COVERUP: Why didn't the DOJ bother to tell us that a after a three year FBI investigation a grand jury determined that Reps Schiff and Swalwell leaked classified documents to the press? Why didn't they prosecute the leakers? The DOJ IG is asking the same questions. COVERUP: Make no mistake Section 605 of the Continuing Resolution was designed to prevent @PamBondi and @Kash_Patel from investigating Schiff, Swalwell, and Cheney.

https://x.com/amuse/status/1869389184777019792

COVERUP? Has anyone else noticed a concerted effort to suppress the drone story? The new narrative is that there are no drones and that we’ve all been seeing airplanes. Everytime I share new video it get immediately ‘community noted’. Who is behind the suppression? COVERUP? Clearly videos like this one are merely airplanes. This is how airplanes move.

COUP? Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared emergency martial law against "antistate forces" Tuesday night in an unannounced press conference, according to media reports.

Martial law in South Korea refers to a legal framework under which the administrative and judicial powers of the state are transferred to a military commander. Under the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, the president has the authority to declare martial law, as stipulated by the Martial Law Act, in circumstances of war, armed conflict or other national emergencies deemed equivalent in gravity. The objective of martial law is to meet military requirements or maintain public safety and order when the normal functions of government are perceived to be inadequate.

Martial law is divided into two types: emergency martial law and security martial law. Emergency martial law grants the government sweeping powers, such as suspending the warrant system, restricting freedom of the press, curbing publication rights and limiting assembly and association, as well as overriding the authority of civilian courts and government agencies. When martial law is declared, the president must notify the National Assembly immediately. If the National Assembly demands its termination by a majority vote, the president is legally obligated to comply. While the National Assembly retains legislative authority, there are exceptional circumstances under which a military regime can temporarily assume control, particularly in the event of a coup that disrupts the normal constitutional order. COUP: They’ve been predicting President Yeol would declare martial law since September. The folks who shared the warning were called conspiracy theorists.

https://twitter.com/windinwindow/status/1863940585926877537

PARDON? President Biden decided to go back on his promise not to pardon his son Hunter. First, I think this is the right thing for a father to do. Second, this will create an interesting situation as Hunter will no longer be able to invoke the 5th Amendment and will have to testify against his father. Third, it will be interesting to see how the media handles this. Will they call the president out for breaking his promise to the American people or will they give the almost former president cover?

Biden's Statement:

Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted. Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.

The charges in his cases came about only after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my re-election. Then, a carefully negotiated plea deal, agreed to by the Department of Justice, unraveled in the courtroom — with a number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process. Had the plea deal held, it would have been a fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter’s cases.

No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong. There has been an effort to break Hunter — who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me — and there’s no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough.

For my entire career I have followed a simple principle: just tell the American people the truth. They’ll be fair-minded. Here’s the truth: I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice — and once I made this decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a President would come to this decision. PARDON! Joe Biden pardons son Hunter in not-shocking reversal, claiming he was ‘unfairly prosecuted’ as lame-duck prez winds down term
nypost.com/2024/12/01/us-…

WAR: Russia announced Ukraine attacked it using US-made nuclear-capable tactical missiles, after the US confirmed the report, Russia signaled it's ready to launch a tactical nuclear response according to @CNBC. Pray for peace. WAR: The use of low yield tactical nukes, especially airburst, on the battlefield would give Russian troops a huge advantage and facilitate rapid troop advancement on all fronts. It would also demoralize Ukrainian troops. The targeted areas would be safe for troops within 12-24 hours. If NATO decided to intervene it would have to accept the very real threat of European capitals being targeted with strategic nuclear missiles. Russia clearly communicated, publicly and privately, it would reserve the right to a nuclear response if NATO provided and authorized use of long range missiles inside Russia. That line was crossed last night.

