🧵🧵 The actual constitutional crisis has absolutely nothing to do with President Trump, but because people don’t know their history, they don’t even understand how our constitution works.

The constitutional crisis started with Woodrow Wilson. And from there every other progressive democratic leader has slowly but surely ripped it apart more and more.

Donald Trump is actually returning us back to what it means to be a constitutional republic. Not the other way around. It didn’t start in the 1960s. It started with Woodrow Wilson, the first president to openly reject the Founders’ vision. He believed the Constitution was outdated and that government should evolve with the times—“living Constitution” ideology begins here.

Wilson despised the checks and balances system. He called the Founders’ framework “mechanical” and obstructive to “efficient” governance. In other words: too much constraint on centralized power.

Under Wilson, we got the Federal Reserve (1913) and the income tax (16th Amendment)—two massive shifts away from decentralized government and individual economic liberty.

🧵🧵 The Global Judicial Insurrection: How the Left Captured Courts in Brazil, Israel, as a trial run and is now working the U.S.—With Help from NGOs and USAID

Across the globe, the political Left has developed a powerful and repeatable strategy: when electoral victories are uncertain, capture the courts. Through a mix of litigation, media campaigns, international pressure, and vast NGO funding networks—often backed by U.S. taxpayer money—left-leaning elites are using judicial institutions to override democracy, impose ideological agendas, and insulate power from voters.

We saw the blueprint for this coordinated attack in Brazil, and Israel first, and now it’s being applied in the United States. Here’s how it works—and who’s funding it. Brazil: Lawfare and Judicial Censorship

In Brazil, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) has become a hyper-political institution, operating well beyond its constitutional role. Under the leadership of figures like Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the court has:
•Prosecuted political opponents without due process
•Shut down media accounts critical of the Left
•Imprisoned Bolsonaro supporters for “disinformation”
•Interfered in elections and barred candidates from running

This is no longer about the rule of law—it’s about lawfare.

Behind this transformation is a well-funded network of NGOs and civil society groups. Major funders include:
•Open Society Foundations (George Soros)
•Ford Foundation
•USAID and other U.S. State Department affiliates

These groups have funded training for judges, legal education initiatives, and activist infrastructure that frame opposition as “fascist” or “anti-democratic.”

The result: Brazil’s highest court now operates as a de facto ideological enforcer.

🧵🧵ICA, USAID, the CIA, Obama and Signal Gate

Either the contents of this thread are just a total coincidence or we have a serious problem. 1955: The U.S. creates the International Cooperation Administration (ICA)—a foreign aid agency meant to “win hearts and minds” in the developing world.

But ICA wasn’t just building schools and roads. It was a cover for covert power.

The CIA used the ICA as a tool of influence.

Aid missions often doubled as:
•Election interference
•Regime stabilization (or destabilization)
•Covers for U.S. intelligence officers

“Technical assistance” became political manipulation.

🧵🧵The Capital Research Center’s report, “When Charities Betray America: How ‘Pro-Palestinian’ Protest Groups Promote Anti-Americanism,” examines the online rhetoric of major U.S.-based “pro-Palestinian” groups and activists before and after the Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.

The study analyzed thousands of social media posts from 496 prominent entities and found significant increases in anti-American and anti-police sentiments, as well as calls for violence. Key Findings:

•Increase in Anti-American and Anti-Police Rhetoric: There was a 186% rise in the use of anti-American and anti-police keywords and phrases in the 15 months following the October 7 attack compared to the preceding 15 months.

•Surge in Calls for Violence: Posts endorsing violence surged by 3,000% during the same period, indicating a rapid radicalization within the movement.

•Engagement Metrics: Hateful posts garnered over 23 million views and 4.2 million engagements (comments, likes, shares) on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok.

🧵🧵 What the heck is going on with USAID in Cairo—and why does it feel like a fortified black site with a billion-dollar budget?

USAID Cairo looks less like a development agency and more like a military installation.
We’re talking block walls, metal spikes, guardhouses, no signage, and full surveillance.
Not exactly the friendly face of American aid. The U.S. has poured $30+ billion into Egypt via USAID since 1978.
It’s one of the largest aid programs in the world.
But instead of transparency and impact, what you get is confusion, contradictions—and occasionally, detentions.

