🧵🧵🧵 OpenAI and Anthropic are building the AI products that threaten to displace millions of workers while simultaneously funding the research that quantifies that displacement, bankrolling the political candidates who propose government solutions like universal basic income, and lobbying for regulations that only the wealthiest companies can afford to comply with, which locks out competitors, consolidates their control over how the public accesses information, and ensures that taxpayers rather than tech billionaires absorb the economic fallout.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

And they are trying to do it before midterms hoping they can swing the election to the democrats. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman personally funded the largest universal basic income study in American history through his nonprofit OpenResearch, giving $1,000 a month to 3,000 people over three years.

He did this before ChatGPT even launched, meaning he was building the case for government cash payments while simultaneously building the product he now says will destroy jobs.

Altman has publicly stated that many professions will “go away” and that “the world is not prepared.” He is the salesman and the arsonist selling fire insurance.

. @LarryTaunton went to the Gaza border. With an M16 in his lap. Riding with IDF soldiers along the same roads where Oct. 7 happened. He wrote it up for The Federalist and it’s one of the most important pieces of journalism on this conflict I’ve read. But it hasn’t gotten nearly enough attention for the amazing reporting that was done. 🧵

The article is linked at the end of the thread and I hope everyone takes the time to read it. This is just a summary of its most important points. 1. He physically drove along “Burma,” the IDF code name for the fence road, with a 25-year-old IDF soldier named Mikaela and a Special Forces guide named Doron. He saw the destroyed surveillance towers. The mobile bomb shelters where families were slaughtered. The battlefields.

2. Remember that border fence? $1.1 billion. Three years to build. 40 miles long. Israel’s defense minister called it a “wall of iron” in 2021. The IDF chief of staff said “what happened in the past won’t happen again.” Less than two years later, ~7,000 Hamas fighters breached it in 109+ locations.

3. This wasn’t a random terrorist attack on a music festival. That’s the narrative Western media sold us. Taunton lays out that it was a coordinated military operation by land, sea, and air. Fighters came on motorcycles, boats, paragliders, even golf carts. They carried AK-47s, RPGs, anti-tank missiles, .50 cal machine guns. 50 battle sites. 600 square kilometers. 50 hours.

4. A senior Israeli law enforcement official retired IDF lieutenant colonel told Taunton something chilling. Hamas fighters carried maps with exact locations. They knew where every kibbutz was, who lived where, even who had a dog. How? Work visas.

🧵🧵 Your quick guide on the Demolition Project underway in the conservative right.

The End Goal

The end goal is the replacement of the American constitutional republic with a post-liberal political order rooted in a specific religious and cultural authority.

Not conservatism as it has existed.

Not the Judeo-Christian framework that undergirds the founding.

Something fundamentally different that uses Christian language but operates on pre-Christian, pre-constitutional principles of centralized authority, enforced orthodoxy, and hierarchical control.

Everything else is a means to that end.

The Architecture

Think of it as a building with multiple floors. Each floor serves a specific function. And most of the people operating on any given floor don’t see the full building. They think they’re engaged in their own fight. But every floor feeds upward to the same penthouse. Floor One: Destabilize Trust

This is the foundation of everything. Before you can replace a system, you have to make people lose faith in it.

Tucker, the populist influencers, the alternative media ecosystem, they all serve this function.

Question every institution.

Question every source of information.

Question every alliance.

Question every norm.

Some of this is legitimate. Institutions have failed. Media has lied. Politicians have betrayed trust. The grievances are real. But the function of this floor isn’t to reform institutions. It’s to create a vacuum.

When people trust nothing, they become desperate for something to trust.

And desperate people don’t evaluate what they’re offered. They grab whatever feels solid.

🧵🧵Have Candace and Tucker just lost their minds?

No. They have not they are distributing Dugin occultism and satanism to American audiences and calling it Christianity.

In 1980, Dugin joined the Yuzhinsky Circle, a group that dabbled in Satanism, esoteric Nazism, and other forms of the occult. The circle gained a reputation for séances, mysticism, hypnotism, Ouija boards, trances, and pentagrams. Dugin adopted an alter ego named “Hans Sievers” a reference to a Nazi researcher of the paranormal.