Senator, based on a leaked whip count, you are supporting @SenJohnThune for Majority Leader. Can you confirm this is the case? @RepJimBanks, @SenJohnBarrasso, @MarshaBlackburn, @SenBillCassidy, @SenatorCollins, @SenTomCotton, @SenKevinCramer, @SenTedCruz, @RepJohnCurtis, @SteveDaines, @SenJohnHoeven, @WVGovernor, @SenLummis, @LeaderMcConnell, @SenMullin, @lisamurkowski, @SenatorRounds, @SenatorTimScott, @TimSheehyMT, @SenDanSullivan, @SenThomTillis, @SenatorWicker, @SenToddYoung.

h/t @bennyjohnson Senator, based on a leaked whip count, you are supporting @JohnCornyn for Majority Leader. Can you confirm this is the case? @JohnBoozman, @SenKatieBritt, @SenatorBudd, @SenCapito, @MikeCrapo, @SenJoniErnst, @SenatorFischer, @LindseyGrahamSC, @ChuckGrassley, @HawleyMO, @SenHydeSmith, @SenJohnKennedy, @SenatorLankford, @DaveMcCormickPA, @SenatorRicketts, @SenatorRisch.

h/t @bennyjohnson

CLOSING ARGUMENT🧵1/4: against another four years of Harris rule by @cb_doge: CLOSING ARGUMENT🧵2/4: against another four years of Harris rule by @cb_doge:

ELECTION INTEGRITY: Last month the USPS quietly issued a last minute directive preventing the imaging of mail-in ballots. Normally the USPS would be able to confirm the number of mail-in ballots sent to election officials to ensure fraudulent ballots aren't inserted into the election. Bypassing the central scanning facilities, as the directive requires, means there will be NO way to verify the numbers reported by local election authorities match the numbers reported by the USPS.

The integrity of an election hinges on the robustness of the systems that facilitate voter participation. When those systems are altered at the last minute, the checks and balances designed to prevent fraud can be seriously undermined. A recent directive issued by the United States Postal Service (USPS), just a month before the upcoming election, threatens to do precisely that. By instructing USPS facilities to bypass their central scanning operations for mail-in ballots, this change removes a key layer of transparency and makes it difficult, if not impossible, to verify the legitimacy of absentee ballots. This decision effectively jeopardizes the integrity of the election by eliminating an important method of auditing mail-in ballots.

Traditionally, USPS relies on centralized scanning to create digital images of every mail piece, including absentee ballots. These scans are more than just technical formalities—they represent a critical layer of accountability. By scanning ballot envelopes, USPS is able to track the movement of election-related mail, confirm its transit through the system, and provide evidence of delivery. This method has allowed for an additional check against fraud, ensuring that every mail-in ballot destined for election officials is accounted for. The number of mail-in ballots scanned by USPS could be cross-referenced with the numbers reported by local election authorities to ensure consistency, thereby minimizing the possibility of fraudulent ballots being introduced into the system.

However, the recent USPS directive has instructed postal workers to bypass these centralized facilities and deliver absentee ballots directly to local Boards of Election (BOEs) without the standard scanning procedures. This means that the usual chain of digital records—a crucial audit trail—will be absent. There will be no comprehensive count of absentee ballots moving through the mail, and as a result, no reliable way for external observers to verify that the number of ballots received by election officials matches the number actually mailed by voters. With the imaging process deliberately omitted, election observers and watchdog groups lose a powerful tool that could independently verify or challenge local election authorities’ claims.

This sudden change also undermines confidence in an already tense electoral environment. With only a month until Election Day, altering fundamental mail handling procedures is bound to generate suspicion. For many voters, the safeguard that USPS imaging provides—an objective count of ballots—is a reassurance that the process is being conducted fairly. By sidestepping this layer of accountability, USPS has inadvertently fed into the narrative that absentee ballots are vulnerable to manipulation. For an electoral system that is often scrutinized for potential vulnerabilities, eliminating an established verification method only adds fuel to those concerns.

Another problem arises with the lack of transparency. Informed Delivery, a service offered by USPS, has allowed voters to digitally preview their incoming mail, providing them with an image of their ballot envelope. This transparency not only gave voters confidence but also created another line of defense against fraud—any inconsistency between what a voter expected and what was delivered could be flagged. Without the centralized scanning process, this transparency is also lost. Voters now have fewer assurances that their ballot has traveled safely through the system or reached its intended destination.

