🧵 THREAD: The NGOs Behind the “Israel Genocide” Accusation — Who They Are, Who Funds Them, and How Deep the Bias Runs
In August 2025, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) declared Israel’s actions in Gaza “genocide.” But the evidence? It comes from a small network of heavily biased NGOs. Let’s unpack them one by one. 🔽
1️⃣ Who did IAGS cite as proof?
In its resolution, IAGS cited these 7 organizations:
•Amnesty International
•Human Rights Watch (HRW)
•Forensic Architecture (FA)
•DAWN (Democracy for the Arab World Now)
•B’Tselem (Israeli)
•Physicians for Human Rights–Israel (PHRI)
•UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese
Each claims to be independent.
Each has serious credibility issues.
2️⃣ Amnesty International
✅ Called Israel an “apartheid state” (2022)
✅ Declared Israel is committing genocide (2024)
🚩 Criticized for legal sloppiness and selective use of quotes, ignoring Hamas war crimes
🚩 Faced backlash from its own Israel office, which was suspended in 2025 for opposing Amnesty’s Gaza stance
📌 Bottom line: Amnesty’s framing aligns with far-left, decolonial discourse.
🧵The Democratic Socialists of America and their explicit ties to Cuba actually pose a national security threat to America.
It is more than just a radical organization that promotes far left and insane ideology. Their extensive ties to Cuba facilitate potential foreign influence operations and espionage by not only them but by the CCP inside the United States.
Read this thread and ask yourself if perhaps this is the reason communism seems to be spreading amongst the younger generations in America.
What DSA is doing by its own documents:
Platform & program
- The DSA’s adopted platform commits the group to “support normalization of relations with Cuba”, to “stop using economic and financial sanctions to punish other countries, such as Cuba”, to “immediately withdraw from NATO”, and to “abolish USAID, NED, [and] Voice of America.”
- Those planks are not stray tweets; they are the organization’s governing platform.
Named Cuba campaign
- The DSA International Committee runs a live campaign—“Diplomacy, Not FORCE”—explicitly aimed at defeating the FORCE Act (H.R. 450), removing Cuba from the SSOT list, and lifting embargo/travel restrictions.
- The campaign provides letter‑writing tools and talking points to pressure Congress.
Delegations & electeds
- DSA advertises that it “helps organize and promote delegations to Cuba, where activists, organizers, and elected officials” can observe and return to advocate for policy change.
- In September 2022, DSA sent its first official healthcare delegation to Cuba, meeting hospital staff and BioCubaFarma while observing the “Families Code” referendum.
Coalitions that amplify the push
•DSA’s International Committee is listed as a member of ACERE (Alliance for Cuba Engagement and Respect). ACERE has marshaled letters from elected officials and labor leaders urging the White House to remove Cuba from SSOT and ease sanctions.
•DSA is also listed as a member of the National Network on Cuba (NNOC), the long‑standing national solidarity coalition.
Municipal & state pressure.
-This coalition strategy has delivered city‑council resolutions in major metros. In New York City, the Council adopted Resolution 285‑A (June 22, 2023) urging an end to the embargo/travel ban and removal of Cuba from the SSOT list; a follow‑on resolution was re‑introduced in May 2025. NYC‑DSA publicly celebrated the 2023 passage as a DSA‑backed victory. Chicago passed a similar resolution in 2021, part of a national template DSA chapters are told to reproduce.
Scale matters
- DSA describes itself as the largest socialist organization in the United States (≈85,000 members), giving its national campaigns real mobilization capacity around sanctions, delegations, and city‑level actions.
🧵🧵An extensive thread about the subversive hold Qatar has on K-12 education in America and what we can do under this administration to change that.
Mind you the available data isn’t up to date. That means the actual effects as of today are much worse.
I don’t want ANY foreign governments to spend 30 million dollars in the American public school system. This is not even addressing what’s happening in colleges, this is K-12. Much less a theocracy that is opposed to the west, supports terrorism and is guilty of human rights violations.
This should concern every single person. It is not a partisan issue.
We need to change the reporting requirements so that foreign countries cannot subvert our children’s future with anti-American and anti-western propoganda.
From 2009–2017 the Qatar Foundation’s U.S. arm, Qatar Foundation International (QFI), disbursed at least $30.6 million to American public schools and supporting initiatives, largely to stand up or expand Arabic language and “culture” programs.
These grants commonly fund teacher salaries/benefits, curricular materials, assessments, professional development, travel, and local cultural programming, and they require ongoing monitoring and data reporting to QFI.
