Male & female minds work differently. As the result of 100,000+ years of tribal warfare determining the few Y chromosomes that survive vs the great majority that do not, men on a primal level do understand that not just violence, but organized
2/
violence is what determines who lives, who dies - and who is in control. Solo "alpha" warriors usually get killed when facing a group. So, men assess numbers & strength on an instinctual level, and the numbers are growing very strong indeed on what is currently emerging.
3/
"Emerging" is important, because this isn't about Trump, or Repubs, or this election, or the dissident RW on X - we're not the leaders, but we are hopefully watching & describing what is happening, as the media refuses to go there.
4/
What the liberal woman of color does not want to "allow" is men deciding to be "fully masculine" again - because if enough of them do, they will sweep the women & girly men from power.
She doesn't actually really get that though. Most women simply do not understand
5/
that though. She understands money, she gets social status, she gets job titles, but she really doesn't get that these vast numbers of "low status" men who she dismisses as being beneath her could sweep her from power through physical power at any time if they wanted to.
6/
Lacking that innate way of thinking, that primal orientation, she is like most women simply oblivious when it comes to what real power actually is.
Women are not the problem, however. Neither are blacks, or the immigrants.
7/
The heart of the problem is the heart of the enemy, which is an ever diminishing minority of white and jewish men who have decided to destroy.
They are punishing other whites. They are punishing other men. They are particularly trying to harm the majority of white men.
8/
This is where this new, emergent property is beginning to manifest, as can be seen in different ways.
Men don't like being discriminated against. Men don't like being called incels, while doing the hard work of society. If you try to dominate and control a large group of men,
9/
then on a certain primal level, they're going to be running the numbers about who has the actual power here.
Election polling shows one aspect of what is emerging - but this is about far more than one election. The really big change can be seen in the radical difference
10/
in political orientations that we are seeing among the young on a gender basis. The young women are making a social move to the Left, even as they destroy their chances of being mothers. The young guys are moving the opposite direction, they are most conservative that we've seen.
Unless complete totalitarian control is established - this creates an imbalance that will destroy the scumbag "progressive" white men who betray their own, even as the women themselves are effortlessly swept from power.
12/
The numbers are there, the momentum is shifting, and something very powerful and new is beginning to emerge among the men in general, and the young men in particular. This is not the Dems vs Repubs of recent decades, but something much more fundamental.
13/
Of course, as a liberal women, she and her kind will do everything in her power to crush all will and independent thought out of the young men. They will succeed with some, who will become feminized Dems. They will not succeed with most - and therein will be our future.
14/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now, now, let's not put words in my mouth. I try to pick my fights.
I will say that I am quite confident that within my son's lifetime, universal suffrage will (at the least) take an extended vacation in the US. This is true whether the Left or the Right wins. 1/
The Left is in practice well beyond democracy. That's what the rampant voter fraud is all about, disenfranchising the political opposition and installing governments regardless of the actual voting. If they regain control again, the situation will get much worse.
2/
The dynamic between the current RINO Right and the radical Left is one of guaranteed losses for the Right. This is what the RINOs are paid for.
Essentially, when the RINOs win an election, nothing happens, and when the Left wins an election, radical changes occur.
3/
Worth watching. The rate of change is still accelerating.
Read an interesting article the other day about the "Middle Powers". The two Great Powers of today are the US & China. The Middle Powers are nations such as Germany, the UK & Canada. They are fearful & angry 1/
because as the World splits into competing geopolitical blocs, both Great Powers are dropping the facade of fair & equal competition among equal nations. Instead, both are openly wielding real power, and aren't acting like equal partners of the weaker nations.
2/
The Middle Powers are not at all happy about this, and some of them like Carney, Starmer & Macron are trying to put together a coalition that will allow their safe & artificial world to continue.
They want to trade among themselves, while building individual & collective
3/
Keep in mind that this Canadian mocking Red-state America is a "Conservative" Canadian. Former Premier of Alberta, and head of the United Conservative Party.
Two things. First, we don't want Albertans voting in US elections, ever. Their "conservatives" are still far Left 1/
Second, the Canadian economy is completely dependent on an unbalanced trade arrangement with the US. Yes, energy from Alberta is part of it, but the main issue is the export of Canadian manufacturing to the US, where they aren't making anything we
2/
can't make ourselves. It was just marginally cheaper to ship American Rust Belt jobs to Canada for the benefit of US coastal "elites". The usual shafting of the Heartland.
This then gives Canada the US dollars to basically support it's entire First World lifestyle,
3/
The US seems to be moving towards soft secession as Blue states openly block federal laws & agents
If secession is the direction, then the Right CANNOT let the Leftists set the rules. If a state can effectively secede from a nation, then the counties can secede from the state 1/
All the "Blue" states are based on the same thing. Some urban assholes in big cities use voter fraud & mass immigration (California being a good example), to control the entire state, while the outstate counties are almost entirely Red.
2/
This isn't really about legality. It is 100% illegal for Minnesota to do what it is currently doing, which is an effective state of open insurrection. The Trump administration allows this making a mockery of the law, as they view putting down insurrection as having poor optics
3/
This isn't about perception management or "blackpilling". What matters is the facts on the ground.
These are NOT protesters. These are brownshirts. Paramilitary, answering to a political party, asserting violent dominance over a civilian population, with the aid of the police 1/
This is something new & poisonous in America. Highly illegal. Also likely to spread to places like California, New York and Oregon unless it is stopped & stopped hard.
Minnesota was supposed to be the test case, that set the national precedents.
2/
And the national precedent so far is that the Feds are going to run, and they will let paramilitaries take over American cities, with the support of Blue state & local governments.
And yes, I know the police sometimes break these up, and arrests are sometimes made.
3/
was the mantra which she fully endorsed. The Left wanted to leave those big, beautiful trees right over the power lines, which then fell on those power lines when the next (statistically predictable) big ice storm occurred.
2/
At the same time, as part of the new CEO's agenda, they were increasing DEI meetings & spending.
This isn't difficult or nuanced. A political employee came in, knowing nothing about utilities, and promptly slashed operational spending for preventative maintenance,
3/