The biggest problem with decolonization is that Decolonization is the Glorification of Entropy
Entropy is the Enemy of Civilization, so Glorifying It Means Things Will Only Decay and Deteriorate
Southern Africa shows this quite well, but it's happening in America too🧵👇
The obvious example of this is the clip from "Empire of Dust" I used yesterday; decolonization, or the destruction of European governance and the handing of power to non-white "oppressed" groups has been tried
Take the Belgian Congo. It was a jewel of Subsaharan Africa under Belgian rule, and quite prosperous
Particularly, the resource-rich region of Katanga was heavily invested in and quite prosperous
So, when the Belgians announced in 1960 that they would be leaving, the Katangese tried breaking away from the Congo because they, the native Africans of Katanga, wanted the Belgians to stay
They wanted white businesses, white soldiers, white police, white administrators, and so on. They saw those men as being good at governance, just, and competent, and so wanted them to stick around after "independence". That's why they brought in Mike Hoare to help them fight for independence
But Katanga's demand for independence and a continued European presence was deemed unacceptable by the pro-decolonization West
So, in the name of "independence" from the supposedly evil colonial overlords, the UN was sent in to stop Katanga from breaking away
The result was that, remaining part of the Congo, the Katangese have forever suffered and shared in the same evils as the rest of the country. The Simba Rebellion, the years of civil war and murderous anarchy, the famine, etc. All of it could have been avoided had Katanga been allowed to break away and keep a European presence intact
Instead it got crushed by the UN, got its full share of "decolonization," and has forever suffered because of it and the entropy that decolonization brought
Now, the Congo has the state of things seen in Empire of Dust: rooting infrastructure that was never repaired or replaced, a population hostile to the idea of maintenance and learning, and an utter state of disorder that's closer to the Congo Livingstone and Stanley found that the Belgian Congo of the 50s
Why? Why did it end so poorly? Entropy
Decolonization is essentially the removal of European-enforced order and the replacement of it with absolutely nothing anything effective, or, in other words, the destruction of order and the resultant creation of disorder
That's entropy. Entropy is, very loosely defined, a state of disorder toward which everything naturally drifts
It is unpaid mercenaries fighting starving, drunk rebels over villages that no longer exist and cities full of more trash than living people, forever
And that is what "decolonization" praises
It sees order as an unnatural state, which it is, as it requires much work, from Singapore-style policing to constant maintenance of machinery, to create and keep
As the anti-colonial movement glorifies being in a state of nature, it is therefore hostile to anything done to bring about order, as entropy is the "natural" state of things
That is as true with their hatred of things like dams for being "unnatural" as it is of their hatred of policing for being "cruel"
So they want to blow up the dams, hug the trees, and defund the police
That leads to CHAZ/CHOP. Remember that? When anti-Western lefties took over the Capitol Hill zone of Seattle, ushered out the police, and created...anarchy (the entropic version of crime and justice) that resulted in mayhem and murder
It was pretty much a six-block version of Johannesburg, and ended up being exactly like Johannesburg, a land ruled by entropy as applied to daily life, anarchy and chaos
But it's not just crime. While that situation, the anarchy present everywhere from London to LA, is the obvious result of the decolonization of the Great Powers, it crops up in other areas of life as well
Take property. Property rights are not a natural thing. The state of being to which everything reverts when entropy isn't fought is the law of the jungle; one can do what one wants and take what one wants so long as one is strong enough
Property rights, on the other hand, are the root of civilization, and the concept of "ownership" means that violence doesn't transfer the right to real estate or personalty. Even if it is in a different set of hands rather than the rightful ones, that doesn't mean the rightful ones lose their claim to it
Now that is under attack because "decolonization" means the weak, or in this case propertyless, are seen as always right and in need of help, meaning property rights will be stripped away - such as by giving squatters more rights than property owners
That is not natural. The Vikings pillaging a monastery and taking everything is "natural," and is the state to which things revert when civilization is yanked away
The Congo is another great example. What did the natives do as soon as Belgian rule was yanked away and replaced by nothing? Entropy set in and the Simbas raided the Convents and Monasteries, killing, torturing, and otherwise abusing the nuns and monks while stealing and abusing the populations they crossed, particularly the Belgians
That is what decolonization is. It is entropy. It is the absence of order that spirals into ever greater disorder
And at some point you end up as Johannesburg, a city covered in filth, full of decaying buildings, and overrun with crime; it's Mad Max with more trash and murder as thugs smash the road with pickaxes so they can rob trucks
So, when the usual suspects rant about "decolonization," that is what they are praising. That is to where decolonization always leads, as it is a war upon order
Take, for example, these pictures of a street in Johannesburg. On one hand, it is entropy, the absence of order (maintenance) leading to decay. On the other, it is evident in America. What are the shantytowns of California, the homeless encampments of the Bay area, the decaying neighborhoods of Baltimore and Detroit, but Johannesburg with more drugs?