A representative primary source…the Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) grant contract documents the operational model in detail, including classroom observation rights for QFI staff, use of specific progress‑monitoring tools, and a mandate to stage 6–8 cultural activities per term.
While QFI markets itself as an independent education philanthropy, Qatar’s government has simultaneously pursued an overt soft‑power strategy (media, sports diplomacy, cultural diplomacy) and hosted the political office of Hamas in Doha during key periods facts that color the perceived intent behind K‑12 engagement.
1. The K‑12 model maximizes curricular adjacency and teacher dependency on QFI resources and networks;
2. QFI‑connected content channels have included material with explicit loyalty messaging to Qatar and lessons that legitimize terrorism;
3. The overall environment correlates with spikes in K‑12 antisemitic and anti-American sentiments even where direct causation cannot be proven.
QFI is a Washington, DC‑based entity created to support Arabic teaching and “Arab world” cultural programming across North America and Europe.
Its own materials emphasize grants to teachers, schools, districts, and teacher networks (Arabic Teacher Councils), plus professional development and exchanges. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2017 that Qatar Foundation QFI’s parent channeled $30.6 million to U.S. K‑12 schools and related initiatives from 2009 to 2017.
Below is an example of the types of awards that are granted to K-12 schools:
Tucson Unified (AZ): multi‑year grant totaling $465,000 (2013–2018) to stand up Arabic language/culture courses, with detailed terms and a line‑item budget (teacher salaries, materials, cultural events).
Austin ISD (TX): $100,000 grant to launch Arabic language and culture in 2016–17; subsequent district budget notes additional QFI support.
Washington Latin PCS (DC): about $1.04 million in cumulative QFI funding since 2009, according to the foundation’s reporting cited at the time.
New Haven (CT): $61,036 in 2025 to retain/add Arabic teachers, expand cultural activities, and build Seal of Biliteracy pathways; district confirms QFI as the funder.
Houston ISD – Arabic Immersion Magnet School: board agenda lists a “Detailed Budget for Qatar Foundation Grant” for AIMS; local coverage documented protests centered on QFI’s role.
Awards typically pay for core instructional costs (salaries, materials) plus program extras (cultural events, teacher PD, travel), and they often seed programs that districts later absorb into base budgets.
🧵🧵The Middle East Mirage: How Both Parties Got It Wrong on Qatar, Turkey, and Syria
For over two decades, American foreign policy in the Middle East has been defined by a dangerous mix of wishful thinking, strategic hypocrisy, and bipartisan neglect. The result? The United States props up authoritarian regimes that bankroll extremism, betrays its most loyal allies, and loses credibility in a region that remains as volatile as ever.
At the heart of this dysfunction lies a stubborn refusal by both Republicans and Democrats to confront two key facts: Qatar and Turkey are not reliable partners, and Syria is not a war that can be ignored into resolution.
Qatar: Our Billion-Dollar “Frenemy”
Qatar hosts the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East—Al Udeid—and serves as a diplomatic backchannel to Hamas, the Taliban, and Iran. But it’s also the world’s most successful double-dealer. Behind the curtain of shiny PR campaigns and think-tank donations lies a regime that:
•Harbors Hamas leadership in Doha.
•Bankrolled Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda’s Syrian franchise, during the height of the civil war.
•Spends hundreds of millions influencing U.S. universities and think tanks, from Georgetown to Brookings, to shape American foreign policy from within.
And both parties let it happen.
The Obama and Biden administrations embraced Qatar as a “progressive” Gulf state and gave it a diplomatic free pass. The Trump administration, for all its tough talk on terrorism, allowed Qatari lobbyists to wine and dine officials and even floated arms deals with minimal oversight. Pam Bondi, a former Florida Attorney General and Trump ally, reportedly earned six figures per month lobbying for Qatar while the regime funded Hamas.
Why? Because Qatar pays handsomely. And Washington, left and right, has a price.
Turkey: NATO’s Rogue Elephant
Then there’s Turkey—a NATO member that behaves more like a regional bully than a Western ally. Under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey has:
•Attacked U.S.-backed Kurdish forces fighting ISIS.
•Bought Russian missile systems in defiance of NATO protocols.
•Jailed journalists, crushed dissent, and turned into a de facto autocracy.
Yet the U.S. response has been tepid at best. Presidents from Bush to Biden have tiptoed around Erdoğan, terrified of losing access to the Incirlik Air Base or angering a refugee gatekeeper to Europe.
