I thought both men last night were pretty well attired, aside from Vance's tie. Shoulders fit well, no dimpling at the sleevehead, minimal pulling at the waist.
As a matter of preference, I liked Vance's lapels a little better. They were just a touch wider in relation to the breadth of his chest. The gorge, which is the seam that connects a jacket's collar to the lapels, was also a little lower. I prefer the proportions of his jacket.
However, one thing that kept sticking out is how the left side of his jacket's collar (or, right-side for the viewer) didn't hug his neck. Why is that?
It's certainly not the result of bad tailoring. Whoever made this suit gave Vance a very nice garment.
The issue has to do with his posture.
When people stand in front of a mirror or when they know their photo is being taken, they tend to throw their shoulders back and straighten their spine. This comes from years of being told to "stand up straighter."
However, when you do this, you throw off the way the jacket fits. This is why, when you're being fitted in a garment, is important to stand naturally. Remove the temptation to stand up straighter. You want to assess how you look 99% of the time.
Vance's suit last night was beautifully tailored. But since he kept throwing his shoulders back to project a stronger, more confident self, his jacket didn't fit as well. This jacket was made for a man with a different posture.
If he plans on doing this, I recommend two things: learn to always stand straight or have a suit specially made for public appearances, which will fit your "public appearance" posture.
I raise this issue for two reasons. First, hopefully it helps you understand the relationship between posture and fit. Always make sure you are standing naturally when looking at yourself in the mirror and assessing whether something fits. (Or when you're at a fitting)
Second, I take issue with the idea that the cost of a garment or the label inside has anything to do with how good something looks. Aside from avoiding fast fashion brands like SHEIN, you should not feel ashamed by the label or cost.
For instance, Tristan Tate claims this is a $20k suit. But the chest is too tight, which is creating a dent in the sleevehead and forcing the lapels to buckle away from his body. The front-back balance is also wrong, so the front of his jacket looks like it's riding up on him.
Conversely, here's @MrSamWilkin and @andrewdefrank. The first is wearing a $500 Suitsupply suit. The second is wearing a $200 suit from the prestigious tailoring house Jos A Bank. Neither exhibit any of the issues in Tate's $20k bespoke garment.
As you move down the price scale, there are often real compromises in quality and fit. The armholes are likely to be low; the pattern matching may be off. When you have a limited budget, you also limit your options. This narrows your ability to find something that fits.
But the only things that matter are how the garment makes you look and feel. If you develop an eye for things, you can get great stuff by spending little. No one will ever know how much you paid for a garment or what the label says inside, so these things should not sway you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Not trying to create a pile-on here. But let's talk about why something might still be made in unethical conditions even though it bears a "made in USA" tag. 🧵
The first thing to understand is that not all workers are covered by US labor laws. You might assume that workers get paid a minimum wage (after all, it says "minimum"). In fact, many garment workers in the US toil under what's known as the piecework system.
Piecework means you get paid not by the amount of time you work but the number of operations you complete. This system should be familiar to many of you. As a writer, I get paid per word. The pay is the same whether it takes me 100 or 10 hours to write a 1,000 word article.
Like suits, ties can have meaning. This meaning is determined by things such as color, pattern, texture, sheen, and fiber.
My guess is that you already know this. If you had to go to a funeral tomorrow, would you choose: the black grenadine on the left or the "fuck you" tie on the right? Probably the black grenadine.
Both ties below are from Chipp Neckwear, who makes their ties in NYC.
In honor of Jimmy Carter's 100th birthday, let's take a look at why he's one of our under-appreciated style icons. 🧵
Carter's tailored outfits during his time as President were heavily shaped by the trends of the era. He often wore wide lapels, long collar points, and fashionable ties (wide cut with wild prints).
But photos of him from that era largely aged well because he never ventured into the extremes. His outfits also kept good proportions, such as having the width of the tie echo the width of the lapel, and the shirt collar points being long enough to tuck under the jacket (mostly).
Let's talk about this: should you avoid visible logos in fashion? 🧵
IMO, our judgements of fashion are not wholly neutral but rather shaped by the bodies underneath the clothes. It's important to understand this because it allows you to appreciate the role that class, race, and other markers of identity play in our judgments of taste.
We see this dynamic constantly throughout history. Just before the end of the Second World War, wealthy British guards ordered bespoke Edwardian-style suits from Savile Row tailors. It was all the rage among those with a bit of money.
There are a few giveaways. First, we know the suit is from a brand because the jacket is a touch short. A traditional bespoke tailor would have given him a longer jacket. Compare Rocky's jacket on left to the two bespoke suits from A. Caraceni on the right.
So if the suit is from a brand, then which one? Well there are a few clues.
The shoulder line here is very padded. The lapel is wide. And the trousers are full.
Tomorrow is Geeks & Nerds for Harris, a free livestream hosted by @RealLyndaCarter bringing fandoms together in support of Kamala Harris. I don't know if anyone is planning to show up in a costume, but if they do, I want you to think about the work that goes into costuming. 🧵
If a costume dept has done its job well, you shouldn't think about the costumes at all. The clothes should just pull you into the show. Such is the case of The Boys, where the clothes were made by a network of tailors and designers operating under the name LA Specialty Costumes.
To understand what makes this type of work special, you have to understand how clothes are made. Generally speaking, there are two types: ready-to-wear and bespoke.
In ready-to-wear (RTW), a designer comes up with an idea and works with a factory to make a series of samples