Martin Skold Profile picture
Oct 11 38 tweets 5 min read Read on X
I talk about this a lot, so once more:

A Possible US Grand Strategy According To Martin

(This is intended to be as realistic as possible, but some amount of “strategic reach” and problem-solving on the fly is obviously required)
***China***
—Make China the top priority
—Shift the carriers to the Western Pacific, except for one group which I’ll get to
—Do the same with the Air Force
—Start a major diplomatic effort to save Taiwan, and/or, if that proves unsuccessful, to prepare for a post-Taiwan coalition (failing -that-, start getting ready to repel boarders on US possessions across the Pacific)
—Tie USAF deployments to a strategy crafted based on the above
—Find a way to rhetorically downplay our commitment to RoK -unless and until- they both make a commitment to our theatre strategy -and- can help guarantee sea and air access in a fight (and perhaps withdraw US Forces Korea so that they are not sitting ducks)
(In effect, we’re playing diplomatic hardball - help us or we can’t help you, and the longer the nonsense goes on the less there is to work with)
Europe
—Tell Europe, loudly and publicly (so it’s not seen as reversible) that the US will no longer be the primary guarantor to NATO in a crisis (I’d say get out of NATO, but that ain’t happening)
—Pursue a ceasefire in Ukraine on the most advantageous terms possible, employing all available bargaining leverage and using brinksmanship to force the issue if necessary
—Do not admit Ukraine to NATO; instead work with the Nordics and the Intermarium to increase defense cooperation along the Russian frontier and to kickstart munitions production in the countries behind the front line
—Pull the Army out of Europe entirely
—Cut the Army’s budget by a third or more
—Temporarily reprogram some of the savings to arms production for a military aid program to Ukraine, Poland, Sweden, and Finland (aircraft in particular), and tell them diplomatically that the aid ends quite soon (this will also help kickstart the defense industrial base)
—Offload as much of the Army’s heavy equipment onto Ukraine and Poland as possible (do it -after- a ceasefire is obtained so that it’s not wasted in futile assaults)
—If we’re out of NATO completely, or if we’ve successfully altered the diplomatic picture enough: Consider quietly accepting or even encouraging the nuclearization of Ukraine, Poland, Finland, and perhaps Sweden, effectively turning the Russian frontier into a no-go zone
Western Hemisphere
—Convert the Army into a border constabulary force (can use the early 20C as a model if it helps) and deploy it to the southern border
—Build more border fortifications, stop processing asylum claims, and employ electronics/drones as force multipliers for a defense in depth involving CBP and the military
—Coordinate with state governors, Guard forces, etc to keep an active effort going
—Start seriously twisting arms diplomatically in our hemisphere regarding Chinese and Russian influence and abetting migration; employ carrots only as rewards for established and continuing good behavior
—Counter Russian and Iranian deployments to Venezuela with a contractor/mercenary presence in Guyana (this is one area where a light/corporate force can be adequate)
—Keep one carrier group on station somewhere near the Canal as a warning against various mischief and to establish ourselves as a hemispheric player (two would be better but we’re going to have to build those)
Industry/Economic
—Use the remaining savings from the Army’s budget (should be the bulk) to build ships for the Navy and aircraft for the Air Force (and equip and man them)
—Accelerate drone and other R&D (since I harp on this: try to figure out command/control issues well in advance so this doesn’t become a problem down the line)
—Use targeted subsidies to kickstart commercial shipbuilding and also rare earth mining and, if possible, domestic heavy industry
—Stockpile not only food but fertilizer and pharmaceuticals to harden the country against Chinese trade warfare (a coordinated state effort may be better than federal efforts for this, given experience)
—Work to remove regulatory and structural (union and monopoly power) barriers to entry and efficiency in domestic industry (and try to break up defense conglomerates and/or encourage competition in that area)
Trade:
—Start building a preferred trade bloc with -reliable- US allies (the list might be -very- short at first and should be curated based on willingness to provide for their own defense and diplomatic good behavior)
—Use membership in this bloc as a carrot for further cooperation (effectively enabling a “soft decoupling” over time)
—Stop all future trade cooperation with China and regard further trade enmeshment by US allies, partners, etc as a red flag, with cooperation adjusted accordingly
—Structure US trade policy such that key decisions can be made quickly in response to trade partners’ behavior (ie, avoid inflexible treaties, require frequent congressional reapproval, use executive power for entente diplomacy rather than formal agreements, etc)
Finance:
—Accept the end of the petrodollar system and start preparing for a post-exorbitant privilege world
—Try to exploit the end of the petrodollar system to kickstart domestic industry (particularly heavy industry)
—When the domestic entitlements trust funds start to run dry, use the opportunity to shift some of the spending (which probably cannot be cut without causing a recession) to defense and/or industrial subsidies…
…(effectively accessing some previously engaged latent economic potential)
And last…

