Labrador Skeptic Profile picture
Oct 12, 2024 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The key words here are her questioning whether they should "allow this drift towards full masculinity."

Wow. There's a lot to unpack in this 38 second segment. Men being "recruited to fascism." Men needing therapy.

The big one is total female control over males & what males
1/
are allowed to think and do.

Male & female minds work differently. As the result of 100,000+ years of tribal warfare determining the few Y chromosomes that survive vs the great majority that do not, men on a primal level do understand that not just violence, but organized
2/
violence is what determines who lives, who dies - and who is in control. Solo "alpha" warriors usually get killed when facing a group. So, men assess numbers & strength on an instinctual level, and the numbers are growing very strong indeed on what is currently emerging.
3/
"Emerging" is important, because this isn't about Trump, or Repubs, or this election, or the dissident RW on X - we're not the leaders, but we are hopefully watching & describing what is happening, as the media refuses to go there.
4/
What the liberal woman of color does not want to "allow" is men deciding to be "fully masculine" again - because if enough of them do, they will sweep the women & girly men from power.

She doesn't actually really get that though. Most women simply do not understand
5/
that though. She understands money, she gets social status, she gets job titles, but she really doesn't get that these vast numbers of "low status" men who she dismisses as being beneath her could sweep her from power through physical power at any time if they wanted to.
6/
Lacking that innate way of thinking, that primal orientation, she is like most women simply oblivious when it comes to what real power actually is.

Women are not the problem, however. Neither are blacks, or the immigrants.
7/
The heart of the problem is the heart of the enemy, which is an ever diminishing minority of white and jewish men who have decided to destroy.

They are punishing other whites. They are punishing other men. They are particularly trying to harm the majority of white men.
8/
This is where this new, emergent property is beginning to manifest, as can be seen in different ways.

Men don't like being discriminated against. Men don't like being called incels, while doing the hard work of society. If you try to dominate and control a large group of men,
9/
then on a certain primal level, they're going to be running the numbers about who has the actual power here.

Election polling shows one aspect of what is emerging - but this is about far more than one election. The really big change can be seen in the radical difference
10/
in political orientations that we are seeing among the young on a gender basis. The young women are making a social move to the Left, even as they destroy their chances of being mothers. The young guys are moving the opposite direction, they are most conservative that we've seen.
Unless complete totalitarian control is established - this creates an imbalance that will destroy the scumbag "progressive" white men who betray their own, even as the women themselves are effortlessly swept from power.
12/
The numbers are there, the momentum is shifting, and something very powerful and new is beginning to emerge among the men in general, and the young men in particular. This is not the Dems vs Repubs of recent decades, but something much more fundamental.
13/
Of course, as a liberal women, she and her kind will do everything in her power to crush all will and independent thought out of the young men. They will succeed with some, who will become feminized Dems. They will not succeed with most - and therein will be our future.
14/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Labrador Skeptic

Labrador Skeptic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SaysSimulation

Jun 23
One of the biggest issues facing the US is that the "elite" groupthink / propaganda is so appallingly bad. Case in point, today's WSJ analysis of Iran trying to close the Straits of Hormuz (link follows).

By unanimous consent, the Houthis closing the Red Sea never happened.
1/
"The saber-rattling has conjured memories of the attacks on oil tankers traded by Iran and Iraq during their conflict in the 1980s. U.S. warships patrolled the region and eventually began escorting some commercial ships, in operations that turned deadly."
"McTigue’s ship returned fire with four of its own missiles, helping destroy the largest warship the U.S. Navy has sunk since World War II. “They called it a one-day war,” McTigue said of Operation Praying Mantis"
3/
Read 10 tweets
Jun 22
I'm seeing replies addressing right or wrong in this & related threads. Yes, this is how the justifications are presented, but this can't be seen in isolation.

The adult framing HAS to be how to use limited resources to navigate a difficult world with many challenges.
1/
Because of decades of military, political and economic decisions, the US finds itself wanting to act a global military superpower, but without the defense manufacturing base to back it up.
2/
If the US wants to continue to be a global military superpower, then it must very carefully & strategically manage what resources it has while pursuing an emergency reindustrialization program that is particularly aimed at defense manufacturing.
3/
Read 6 tweets
Jun 22
I'm seeing a lot of silly talk about the US strikes on Iran's nuclear program. This isn't a one off, it didn't start or end here.

What matters is the global chess board over the next 5-10+ years, and whether a third front has been opened that will consume US strength.
1/
As I've written about in numerous threads, the US has some fantastic weapons that were only made in moderate numbers, and that it cannot currently manufacture at scale or quickly. If the US uses up too many of them too quickly, such as interceptor missiles, then the US loses.
2/
That is the irreplaceable strategic context that all major US military actions need to be evaluated from, one offs are propaganda for children.

The attacks were a gamble. They will be a success if nothing spreads. They will be a horrible error if things escalate.
3/
Read 6 tweets
Jun 20
US national security in the medium-term is being dealt a devastating blow as a result of the political inability to say "no" to Israel.

As discussed in the thread below, and updated in today's WSJ (link later), Israel is running out of missiles, and the US doesn't have enough
1/
From today's WSJ: "U.S. Races to Defend Israel as It Burns Through Missile Interceptors"

"Short supplies of high-end defenses could lead to rationing as Iranian attacks continue"
2/
"The U.S. is racing to reinforce Israel’s defenses, sending more warships capable of shooting down ballistic missiles to the region as Iranian attacks drain Israel’s stocks of interceptors."
3/
Read 11 tweets
Jun 19
The news from Israel is so good that it contradicts itself. Israel has total air superiority, and has devastated Iranian launcher capabilities. Also, Israel is intercepting 90% of Iranian missiles.

But - too many missile are getting through for both statements to be true.
1/
If Israel has devastated Iranian launchers then Iran isn't launching 100s of missiles daily - so a lot more than 10% are getting through.

If only 10% are getting through, then Iran must still have hundreds of active launchers, so Israel hasn't destroyed them.

Which is true?
2/
Resolving this contradiction is very important for Americans.

If Iran isn't near destroyed but still a snarling beast able to launch barrages of hundreds of missiles - we the people need to know that before getting directly involved.
3/
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18
Reality beats the Narrative, and that is true even during the hyperventilating propaganda of a new Mideast war. As I've been writing about for years, the reality is the US doesn't have enough missiles.

Per the WSJ (video link later), Israel is running out of Arrow 3 missiles.
1/
Israel uses a four part layered antimissile missile defense, and the Arrow 3s are the "crown jewels" of their system, the interceptors for long-range ballistic missiles.

As covered in the video, the Israelis claim to have shot down about 90% of the 370 Iranian missiles shot.
2/
But the issue is what it has always been - the Iranians have more long-range ballistic missiles than the Israelis do interceptors.

If the interceptors run out, and the Iranians still have launch capabilities - it will be mayhem in Israel, just the simple numbers.
3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(