Case in point: Larry Taunton
In early 2025, Taunton—a writer and commentator—walked into USAID Cairo to ask whether they were complying with Trump’s new aid freeze (Executive Order 14169).
He walked out under detention.

On his second visit, Taunton says he was detained by security, accused of being a terrorist, and interrogated for simply asking what the office was doing with U.S. taxpayer funds.
He documented everything.

🧵🧵 The judicial branch needs to be reigned in. It was never supposed to be determining nationwide policy positions.

How was the judiciary supposed to be kept in check under the Constitution?

The Federalist Papers laid out a vision of a passive, limited judiciary—one that absolutely was not meant to shape national policy or issue sweeping rulings affecting every American. The framers called the judiciary the “least dangerous” branch.
Why?

Because it had “neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.”
(Federalist No. 78)

It couldn’t raise armies, control the purse, or even enforce its own decisions.

🧵🧵THREAD: Jessica Aber, the former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was found dead in her Virginia home on March 22, 2025, at age 43. Here’s everything we know about her life, legacy, and the open questions surrounding her sudden death. Aber was a career federal prosecutor who served in the Justice Department since 2009. She was appointed U.S. Attorney by President Biden in 2021 and served until Jan 20, 2025 — the day of President Trump’s second inauguration.

🧵🧵 Suggestions for desperately needed judicial reform

We need to start figuring out which one of these, or all of these, we want to implement and put pressure on Congress to get it done. These are not things that would only help conservatives, these are completely unbiased and imp partisan solutions to a very partisan problem. 1. Congressional Reforms (Legislation-Based)

These can be passed by Congress without constitutional amendments.

A. Jurisdiction Stripping

What it does: Congress has the constitutional power to limit the types of cases lower federal courts (and in some cases the Supreme Court) can hear.

Example: Prevent federal courts from hearing certain election-related or immigration cases.

Goal: Prevent judicial overreach in politically sensitive areas.

Term Limits for Lower Court Judges

What it does: Impose fixed terms (e.g., 10–15 years) on federal district judges.

Goal: End de facto lifetime appointments that create unaccountable legal fiefdoms.

Note: This would likely require some reinterpretation of Article III or a constitutional amendment.

C. Creation of Judicial Review Boards

What it does: Independent (or congressional) boards to review repeated instances of unconstitutional rulings or injunctions with no basis in law.

Goal: Apply pressure and public accountability for rogue judges.

Could be modeled on: Office of Congressional Ethics or internal DOJ oversight bodies.

D. Venue Reform

What it does: Change the rules for where federal cases can be filed to avoid “judge shopping.”

Example: Prohibit filing nationwide injunction cases in ultra-partisan districts (e.g., Northern District of California or DC Circuit).

Goal: Prevent partisan legal teams from always landing sympathetic judges.

🧵🧵 The Law Firms that Run DC

I see a lot of articles saying how President Trump is attacking law firms in Washington DC because he is vindictive. When in fact, it has nothing to do with being vindictive, and everything to do with the fact that they are acting like an extension of the Democratic Party.

This web shows how elite law firms in DC have become de facto political actors, coordinating with bureaucrats, Democratic campaigns, and activist groups to advance one side’s agenda while insulating allies from legal consequences. 1. Perkins Coie

Partisan Alignment: Strongly Democratic

Key Players: Marc Elias, Michael Sussmann

Involved In:

•Russiagate:

•Hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC to create the Steele Dossier.

•Michael Sussmann was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI about the source of Alfa Bank/Trump server claims (acquitted, but case exposed coordination between Clinton-linked lawyers and the intelligence community).

•Through Marc Elias, aggressively litigated to change election laws in battleground states pre-2020 (e.g., mail-in ballot rules, signature matching, ballot curing).

•Litigated against voter ID laws and redistricting efforts favoring GOP, using courts to alter rules under the guise of civil rights.

🧵🧵The media is lying to you about everything DOGE. Bookmark this thread and send it to people who keep telling you that DOGE is dangerous, destructive and an assault on the government. Narrative # 1: DOGE’s "slash-and-burn" approach has eliminated thousands of federal jobs, causing hardship for workers, including veterans, and creating "tremendous anxiety" (CBS News, Business Insider).

Truth:

1. Reports like Newsweek cite 18,000 IRS and 10,000 USPS layoffs, but this is a fraction of the 2.3 million federal workforce— less than 5%. This isn’t a gutting but a trimming of excess.