Ultimately, the USPS directive introduces an alarming level of uncertainty into the electoral process. Election integrity is not just about preventing fraud; it is also about ensuring that the systems in place foster trust. By removing the ability to confirm that the numbers of ballots mailed, received, and counted are consistent, the USPS is inadvertently creating opportunities for discrepancies. These discrepancies, whether intentional or not, could easily undermine public confidence in the outcome of the election.

In conclusion, the last-minute USPS directive to bypass centralized scanning of absentee ballots has significant ramifications for election integrity. It removes a key verification step that has historically helped ensure the legitimacy of mail-in voting. By stripping away a vital layer of transparency, this directive leaves voters and observers in the dark about whether the number of ballots reported by local election authorities truly reflects those mailed. In a time when public trust in elections is already fragile, such a change—made just weeks before Election Day—could prove deeply damaging to the perceived legitimacy of the entire electoral process. ELECTION INTEGRITY: The federal workers that are entrusted with delivering millions of ballots are being told by their leaders that Trump is a threat to democracy and that if they don't stop him he will become dictator.

It is unacceptable that the Postal Worker's union that represents 92% of America's letter carriers is able to use its influence and presence in 30,000+ post offices to spread this sort of dangerous misinformation to federal employees.

It is one thing for Union President Mark Dimondstein to endorse Kamala Harris and quite another to use his position to spread dangerous lies about the former president. This amounts to election interference and is likely resulting in thousands of letter carriers violating the Hatch Act.

If you were convinced that Hitl*r was coming to power in America what would you do to stop him? Would you throw away ballots from houses with Trump signs? Throw away ballots from houses with American flags (just in case)?

ELECTION INTEGRITY: Dallas County hired a new election administrator to run its elections this year and things are off to a rough start just two days into early voting as software glitches are causing huge lines at voting places. Many are asking if the 'glitches' are a feature or bug so I decided to take a look at who the county hired to run the election.

I was shocked to learn that Dallas County decided to hire a Venezuelan national named Heider Garcia to be its election administrator [Garcia's immigration status is not public]. I was even more shocked to learn that he ran at least three nationwide elections in Venezuela as a Smartmatic employee - election monitors believed vote totals and results provided by Smartmatic machines were being manipulated to help Hugo Chávez. By 2017 Smartmatic admitted it could not certify the integrity of elections using its machines in Venezuela.

By 2010 Smartmatic had moved Garcia to run elections in the Philippines until 2016 when it was discovered that voting machines he was responsible for had unauthorized changes made to the vote transmission script during the election night. While Garcia wasn't implicated he left the company and took a job in California. Recently the co-founder of Smartmatic was charged in a bribery scandal with bribes to Philippine officials.

During Garcia's short stint in Placer County as election coordinator the county had huge issues with ballot printing errors requiring votes to be thrown out, new ballots to be printed, and voters to be contacted individually. By 2016 many voters weren't even getting their ballots as a result of printing delays. There were massive problems with the voter registration system forcing many voters to use provisional ballots.

Garcia left Placer County for a job as Tarrant County's election administrator in 2018. His tenure with the county was fraught with controversy and scandal. At one point at least a third of the county's mail-in ballots had to be rescanned due to a barcode glitch. By 2023 he was forced to resign amid an investigation by County Judge Tim O’Hare into Garcia's decision, priorities, and budget.

Why would Dallas County hire a former Smartmatic executive involved in the most corrupt elections in the world be hired despite questionable tenures running elections in Placer and Tarrant County? The best case is that Garcia is incompetent and the worst case is that he's compromised.

So what is the answer? Vote. Got vote ASAP. Stand in line as long as you have to stand in line. The answer isn't to give up. We ALL must stand up and make our voices heard at the ballot box. Please don't get discouraged.

h/t @Carlos__Turcios ELECTION INTEGRITY: Dallas County's new Venezuelan Election Administrator says he is sorry for 'glitches' that caused hundreds of early voters to be turned away. Wait times exceeded two hours for the brave.

