🧵1/Ω
A thread about the recent connection of what WSJ calls “the shadow dollar that’s fueling the financial underworld” and the Trump campaign (basically a 🧵 version of my pinned tweet).

Ω👇Ω
🧵2/Ω
Some background: there’s a NYC based financial firm called Cantor Fitzgerald whose CEO is a man named Howard Lutnick. Lutnick became somewhat infamous in the aftermath of 9/11 for cutting off payments to the many Cantor employees who died in the World Trade Center. Image
🧵3/Ω
Lutnick has two roles that matter for the purposes of this 🧵. The first is he was recently made the co-chair of the Trump transition team, meaning if Trump wins Lutnick will be choosing who will run things like the Dept. of Justice, Defense, etc.
thehill.com/homenews/campa…
🧵4/Ω
The second is that Lutnick recently came out publicly as the man who manages "many" of the assets of "the shadow dollar that’s fueling the financial underworld" that I mentioned in the first tweet, a company called Tether. He's also just generally a crypto bro.
🧵5/Ω
What is Tether? It's a "stablecoin" in the parlance of the bros.

- Tether issues a token "USDT"
- Each USDT is worth $1

If that term is unfamiliar envision an enormous bank account shared by every kind of criminal the world over (and some, I'm sure, who are good people).
🧵6/Ω
Think organized crime groups of many and varied ethnicities, drug cartels, terrorists, rogue nuclear states, money launderers, offshore casino operators, and so on (and some, I'm sure, who are good people), all sharing a bank account. Image
Image
Image
🧵7/Ω
With that giant bank account in mind:

1) Tether is the accounting system that enables this cast of supervillains (and some, i'm sure, who are good people) to share the bank account. Keeps track of who owns what.

2) Howard Lutnick’s company Cantor Fitzgerald is the bank.
🧵8/Ω
How big is that bank account? Theoretically ~$120bn, meaning it's one of the largest pools of capital on the planet other than things like the Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund.
🧵9/Ω
(At least, theoretically. Tether has never been audited so no one knows whether all this money exists. All we have to go on is what Tether and Lutnicks say.

Lutnick has not to my knowledge ever said he's seen "all" Tether's assets, only "many" of them, as he does here:
🧵10/Ω
This video of storied fund manager Hugh Hendry discussing Tether at a bitcoin event is a good approximation of how many competent financial professionals view Tether.
🧵11/Ω
We're not going to relitigate Tether's solvency here. I will just note the only time said solvency has been litigated Tether was found to be lying about its assets. Most of Tether's money had been seized from a drug cartel bank.
ag.ny.gov/press-release/…
🧵12/Ω
Let's assume Tether has the money and it's at Cantor.

As I said Tether's USDT token is roughly the accounting system of a shared bank account. It's not the best accounting system for many reasons but it kind of works. Image
🧵13/Ω
(Now might be a good time to mention that USDT tokens have literally none of the "decentralized" and "immutable" features bros love to harp on about. Tether can, on the whims of two people, seize anyone's tokens at any time. But I digress.)
🧵14/Ω
A roughly equivalent way of thinking about Tether's shared bank account + accounting system is that it's a bunch of little bank accounts.

In fact that's exactly how Tether wants you to think about it w/constant refrains of "banking the unbanked". Image
🧵15/Ω
Let's look at a specific case of how that plays out. "Tradfi" companies like banks and EMTs are barred from providing services to Iranians bc of longstanding sanctions.

Mysteriously however it is actively advertised that Iranians freely use Tether.
🧵16/Ω
Those Iranians are widely rumored to include the Iranian Revolutionary Guard who are in turn rumored to use Tether as a way to distribute US dollar equivalents to groups like Hezbollah. But it doesn't really matter; US sanctions on Iran are wide ranging. It's all bad.
🧵17/Ω
Putting aside for a moment the fact that this means Lutnick, who seems to be an ardent zionist, is more or less "banking the unbankable" Iranians just as Israel and Iran are on the verge of all out war, you may be wondering "how does that work?"
🧵18/Ω
A "tradfi" banker who opened bank accounts for Iranians could be sent to prison (and probably would be if it came out there was IRGC involvement). Even if that banker didn't know!

There is a heavy burden on financial companies to "know their customers" ("KYC").
🧵19/Ω
So how does Tether get away with letting Iranians buy USDT tokens? Here's the theory:

1) Tether only has ~300 *actual* customers

2) If those customers buy USDT in bulk they can sell it to... pretty much anyone. Image
🧵20/Ω
Possibly worth mentioning that Tether's biggest customer until recently was Sam Bankman-Fried who bought almost $40 billion worth of USDT...
🧵21/Ω
Which he seems to have sold to people in Hong Kong who turned up at the offices of an FTX subsidiary with garbage bags full of cash every day for years.

Definitely not Tether's problem where all that cash came from (at least according to Tether).
🧵22/Ω
This 🧵 suggests it's reasonable for American voters to be a bit concerned that a billionaire Wall St. bro whose company is roughly the central bank of int'l criminal finance is on track to choose who will enforce the law if Trump wins.

