America First Legal Profile picture
Oct 2, 2024 • 16 tweets • 6 min read • Read on X
/1🚨BREAKING🚨

The Biden-Harris NARA, Biden’s lawyers, and Obama’s legal representatives just delayed the release of Biden’s Vice Presidential records, including records on Hunter Biden and his foreign business dealings, until November 6, 2024 — the day AFTER the Election: Image
/2 We have just been notified by the Biden-Harris DOJ that President Biden’s lawyers and President Obama’s legal representatives have claimed an extension under the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. § 2208(a)(3)(B), delaying the public release of records from Joe Biden’s time as Vice President, including records relating to Hunter Biden and his foreign business dealings, by the National Archives.
/3 In other words, Biden, Obama, and NARA are concealing these potentially explosive records until the day after the 2024 election, November 6, 2024. Image
/4 In August 2022, AFL launched a multi-front FOIA investigation, seeking records from NARA related to President Biden’s time as Vice President and Hunter Biden’s corrupt foreign business dealings. 

In September 2022, AFL filed a lawsuit against NARA to obtain these records after NARA refused to comply.

To date, this lawsuit has uncovered documents revealing evidence that…
/5🚨Then-Vice President Biden used a personal email address for official government business: Image
/6🚨Hunter Biden should have registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), and the Obama Administration had concerns about Hunter Biden’s appointment to Burisma:
Image
/7🚨The Office of the Vice President coordinated directly with Hunter Biden and his firm, Rosemont Seneca, for press inquiries: Image
/8🚨Then-Vice President Biden personally signed off on the statement given in response to reporters about whether Hunter’s appointment to Burisma undermines the Vice President’s credibility in pushing anti-corruption measures in the country.

These are just a few highlights… Image
/9 Now, just a month before the 2024 Presidential election, President Biden’s lawyers and President Obama’s legal representatives are delaying the release of documents that include “email messages with James Biden …, Lion Hall …, and [Hunter’s firm] Rosemont Seneca,” about “photographs from a White House visit of Vice President Biden with James Biden [and] preparation of Vice President and Biden’s final tax forms and financial disclosures for the year 2015.”Image
/10 This is deeply alarming because:

🚨The Presidential Records Act typically provides the incumbent President, or the President and Vice President who were in office when the records were created, 60 working days to review and assert claims of constitutionally based privilege over the records before their release. 44 U.S.C. § 2208(a)(1)(A), (a)(3)(A).

🚨Accordingly, these records should have been released by September 23, 2024.

🚨Under 44 U.S.C. § 2208(a)(3)(B), they may invoke a 30-working-day extension “by filing with the Archivist a statement that such an extension is necessary to allow an adequate review of the record” for “a claim of constitutionally based privilege against disclosure.”

🚨In this case, invocation of the 30-working-day extension delays the release until the day after Election Day.

🚨An extension had not been invoked in this case until now.

🚨President Biden’s lawyers and President Obama’s legal representatives have had since June to review these records, so it is not credible that they need an additional 30 working days to review them for executive privilege.
/11 This would not be the first time that political operatives have attempted to cover up a potential October Surprise right before a presidential election. Image
/12 NARA’s June 27, 2024 notification related to a tranche of then-Vice President Biden’s records that would have been released last week.

The Presidential Records Act invocation pushes the deadline to November 6, 2024 (the day after Election Day).Image
/13 Again, NARA described these “Biden Vice Presidential records” as “email messages with James Biden …, Lion Hall …, and [Hunter’s firm] Rosemont Seneca,” about “photographs from a White House visit of Vice President Biden with James Biden [and] preparation of Vice President and Biden’s final tax forms and financial disclosures for the year 2015.”
/14 In 2015, Hunter Biden was receiving regular payments from Ukrainian gas company Burisma and from Gabriel Popoviciu, a Romanian businessman under prosecution. Special Counsel Weiss has since revealed evidence that Hunter “received compensation from a foreign principal who was attempting to influence U.S. policy and public opinion and cause the United States to investigate the Romanian investigation.”

Would the photos of Jim Biden at a White House visit relate to the Romanian President visiting then-Vice President Biden at the White House in 2015?Image
Image
/15 In 2015, James Biden and his firm, Lion Hall, received hundreds of thousands of dollars in “loans” from Hynansky, a big Joe Biden campaign donor who received federal loans for his business expansion into Ukraine.

