There is no indication that birth rates are going to stabilize, let alone recover, anywhere. Only Israel and Georgia (?) look like even half-way exceptions.
Unless they drastically and rapidly change, the 21st century will be the century of unbelievable aging and depopulation.
Based on these latest fertility numbers, we can expect the drop in new people in 100 years to be the following: USA (-47%), France (-46%), Russia (-65%), Germany (-68%), Italy (-78%), Japan (-81%), China (-88%), Thailand (-89%).
Turkey, UK, Mexico, etc. all similar.
People haven't really integrated what this means for our civilization, industrial society, and the progress of history because it's too big to wrap your head around.
I think what it means is that our civilization is about to collapse. Meaning sometime before 2200.
It is in every practical sense numerically *impossible* for immigration to fix this. You can't "make up the difference" with immigration when the difference is 50%+ of an entire generation. Especially not if you're China or the EU and your shortfall is in 100s of millions.
People still haven't updated on how rapidly fertility rates in the developing world are falling either. In 2022 already, Brazil was at 1.6, Mexico 1.8, India 2.0, Turkey 1.9, etc.
Numbers above say *Chile* is now at *0.88.* Thailand is at 0.95! What is happening!
The Danish population of Denmark hasn't changed a whit since 1980—44 years ago, or, you know, half a century.
The entire population growth in Denmark since 1980 has been immigrants. I bet this holds for many other countries too. Which means...
...the entire functioning of the quasi-redistributive quasi-capitalist system we have in Europe and North America has been subsidized by immigration for half a century already, while the previous population has stagnated and aged.
The system has been non-functional for decades.
There is no way to sustain the stack of institutions behind our version of modern industrial society when the next generations are collapsing by 50%+. It is as numerically impossible as throwing more immigrants at the problem. The math doesn't add up.
There is a strong psychological need to believe in utopian or apocalyptic visions of the near future, like AI doom/acc or imminent WW3 or ecological catastrophe, because the alternative is staring our incomprehensibly pathetic civilizational population collapse in the face.
I don't expect the dead players and bureaucrats to leap at opportunities for reform, but I think it's a catastrophic distraction for live players and independent thinkers, especially in tech, to forget that the straightforward solution is societal reform.
The solution isn't to hope we can build an AI who will solve all our problems for us or subsidize our incoherent, sociobiologically insolvent system with our wacky technology, the solution is coming up with a new, functional plan for organizing industrial societies.
People used to think that surely the low fertility rates of Asia would stabilize at, like, 1.1 at absolute minimum.
Nope. South Korea (population of 50 million) is now at 0.68. Others following. As @SamoBurja says, no reason not to expect 0.0 TFR societies in the near future.
If we fumble a much-needed reform of industrial society by 2100 or so, I think we miss our opportunity to establish permanent settlements in the Solar System and thus our chance at the stars down the line. It closes the book on that for us. Maybe in another 1000 years.
Everyone proposing to save the day with robots, AI, artificial wombs, longevity, or whatever other speculative wacky tech solution is proposing to do a great favor to the bad and broken system that brought us here.
The system needs reform, not more subsidy. Ideas, not tech.
The global economy and industrial/post-industrial standard of living, and all its attendant social norms, relies on a tremendous scale of population to be viable.
I don't think it's viable anymore when South Korea has 5 million people instead of 50 million.
I'm working on what I think will be a solution to industrial civilization's fertility problem. It's not a quick or easy problem. I published the first piece here in @palladiummag:
Also worth reading (and subscribing to!) @bismarckanlys Brief, which investigated India's rapidly falling fertility rates and near-future population stagnation here: brief.bismarckanalysis.com/p/fewer-than-o…
There is a personal upside to civilization-scale population collapse. If you are one of the few people to prioritize high fertility, your children and grandchildren will inherit a world:
Unfounded hope that fertility is a self-correcting problem, yet as @Empty_America is fond of pointing out, falling populations congregate in low-fertility cities even harder. They don't spread out to areas with cheap homes and fruitfully multiply!
If cheap homes attracted young people who automatically used them to be fecund according to some Malthusian logic, it would have happened already in places like rural America or Italy. The opposite is happening.
If you enjoyed these insights or wish to support further research on solving the problems raised herein, I warmly invite you to become a paid subscriber to @bismarckanlys Brief.
One underexplored aspect of the population collapse crisis is how many developing countries simply have fraudulent population numbers for various reasons.
Nigeria's population may be overstated by as much as double.
