Ben Alfred Profile picture
Oct 5, 2024 4 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🚨🧵
DO NOT let modernity gaslight you on the LQ (lard question). the claim lower bmis being more attractive is because of unattainable, ‘cultural’ beauty standards is environmentalist cope.

the default hypothesis: lower bmi signals fertility + genetic fitness.

guess what? t.co/NrPPOSUPIKImage
Image
Image
Image
so what’s classed as ‘underweight’ (<18.5) isn’t associated with lower fertility or higher infant mortality. in fact, quite the opposite seems true. what about signs of fitness? intelligence is inversely associated with bmi: Image
Image
so, what is the ideal bmi in terms of attractiveness? silhouette studies seem to suggest lower numbers than those asking people to rate actual people and looking for a relationship. idk what the better proxy is.

either way, 16-20 seems a safe range. Image
Image
Image
Image
#normalisecallingmorepeoplefat Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Alfred

Ben Alfred Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ben_Alfred_

May 24
Aberrant sexual orientation/gender identity groups have far higher rates of mental illness. This gap is present across all categories, to varying degrees, and is uniform in direction. Non-heterosexual women and transexuals have especially elevated rates: Image
Interestingly, the mental illness gaps between non-heterosexual and heterosexual women tend to be larger than those between non-heterosexual and heterosexual men. Within-sex rate differences: Image
Why this is the case is unclear, as both behavioural patterns seem equally unadaptive. Nonetheless, the trend is present on the genetic level as well; perhaps this is due to the psychopathology factor threshold for women to deviate from normalcy being higher? Image
Read 4 tweets
May 10
Do lesbians exist?
In one study, arousal to different sexual stimuli was close to identical between self-identified heterosexual and homosexual women, but pronouncedly differed between gay and straight men in the direction you’d expect. My guess is it is mostly LARP. Image
The largest recent physiological study I could find seems to replicate this. All orientation groups in the sample showed arousal to stimuli depicting both male and female models to similar degrees. The nominally significant findings do not survive basic statistical hygiene. Image
What about neurological evidence? In one study, sound processing regions lit up more in all women to female stimuli (though there was confounding due to the loud moaning in the female video) and especially so in lesbians. Somatosensory regions lit up more in all orientation groups when watching male over female stimuli.Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 5
This effect held in 3/3 of the national standardisation samples I checked, and using three different methods of g-loading estimation.

The g-loading–male advantage associations were all directionally consistent, and statistically significant in most cases. Image
Italians were an exception, as the gender ability profiles in their sample appear to be less differentiated. Strangely, Italian males even outperformed Italian females on some processing speed tasks. Image
Moving on, it’s immediately obvious that the cancellation subtest is a uniquely poor g proxy, and there is an intuitive way to demonstrate this: it is 2.79 standard deviations below the subtest mean correlation average. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 8
On the individual level, higher intelligence has a protective effect against fatal car accidents, but does the same hold true when comparing populations?

It appears yes: national IQ correlates at r = -0.7 with country-level road-traffic death rates. Image
MENA nations only: Image
European nations only: Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 6
Is 'mansplaining' actually necessary?
It may well be, as women know much less than men in almost every domain. This is especially true for finance, the general factor of knowing about things, and science-related knowledge.

Evidently, men are not mansplaining enough: Image
You may be wondering "what's going on with factor 4?", and so did I. However, it ceases to be mysterious once you realize that factor 4 does not load at all on the second order general factor, and was also uncorrelated with factors 1 through 3. And look at the subtest loadings!Image
Despite being labeled 'humanities,' it is primarily defined by moderate negative loadings on Sport and Games, effectively indexing the absence of male-coded knowledge rather than humanities expertise. The former test is also the only one whose largest absolute loading was on F4.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 4, 2025
🪡🧵@jensenjeans recently used more data to refine national IQ estimates.
Here are the revised averages with 95% confidence intervals: Image
Subsaharan-Africa (continental and islands): Image
Europe: Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(