I’m in the waiting room for the Tribunal hearing to decide whether an Interim Order is made against Rosario Canadé (Dr Ross Canadé) from the @TaviAndPort
I hope I’ll be given permission to Live-Tweet (not yet confirmed).
#RossCanadéTribunal
I’m also going to make a video, which will be uploaded to my YouTube Channel,
and I’ll be summarising on my free Substack.youtube.com/@ClaireFeminist
I tweeted yesterday, about my concern that this man remained on the HCPC Register, until now.
I’m in. Introductions all around
#RossCanadéTribunal
Nobody has informed me that I can’t Live-Tweet, so hopefully I’ll be fine to do so? A reminder that all publications must be lawful, fair, etc. I’m guessing that includes live tweets! #RossCanadéTribunal
The background, from the Tribunal.
He was employed as a Clinical Psychologist, progressing to a Highly Soecialist Clinical Psychologist.
Referral from the Trist came on 30/08/24
Aren’t was on 07/06/24, and Trust was informed by LADO on 10/6/24
#RossCanadéTribunal
Canadé was suspended on the date they were informed from the LADO.
Allegation: he engaged in online chat with an individual he believed was 15 yrs old. Chat moved to WhatsApp and became sexual. Meeting happened on 07/06/24. They went to Nando’s, and discussed going to the park for sexual activity
#RossCanadéTribunal
On 05/08/24 the police informed the Trust that Canadé had pled guilty to the offences he was charged with.
They all have a bundle giving these dates: I’m being as accurate as I can, but please excuse if I have made any transcription errors
#RossCanadéTribunal
Conviction is a custodial sentence, suspended for 18months, unpaid work, attendance at sexual offenders treatment programme. Canadé has been cooperative and helpful with informing the HCPC throughout this process
#RossCanadéTribunal
The grounds for suspension under an Interim Order can be up to 18 months, and can be on grounds of protecting the public etc.
In this case, info from meeting notes from LADO and from the Trust are the Primie Facie case.
#RossCanadéTribunal
The order is “necessary for the protection of the public”
The registrants conduct is “serious” and this is magnified by his seniority and role in safeguarding. His job description states that he is to provide help to children and families, direct assessments and therapeutic work with children
#RossCanadéTribunal
Job description highlights that Canadé is required to work independently with children, does outreach to schools, and provides support to specialist Autism service.
He has been convicted of very serious offences, and the case is very clear that we must protect the public
#RossCanadéTribunal
Case Law:
2 cases mentioned, but I couldn’t guarantee accurate transcription. They support that a conviction like this warrants immediate suspension, and that a member of the public would be shocked or troubled to discover the registrant continued to practice
#RossCanadéTribunal
HCPC seeks an Interim Order, and believes solid grounds on both public protection and public interest grounds.
Concern about prejudice to Canadé based on decision, but need for public safety and public confidence far outweighs this concern
#RossCanadéTribunal
Looking at Interim Orders, we want to impose the least restrictive condition that satisfies the grounds, and no grounds less than suspension would meet the needs of public safety and public confidence.
There’s another case which supports that any conviction must be completed before return to practice
#RossCanadéTribunal
The HCPC submits that the Interim Order is required because Canadé will be discharging conviction until that date.
Thats 18 months (the maximum) during which time the investigation will continue for the full Tribunal
#RossCanadéTribunal
Canadé is not represented at this hearing, but is asked if he wants to address the panel. He says “no, I have nothing to say and nothing to add”
Panel seeks further information about sentencing
#RossCanadéTribunal
Canadé confirms a 9 month conviction, suspended for 18 months, ? Hours unpaid work, 18 hours attendance at Horizon sex offenders programme. He is subject to notification requirements, and a sexual harm prevention order has been imposed, regarding use of the internet and contact with <18
#RossCanadéTribunal
Legal advice incoming:
This case regards an allegation
It may be considered a cogent allegation, but it remains an allegation
This is not the final decision about Canadé’s ability to practice
The panel must consider the cogency and strength of the allegation.