Even Trump who once claimed he’d bring troops home allowed Turkey to invade Kurdish regions in Syria in 2019, abandoning America’s most loyal battlefield partners. Democrats condemned the betrayal but did nothing to change course once they retook power.
Meanwhile, Turkey’s lobbying arms—from the Turkish Coalition of America to multi-million-dollar D.C. firms—continue to grease wheels on Capitol Hill.
🧵🧵How did Epstein get all of his money...maybe it was Mossad, the CIA and the tooth fairy all in one.
Or he might have just been the original Bernie Madof before he was the original Bill Cosby.
I always bring the receipts (sources and citations at the end of the thread).
In the late 1980s, Jeffrey Epstein wasn't a billionaire.
He was a "consultant" working with Steven Hoffenberg, the CEO of Towers Financial — a firm that would soon run one of the largest Ponzi schemes in U.S. history.
And Epstein? He allegedly designed it.
From 1987–1993, Towers Financial sold over $460 million in fraudulent promissory notes to investors.
Steven Hoffenberg later testified that Epstein was the architect of the fraud.
“He was the brains. He created the Ponzi scheme.”
— Hoffenberg (via Washington Post, 2019)
Steven Hoffenberg, Epstein’s partner at Towers Financial, directly stated that Epstein “took north of $50 million”, financing his opulent lifestyle through Towers funds.
Hoffenberg admitted giving Epstein a $2 million no-repay loan in 1988, well before the collapse.
Towers had purchased $400 million+ in fraudulent promissory notes between 1988–1993 suggesting substantial misuse of investor money.
Hoffenberg was arrested in 1993. He spent 20 years in jail for defrauding investors. He was found dead in 2022 at 77 years old.
Despire testifying that Epstein was the mastermind of the Ponzi scheme, Epstein was never charged. According to Hoffenberg, Epstein walked away with $50 million dollars.
Epstein never had a license, degree, or formal position.
He was "just a consultant" — which gave him plausible deniability.
But behind the scenes, he:
– Created offshore accounts
– Forged financial documents
– Built shell companies to move investor funds
– And took a massive cut
Hoffenberg later testified that Epstein was the “architect” of the fraud:
Helped create phony bonds and shell companies.
Designed fake financials to make the company appear profitable.
A
ided in raising capital from investors under false pretenses.
Epstein reportedly used offshore bank accounts and “complex financial structures” to hide stolen funds.
They attempted hostile takeovers of Pan Am and Emery Air Freight using investor money. They failed.
🧵🧵How much do you think people like Obama, Clinton and other leftist aligned global interests would hide for the opportunity to access $1 trillion dollars worth of foreign investment in oil, aviation, banking, shipping and telecom contracts?
Do you think they would look the other way when they realized one of the key shady power players had a team of women plus all of his staff procure and fly out underage girls that he abused in his depraved world?
Marc Rich: The Original Sanctions Profiteer
Marc Rich pioneered the art of profiting from sanctioned regimes, most infamously by buying Iranian oil during the U.S. embargo and selling it through secret routes. He built vast wealth through opaque offshore companies, setting a model for navigating around sanctions, manipulating commodities markets, and leveraging global connections.
In the 1970s and 80s, he pioneered the spot oil market, buying crude on short notice and flipping it for profit.
He continued trading with Iran after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and during the U.S. hostage crisis, blatantly violating U.S. sanctions.
He was indicted for tax evasion and illegal trading but never stood trial living in Swiss exile until he was controversially pardoned by President Bill Clinton in 2001, after significant donations to Clinton-linked foundations by his ex-wife Denise Rich.
Ehud Barak: The Israeli Connector
Barak, former Prime Minister and elite special forces operative, bridged the worlds of military intelligence, finance, and global tech. His name surfaced in U.S. legal chatter around Rich, but he was never charged.
He was very close to Clinton and Obama. He even lobbied on behalf of Marc Rich for a Clinton pardon. In late 2002, Haaretz reported that Barak “failed to reply to questions posed by federal prosecutors in New York,” which triggered talk of an arrest threat—but no action followed....
Barak and Rich had overlapping circles, particularly within elite financial, intelligence, and national security communities in Israel and Europe.
As a major figure in Israeli tech and defense, Barak later became chair of Carbyne, a surveillance-tech firm funded by Jeffrey Epstein, and invested in by Peter Thiel.
Barak moved seamlessly between national security, high finance, and global elite networks, making him a perfect bridge between past clandestine operations (Rich) and the modern data-security state (Carbyne, Thiel, Epstein).