Consider an RT if you agree.
🧵23/Ω
For more info see the original post on The Blogging Site That Shall Not Be named (link in bio).
@Bitfinexed @ParrotCapital @ImDrinknWyn @WillHild @RhoRider @Nostre_damus @CasPiancey @coffeebreak_YT @molly0xFFF @EggerDC @StringwallApp @mopeng @patio11 RT's appreciated.
@DennisKelleher @BetterMarkets @BennettTomlin @CasPiancey @Marc_Fagel @JohnReedStark @mcuban @MikeBurgersburg
Thread might be of interest to you guys.
@davidgerard @ahcastor
🧵24/Ω
[shill section] I'll be publishing my next piece on The Blogging Site That Shall Not Be Named about New York City's recently indicted mayor Eric Adams's many crypto connections so if that kind of thing interests you consider subscribing (it's free). #EricAdams Image
@vortoxica
@ryangrim
@gilduran76 @shanley @ExkrementKoin @Pledditor @RogueCfpb @gmorgenson @davetroy @laurenbalik
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ⚯ M Cryptadamus ⚯ | @cryptadamist@universeodon.com

⚯ M Cryptadamus ⚯ | @cryptadamist@universeodon.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Cryptadamist

Sep 26
🧵1/Ω
Eric Adams minorly mega-thread bc I broke the other one:
🧵2/Ω
I have videos of these screenshots but the frame rate is broken and i'm too lazy to correct it right now, but Uzbekistan's #Agrobank hired Brock Pierce's favorite lobbyist and went to meet Ted Cruz and went to the White House:
🧵3/Ω
DOJ lobbyist registration for Uzbekistan's #Agrobank hiring Brock Pierce's favorite lobbyist.
Read 36 tweets
Sep 10
Ω❓Ω
maybe nothing but interesting the total value of Tether's repo assets for 2023-Q4 is only 2% less than the collateralized assets listed on #CantorFitzgerald's 2023 filing

@Bitfinexed @myuzumaki_com @OccamiCrypto @tysgillies @BenFoldy @crypto1nfern0
sec.gov/Archives/edgar…

Image
Image
@Bitfinexed @myuzumaki_com @OccamiCrypto @tysgillies @BenFoldy @crypto1nfern0 @DesoGames @ParrotCapital 👆
2/ maybe more likely to be nothing but Tether's infamous "Secured Loans" number is only 3% less than the "Securities purchased under agreements to resell" on the #CantorFitzgerald balance sheet
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 30
🧵1/Ω
Just read #Chainalysis "2024 Crypto Crime Mid-Year Report". Obvs they have a habit of minimizing crypto crime stats but reading closely I realized this is kinda nuts. So nuts I that we need new rhyme akin to "pump & dump" vein. I give you:

"Minimize & Legitimize"

Ω👇Ω Image
🧵2/Ω
The report has two parts. I focused on the 2nd half because it makes a big deal about CSAM. Surprisingly to me it seemed like Chainalysis was for once maybe not downplaying something really bad...

But then I started checking the numbers.

(Report: )chainalysis.com/blog/2024-cryp…
🧵3/Ω
Below is the tweet I dashed off as did a quick scan. CSAM is bad. If CSAM number go up = really bad. Looked like Chainalysis was admitting bad number go up!

Which, speaking as someone who's checked their work on terrorism financing, was surprising.
Read 46 tweets
Nov 2, 2023
🧵1/Ω
It’s that time again. Gather round, children, for a thread about the closing arguments in the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried. #FTXTrial #FTXScam

Ω👇Ω Image
🧵2/Ω
The govt’s case revolves around a few things but fundamentally it’s about risks that were not disclosed to customers/investors.

According to the govt not only were these risks not disclosed SBF took steps to conceal them. Which is, you know, a crime

Text from my 📌 twt 👇 Image
🧵3/Ω
It’s conceded by everyone including SBF himself that there were undisclosed risks so the question becomes one of intent. The govt’s argument is that the many steps taken to conceal the risks reveal ill intent. SBF's argument is basically "being irresponsible is not illegal"
Read 42 tweets
Oct 30, 2023
🧵1/Ω
Thoughts from SBF’s 2nd day of cross examination:

Today went very, very badly for Mr. Bankman-Fried but it was still kind of a shame the jury didn’t get to witness the absolute train wreck of his first attempt especially this part:
🧵2/Ω
Things got off to a rough start when SBF tried to say that the million and one times he claimed that Alameda was just like any other FTX customer in every way he secretly was communicating that “every way” meant “one way”: Alameda didn’t front run FTX's customers.
🧵3/Ω
Cue AUSA bringing up approximately a bazillion tweets, emails, slack messages, etc. where SBF said Alameda was just like any other customer followed by the question “does it say ‘in terms of frontrunning customers’ here?”
Read 48 tweets
Oct 26, 2023
🧵1/Ω
Thoughts about SBF’s testimony today:

1. I never imagined it would be so grimly satisfying to watch a man hang himself before my eyes. The only disappointing part was that today wasn’t in front of the jury.
🧵2/Ω
SBF’s “my view from the perspective of the data I had available to me at the time” and “I’ll try to answer the question I think yr asking”¹ schtick did not play well with the judge.

¹ he actually said this, after which the prosecutor said “you didn’t answer my question".
🧵3/Ω
His testimony today was about whether he would be able to use the “but my lawyer said it was OK” defense in front of the jury. Let me summarize how it went:
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(