If panel believes it is a cogent allegation, they then have to look at risk management
#RossCanadéTribunal
The risk management grounds are
Public safety
Public confidence
Registrants safety.
In this case, first two apply
A high bar is set for these interim orders, because nothing is proved
The conviction, of course, influences this decision. If the panel finds the grounds are met, it is likely they shall wish to impose an Interim Order
#RossCanadéTribunal
Interim order is required to be justified because restrictions on practice wouldn’t meet the grounds. Length of time will be determined by investigation and by discharge of conviction
#RossCanadéTribunal
No questions about the legal advice given.
Panel will be following the legal advice, and will be utilising the HCPC Practice Notes.
The panel must reach a decision and then the document must be drafted that sets out the grounds. The panel retired at this point, and we shall have a break until the process concludes. We cannot say when that will be (but I think this afternoon)
#RossCanadéTribunal
Just to reassure everyone, I’ve received email confirmation that live-tweeting from tribunals held in public is allowed, as long as the conditions (lawful, fair, protects confidentiality where appropriate) are met. Phew!
This is shocking news, and the suggestion that this perp might be free to continue to practice is, of course, a huge safeguarding issue. I did some digging…
The experience of a #LetWomenSpeak event is so powerful. The voices of the extraordinary “ordinary women” are each other’s inspiration. We don’t need academic feminists or professional lobbyists, because we have TRUTH.
I can imagine this feels threatening to academic feminists, politicians, professional lobbyists etc, because they rely on being the mediating voices between Power and the powerless. But they only have the power we give them. What happens when we don’t need them, anymore?
Imagine believing that extraordinary “ordinary women” need your insights, your organising, your pontifications, rather than noticing things about their own lives and having the courage and opportunity to speak out
When I was working in Acute Mental Health Inpatient Care, I had lots of training in managing violence and aggression. Managing risk involved all sorts of strategies we were not allowed to share with muggles. We were still advised to avoid physical confrontation at any cost
The biggest piece of advice was to never let anyone block your escape route, because your life may depend on being able to escape. This saved me from several dangerous situations visiting unwell people in their own homes, too
The use of physical interventions to protect ourselves and our colleagues as well as inpatients (from themselves and each other), was far less frequent on the women’s wards than on the men’s wards. But we never even attempted full restraint unless there were 6 of us
.@AlessandraAster has consistently argued for women’s rights, and for #RepealTheGRA. She exposed the misogyny of Government decisions to grant an “F” marker in passports, under self ID, and suggested a legal route to be reverse it. I’ve never witnessed her being homophobic
I have bought (and read) Andrew Doyle’s books, and think he is a clever and thoughtful gent. He really didn’t enjoy feeling so many women expressing disagreement with his position on feminine pronoun use for men. Who would? It must feel discombobulating, on that scale
I didn’t witness Alessandra behave inappropriately during that conversation. Indeed, I’ve never seen her behave inappropriately in any online conversation. It’s possible that Andrew’s perception of her comments was influenced by his experience of wide-scale disagreement
Ok. I’m going to do a thread on this ridiculousness, because perhaps it might explain how very fucking tired we are of all the bloody excuses #LabourLosingWomen theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
First thing that raised my hackles:
“Responsible politicians would understand that this isn’t a debate to exploit, it’s people’s lives. Who they are and who, all too frequently, they suffer violence for being.”
Men kill 2 or 3 Uk women every week, along with 1 in 4 women experiencing domestic violence refuge.org.uk/what-is-domest…
There’s so much naked envy of KJK. Envy that she is beholden to no employer, no profession, and (recently!) no mortgage provider. It’s a truly privileged position to be in: that’s true! But the proof of the pudding is in the eating…
What does KJK do with the freedom from job, regulator, and bank? How does she choose to spend her time? She works for women. Every day. She doesn’t engage in direct service provision for abused women: that’s not her skill set. She markets ideas. And she’s genius at it
I can tell you, from experience, that building a YouTube channel takes daily grind. The filming is the least of it. I am in AWE at the work that KJK is doing, to create so much YouTube content, every week. Most of it speaking off the cuff. Very few people can do this