You've probably seen this image, or some version of it. (thread)
The image is created by and for western sympathizers with Palestinian violence. The slogan after all is written in English. (2/x)
The people who display the poster do not intend to participate in the violence themselves. They live in western countries with effective police. Violence, in their imagination, is work for poor Third World people to do for their entertainment. (3/x)
Violence is entertaining, however, only when sanitized. The gunman in the image is not fighting. He is posing. He is not aiming the rifle at a target. Aiming requires two hands. He needs one of his to flash Churchill's V for victory (English, again!) at the photographer. (4/x)
If that photogenic masked Palestinian gunman dared make an actual in-person appearance on the Gaza battlefield against Israel's defense forces, he would get very, very dead, very, very fast. (5/x)
The uselessness of the gunman's posing raises a question about the slogan around him. Is terrorist violence in fact a "necessary means"? If so - follow-up question - to what end is terrorism the necessary means? (6/x)
The iconography of the poster-the scarf, the color scheme - evokes Palestinian nationalism. Presumably the "end" to which the gun is the "necessary means" is Palestinian aspiration. (7/x)
Palestinian Arabs have often tested the promise in the poster. They have sought to achieve aspirations by violence again and again since the anti-Jewish Hebron pogrom of 1929. Not once has the promise come true. How can something be "necessary" when it never works? (8/x)
The violence celebrated by today's poster-carriers is the mass murder/rape/infanticide/abduction of October 7, 2023. However enthralling that experience felt to anti-Israeli onlookers at the time, it has led to utter destruction for the perpetrators and their community. (9/x)
Palestinian gains, when they have been achieved, have been achieved by diplomacy under US authority. If you want an accurate image for your "By Any Means Necessary" poster, it's this. (10/x)
Or this. (11/x)
Or - if you're truly a Palestinian determined to make any sacrifice for your people, however distasteful - even this (12/x)
That's the way, and the only way. The image below is just play-acting in front of a mirror and a selfie-cam. (13/x)
If you seek a peaceful and prosperous national existence for Palestinian people, cooperation with Israel under US protection is the only way. But of course, that's not the "end" that the poster carriers have in mind for their "necessary means." (14/x)
For them, violence is the end - violence as ideology, violence as redemption. Middle Easterners do the killing, Middle Easterners do the dying, Westerners get the show, Westerners get the thrill. In English. For Instagram. (15/x)
When the current spasm of violence subsides, Israel will emerge stronger than ever. Palestinian self-rule will recede further away than ever, because Palestinians will have deprived themselves of the truly requisite "necessary means": Israeli trust and American support. (16/x)
The people who carry the "any means necessary" posters won't care. They've had their fun. They'll soon shift to their next cause - or no cause at all, meditation maybe. They're not sleeping in tents where homes used to stand. (17/x)
But if you actually do care, send this message to the people of Gaza, the West Bank, South Lebanon, etc.: lay down your arms. Your wars against Israel have failed. Make peace. Accept cooperation. By any means necessary. END.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Co-chair of Reagan campaign in Florida 1980
Chair of the Florida GOP during Bush-Gore race 2000
Chair of the American Conservative Union during Romney-Obama race 2012.
Kamala Harris voter 2024.
They're not all public, but you could fill a substantial hall with "Former Republican cabinet secretaries, sub-cabinet officials, ambassadors, governors, senators, and wives and children of past Republican presidential nominees for Harris-Walz."
On the other hand, Trump did pick up the coveted Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr endorsements.
Right-wing influencers like @mayemusk proclaim that illegal voting is safe and easy. Gullible Republicans believe them, commit crimes, and get caught and sentenced to prison. washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/04…
Right-wing influencers like @mayemusk proclaim that illegal voting is safe and easy. Gullible Republicans believe them, commit crimes, and get caught and punished (example 2). nbcnews.com/politics/polit…
@mayemusk Right-wing influencers proclaim that illegal voting is safe and easy. Gullible Republicans believe them, commit crimes, and get caught. (Example 3) reuters.com/world/us/repub…
Trump tonight: "I haven't been treated right .... If I don't win this election ... the Jewish people would have a lot to do with the loss."
I don't think of Trump as an antisemite, exactly. He stereotypes Jews, but he is not especially hostile to Jews. But he is tonight offering a "stab in the back" legend that will resonate powerfully with the next generation of MAGA that is more self-consciously antisemitic.
The next generation of MAGA pulses with antisemitic conspiracy theories and Nazi apologetics. Trump tonight invited them to regard his likely defeat in November as the work of the Jews. MAGA world has not many inhibitions against accepting that invitation.
The upsetting things said by Trump and Vance are not true.
The upsetting things said about Trump and Vance are true.
Trump really did mount a violent coup against the Constitution. He and his relatives really did take bribes in office, including from foreign governments. He really was helped into power by Russian espionage agencies. He really did steal secret documents from the US government after his election defeat. And Vance really did, and by his own admission, intentionally "create stories" for political advantage that put residents of his state at risk of physical harm.
When a group of right-wing extremists were arrested for plotting to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer during the COVID pandemic, then-President Trump shrugged it off. "Maybe it was a problem, maybe it wasn't."
When a Republican candidate for governor of Montana assaulted a reporter who asked a question he didn't like, Trump praised the candidate: ""Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type!" axios.com/2018/10/19/tru…
Trump and his running mate have spent the past week successfully inciting violence in Springfield, Ohio. Today they want to present themselves as near-victims of violence - in this case, of violence completely unrelated to themselves and at a very safe distance from themselves.
Everybody remembers Ronald Reagan's famous question from the 1980 presidential debate, "Are you better off than you were four years ago?" But have you recently watched the whole 60 seconds? A link follows ...
Notice the simplicity and dignity of the language. Notice the temperateness of the mood. Notice that he "suggests" - not demands - the viewer's vote. Notice the respect for the voter's ultimate right of decision.
Reagan's greatest vulnerability in 1980 was the perception of him as intemperate. That's the fear that finished Goldwater in 1964: "in your guts, you know he's nuts." Reagan refuted the fear by consistently speaking temperately.