His influences include René Guénon (a French occultist), Julius Evola (an Italian fascist occultist), and Aleister Crowley the most famous Satanist of the 20th century.

The symbol Dugin chose for his political movement is the “wheel of chaos” which comes from British occultism and looks strikingly similar to SS and neo-Nazi symbols.

Despite claiming to be a Russian Orthodox Christian, Dugin’s actual beliefs are manifestationist and occultist.

His supposed Christian allegiance is in fact adherence to esoteric ideas that he claims are the hidden truth underneath Christianity.

A Russian occultist fascist philosopher who practiced séances, adopted a Nazi alter ego, was influenced by Aleister Crowley, uses a chaos magic symbol, and believes in a cosmic war between Christianity and Judaism that man’s ideas are now being delivered, almost word for word, to the largest conservative podcast audiences in America.

They haven’t lost their minds. They’re doing exactly what Dugin’s framework calls for: using Christian civilizational language to deliver occult-fascist content to Western audiences, in order to destroy the liberal democratic order from within, break the American-Israeli alliance, and reorient the West toward the Eurasian axis.

The founders built the First Amendment to prevent foreign religious and political influence from capturing American discourse. What’s happening right now is a Russian occult-fascist framework, laundered through Catholic cultural identity and conservative media infrastructure, being delivered to the American public as though it were patriotic Christianity.

It isn’t. And once you see the overlay between Dugin’s published writings and Tucker and Candace’s recent content, you can’t unsee it. What does he believe?

One: There was a lost golden age before recorded history an ancient civilization of spiritually advanced beings, sometimes called Hyperboreans, sometimes connected to the biblical giants (Nephilim). This idea comes from völkisch occultists who believed the Aryans originated in a paradise at the North Pole called Hyperborea or Arktogäa. Modern civilization destroyed the connection to this spiritual knowledge.

Two: Certain people can access hidden spiritual dimensions through esoteric practices
astral projection, trances, séances, activation of the “third eye.” Modernity suppressed this knowledge. Recovering it is part of the spiritual revolution.

Three: History is a cosmic war between two civilizations. The “Eurasian” civilization (Russia, the Orthodox world, traditional Islam) represents spiritual truth. The “Atlanticist” civilization (America, the West, liberal democracy) represents spiritual death. Russia as the “Third Rome” is the Katechon the Restrainer holding back the Antichrist. And the Antichrist is the Western liberal order.

Four: Jews are the hidden enemy. Dugin refers to a “world plot” and an “eternal enemy” behind it, directly related to the narrative of the Antichrist. This ideology sees an “occult metaphysical war” between Christianity and Judaism. In 1993, he appeared on Russian TV scaring audiences with a world plot allegedly organized by “Kike-Masons,” referencing the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In his framework, the Jewish desire to rebuild the Third Temple in Jerusalem is the trigger for the apocalypse the final move in the cosmic war against Christian civilization.

Five: The goal is to destroy liberal democracy and replace it with a spiritual-political order based on tradition, hierarchy, and religious authority. There is no separating the political and the theological in Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory. He wants to end the separation of church and state everywhere.

How Candace and Tucker are distributing this to America:

On February 16, MTG sat in Bethlehem with Mayor Maher N. Canawati and broadcast his claim that Israel is persecuting Palestinian Christians.

She cited 139 IDF checkpoints, accused settlers of stealing Christian homes, and urged American Christians to “speak out.”

What she did not say is that Canawati was not elected by the people of Bethlehem. According to the Palestinian News Network, his appointment was brokered by Palestinian Authority intelligence chief Majed Faraj during a closed session packed with Fatah officials and PA security figures.

The mayor’s chair is rotated through backroom power-sharing deals, not ballots.

Bethlehem sits in Area A under the Oslo Accords, meaning it is entirely under PA jurisdiction.

Israelis cannot even enter the city. Greene blamed Israel for conditions in a city Israel does not govern.

The persecution Greene attributes to Israel is inflicted by the Palestinian Authority and Hamas and she knows it.

