Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Oct 8, 2024 10 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Elon Musk Drops Epstein Bombshell in Jaw-Dropping Tucker Carlson Interview

You won’t believe who he named.

🧵 THREAD Image
In an “off-the-cuff” conversation with Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk wasted no time going straight into politics and the 2024 election.

He broke his silence on his deleted tweet about Kamala Harris, explaining that nobody even bothers trying to assassinate Kamala Harris because she's just another "puppet" of the "machine."

“Nobody tries to assassinate a puppet,” Musk said.

“She's safe,” he continued. “Like, they tried to kill Trump twice with actual guns and bullets.”

Musk went on to explain that Trump inherently has the "constitution of an ox,” even though he doesn't work out and consumes “cheeseburgers and Diet Coke and stuff.”

“I think he [Trump] just inherently has a strong constitution,” Musk said, adding that he is of “sound mind and body and strong backbone” after two assassination attempts.
The conversation shifted to Musk explaining how it’s “pretty fun” to be “all in” on Donald Trump, even if the downsides of that choice come with some dire consequences.

These remarks came after Musk trashed Kamala Harris, marveling at how “amazing” it was that he spoke at Trump’s rally without a teleprompter.

“Wow. Amazing. I can talk without a teleprompter. That's crazy,” he mocked.

Musk laughed that he is “all in the deep end [on Trump],” acknowledging that “in the hopefully unlikely event that he loses, there may be some vengeance on me.”
Musk then raised a shocking and disturbing revelation that there has been a 700% surge in illegal immigration to some key swing states over the past 3 years, saying that this election is the "last election" if Democrats win.

Why does he say that?

Because “these swing state margins are sometimes 10, 20 thousand votes. So what happens if you put hundreds of thousands of people into each swing state?" Musk asked.

“When somebody is granted asylum, they are fast-tracked. They can get a green card, and then five years after the green card, they can get citizenship, and they can fully legally vote. And when they do so, they vote overwhelmingly Democrat,” Musk explained.

By 2028, every swing state will have turned blue, leaving America under a permanent Dem supermajority.

That's why Musk calls this the "last election" if Kamala wins.
Without skipping a beat, Musk turned his attention to what few billionaires would dare talk about—election fraud and voter IDs.

Without one single stutter, Musk declared, “The purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections.”

“The same people that demanded vaccine IDs if you want to travel or do anything are the same ones who say no voter ID is required,” he added.

Musk pointed out how it is “literally impossible” to prove fraud if no voter ID is required, saying it enables “large-scale fraud.”

“So, yeah, the purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections, obviously. There can be no other explanation,” Musk concluded.
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one. Image
The bombshell dropped when Musk suggested that Bill Gates, Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman, and other billionaires are “terrified” of a Trump victory because if he wins, the Epstein client list is coming out.

Musk said this after declaring that there is a “strong overlap” between Kamala's top 100 puppet masters and the Epstein client list.

Musk called it “mind-blowing” that hundreds of January 6th protesters have been sentenced to prison, yet there’s been no action to prosecute the “worst offender on the Epstein client list.” “That’s insane!” he emphasized.

“I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome,” Musk said.
In another striking moment, Musk entered the vaccine debate, saying, “We shouldn't force people to take vaccines,” adding, “I believe in freedom.”

Musk explained that he's not “anti-vax” and that he believes vaccines have done a lot of good, but he also believes that the “quality control on vaccines” should be “incredibly good if we're giving them to children and whatnot.”
In the final moments of the interview, Musk said he's going to need to beef up his security team if the Trump administration starts slashing federal agencies.

“I'll probably need, if this happens, quite a significant security team because someone might literally go postal on me,” he warned.

Musk pointed out the staggering number of over 440 federal agencies in the US government, suggesting it could easily be cut down to 99 without major consequences.

He recounted his own experience at X, where he slashed 80% of the staff and “actually improved the features and functionality of the site more in the past year and a half than the last eight years.”
Thanks for reading! If you found this post helpful, please do me a favor and follow this page before you go.

To hear everything Elon Musk had to say, check out the video below for his full conversation with Tucker Carlson.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

Dec 6
In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.

Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.

“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.

In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come to [him], and they’d bring [him] video tapes of their [formerly healthy] children. And they’re all about the age of [Scarborough’s] son or younger. Something happened in 1989!”

Twenty years later, it’s hard to ignore that the mainstream media never airs segments like this anymore.

Did the evidence change... or something else? 🧵
Most people have absolutely no idea how much public-relations machinery shapes what they believe about health.

PR campaigns don’t just change opinions, they change language in the process.

And when language changes, memories and ideas seem to disappear—including things we used to openly acknowledge, like vaccine-induced brain inflammation and neurological injury.

Today, those concepts barely exist in public vocabulary, but just decades ago they were recognized everywhere.

The shift happens slowly. That’s how the tactic is so successful. Most people don’t even realize it’s happening.

For example, take a look at this 1983 debate that took place on the largest talk show in America. A conversation like this would never, ever happen on TV today.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-vaccine-…
Read 18 tweets
Dec 5
A long-awaited vaccine reversal has just sent shockwaves through the US medical establishment after 34 long years.