Civilization is not easy to create or maintain. It requires work, it requires hard hearts, it requires ruthless maintenance and everything that brings
Decolonization not only picks away at all that but smashes it in the name of "equity," thus not only introducing entropy to the civilizational system but praising it for eating away at the pillars of civilization
Thus, it's easy to see to where this leads
Entropy will destroy everything we hold dear. From a house that is "yours" to the ability to take your kids for a walk in the park, none of that is possible in a state of nature, a state of entropy, the absence of order
Only chaos is!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NYC's communist is quoting Nelson Mandela, a communist terrorist known for murdering white civilians
As a reminder: Nelson Mandela was not a kindly leader as presented in Invictus. He did not want peace; he explicitly rejected it
A short 🧵on Mandela's terror campaign👇
For one, Mandela was in prison because he created a civilian-bombing terror group called "Spear of the Nation," and premised it on the success of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara in Cuba
He then carried out dozens of bombings on civilian farms and infrastructure
MK was backed by the Soviet Union, co-led by a Lithuanian communist named Joe Slovo, and the Mandela-era leadership was convicted of trying to violently overthrow the state
This was after Mandela convinced the ANC, in the '50s, to request arms and support from the People's Republic of China
Once in prison, Mandela refused to renounce violence
In fact, the South African government offered to release him from prison if he would simply pledge to not engage in terrorism anymore. He refused
He then smuggled messages to MK's new leadership through his murderous wife Winnie, and those messages helped them plan their attacks and tactics in the terror bombing campaign of the '70s and '80s, which led to hundreds of white civilians killed and thousands wounded
*I typed this incorrectly. It was this percentage per generation, not per year. However, the same study estimates that around the same percentage died at the scene of the crime, in some form or another, or while awaiting trial, which would boost it to 1-2% per generation
So yes, not per year, per generation. Still a lot of people and enough for a eugenic effect over time
All you think you know about King Leopold II and the Belgian Congo is wrong
You were told it was a hellish land of cruel exploitation. That's a lie
In reality, Congo was a colonial jewel, the atrocities didn't occur, and the Belgian years were the only good rule it's had🧵👇
First, it's important to note what state of things existed in what became the Belgian Congo before King Leopold II became its ruler
That tale is best told by Henry Stanley in his book, How I Found Livingstone, his tale of searching for Dr. Livingstone in the heart of Darkness
In it, he describes hell on a grand scale. Arab slavers from Zanzibar pillaged the anarchic territory, taking gangs of fettered slaves back with them to be castrated and sold to the Arab slave market
The interior, when not being raided by Arabs, was in a state of horrid chaos. Random violence, cannibals, the ever-present threat of famine, and all the rest we think of when we think of pre-colonial Africa is what life was like in the Congo. Rotting vegetation, insect-infested huts, farms barely maintaining subsistence, and tribes raiding each other and explorers were the basic aspects of life in the pre-Belgian world
In short, life before the Belgians was like life in the Stone Age: nasty, brutish, and short, with the only law being the law of the jungle
Stanley and Livingstone did much to expose this state of things, and it was the greedy, exploitative traders who followed in their wake, before Leopold and the Belgians, that are recorded by Conrad in his The Heart of Darkness
It was about a decade and a half later that, during the Berlin Conference, King Leopold II was granted control of the area now knows as the Democratic Republic of the Congo
He controlled it through the Congo Free State, a private attempt he founded and fully owned, with the goal of colonizing and bring order to the anarchic territory
To do so, he started sending to the state Belgian officers and administrators. They, along with a bevy of monks, nuns, and traders, were the ones who set out to turn the anarchic Congo into a well-administered area that turned from animist paganism to Christianity while becoming prosperous and stable
The military/police arm of that rule was the Force Publique, which was mainly officered by Belgians but otherwise consisted of natives allied with the Congo Free State. They protected the nuns, protected the traders, kept out the Arab slavers from Zanzibar, and generally tried to first impose and then maintain order
