Steve McGuire Profile picture
Oct 2 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵Harvard asked its students, faculty, and teaching staff about their comfort discussing controversial issues on campus.

The results show that faculty/staff are more fearful than students.

68% of faculty/staff said they would be reluctant to speak up outside the classroom. Image
Only 38% of students said the same — that they would be reluctant to speak up during a discussion of a controversial issue outside the classroom. Image
Alarmingly, just over half (51%) of Harvard faculty and teaching staff said they would be reluctant to lead a class discussion on a controversial topic. Image
Meanwhile, 45% of students said they would be reluctant to speak up during a classroom discussion on a controversial topic. Image
Recognizing that these conditions are not conducive to education, the committee recommends several actions: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve McGuire

Steve McGuire Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfmcguire79

Sep 24
This guy is one of the lead protestors at Cornell.

When the student government denied his group’s divestment resolution, he and others vowed to repeatedly disrupt the campus, which they did.

He was suspended last year too.

Looks like Cornell might be done messing around. Image
In case you’re tempted to feel bad for Taal, here’s what he said when the Cornell student assembly rejected his divestment resolution:
Here’s what he had to say on October 7: Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 10
🎉🎉🎉

All on the same day:

1. Stanford’s board of trustees commends the faculty senate on its institutional neutrality statement.

2. Penn leadership declares a policy of institutional neutrality.

3. Yale sets up a committee to consider institutional neutrality.

🧵
Read 5 tweets
Aug 27
NEW: Students at @SarahLawrence are boycotting my friend, @SamuelAbramsAEI, because he’s a “proud Zionist and advocates for Israel’s right to self-defense.”

As he shows in the piece below, they were private messaging prospective students and telling them to boycott him.

🧵 Image
As Sam writes in @MindingCampus, “this tactic of directly messaging students is a chilling evolution of cancel culture that threatens speech, expression, learning, and open inquiry.”
mindingthecampus.org/2024/08/27/the…
Here’s an example of one of the messages from the article: Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 21
BREAKING: MIT has published the profile of its incoming class, the first admitted in the wake of the SCOTUS decision again affirmative action.

Here is a chart comparing the ethnic profile of last year's class to this one: Image
MIT’s director of admissions says, “As a baseline, in recent years around 25% of our enrolling undergraduate students have identified as Black, Hispanic, and/or Native American and Pacific Islander. For the incoming Class of 2028, that number is about 16%.”
This year’s demographic data:
mitadmissions.org/apply/process/…
Read 5 tweets
Aug 15
BREAKING: Johns Hopkins University has adopted a “posture of restraint” on public statements.

Such statements should be made “only in the limited circumstances where an issue is clearly related to a direct, concrete, and demonstrable interest or function of the university.” Image
The university’s leaders say, “the very idea of an ‘official’ position of the university on a social, scientific, or political issue runs counter to our foundational ethos.” Image
They say that institutional statements can create an illusion of consensus and also point to the performative nature of such statements: Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 5
An embarrassing window into both Ivy League disdain for common Americans and potential research bias:

Yale researcher Ryan McNeil and a colleague were caught on a hot mic insulting a Harlem activist after interviewing him as part of their NIH-funded research project on addiction and homelessness.

The interviewee had expressed concerns about the impact of safe injection sites on the community.

But McNeil is obviously a huge advocate for such sites.

“That dude suuuuuuucked,” he said.

He then dismissed the man’s concerns:

“His primary concerns were basically around, frankly, white discomfort.”

“And there’s the whole…liberal white…the business are closing bullsh*t.”

At one point, McNeil seems to mock concern about kids witnessing drug use, etc.

Finally, raising concerns of research bias, McNeil said he “was hoping he was going to be, honestly, a bit more of an outwardly prick.”

“Let’s try to get some more interviews of people who suck,” McNeil said, adding, “I want to find someone who we can give enough rope to hang themselves with.”

Here’s the audio:
You can read more about the story here: gothamist.com/news/yale-rese…
The research is reportedly paused and the researchers have apologized: Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(