How might the records relating to the preparation of Biden’s 2015 tax forms and financial disclosures relate to alleged “loan repayments” from his brother?Image
Image
/16 President Biden’s lawyers and President Obama’s legal representatives arbitrarily invoked a statutory extension meant for executive privilege review obviously to prevent their public release until after the election. aflegal.org/breaking-biden…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with America First Legal

America First Legal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @America1stLegal

Oct 9
/1🚨BOMBSHELL🚨

AFL has uncovered that MULTIPLE states suing President Trump over his Executive Order on birthright citizenship appear to have NO EVIDENCE to support their claims.
/2 On January 21, 2025, the states of Washington, Oregon, Illinois, and Arizona sued the Trump Administration over Executive Order 14160, which ends birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens.

The states allege the order will cost them money in programs like Medicaid, CHIP, and adoption assistance.
/3 There’s just one problem.

When AFL filed public records requests seeking clarity from these states on their claims — to show ANY DATA linking the order to actual costs — they came up empty-handed.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 8
/1🚨LANDMARK LAWSUIT🚨

AFL is fighting for a fair and lawful Census — alleging that the 2020 Census used FLAWED statistical methods that FABRICATED population counts and STOLE representation from the American people. Image
/2 The U.S. Constitution requires an actual count of every person every ten years.

Federal law explicitly prohibits the use of “statistical sampling” or other methods that risk inaccurate results.

No models.

No estimates.

No statistical tricks.Image
/3 In 2020, the Census Bureau ignored this mandate.

Instead of counting real people at their real addresses, it used two deeply flawed and unlawful methods:

📊 “Group Quarters Imputation”

💻 “Differential Privacy”
Read 18 tweets
Oct 4
NEW 🚨: America First Legal has re-filed its case against Fairfax County Public Schools in federal court.

This case is about restoring sanity, protecting free speech, and keeping MEN out of GIRLS’ spaces.
/2 At threat of punishment, Fairfax County forced then-student Jane Doe to forego her religious beliefs and use her peers’ preferred pronouns.

🚫 Compelled speech. ❌ Forced ideology. ⛔️ Violation of her First Amendment rights.
/3 At the same time, FCPS trampled her right to privacy.

They allowed a male student to use the girls’ restroom because he “felt unsafe” in the boys’ room.

But when Jane said she felt unsafe, she was told: Deal with it, or find a private bathroom.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 3
🚨BREAKING — AFL has obtained thousands of pages of records exposing Biden DOJ’s SHOCKING partnership and coordination with the radical SPLC to WEAPONIZE civil rights enforcement.

No daylight between DOJ and SPLC.

Here’s round #1👇 Image
/2 Explosive documents, obtained via FOIA, reveal Biden’s DOJ gave SPLC UNPRECEDENTED access to influence federal civil rights enforcement.

They weren’t just at the table — they were helping RUN THE SHOW.

Quarterly meetings, coffee and danish meetups, training DOJ prosecutors… Image
/3 SPLC, known for smearing groups like Moms for Liberty and Turning Point USA as “hate groups” alongside the KKK, got early access to FBI hate-crime data, drafted DOJ talking points, and even TRAINED federal prosecutors. Image
Read 11 tweets
Sep 29
🚨EXPOSED — Biden’s HHS funneled millions to Washington University in St. Louis to embed “diversity, equity, and inclusion” into medicine and clinical research.

Yes, your tax dollars are bankrolling racial discrimination and ideological experiments.

Here’s the proof…🧵 Image
/2 Biden’s HHS gave WashU $5 million to run a nationwide “Neurosurgeon Research Career Development Program” to “promote and foster diversity, equity, and inclusion at every level.”

It mandates DEI, builds a “pipeline program” to recruit based on identity, and embeds “diversity” into selection, mentoring, and leadership.

This is taxpayer-funded discrimination — reorienting the medical workforce around ideology instead of merit.Image
/3 Biden’s HHS gave WashU $3.4 million to “increase diversity, equity, and inclusion” in Alzheimer’s research through 2026.

The project builds a “culturally appropriate” registry led by “diverse researchers” to recruit participants by race, and frames disparities as products of “systemic and systematic racism,” “ethnoracial factors,” and “classism.”

Our tax dollars should fund treatments — not racial ideology in medical research.Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26
🏛️⚖️ NEW — The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has AFFIRMED the President’s Article II authority to remove appointed officials.

AFL filed an amicus brief in this case defending that presidential power. Image
/2 AFL, with Boyden Gray PLLC and Givens Purley LLP, filed an amicus brief in Robert P. Storch v. Pete Hegseth supporting former U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General Eric J. Soskin.

Soskin was removed by President Trump — yet defended presidential removal power even in his own case.
/3 Eric Soskin is a longtime practicing constitutional lawyer with decades of experience in public service, including in the U.S. Department of Justice and as Inspector General of the Department of Transportation.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(