here )imf.org/external/pubs/…
The Telegraph and City AM reported in the week that the abolition of the non-dom regime would *cost* £1bn. How fair is that figure? And what will actually happen if the Government abolishes the non-dom regime?
Background: the last Conservative Budget announced the end of the non-dom regime, which exempts foreigners living in the UK from tax on their foreign income. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…