ASSASSIN@TION: With just months left in office the Biden-Harris regime decided to update the 17 year old Bush-era directive against assassin@tion of Americans. Why would the regime feel the need to legalize killing Americans who threaten the foundations of our democracy?
In a chilling and unambiguous act, the Biden-Harris regime has recently updated the 2007 DoD Directive 5240.01, stripping away crucial protections that safeguarded American citizens from government-sanctioned assassin@tions. The original directive contained an explicit prohibition, stating, "Under no circumstances shall any DoD Component or DoD employee engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassin@tion." This unequivocal language has been removed, paving the way for a dangerous new precedent that authorizes the targeting of both American citizens and foreign nationals—both on domestic soil and abroad—under vague and ominous "special circumstances."
This egregious alteration marks a perilous departure from the established norms that have historically protected the civil liberties of U.S. citizens. The notion that the government can now potentially authorize the assassination of Americans under the guise of national security is nothing short of a constitutional crisis. It opens a Pandora's box where the executive branch could circumvent legal processes and judicial oversight, allowing for a chilling expansion of government power and an alarming erosion of individual rights.
The Biden-Harris regime’s willingness to authorize assassin@tion reflects a profound disregard for the sanctity of American lives and the rule of law. It exemplifies a troubling trend toward authoritarianism, where the state’s interests are prioritized over the rights of individuals. By enabling the targeting of U.S. citizens—often without the checks and balances that judicial oversight provides—the regime is setting a dangerous precedent that could lead to abuses of power reminiscent of the darkest chapters in our nation’s history.
Moreover, the implications extend beyond mere policy shifts; they signal a fundamental transformation in the relationship between the government and its citizens. The ability of the state to conduct targeted killings without due process undermines the very foundations of our democratic society, where the rule of law and the protection of individual rights have been paramount. It raises unsettling questions: Who decides what constitutes a "threat"? What criteria are used to determine when such extreme measures are warranted?
This new directive does not merely modify existing procedures; it fundamentally alters the landscape of governmental authority and individual rights in America. As we stand at this critical juncture, we must remain vigilant and resolute in our defense of civil liberties. The implications of the Biden-Harris regime’s actions demand serious reflection and urgent action from all who cherish the freedoms granted to us by our Constitution.
In conclusion, the recent updates to DoD Directive 5240.01 should serve as a clarion call for all Americans. The stripping away of prohibitions against assassin@tion represents not just a policy change, but a grave threat to the very essence of our democratic principles. We must rally together to demand accountability, transparency, and a reaffirmation of the rights that define our great nation. The time to act is now; let us not allow this regime to tread upon the rights of the American people without consequence.
h/t @nataliegwinters
ASSASSIN@TION: Last month the Biden-Harris regime updated the 2007 DoD Directive 5240.01 removing the prohibition, "Under no circumstances shall any DoD Component or DoD employee engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassin@tion.” Under the regime’s new rules the government can target foreign nationals and Americans both here and abroad.
h/t @nataliegwinters
ASSASSIN@TION: If you'd like to compare the 2007 and 2024 DoD Directive 5240.01 yourself, here are the PDFs. You can upload them into ChatGPT and ask the LLM to compare and contrast the two versions. The 2024 version is 244 pages compared to 43 in 2007 version. Be sure to ask the LLM to explain how the 2024 update removed the original 2007 directive included a clear and unambiguous statement that "Under no circumstances shall any DoD Component or DoD employee engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassin@tion."
ELECTION INTEGRITY: What if I told you that anyone could go online and claim to be a citizen living overseas, get a ballot, and vote without ever having to prove your identity or citizenship? Sounds crazy, right? What if I told you federal law made it illegal for the state to attempt to verify your identity and citizenship? You don't even need to use your real name or even the name of a living person. Even crazier, right? Well that's exactly what the UOCAVA allows and requires.
The census estimates there are less than 3 million Americans living overseas, but the Democrats are telling donors to their Vote From Abroad Program that there are more than 9 million. So anyone with a computer can go to the FVAP website and fill out a few forms and be registered to vote and receive a ballot - you don't have to provide a real name or address and driver's license and last four of SSN are all optional (fun fact the state isn't allowed to confirm the last four of the SSN you provide matches the name or DoB you provided).
This is the case for all 50 states but I specifically confirmed this with the Texas Secretary of State. Of course, whoever fills out the registration and ballot will need to swear they are a citizen - but since we don't know the real name of the voter or anything about them there is little risk of getting caught.
The Democrats claim they are investing 'six figures' in getting out the overseas vote - a number that seems very low if they're interested in getting 9 million ballots. I can't help but wonder if that effort is cover to explain why they get so many overseas ballots in November.
ELECTION INTEGRITY: The use of the UOCAVA voting loophole exploded between 2016 and 2020. Iowa saw a 2,244% increase in overseas ballots. Other significant increases in non-military overseas ballots include:
- Hawaii 358% increase
- Virginia 235% increase
- Texas 100% increase
Suspiciously, 2020 was the first year that more people voted from overseas than filed overseas tax returns.