Every week, Bismarck Brief sends paid subscribers a new in-depth investigation of the strategy of a key institution, industry, or influential individual, from China to Silicon Valley.
Finding solutions to civilization-scale threats like the imminent demographic collapse is part of our daily work at @bismarckanlys. Make sure to follow our founder and president @SamoBurja and my colleagues @benlandautaylor and @RianCFFWhitton to stay up to date on our work!
Indeed. We could call the current demographic collapse trajectory "the Thanos Plan." Many think it will turn out very well, strangely enough. But maybe we shouldn't Thanos ourselves.
The Balkans are weird because it's acceptable to be like "well obviously the problem with our country is that half of us are irredeemably grugheaded cavemen" and everyone just kind of nods and agrees like, yup, that's it, nothing can be done about it.
There is a whole serious discourse about who or what is and isn't "civilized" and who is and isn't a "primitive" (literal translation) or a "villager" in the Balkans. The weird thing is that it's not like we aren't all the same genetically and culturally. Self-hating, I guess.
Maybe a genetics/history autiste can disprove me and I will stand corrected, but my impression is that like other Eastern European societies, Balkan societies are basically highly egalitarian and homogeneous. That's what makes this discourse weird.
Watching Elon speedrun the entire development of cutting-edge modern online political theory, at an accelerating pace even, has been fascinating. He went from normie liberal to concerned centrist by 2020-22, by early '24 reluctant Republican, then quickly MAGA and now quasi-NRx.
It's not going to be a popular view but I credit about 95% of the "vibe shift" directly and solely to Elon. If you jog your memory a bit and think it through, his extremely vigorous and frequent live player actions are "what has changed." Live players are insanely underrated.
Based on this I predict that we will actually see even more shocking, unexpected, and unpredictable political changes in the next few years; thanks to Elon. That's what you should expect from a live player. Expect to be surprised!
Hard to think of a clearer sign our society has gone too way far in the direction of feminized gerontocracy—rule by risk-averse grandmas and "wine aunts"—than a meme unironically calling four distinguished, grown-ass adult professionals "little boys" who need their mama. Enough!
"Who are these grandmas? And why are they in charge of our society?
A modern society relies on hard work, risk-taking, intellect, and industry, and is usually run by vigorous young and middle-aged men.
Boys, come get your grandmammies out of our government."
If calling distinguished 21-year-old men, fully-grown adult men with professional skills, accomplishments, and the legal rights to father children or die in combat, "little boys" is on the table, then I counter-propose we set age limits of 60 or 70 for key positions in gov't.
After a few weeks browsing the Subst*ck algorithm, I take back what I said about Zoomers not reading. Zoomers don't read because scrolling TikTok is more dignified than reading endless GenX/Xillennial slop about dating and frivolous culture war drivel. I apologize to Zoomers.
Things I want to read online: new ideas, cool stories, theory, analysis, manifestos, relevant news, funny jokes
Things I am getting instead: slop, drivel, thinly-disguised shilling, navel-gazing, open and proud shilling, advertising, unfunny forced memes
Seriously, what is wrong with Gen X and Elder Millennials? These people are in their 40s and 50s. Some of them are grandparents already. And they are still writing self-absorbed million-word essays about sex, weed, and racism.
Barron Trump is half-Slovenian. Half-Yugoslav. He is a Balkaner. This is underrated and underappreciated. You have no idea what kind of power will be unleashed when a Balkaner is elected President of the United States, someday. You are not prepared for a Balkan POTUS. Nobody is.
Barron Trump's grandfather and my grandfather were both members of the same communist party, at the same time, in the same forgotten corner of Europe. What a strange world.
Thanks to AI, it is possible to envision what it would look like for the ghost of Josip Broz Tito to guide President Barron Trump's hand in the Oval Office.
If the EU and European elite agreed to be collectively about 20-25% less geriatric, insane, and malicious, and go back to the EU and Europe being about antimatter laboratories and Leonardo Da Vinci, the people would be begging, crying, and pleading for more European integration.
"We made European integration all about deliberately impoverishing ourselves at breakneck speed in order to... actually we're not sure why, something about justice for the Third World and human rights or global warming or something. We're not sure why this isn't popular."
"European integration was really popular when it was about pooling funds to build antimatter laboratories and reducing passport bureaucracy on vacations to Copenhagen and Dalmatia. We don't understand why our bold new direction isn't as popular. It's the people who are wrong!"