What is the answer? Go vote, vote, vote! Get everyone you know to vote. If there are going to be shenanigans this election we've got to overwhelm the Democrats with as many votes as possible. Don't get discouraged. Report issues so we can fix the system for next election - but the only answer today is to vote. PLEASE VOTE!

h/t @Carlos__Turcios

ELECTION INTEGRITY: It concerned me when the head of the postal workers union told his members that Trump would end democracy and fire them if they didn't stop him from taking office. We're now seeing ballots from Republican areas being thrown away. ELECTION INTEGRITY: Postal workers have been at the heart of various efforts to undermine the integrity of our elections. Here just a few examples:

- 2017 Democrat operatives bribed a Texas postal worker named Noe Olvera to give them the names and addresses of residents who received a mail-in ballot. He pled guilty.

- 2021 New Jersey postal worker named Nicholas Beauchene discarded 99 absentee ballots a month before the 2020 presidential election. He pled guilty.

- 2021 New York postal worker named Brandon Wilson was caught carrying undelivered absentee ballots in the trunk of his car by CBP while attempting to cross the border. He pled guilty.

- 2024 Tennessee postal worker named DuJuan Butler was caught on tape throwing away baskets of mail containing voter registrations, ballots, and other election related material. He's facing 5 years in prison and $250,000 fine.

- 2024 Four Puerto Rico postal workers were charged with delaying delivery of ballots to certain addresses during the 2022 special election.

The federal workers that are entrusted with delivering millions of ballots are being told by their leaders that Trump is a threat to democracy and that if they don't stop him he will become dictator.

It is unacceptable that the Postal Worker's union that represents 92% of America's letter carriers is able to use its influence and presence in 30,000+ post offices to spread this sort of dangerous misinformation to federal employees.

It is one thing for Union President Mark Dimondstein to endorse Kamala Harris and quite another to use his position to spread dangerous lies about the former president. This amounts to election interference and is likely resulting in thousands of letter carriers violating the Hatch Act.

If you were convinced that Hitl*r was coming to power in America what would you do to stop him? Would you throw away ballots from houses with Trump signs? Throw away ballots from houses with American flags (just in case)?

ELECTION INTEGRITY: What if I told you that anyone could go online and claim to be a citizen living overseas, get a ballot, and vote without ever having to prove your identity or citizenship? Sounds crazy, right? What if I told you federal law made it illegal for the state to attempt to verify your identity and citizenship? You don't even need to use your real name or even the name of a living person. Even crazier, right? Well that's exactly what the UOCAVA allows and requires.

The census estimates there are less than 3 million Americans living overseas, but the Democrats are telling donors to their Vote From Abroad Program that there are more than 9 million. So anyone with a computer can go to the FVAP website and fill out a few forms and be registered to vote and receive a ballot - you don't have to provide a real name or address and driver's license and last four of SSN are all optional (fun fact the state isn't allowed to confirm the last four of the SSN you provide matches the name or DoB you provided).

This is the case for all 50 states but I specifically confirmed this with the Texas Secretary of State. Of course, whoever fills out the registration and ballot will need to swear they are a citizen - but since we don't know the real name of the voter or anything about them there is little risk of getting caught.

The Democrats claim they are investing 'six figures' in getting out the overseas vote - a number that seems very low if they're interested in getting 9 million ballots. I can't help but wonder if that effort is cover to explain why they get so many overseas ballots in November. ELECTION INTEGRITY: The use of the UOCAVA voting loophole exploded between 2016 and 2020. Iowa saw a 2,244% increase in overseas ballots. Other significant increases in non-military overseas ballots include:

- Hawaii 358% increase
- Virginia 235% increase
- Texas 100% increase

Suspiciously, 2020 was the first year that more people voted from overseas than filed overseas tax returns.

Even more suspiciously, in 2020 (in jurisdictions that conducted hand counts of UOCAVA ballots) more than 74% of votes were for President Biden. In Fulton County, GA, remarkably, 100% of UOCAVA ballots were for Joe Biden.

The UOCAVA voting loophole allows anyone to make up a fake name, pretend they are living overseas, and vote as many times as they like. Federal law prohibits states from verifying identity and citizenship. These are untraceable ballots. If you thought 2020 was bad 2024 is going to be a bloodbath.