Even more suspiciously, in 2020 (in jurisdictions that conducted hand counts of UOCAVA ballots) more than 74% of votes were for President Biden. In Fulton County, GA, remarkably, 100% of UOCAVA ballots were for Joe Biden.
The UOCAVA voting loophole allows anyone to make up a fake name, pretend they are living overseas, and vote as many times as they like. Federal law prohibits states from verifying identity and citizenship. These are untraceable ballots. If you thought 2020 was bad 2024 is going to be a bloodbath.
ELECTION INTEGRITY: The Census Bureau thinks there are around 3 million non-military Americans living overseas. Interestingly the Democrats are claiming (without evidence) there are 9 million non-military Americans living overseas. Conspiracy theorists like me assume they are making that claim so they can justify delivering more and more ballots via the UOCAVA loophole. They are even telegraphing the fact they are 'investing' money in chasing those ballots - ironically a six figure investment seems really small unless you realize that there is no way to get caught creating fake voters in any state.
The Biden-Harris regime has lost control of the Army. They’re taking to TikTok exposing the incompetence of their leadership and the commander in chief.
Meanwhile average people are using drones to fly baby formula into families the US Army can’t reach…
PROJECT 2025 🧵1/6 : Next time a Democrat brings up 'Project 2025,' remind them that the founder of the sponsor, the Heritage Foundation, started working to prevent President Trump’s re-election as far back as 2021. Here’s Rep. Marvin Edwards explaining why he left the GOP and how he plans to take it back—he’s a trustee of the Heritage Foundation - the group behind Project 2025.
Read through this short thread to uncover the truth behind the biggest propaganda push of the 2024 election—Project 2025. President Trump immediately disavowed the Heritage Foundation’s plan when he learned about it, recognizing it as a tool crafted by Democrats and Never Trumpers to undermine his campaign.
PROJECT 2025 🧵2/6 : Democrats came out in full force at the DNC, pushing the false narrative that President Trump was behind Project 2025. The claim was so blatantly false that even CNN had to acknowledge the truth, confirming that the former president had no involvement with Project 2025 and had, in fact, emphatically disavowed it.
Check out this short thread to uncover the truth behind one of the biggest propaganda efforts of the 2024 election—Project 2025. When President Trump learned about the Heritage Foundation’s plan, he immediately disavowed it, seeing it as a scheme by Democrats and Never Trumpers to sabotage his campaign.
PROJECT 2025 🧵3/6 : Many of you pointed out early on that Project 2025 seemed like a psyop. It turns out you were likely right. Much of the actual policy proposals in the document align almost perfectly with the Democrat's 2024 Platform. The founder of the Heritage Foundation and current trustee hates President Trump and has been plotting to keep him out of the White House since 2021.
Dive into this short thread to uncover the truth about the biggest propaganda effort of the 2024 election—Project 2025. When President Trump learned about the Heritage Foundation’s plan, he promptly disavowed it, recognizing it as a tool designed by Democrats and Never Trumpers to sabotage his campaign.
DEBATE🧵: I'll be including commentary and reaction to the vice presidential debate exclusively in this thread.
DEBATE🧵: CBS pre-debate panel is warning Senator JD Vance NOT to bring up Tim Walz's stolen valor. I think this is a good reason for @JDVance to bring it up.
DEBATE🧵: Polymarket has a bunch of bets going on words Senator JD Vance will use during the debate including:
- Mamaw 37% Chance
- Hillbilly 17%
- Stolen valor 25%
- Israel 95%
ELECTION INTERFERENCE: The Kamala Harris campaign has been receiving material support from Iran. The Islamic Republic has been providing the Harris campaign hacked information from the Trump campaign. The FBI, ODNI, and CISA has known about it it since June or July and failed to alert the Trump campaign - the Harris campaign kept the support secret as well.
ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Trump campaign's comment on revelations that Iran is working with the Harris campaign.
Joint ODNI, FBI, and CISA Statement on Harris Campaign Receipt of Material Support from Iran. dni.gov/index.php/news…
WWIII: The Biden-Harris regime has decided to cross Russia's redline and allow long range missile attacks. These attacks could take place as soon as this weekend but I suspect they won't start until October. Why has the White House decided to take this risk just two months before the presidential election? Would a nuclear war help Kamala Harris in November? Would they be able to suspend the election? I'd love your thoughts on this. @RealAlexJones @ggreenwald @KanekoaTheGreat
WWIII: You will know the long range missile strikes will begin as soon as Russia begins expelling diplomats. With UKs decision to allow Storm Shadow missiles to be used in Russia, Putin has responded by beginning expulsions. reuters.com/world/europe/r…
The Storm Shadow missiles authorized for use in Russia have a range of 150-350 miles - Moscow is 280 miles from Ukraine border. kyivindependent.com/guardian-uk-ha…