ACIP just voted 8–3 to end the universal Hepatitis B birth-dose recommendation.

For the first time since 1991, parents (not a blanket federal recommendation) will decide whether their newborn receives this shot in the first hours or days of life.

Here are the three voting members who still insist every child needs a hepatitis B shot at birth. Remember their names. 🧵Image
Voting YES to end the universal mandate: Retsef Levi and seven other members.

Voting NO: Dr. H. Cody Meissner, Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, and Dr. Raymond Pollak.

Two of the three issued grave warnings, insisting the decision to end the universal hepatitis B recommendation will “cause harm” and that the panel will have to “accept this responsibility when this harm is caused.”

Video: @Holden_Culotta
The decision to end the universal hepatitis B vaccination recommendation is a huge deal because the three-shot series is required for public school attendance in nearly every state, and most states base their mandates directly on ACIP recommendations.

Today’s decision instantly places the decades-old school requirement on unstable ground.Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 4
The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public school in virtually every state.

Hepatitis B is transmitted through needles or sexual contact, so why is this vaccine pushed on babies their first day of life?

Doctors don’t have a valid answer. If you ask them why your child needs the Hep B shot on the first day of life, they give you the lame excuse that there could be a hepatitis B-infected needle on the playground.

Mothers are tested for Hep B beforehand, so the disease poses no risk to the baby, as long as the mother is negative. However, the US still recommends that every child be injected on the first day of life.

Make it make sense.

Many questions about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been raised by figures such as Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Casey Means, and countless concerned parents.

But one CDC contractor, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, walked into the ACIP meeting and raised another critical question: has universal Hepatitis B vaccination, after 34 long years, even lowered Hepatitis B cases on a population level?

Dr. Nevison’s answer to that question might surprise you. 🧵
The first slide Dr. Nevison presented showed acute Hepatitis B cases over time.

At first glance, it looks like universal vaccination in 1991 is the reason for the downtrend, but if you look closer, you’ll notice that acute Hepatitis B cases were already falling sharply compared to when they peaked in 1985.Image
Moreover, if you look at the 20–24 (light blue) and 15–19 (orange) age groups, you’ll notice that the rates of acute hepatitis B were falling long before the vaccination could ever be given credit, because the vaccine would not have an impact on 20–24-year-olds until around 2011–2012, or until 2006–2007 for 15–19-year-olds, Dr. Nevison noted.Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 3
Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China?

It sounds far too dark, but it’s true.

Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time.

But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner.

China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story.

And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America?

This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵
Most people think organ donation is a simple act of generosity. Check the box. Save a life. End of story.

But behind the scenes, a series of federal investigations has exposed something far more disturbing. And there’s no generosity in sight.

The system meant to protect those barely clinging to life is failing—and in some cases, it’s a catastrophic failure.

Take Jenny’s story for example. Jenny was declared brain dead when she wasn’t at all. Terrifyingly, she was stuck inside her body, fully aware of everything that was happening—and being said—around her.

Including a doctor telling med students that her husband was “unreasonable” for not signing her organs—and her life—away.

Thankfully he didn’t or Jenny wouldn’t be here today to share her story.

What is brain death? There is no standard.

The ethical line between life and death is not where you think it is.
Modern medicine has slowly reshaped how we think—and feel—about death.

Tools like CPR, ventilators, and organ transplantation have created the belief that death is negotiable—something to be delayed, managed, or “conquered.”

That belief built enormous trust. And with that trust came enormous profit.

Organ transplants can cost a staggering $446,000–$1.9 million each. In the US, healthcare now consumes 17.6% of the economy.

Where scarcity meets profit, exploitation always follows.

Always.Image
Read 27 tweets
Dec 2
The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states.

Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life.

Why?

We finally have some answers.

Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵
For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question:

Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn?

The truth reveals a story of shaky science, ignored safety signals, and hidden agendas.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…
@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years.

But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird.

Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.
Read 28 tweets
Dec 1
How many times have you heard someone say: “I got the flu shot, and I still got the flu anyway”?

Bill Maher says he once got the flu shot and “immediately” came down with the flu.

Lara Trump’s mother had an even worse experience. As a nurse, she got the flu shot every year—and “every time [she’d] ever gotten it, [she’d] get the flu immediately after it.”

Now, she doesn’t get it anymore.

Why do so many people get sick after the flu shot?

This thread explores why that happens—and what really happens inside the body right after a vaccine. 🧵
For decades, vaccines have been marketed as “safe and effective.”

No questions. Nothing else to consider. Safe and effective. Full stop.

But a mountain of buried medical research and endless reports from the vaccine-injured show a very different pattern—one that has repeated for more than a century.

In disease after disease, across multiple countries and multiple eras, vaccines have a weird habit of triggering or worsening the very illnesses they are supposed to be preventing.

Strange.

This occurrence isn’t fringe. It’s documented, replicated, and historically well known.

But millions of people—doctors, teachers, parents, friends—pretend it isn’t.

And even when they do offer a protective effect for some disease, they can leave your immune system weakened and vulnerable to other infections that can end up killing you. Just look at what happened in Guinea-Bissau.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vacci…
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(