2. Anecdotal "anxiety" (e.g., Murkowski’s quote) lacks data showing widespread economic ruin. Federal workers often receive severance or transition to private roles, cushioned by a strong job market.

3. Claims of veteran harm are unproven—Energy Department layoffs spared critical nuclear staff, and no mass veteran layoffs are documented.

4. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has long flagged duplicative roles—e.g., 94 programs across 11 agencies for STEM education cost $3 billion annually with little coordination (GAO, 2018). DOGE’s cuts target such redundancies.

5. With interest on the $35 trillion debt exceeding $1 trillion yearly (CBO projections), each redundant job—say, $80,000/year—compounds the burden. Cutting 100,000 jobs could save $8 billion annually, a small but critical dent.

6. Streamlining bloated agencies like the IRS, which struggles with backlogs despite staffing, ensures taxpayer dollars fund results

Cuts are modest and justified by rampant overlap and fiscal pressure.

🧵🧵How Obama Made the Intelligence State Untouchable

1/ Barack Obama didn’t create the U.S. intelligence leviathan — but he perfected it.

Under his leadership, intelligence became decentralized, privatized, and embedded so deeply into the state that no one — not even the President — could fully control it again. Here’s how it happened: After 9/11, Bush built the post-Patriot Act security architecture. But Obama normalized it. He expanded it. And he protected it from consequences.

His actions didn’t just preserve the system — they sanctified it as the new status quo.

🧵🧵Indivisible is definitely the ring leader of the Tesla Takedown domestic terrorism movement. They are the main organizers, they host the weekly calls to lay out their plans.

Today was one of them. The call was one hour and ten mins and had some very interesting moments.

I see that today all over their messaging it says nonviolent because of the charges that were brought by Pam Bondi so they seem a little spooked.

Anyway, I listened to their entire organizing call for the 500 protests they are trying to organize for 3/29.

Truly dystopian stuff. 1. One of the speakers is a federal employee who belongs to the American Federation of Government Employees Union.

For that that don’t remember, they are one of the six groups that teamed up on December 19, 2024, to take down Trump. Marc Elias launched Civil Service Strong. The press release calls the firm a coalition of civil society institutions and organizations, including 2.2 million federal government civil servants.

She spoke on the call to rally protesters all across the country to make their voices heard.

So I just connected Indivisible with Civil Service Strong because it’s all tied together.

🧵🧵Politico released an article titled "USDA halts millions of dollars worth of deliveries to food banks"

Let’s break it down to show how the corporate media uses conjecture and innuendo, instead of verified sources and facts to push false narratives.

To be an informed citizen, you have to learn how to consume information. Let’s break down the claims the article makes, examine the people making the claims and determine if this is reporting the news or selling a narrative that they know is not based in facts. Summary of the article:

The Politico article claims that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), under the Trump administration, has halted millions of dollars in food deliveries to food banks through The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP).

They specifically cite that $500 million allocated for fiscal year 2025 was canceled.

It states that this follows a separate $1 billion cut to programs supporting schools and food banks purchasing food from farms.

The article suggests these cuts are part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to redirect funds, possibly from the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), to other priorities, leaving food banks in a lurch amid rising hunger needs.

Ok narrative: Trump is evil and purposefully cutting food bank programs so people starve while his billionaire friends get richer.

🧵🧵Sadly, because people are incapable of critical, thinking I have to debunk this— no Israel is not behind 9/11 🙄

Below are the three favorite “claims” in support of that and why they are wrong. “The Dancing Israelis"

One widely cited story involves five Israeli men detained in New Jersey on 9/11 after reportedly being seen celebrating or filming the attack. Apparently they are Mossad.

The men were employees of Urban Moving Systems, a company owned by an Israeli, Dominik Suter.

The FBI investigated them due to suspicious behavior (e.g., filming the burning towers) and found cameras, cash, and foreign passports in their van.

After extensive interrogation, including polygraph tests, the FBI concluded they had no prior knowledge of the attacks. They were deported for visa violations, not espionage or terrorism.

Their behavior—filming a major event—was not unique; many people documented 9/11.

The "celebration" claim stems from unverified witness accounts that were never substantiated.

There is zero evidence that links them to Mossad or the attacks’ planning.

The story was sensationalized by outlets like ABC News but clarified by subsequent FBI findings.