The Biden-Harris regime has lost control of the Army. They’re taking to TikTok exposing the incompetence of their leadership and the commander in chief. Meanwhile average people are using drones to fly baby formula into families the US Army can’t reach…

PROJECT 2025 🧵1/6 : Next time a Democrat brings up 'Project 2025,' remind them that the founder of the sponsor, the Heritage Foundation, started working to prevent President Trump’s re-election as far back as 2021. Here’s Rep. Marvin Edwards explaining why he left the GOP and how he plans to take it back—he’s a trustee of the Heritage Foundation - the group behind Project 2025.

Read through this short thread to uncover the truth behind the biggest propaganda push of the 2024 election—Project 2025. President Trump immediately disavowed the Heritage Foundation’s plan when he learned about it, recognizing it as a tool crafted by Democrats and Never Trumpers to undermine his campaign. PROJECT 2025 🧵2/6 : Democrats came out in full force at the DNC, pushing the false narrative that President Trump was behind Project 2025. The claim was so blatantly false that even CNN had to acknowledge the truth, confirming that the former president had no involvement with Project 2025 and had, in fact, emphatically disavowed it.

Check out this short thread to uncover the truth behind one of the biggest propaganda efforts of the 2024 election—Project 2025. When President Trump learned about the Heritage Foundation’s plan, he immediately disavowed it, seeing it as a scheme by Democrats and Never Trumpers to sabotage his campaign.

DEBATE🧵: I'll be including commentary and reaction to the vice presidential debate exclusively in this thread. DEBATE🧵: CBS pre-debate panel is warning Senator JD Vance NOT to bring up Tim Walz's stolen valor. I think this is a good reason for @JDVance to bring it up.

ELECTION INTERFERENCE: The Kamala Harris campaign has been receiving material support from Iran. The Islamic Republic has been providing the Harris campaign hacked information from the Trump campaign. The FBI, ODNI, and CISA has known about it it since June or July and failed to alert the Trump campaign - the Harris campaign kept the support secret as well. ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Trump campaign's comment on revelations that Iran is working with the Harris campaign.

WWIII: The Biden-Harris regime has decided to cross Russia's redline and allow long range missile attacks. These attacks could take place as soon as this weekend but I suspect they won't start until October. Why has the White House decided to take this risk just two months before the presidential election? Would a nuclear war help Kamala Harris in November? Would they be able to suspend the election? I'd love your thoughts on this. @RealAlexJones @ggreenwald @KanekoaTheGreat WWIII: You will know the long range missile strikes will begin as soon as Russia begins expelling diplomats. With UKs decision to allow Storm Shadow missiles to be used in Russia, Putin has responded by beginning expulsions. reuters.com/world/europe/r…

I never saw this. Democrats in New Orleans went door-to-door to seize firearms from law abiding citizens. Their excuse was the hurricane. Must Watch: Everyone who survived eventually got their guns back thanks to the NRA. Had they not sued Democrats were going to keep the seized firearms.

🧵1/3 The host of the ABC presidential debate, Dana Walden, is even more conflicted than the co-moderators. @realDonaldTrump really should bring this up publicly. Dana is a member of the Biden-Harris administration to start: 🧵2/3 The host of the ABC presidential debate, Dana Walden, is even more conflicted than the co-moderators. @realDonaldTrump really should bring this up publicly. Dana is best friends with Kamala Harris:

Throughout Kamala Harris's political career her biggest weakness was her sobriety according to those closest to her. In her first run for the presidency donors were especially reluctant to fund her campaign forcing her out of the race. According to various reports, Obama did NOT want to appoint her to be the Democrat nominee and he lobbied fellow Democrats for a week after Biden withdrew to pick someone else. Anyone who has watched videos of Kamala Harris at events over the past four years can recognize the telltale signs that she is often drunk and/or on mood altering medications. Should Democrats have taken more time to pick a candidate who doesn't struggle with alcoholism and addiction? Can we afford ANOTHER incapacitated president? Of course, Tim Walz is worse given his criminal record related to drunk driving... Reminder the media knew all about Kamala Harris's addition problem throughout Biden's term - they were all calling for her replacement in his second term.