The Middle East (avoid, avoid)
—Avoid entanglement in the MidEast, and let a balance of power form between Iran and the Sunni states so we’re not dealing with the worst of either…
…(in particular, make sure there’s enough Iranian proxies to keep IS down, and try to keep Iran tied up in turn)
—Close off most ME immigration except as strictly necessary (and revamp the visa system as necessary)
—Tell Israel we’re behind it morally but they need to get their domestic arms production up because supplies may be limited in the future (and mean it)
—Regard the Red Sea as impassable and adjust naval strategy, trade policy, and financial expectations accordingly (effectively, we’re writing this off)
—Pursue closer ties with India, but recognize they are unlikely to commit to anything substantive; reward cooperation on naval, defense, and trade matters
There is -PLENTY- to do here - but if you got this going more things would start to shift.

The biggest problem here has been inertia and drift: If you started working on these things interested parties, foreign & domestic, would come forward to help.

And you could go from there
Of interest to:

@LukeGromen @matthew_pines @ElbridgeColby @maphumanintent @johnkonrad @mercoglianos (and feel free to tag others)
@LukeGromen @matthew_pines @ElbridgeColby @maphumanintent @johnkonrad @mercoglianos @FPRI_Orbis and @arisroussinos as well, perhaps.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Skold

Martin Skold Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinSkold2

Aug 23
It would help, candidly, if all sides of this debate would look at a map.

The US has 9 functional carriers (11, but only 9 carrier air wings for them). A tempo with 3 deployed, 3 readying, and 3 refitting is about as rigorous as we can go (and there are already problems there).
So 3 carriers get to be at sea. If you put them -all- in the South and East China Seas, you would have a fighting chance at deterring an attack on Taiwan….
…not by denial - they’d have their hands full with the PLAN and even with most of the US Air Force in theatre - but by cost-benefit calculations and threat of escalation.

If we wanted to play that game; if we thought we could win it.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 16
There’s a folkways difference here as well. The financialization of the US economy traded a culture that ran on networks for one that just didn’t.
As I’ve noted from time to time, the financialization of the US economy in the ‘80s brought Wall Street to the Rust Belt and in so doing brought New Amsterdam as a culture onto a collision course with Greater Quakerdom.
The two do not really think about wealth generation the same way.
Read 32 tweets
Jan 1
You have to figure: If you assume they’ll go in a US/Taiwanese election year (reasonable, but it’s noteworthy the -Pentagon- used to assume it), there are a lot of reasons this one beats 2028: …
—Xi isn’t as old as he will be in 2028
—The US president won’t be as old and infirm in 2028 as he is now
—The Ukraine, Israel, and Red Sea crises may be wrapped up by 2028
—The US/Western munitions stockpile will likely be better in 2028
—The US Navy will not be as overcommitted in 2028 as now
—The US is about to have another inflation crisis and/or recession
—US politics may or may not be this much of a shitshow in 2028, but this one’s gonna be epic
Read 7 tweets
Feb 14, 2023
Setting aside the gender issue (given the need to compare apples to apples over time & pay gaps & gender roles in the ‘80s, it may make sense to do it this way), this is the crux of America’s economic problems: middle class life is measurably diminished.

I’d add a bit though: …
The thread touches on this but doesn’t quite say it explicitly: lifestyle and social conventions matter. Yes, you could in theory live according to ‘80s living standards…but society wouldn’t support it and in many cases the components aren’t available at any price.
Could you buy an ‘80s-style car with fewer bells and whistles and gadgets? Barely - most models aren’t sold that way, and a used one would be expensive to maintain.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 19, 2023
Spare a thought for poor Germany. If you’re them, you had a plan and it almost worked, but now it’s unraveling:
—You would solve the historic European balance of power problem associated with German unity, -and- the fear of another Hitler, by demilitarizing post-reunification
—You would instead solve your defense problem by persuading the US to extend its Cold War security guarantee to Europe in perpetuity, even with the Cold War gone
—You would also attempt to buy off Russia from attempting a takeover by tying your energy policy to Russian gas, making it (in theory) opportunistically costly for them to attack you and almost incidentally diversifying your energy supply
Read 5 tweets
Oct 22, 2022
There have been a few curveballs like this - essentially, of US adversaries overcoming obstacles thought to be insurmountable through some unexpected action. Our policy makers formed their mindsets and worldviews in an era of unchecked US power - we don’t always see it coming.
Here are a few other curveballs that have been thrown:
—It was thought that the dollar was irreplaceable as the global reserve currency, and that the yuan in particular was a poor replacement. But China appears to have managed to peg the SDR to gold instead, and it’s waiting in the wings.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(