James Lindsay, anti-Communist Profile picture
Oct 6 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Have you seen Beneath Sheep's Clothing yet? You need to. It's available now. People are saying it's a huge eye-opener. I'm going to tell you some about it.
Beneath Sheep's Clothing is a film we made to solve a particular problem: namely that Communism (in a new form) isn't just coming to American and the West, but it's already here, but people are struggling to see it. Books, articles, podcasts are great. We needed a film.
The film is the product of the admirable @JulieABehling, who traveled to Russia just after the collapse of Soviet Union and then studied Russian history and literature in order to make sense of uncanny observations she was making even back in the 90s about the US.
@JulieABehling Julie noticed that many of the things she encountered talking to people in Russia about Soviet Union, especially with regard to the Soviet uses and abuses of religion, had unsettling parallels already over twenty years ago in the United States.
@JulieABehling Eventually, Julie wrote a book titled Beneath Sheep's Clothing about it and presented an early copy of the book to me when I spoke in Utah just outside of Salt Lake City. She wanted to expose these parallels between USSR and USA religion and education.
amzn.to/4eAsevw
@JulieABehling A few months later, after what seems to be some divine intervention, Julie told me there was going to be a documentary made based upon the book and asked me to participate. I was eager to help, and we got it set up so I could. The budget was a shoestring and a prayer, basically.
@JulieABehling One thing led to another, and eventually the film got some major backing from executive producer Cristhian Palacios, and the opportunity for the production quality went way up. It looked like another bit of intervention to get this message looking good and get it out there.
@JulieABehling The film is meant to tell the story of how a new brand of Communism, called "Woke" in the slang, has established itself in American and how it works here, drawing parallels to Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China and Mao Zedong. It's powerful.
This subject is unfortunately difficult, and without a show don't tell approach, it's hard to help people see what's really happening in our country. Beneath Sheep's Clothing was meant to solve that problem by showing people exactly what's happening with clear explanations.
@JulieABehling Whether it's the many nefarious ways our churches have been infiltrated by Woke (Left and Right) in order to build a one-world "transformative" religion, agendas in education like Social-Emotional Learning, raging identity politics, etc., lines draw back to Lenin and Mao.
@JulieABehling Beneath Sheep's Clothing tells this story powerfully, visually, and with a kicking soundtrack. Every single person I have talked to who has seen the film has said the same things, that it's powerful and eye-opening. It's getting people off the couch. It's moving the needle.
@JulieABehling I hope you'll check the film out. Watch it. Show it with your friends, at your church, in your organization, or at a big screen in town. America and all freedom-loving people need to see this film. And yes, I'm in it. A lot. So the sex appeal is way up.
beneathsheepsclothing.movie

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Lindsay, anti-Communist

James Lindsay, anti-Communist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConceptualJames

Oct 5
Given all the hate and excitement, I wasn't going to bother doing a thread tonight, but I'm procrastinating on real work I really don't want to do.

We need to talk about Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence or stupidity."
Hanlon's Razor is obviously a call to charity: it's a demand to think the best of people who are messing up. They're probably just ignorant, stupid, or incompetent. They're probably not intending to do bad things. Don't accuse them unnecessarily!
We should probably just put on the table where Hanlon's Razor comes from specifically before talking about where it comes from philosophically. It originates from a joke book, namely Murphy's Law, Book 2. You might want to keep that in mind when someone invokes it.
Read 27 tweets
Oct 3
I am once again telling you Auron McIntyre is a propagandist and a fraud. His strawman is transparently stupid (he can't organize a sock drawer and is just a dipshit pawn), and he's deflecting from a real globalist agenda he doesn't want you to know about.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Regions in this stepping-stone plan are devised to cross borders and have some other features in common. They're to gain relevance over time, politically and economically, until the existing borders and laws are a burden. National sovereignty gets nullified as regions grow.
Ignorant turd or lying shit Auron doesn't want you to understand what's really happening because he's part of the program pushing for it, although he's probably too stupid and high on his own supply to know he's a patsy. Paid pretty well, though. Big platform. Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 2
Regarding the "Woke Right," it is also structured like the Woke Left or any other cult. It's a little more complicated because the Woke Right contains many factions, and one of them has not yet won out (the most intolerant will eventually win), but the basic structure is there.
The basic structure of cults is like three rings, where each ring might be divided up into levels. In the center, there's an "Inner Circle" who knows what's going on and uses the cult. Beyond, there are an "Inner School" and "Outer School" of members.
newdiscourses.com/2023/05/struct…
This structure is pretty clearly delineated in Wokeness, in which a single faction (Intersectional Maoism) took over. It's even clearer in secret societies like Freemasonry in which it is made explicit (1-11; 12-31; 32-33). It's diffuse on the Woke Right.
newdiscourses.com/2023/03/wokene…
Read 33 tweets
Oct 1
Another little something you're not ready to hear.

What is the Woke Right?

There's a growing movement that is reaching breakout velocity on the "Right" that is ostensibly ultra-conservative ("far right") but that shares much more in common with the Woke Left than conservatives.
To explain the Woke Right, we have to start by explaining Woke, which is still poorly understood and does not, in fact, mean "Leftist."

Woke Leftists believe they have woken up to a particular view of reality constructed by power so that it is hidden from view (occult) by power.
More specifically, they believe that entrenched structural power dynamics contour our experience and explanations of reality, preventing us from learning the hidden truth about reality that would liberate us from oppression by the ruling powers, which alienate us from ourselves.
Read 52 tweets
Oct 1
What this suggests when expanded to the level of states or nations generally recognized as free is that the fly in the soup of Liberal Republics is not some baked-in metaphysical failure or being early-stage Communism but an inability to resolve the Paradox of Tolerance.
The Paradox of Tolerance is the observation (attributed to Karl Popper) that if an entity is tolerant of intolerance it will eventually be overcome by intolerance, but if it is not, then it isn't tolerant in the first place. So, it's a question on the limits to Liberal tolerance.
We generally want to live in tolerant societies and also recognize that there must be limits to tolerance ("Liberation" is genuinely a tragedy), but those limits cannot be so severe as to create an authoritarian or fascist or repressive arrangement. It's a hard question.
Read 15 tweets
Oct 1
Conquest's Second Law, which is O'Sullivan's First Law likely misattributed to Robert Conquest, is famous but incorrect: "Any organization that is not explicitly right wing will become left wing over time." It's not exactly wrong so much as it is corollary to a more general rule.
Conquest (or O'Sullivan) are actually right in practice. Any organization that isn't explicitly right-wing will become left-wing over time. The thing is, this political formulation obscures all understanding of the dynamic causing the trend left, which isn't inexorable or unique.
The right general formulation for Conquest's Second Law would be a Law of Intolerant Factions:

"Given enough time, any organization will eventually be conquered from within by the most intolerant faction it tolerates."

This locates (radical) intolerance as the cause of drift.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(