Throughout President Biden’s first term, the mainstream media repeatedly questioned the fitness of Vice President Kamala Harris, casting doubt on her capability not only as the second-in-command but also as a potential successor to the presidency. The calls for Biden to select a new running mate for his second term were not mere whispers—they were headlines that dominated the news cycle.

Headlines Over the Years
"Kamala Harris Struggles to Define Role as Vice President Amid Criticism" – The New York Times, July 2021Just months into her tenure, Harris faced widespread criticism for her inability to establish herself as a strong and independent leader. The article highlighted her floundering performance and the lack of a clear role, leading many to question whether she was the right choice for such a crucial position.

"Biden's Border Czar Under Fire: Can Kamala Harris Handle the Immigration Crisis?" – CNN, October 2021As the border crisis escalated, Harris, who was tasked with handling the issue, failed to provide effective leadership. Her reluctance to visit the border and her ambiguous statements on immigration raised concerns about her competence in managing such a critical national issue.

"Kamala Harris’ Approval Ratings Plummet: What Does It Mean for 2024?" – ABC News, December 2022Harris’s approval ratings tanked, reaching record lows for a sitting vice president. The media began openly discussing whether Biden should consider replacing her on the 2024 ticket, citing her unpopularity as a potential liability for the Democratic Party.

"Democrats Quietly Question Harris’ Leadership: Is It Time for a Change?" – The Washington Post, March 2023Prominent Democrats, frustrated with Harris’s lackluster performance and dwindling influence, began voicing their concerns more openly. The article suggested that even within her own party, there was growing support for Biden to consider a different running mate for his reelection campaign.

"Kamala Harris Faces Backlash Over Foreign Policy Missteps" – Politico, June 2023Harris’s foreign policy gaffes, particularly during her trips to Europe and Asia, were widely covered and criticized. Her apparent lack of preparation and inability to articulate coherent positions on key issues fueled further speculation about her unsuitability for the vice presidency, let alone the presidency.

"Is Kamala Harris the Weakest Vice President in Modern History?" – The Atlantic, November 2023The Atlantic didn’t mince words in its scathing assessment of Harris’s term as vice president. The article detailed her numerous failures, from domestic policy to international diplomacy, and argued that Biden’s legacy could be at risk if he did not choose a more competent running mate for 2024.

Unfit for Office?

Kamala Harris’s time as vice president has been marked by a series of blunders, missteps, and a lack of decisive leadership. The mainstream media, usually an ally of the Democratic establishment, has not shied away from criticizing her, leading to widespread calls for her to be replaced on the 2024 ticket.
Her inability to effectively handle major issues such as the border crisis, her plummeting approval ratings, and her numerous foreign policy missteps have made it clear that she is not just unfit for the presidency but perhaps even for the vice presidency. With Biden’s age and declining health, the possibility of Harris stepping into the role of president is a scenario that should give every American pause. The media’s consistent scrutiny and criticism over the last four years highlight the growing consensus that Harris was a poor choice from the start, and that the country deserves better leadership moving forward.

h/t @rmlunn

TSA WEAPONIZATION🧵: Bombshell reporting by @tracybeanz and @wmahoney5 reveals that a TSA whistleblower informed @LaboscoSonya, Executive Director of the Air Marshal National Council, that Tulsi Gabbard is actively under surveillance via the TSA's Quiet Skies Program. TSA WEAPONIZATION🧵: If the TSA whistleblower's report is accurate and the Biden admin has weaponized the Quiet Skies Program against a former member of Congress and presidential candidate, the next question should be: Which other political enemies is the president monitoring?

🧵A declassified FBI document confirms longstanding suspicions of the agency's active involvement with Patriot Front for years. With 950 pages of details (heavily redacted), it’s evident that numerous federal assets are deeply embedded within the organization. Interestingly, the group's only documented criminal activity appears to be the illegal placement of posters on public and private property. I'll post links to the FBI's documents (again, not terribly interesting given the fact they've been heavily redacted). 🧵The FBI declassified two packages of documents on the suspected federal front group Patriot Front on Monday:



vault.fbi.gov/patriot-front/…
vault.fbi.gov/patriot-front/…