South Africa is back in the news because of its anarcho-tyranny and Mugabe-style land expropriation
Missed is that this is Mandela's vision
The ANC's "National Democratic Revolution" concept—using liberalism to establish communism—is going exactly as he planned & hoped for🧵👇
"National Democratic Revolution" (NDR), is originally a Soviet concept that was adopted and built upon by the South African communists, particularly the ruling ANC regime, to suit their unique situation and goal
Their goal, as one might expect of an anti-colonial communist group, is race communism of the sort seen in Zimbabwe under Mugabe
Their unique situation, however, was that they had the world's sympathy and were expected to create the "Rainbow Nation" rather than just another nominally democratic hellhole
Hence, the NDR concept. By slowly boiling the frog, they could use the slogans and methods of liberalism to first establish socialism, and then, from ther,e move to communism
It's that final step we're seeing now, and they might not have boiled the frog slowly enough, as they're getting more resistance than was expected
Still, it's gotten them this far, so it's worth reviewing
The American left is embracing race communism of the sort that destroyed South Africa + Rhodesia
Here, e.g., the Chicago mayor admits to anti-white racism in permitting: “Every dime [blacks] were robbed of, I’ll make sure is returned two- or threefold”
Here's what's coming🧵👇
Mayor Johnson's spewed absurdities are, essentially, the same inane nonsense the African communists pushed before destroying their countries
In South Africa, Mandela's ANC has long insisted that the white farmers "stole" the land from blacks, and thus it needs to be "returned" to them
Much the same was true of Mugabe's thuggery in Zimbabwe, where he and his cronies insisted that "land reform" (farmland expropriation) was a necessity because the white farmers had "stolen" the land when they founded Rhodesia
In every case, it was absurd: the supposed "thieves" built everything that existed, they didn't steal it
South Africa is a great example. When the progenitors of the Afrikaners arrived in 1654, they found a nearly uninhabited land, and those few Khoisan there were roving pastoralists who had settled nothing. The Afrikaners then built South Africa from the ground up, turning an untamed wilderness into a thriving colony with hugely successful farms. They gradually marched to the north and west, settling the land as they went and eventually finding the Xhosa and Zulu, both of whom arrived in what's now South Africa from the north well after the Afrikaners did. Once again, it was the Afrikaners who built civilization, with their labor and hands, in that mostly untamed land. Over the mid-19th to mid-20th century, Anglo settlers and capital poured in as well, helping build civilization where none had formerly existed in South Africa
Rhodesia was much the same thing. The British South Africa Company did, admittedly, find the Matabele and Shona in what became Rhodesia when settling the territory began. But agriculture was limited. No cities, roads, railroads, or the like existed. Populations were limited and sparse. Anglos then poured in and settled it, turning veldt into farms, building cities on open land, and gradually raising civilization on land where little formerly existed. Further, what land the BSAC obtained, the land on which civilization was built, was bought from the Matabele, not "stolen."
Well, here's what prominent SA politicians say: "We will k*ll white women, we will k*ll white children, and we will even k*ll your pets"
Importantly, this violence is part of Mandela's legacy and happened because of American policy 🧵👇
This should be quite clear as the Afrikaner refugee situation heats up
For example, an ANC (Mandela's party, long aided by the Soviets) hack calling himself "Staling" released this statement about Trump's refugee program and demanded the Afrikaners stay so that they can face "accountability" for "historic privilege"
What does "accountablity" mean in this situation?
It means he wants them to be slain in some of the sickest, most horrific ways imaginable
This is what the farm murders and home invasions across South Africa are: aided by the government (the military, for example, provides them with signal jammers), thugs r*pe, m*rder, and k!ll Boers in their homes
The farm attacks are almost always black on white, almost always involve sexual assault, and frequently involve murder. The same is true of home invasions in urban zones, what few are left in the years after Mandela