Male & female minds work differently. As the result of 100,000+ years of tribal warfare determining the few Y chromosomes that survive vs the great majority that do not, men on a primal level do understand that not just violence, but organized
2/
violence is what determines who lives, who dies - and who is in control. Solo "alpha" warriors usually get killed when facing a group. So, men assess numbers & strength on an instinctual level, and the numbers are growing very strong indeed on what is currently emerging.
3/
"Emerging" is important, because this isn't about Trump, or Repubs, or this election, or the dissident RW on X - we're not the leaders, but we are hopefully watching & describing what is happening, as the media refuses to go there.
4/
What the liberal woman of color does not want to "allow" is men deciding to be "fully masculine" again - because if enough of them do, they will sweep the women & girly men from power.
She doesn't actually really get that though. Most women simply do not understand
5/
that though. She understands money, she gets social status, she gets job titles, but she really doesn't get that these vast numbers of "low status" men who she dismisses as being beneath her could sweep her from power through physical power at any time if they wanted to.
6/
Lacking that innate way of thinking, that primal orientation, she is like most women simply oblivious when it comes to what real power actually is.
Women are not the problem, however. Neither are blacks, or the immigrants.
7/
The heart of the problem is the heart of the enemy, which is an ever diminishing minority of white and jewish men who have decided to destroy.
They are punishing other whites. They are punishing other men. They are particularly trying to harm the majority of white men.
8/
This is where this new, emergent property is beginning to manifest, as can be seen in different ways.
Men don't like being discriminated against. Men don't like being called incels, while doing the hard work of society. If you try to dominate and control a large group of men,
9/
then on a certain primal level, they're going to be running the numbers about who has the actual power here.
Election polling shows one aspect of what is emerging - but this is about far more than one election. The really big change can be seen in the radical difference
10/
in political orientations that we are seeing among the young on a gender basis. The young women are making a social move to the Left, even as they destroy their chances of being mothers. The young guys are moving the opposite direction, they are most conservative that we've seen.
Unless complete totalitarian control is established - this creates an imbalance that will destroy the scumbag "progressive" white men who betray their own, even as the women themselves are effortlessly swept from power.
12/
The numbers are there, the momentum is shifting, and something very powerful and new is beginning to emerge among the men in general, and the young men in particular. This is not the Dems vs Repubs of recent decades, but something much more fundamental.
13/
Of course, as a liberal women, she and her kind will do everything in her power to crush all will and independent thought out of the young men. They will succeed with some, who will become feminized Dems. They will not succeed with most - and therein will be our future.
14/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Homer lived in a time of collapse, and the Iliad was oral memories about the end of civilization times. For 3k years, there had been great Bronze Age empires, many with extensive written records - until they all collapsed. The early Iron Age was similar to the Dark Ages 1/
in that much had been lost, and there were memories of earlier, greater times.
That puts a different spin on the Odyssey, if we think of it as a man wandering through a post-Apocalypse world through what had been empires for thousands of years.
2/
From what I've read, Homer and the oral traditions got some things right about what had happened centuries before, while other parts had more to do with the post-collapse world of the early Iron Age.
3/
Worthwhile long post from an account who should have many more followers. My view is that Obama shattered the uniparty that had existed since WWII. His rapid movement to the hard Left made him an actual Enemy of much of America, and helped create a real RW in response. 1/
The last 15+ years have been a steady process of polarization, as the Left has moved ever more Left, even while a true RW opposition is coalescing. The Left wants to literally kill the developing RW, and the feeling is increasingly mutual, to an extent not seen in 100+ years.
2/
As I've written about before, one of the most interesting parts is that we are seeing a collapse of the former center on both sides. The trendy, status & success-driven Left is getting taken over by actual DSA communists, who will destroy their comfortable communities
3/
I carefully pick my Trump criticisms. I was opposed to the Iran war, but rarely mention that - no benefit for our side.
This👇is an important one. Repubs bailing out corporations that then offshore jobs is toxic to the base, and toxic for turnout. Trump needs to feel the heat 1/
Also, unlike many of the other current problems, this one has an easy fix. A phone call gets made to Intel & the chip factory is built in the US instead of Ireland. Trump can & will do this if he feels the pressure from the RW base.
2/
People wonder the RW base in the Heartland sometimes doesn't turn out for elections, and this sort of toxic crap is the main reason why.
We've seen the deindustrialization & we've seen the freaking establishment Repubs leading the way for decades.
3/
This thread from 3 yrs ago explains what could produce open conflict. The country as a whole is way too fat & happy, too comfortable to rise up into a bloody civil war (a few online radicals aside). People like their pickups, their bass boats, and yes - grilling in their yard. 1/
We've got a problem in that more than half our society is leeches at this point, and they are divided on party lines. The Dems - and even more so the DSA - believe they have the absolute right to take from others, using the violence inherent in the state from others.
2/
The nons & migrants such as the Somalis feel particularly strongly about this, they believe they are entitled to be supported in style, and they have the right to violence to take it - with no resistance or retribution allowed.
3/
of years of recorded history we know that there have slaves and in all cultures. The Amerindians kept slaves as well, and it is safe to assume that slavery went far back into the Neolithic, we likely have tens of thousands of years of slavery history.
2/
The gross, indefensible stupidity of the American liberal mind is to ignore all of that, 99.9% of the history of slaves & slavery, to focus on this relatively brief period of history and relatively small number of victims, and say that is the entire history of slavery.
3/
Read this 👇very carefully. The DSA winning 9 of 10 against the Dem establishment, often incumbents, completes a 10 year revolution in American politics. Trump took out the establishment Right. The communists are taking out the establishment Left. Both of the old are fading, 1/
and we are now seeing the second half of the biggest political change in our lifetimes.
In 2016 it was post-Obama, but nonetheless, the same song-and-dance of the Uniparty, with the Dems steadily moving the country left, while the controlled opposition RINOs moderately slowed
2/
them down. Behind the scenes, wealthy donors & power brokers called the shots.
That's all being swept away. Trump is trying to form a genuine RW opposition. He - and his successor - will not be fighting Newsom or Kamala, but a surging Communist party fueled by immigrants
3/