🧵🧵 It comes as no surprise, that the same people who want to decouple the word Judo from Christian when describing what America was founded on, don’t understand that this is an impossible feat.

The Old Testament shaped the founders’ worldview by providing a narrative of liberty (Exodus), a structure for governance (covenant), a moral compass (Mosaic law), and a sense of divine purpose (providence). It offered a language and logic for resisting tyranny, framing rights, and balancing human frailty with hope—ideas baked into the Declaration, Constitution, and early American ethos. While later termed "Judeo-Christian," this influence was immediate and practical in 1776, grounding their vision in a biblical heritage that felt both timeless and urgent.

At the heart of all of this is a message I have been trying to convey for months. Extremes will always exist in a country that reveres free speech and free expression above all else.

But as you can see below, extremes are not what this country was built on. This country was built on the middle. And, if you remove the media, the middle has much more in common than not.

Judeo-Christian" as a term postdates America’s founding, arising in the 19th century and peaking in the 20th. However, it encapsulates the biblical heritage—Jewish scriptures and Christian interpretation—that influenced the founders’ values and governance. This legacy, emphasizing law, liberty, and morality, distinguishes America’s roots from Islamic theology, which played no role in its formation. The phrase’s modern use reflects both historical reality and a later ideological construct.

And that is why you see a push to severe the two. Because the ultimate desire is to severe America with its founders. For those that want to understand how engrained the Bible is in our countries founding, read the Founders Bible. The Old Testament profoundly shaped the worldview of America’s founders, influencing their ideas about governance, morality, liberty, and human nature. While they were a diverse group—spanning devout Christians to Deists—the Hebrew Bible (what Christians call the Old Testament) provided a shared framework that informed their thinking, often filtered through their Christian lens.

🧵🧵 Since Arabella Advisors has been caught running the fake Families for Billionaires campaign against President Trump and his new tax plan, let’s talk a walk down corrupt NGO memory lane.

Arabella Advisors is the biggest and shadiest of the lefts dark money empires. It is ground zero.

Arabella Advisors isn’t just some do-gooder consulting firm; it’s a billion-dollar machine running a shadowy network of “nonprofits” that pump cash into leftist causes while dodging accountability. And yeah, they’re flirting with the edge of illegal every step of the way. First off: their structure. Arabella manages a web of 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) groups—New Venture Fund, Sixteen Thirty Fund, Hopewell Fund, Windward Fund, North Fund. These aren’t independent charities; they’re Arabella’s puppets. They raked in $1.6 billion in 2021 alone. Smell that? It’s dark money, and it’s stinking up our democracy.

🧵🧵Yes Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is Constitutional and No it is not an abuse of power.

1. It’s been around for 226 years and the courts have not touched it.

The Left loves to scream “unconstitutional!” like it’s a magic wand, but the Alien Enemies Act has stood unchallenged since 1798. Why? Because it’s ironclad.

The Supreme Court has never struck it down—not during the War of 1812, not in World War I, not even when FDR used it in World War II to detain and deport thousands.

In Ludecke v. Watkins (1948), the Court upheld its use, ruling that the President’s power under the Act is a political decision, not a judicial one.

Translation: the Constitution gives Congress and the Executive the reins here, and the judiciary’s got no business meddling. If it was unconstitutional, two centuries of legal minds would’ve torched it by now. They haven’t. 2. It’s Not About Citizens—It’s About Foreign Nationals, Who Don’t Get Full Constitutional Rights

The Left’s favorite trick is pretending the Act stomps on “due process” or “equal protection.” Wrong. It applies only to non-citizen aliens from hostile nations—people who don’t get the full Bill of Rights buffet.

The Supreme Court’s been crystal clear: foreign nationals on U.S. soil, especially in wartime or during a threat, don’t have the same protections as citizens.

Look at Harisiades v. Shaughnessy (1952)—aliens can be deported with minimal process if national security’s at stake. The Act doesn’t touch Americans; it targets enemy agents. Conflating the two is either deliberate bad faith or constitutional illiteracy.

🧵When Commies and Clerics Crashed the Shah’s Party—And the Reds Got Wrecked

Those who fail to study history are destined to repeat it. And as we watch the unholy alliance between the communists and the Islamists form, those of us who are students of history can see the writing on the wall.

Iran, 1979. The Shah’s throne is barely hanging on, and two groups who’d normally shank each other over a bowl of stew decide to team up.

