Male & female minds work differently. As the result of 100,000+ years of tribal warfare determining the few Y chromosomes that survive vs the great majority that do not, men on a primal level do understand that not just violence, but organized
2/
violence is what determines who lives, who dies - and who is in control. Solo "alpha" warriors usually get killed when facing a group. So, men assess numbers & strength on an instinctual level, and the numbers are growing very strong indeed on what is currently emerging.
3/
"Emerging" is important, because this isn't about Trump, or Repubs, or this election, or the dissident RW on X - we're not the leaders, but we are hopefully watching & describing what is happening, as the media refuses to go there.
4/
What the liberal woman of color does not want to "allow" is men deciding to be "fully masculine" again - because if enough of them do, they will sweep the women & girly men from power.
She doesn't actually really get that though. Most women simply do not understand
5/
that though. She understands money, she gets social status, she gets job titles, but she really doesn't get that these vast numbers of "low status" men who she dismisses as being beneath her could sweep her from power through physical power at any time if they wanted to.
6/
Lacking that innate way of thinking, that primal orientation, she is like most women simply oblivious when it comes to what real power actually is.
Women are not the problem, however. Neither are blacks, or the immigrants.
7/
The heart of the problem is the heart of the enemy, which is an ever diminishing minority of white and jewish men who have decided to destroy.
They are punishing other whites. They are punishing other men. They are particularly trying to harm the majority of white men.
8/
This is where this new, emergent property is beginning to manifest, as can be seen in different ways.
Men don't like being discriminated against. Men don't like being called incels, while doing the hard work of society. If you try to dominate and control a large group of men,
9/
then on a certain primal level, they're going to be running the numbers about who has the actual power here.
Election polling shows one aspect of what is emerging - but this is about far more than one election. The really big change can be seen in the radical difference
10/
in political orientations that we are seeing among the young on a gender basis. The young women are making a social move to the Left, even as they destroy their chances of being mothers. The young guys are moving the opposite direction, they are most conservative that we've seen.
Unless complete totalitarian control is established - this creates an imbalance that will destroy the scumbag "progressive" white men who betray their own, even as the women themselves are effortlessly swept from power.
12/
The numbers are there, the momentum is shifting, and something very powerful and new is beginning to emerge among the men in general, and the young men in particular. This is not the Dems vs Repubs of recent decades, but something much more fundamental.
13/
Of course, as a liberal women, she and her kind will do everything in her power to crush all will and independent thought out of the young men. They will succeed with some, who will become feminized Dems. They will not succeed with most - and therein will be our future.
14/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Curtis the Monarchist is correct, Congress is the ultimate power. They have not just the power of purse but the power to remove Presidents & judges at any time.
A Red 2/3 Senate & bare majority House could remove every federal judge - this was the intent of the Constitution. 1/
In the original Constitution, judges did not have the authority to overrule Presidents or Congress, that was invented out of thin air in Marbury v Madison.
The way it was supposed to work (pre-17th Amendment), was that a 2/3 majority of the states could remove any federal
2/
the officer at any time. The people (the House) impeach, the States (the Senate) convict, and the power of the federal government, the President, all judges, can be broken to the will of the States.
In a way, this is still arguably the best way to save this country.
3/
Very well written, please read. This is another aspect of the intersection between increasing complexity & decreasing competence. Reusable rocket science, how semiconductors work, the probabilistic inference underlying AI, how your fingers or voice control your phone, 1/
how GPS works, international economics, they've all reached the point where even a white or asian person of average intelligence can not longer understand. It takes someone 1+ SD above average, and many years of specialized study to understand what is happening in one field.
2/
We also have a growing flood of non-whites with IQs well below average for who these things are all magic - they have zero idea how work, but also increasingly have zero respect for the magicians.
AI is in the process of much things much worse as it literally makes the average
3
There are multiple lessons from the two wars for the future of warfare, and the combatants are not at all the same. First & foremost, the Ukraine War is a proxy war with outside supplies. Ukraine wouldn't have lasted a year without extraordinary support from Europe & the US. 1/
The US & European economies are more than 20X the size of the Russian economy. NATO had spent years building & training the largest army in Europe (other than Russia) for the purpose of beating Russia. The US provided wonder weapons, the best communications seen in warfare,
2/
and targeting information. Most important of all, Ukraine can't build drones by itself, duh. It uses Chinese electronics to build drones, without which it would have lost long ago.
The two lessons there are hard power vs soft power, and the dangers of outsourcing technology.
3/
Historically, the Ivies were more about social class than meritocracy. Young men went to Harvard & Yale to earn "gentleman's Cs" while drinking & joining organizations with their fellow future bankers, judges, politicians and so forth. The mid to late 20th century 1/
were more of an anomaly, as the Ivies tried to become the elites for the entire nation. That meant: 1) stressing intellectual merit, and 2) recruiting from the whole nation. Standardized testing was used to try to cherry pick the smartest students from the nation.
2/
Schools adopted policies of admitting students from all 50 states every fall. At the same time, however, the elites maintained their legacy admissions for their own children. For a while, this worked better than ever, as the rich kids could now claim to be the smartest kids
3/
occupied by nothing and nobody. Then they do two interesting mental tricks. Because the interior of America looks empty to them, they somehow decide that it is their property to do what they wish with, that whatever ideas they have should govern.
2/
The next trick is highly encouraged, and if they think about the people at all - they believe them to be social & mental inferiors. Just the hicks & yokels from the middle of bumblefuck nowhere. Really, too unimportant to have a say.
3/
Time to merge this older thread with several recent threads. Let's merge regions, cultures, politics & fertility. As developed in the thread below, the white RW in the interior South, Midwest and West, is one of the highest fertility groups in America, and the West in general. 1/
There is a "sweet spot" where if one blends our cultures, Christian religion, RW politics, and living in safe, uncrowded conditions where most women have children, and families with 3-4+ children are not uncommon.
That is quite different with secular RW coastal urbanites.
2/
That means that the interior RW, the South, Midwest & West is already in a win-win situation, where our culture has political control, sometimes with supermajorities, and also for cultural reasons, our women are choosing replacement or close to replacement fertility.
3/