On one side, the communists—red flag-waving dreamers of a worker’s utopia. On the other, the Islamists—turbaned zealots led by a guy who looks like he invented frowning. Their mission? Topple the Shah. Their fate? A betrayal so brutal it’s almost comedic. Welcome to the revolution where the commies thought they’d get a starring role, only to end up as the punchline. Meet Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran—a U.S.-backed monarch who treated oil money like his personal slush fund and ran Iran like a Vegas casino with worse odds. After the CIA and MI6 staged a 1953 coup to oust Prime Minister Mosaddegh (who dared to nationalize Iran’s oil) the Shah turned up the authoritarian dial to 11. By the ‘70s, though, his gig was up. Inflation was through the roof, corruption was a national sport, and his Westernization fetish had the locals ready to riot. Enter the revolutionaries, stage left.

🧵🧵The Holy Land Foundation Trial

The Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial stands as the largest terrorism financing prosecution in U.S. history, offering a profound glimpse into how terrorist networks, particularly those tied to Hamas, allegedly operated within the United States. Spanning two trials—2007 (a mistrial) and 2008 (resulting in convictions)—and culminating in sentencing in 2009, the case centered on HLF, once America’s largest Muslim charity, and its five key leaders. The U.S. government accused HLF of funneling over $12 million to Hamas after its designation as a foreign terrorist organization in 1995, revealing a sophisticated financial support system masquerading as humanitarian aid. Founded in 1989 as the Occupied Land Fund and rebranded as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, HLF operated out of Richardson, Texas, with branches in New Jersey, California, and Illinois. It portrayed itself as a charity aiding Palestinians and other needy populations, raising millions annually—$13 million in 2000 alone. However, suspicions of ties to Hamas, a Palestinian militant group rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood, emerged in the 1990s. After Hamas’s 1995 terrorist designation under Executive Order 12947 and the 1996 Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s material support statute, such connections became illegal.

🧵🧵Since Perkins Coie is in the news let us recap this nefarious organized crime racket that doubles as a Democrat law firm:

Perkins Coie, acting as legal counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC), hired Fusion GPS in April 2016 to conduct opposition research on Donald Trump.

Fusion GPS subcontracted Christopher Steele, a former MI6 officer, who produced the Steele Dossier—a collection of memos alleging ties between Trump, his campaign, and Russian operatives, including unverified claims of kompromat (compromising material).

The entire memo was based on lies and fabrication. Perkins Coie paid Fusion GPS $1.02 million in legal fees and expenses between June 2015 and December 2016, with at least $168,000 going to Steele’s firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, via Fusion GPS.

These payments were funneled through Perkins Coie and initially reported as “legal services” or “legal and compliance consulting” on campaign finance filings.

Perkins Coie deliberately obscured the purpose of these payments to hide the dossier’s creation from public scrutiny and regulators. The DNC and Clinton campaign did not disclose Fusion GPS’s role until October 2017, after reporting by The Washington Post.

This is evidence of collusion between the law firm and the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton.

🧵🧵Students for Justice in Palestine is the “grassroots” group organizing the super peaceful protests across college campuses where they lock Jewish students in the library, harass and assault students, spit on them and engage in property destruction.

This is the super peaceful free speech group that Mohammad Khalil is aligned with because one of the main organizers of these protests is SJP.

SJP is the head of WokeQaeda and if after reading this thread you still want to pretend this is peaceful protest and free speech then you need to get a crop top keffiya and chant Infantida along with them. SJP supports “Palestinian liberation” against “Zionist settler-colonialism.” Its rhetoric—e.g., “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free” and “Intifada until victory”—is indistinguishable from Palestinian nationalist factions, particularly Hamas and PFLP, which seek a single Palestinian state replacing Israel.

SJP’s rejects Zionism mirroring the exact stance of Hamas, which gained prominence in the First (1987–1993) and Second (2000–2005) Intifadas. They do not want a two state solution. They want Israel wiped off the map.

SJP statement on 10/7: called Hamas’s attack a “historic win for the Palestinian resistance,” praising “martyrs” and “creativity” in breaching Israeli defenses. They put out a toolkit with a plan for resistance.

SJP organizes campus protests, boycotts (e.g., BDS campaigns), and disruptions (e.g., 2024 Columbia encampments), mobilizing students to pressure institutions into divesting from Israel-linked entities.