Christians went from 86% of Bethlehem’s population in 1950 to roughly 10% today, all under PA governance.

In Gaza, the Christian population collapsed from 5,000 to 1,000 under Hamas rule.

A 2020 survey by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (a Palestinian institution in Ramallah, not an Israeli one) found that over 40% of Palestinian Christians feel Muslims do not wish to see them in Palestine, 44% face discrimination in employment, 30% have been called “non-believers” or “crusaders,” and a quarter have been urged to convert to Islam.

In 2007, Hamas militants murdered Rami Ayyad, a Bible Society worker, for his faith. Greek Orthodox Bishop Alexios confirmed that forced conversions to Islam occurred “under threats, coercion, compulsion, and force” and petitioned Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh to investigate. Nothing happened.

Christians in Gaza have reported practicing their faith in secret and growing beards to blend in.

Christian women under the PA face systematic sexual harassment, land theft, firebombing of churches, forced marriage, and extortion all documented by scholars like Justus Reid Weiner at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, who interviewed dozens of victims too terrified to go public.

The PA actively suppresses reporting of this persecution. The Maronite church in Bethlehem was attacked six times, including an arson attack, and none of the incidents were covered by PA media and gag orders were imposed in every case.

Christian leaders are coerced into blaming Israel as a condition of their survival; researchers have described how the PA “uses Christian leaders as political pawns” who “shift the blame for their struggles onto Israel while denying the role of Muslim-dominated authorities in the persecution.” The PCPSR itself has been the target of PA hostility, with its offices ransacked by mobs after publishing findings that contradicted PA narratives.

Pastor Johnny Shahwan was arrested by PA security forces for “promoting normalization” with Israel.

A mob attacked the Forefathers Orthodox Church in Beit Sahour while congregants cowered inside and the PA did nothing.

Gunmen shot up a Christian-owned hotel and no arrests.

MTG told you none of this though. She sat with the PA’s appointed spokesman and let him perform his role unchallenged.

She’s just an abject liar and you should ask yourself why.

Israel is the only country in the Middle East where the Christian population is growing approximately 187,900 Christians live in Israel, with consistent year-over-year growth.

Christian schools in Israel are among the finest in the country, producing 34 percent of Arab university students from just 4 percent of Arab schools.

84% of Israeli Christians say they are satisfied with life in the country.

Arab pastor Saleem Shalash of Nazareth stated plainly: “As an Arab pastor, I would prefer to live in Israel. The freedom we have in Israel we don’t have in the best Arab countries. We can practice our belief without persecution. And if there is persecution, we can call the police and they will protect us.”

Same ethnicity. Same language. Same region. Christians under Israeli governance thrive. Christians under PA and Hamas governance flee or die.

MTG knows this she’s not stupid. Instead she chose to platform the PA’s hand-picked Christian puppet, amplify the lie that Israel is the persecutor, and give cover to the Islamist authorities who are executing the slow-motion extinction of Christianity from its birthplace.

Why do these people hate Christians so much?

AUGUST 2017: The Beginning
Steve Bannon is ousted as Trump’s chief strategist

∙Leaves White House amid internal conflicts with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump

∙According to Michael Wolff, Bannon meets Jeffrey Epstein shortly after through Wolff’s introduction

∙Wolff later writes: “Bannon and Epstein spent an enormous amount of time together and became very close friends” (NBC News, February 12, 2026)

LATE 2017 - EARLY 2018: The Friendship Deepens

Bannon and Epstein begin extensive communications

∙Text and email “at all hours” (NBC News, February 12, 2026)

∙“Traded political intelligence, speculated about Trump’s legal troubles and made plans to spend time together in far-flung locations such as Paris and New York” (NBC News, February 12, 2026)

∙Arrange secret meetings “under the cover of darkness” to avoid Epstein’s 24/7 surveillance cameras (NBC News, February 12, 2026)

∙Bannon asks for “access that’s not the front door” (NBC News, February 12, 2026)

Epstein offers Bannon lavish perks:

∙“Private jet travel, lodging at his Manhattan townhouse, and medical care” (NBC News, February 12, 2026)

∙Apple watches and other gifts

MAY 2018: “God”

Bannon calls Epstein “God” in text conversation

∙Context: discussing currency trading and Epstein’s financial acumen

∙“Bannon allegedly called Epstein ‘God’” (The New Republic, February 15, 2026)

∙Not sarcastic—appears to be genuine admiration NOVEMBER 2018: The Secret Rome Meeting

Bannon meets Russian Aleksandr Dugin for 8 hours in Rome

∙Meeting takes place in a “fancy hotel room in Rome in November 2018” (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

∙Location: Hotel de Russie, “blocks away from Julius Evola’s old apartment in Rome” (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

∙Meeting was SECRET - Bannon told author Benjamin Teitelbaum: “If (the American media) knew I had a meeting with Dugin, literally it would be front page of the Washington Post. It’s ‘Bannon’s a traitor,’ and they’d go nuts.” (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

∙When first meeting Dugin, Bannon said: “Can you imagine what Washington would think?” (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

What they discussed (per Teitelbaum’s reconstruction from extensive interviews with Bannon):

∙Traditionalist philosophy and Martin Heidegger

∙“A series of geopolitical matters” (Wikipedia: Aleksandr Dugin, accessed February 2026)

∙Bannon “pressed him to abandon his support for China, Turkey, and Iran” (Wikipedia: Aleksandr Dugin, accessed February 2026)

∙The need to “support populist movements in Europe to confront global elites” (Reset DOC interview with Dugin)

∙How to create “a bridge between Russia and American populism” (Reset DOC interview with Dugin)

Dugin on Bannon:

∙Called Bannon “Washington’s last hope” in 2017 (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

∙Said Bannon is “the only American intellectual familiar with Evola and Guenon and interested in Heidegger” (Reset DOC interview with Dugin)

∙Described him as his “ideological ally” (The Daily Beast, September 9, 2024)
Bannon on Dugin:

∙“You know, I’m such a fan of his writing” (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

∙Described Dugin as “one of the greatest, most influential geopolitical thinkers and strategists of modern times” (Inroads Journal, December 14, 2022)

Also in November 2018: Coordinating with Michael Wolff and Epstein

∙Wolff tells Epstein he’s meeting with Bannon (The Hollywood Reporter, November 22, 2025)

∙Wolff is working on second anti-Trump book

∙Epstein later tells Bannon that Wolff’s book contains “lots of Steve quotes. Lots” (CBS News, November 14, 2025)

∙Bannon frets to Epstein: “How bad am I going to get lit up???” (CBS News, November 14, 2025)

🧵🧵 Who is behind the protests in MN tonight. Let’s do a deep dive.

Minnesota’s latest wave of anti‑ICE unrest did not appear out of thin air. It’s the result of a revolutionary ecosystem bankrolled and shaped by foreign‑aligned actors like Neville Roy Singham and their U.S. NGO partners. The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), Refuse Fascism’s orbit, the National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression (NAARPR), the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), and local ICE‑watch networks all snapped into motion tonight each playing a distinct role in turning one shooting into a coordinated campaign against ICE.

But as we know with communists the thing is never about the thing. It’s about the revolution. Long before Renee Good was killed, Minnesota had already become a laboratory for organized resistance to federal immigration enforcement.

Reporting from the Star Tribune describes a dense ecosystem of “ICE watch” networks: residents driving Lake Street for hours, phones mounted on dashboards, constantly feeding information into encrypted chats where a single message—“ICE at the grocery store” or “unmarked vans on 27th” which can draw dozens of people to a scene.

headsupnews.org/p/federal-agen…

Rush Limbaugh, Andrew Breitbart and Charlie Kirk. Some voices are once in a generation. We feel their absence but their words, but their legacy will always be profound.

What has Trump even done since he got into office? My favorite question.

THREAD: Trump’s First 10 Months - The Complete Promise Tracker 🧵
(1/30)

President Donald Trump’s second term has been nothing short of historic.

In just 10 months (January 20 - November 17, 2025), he’s issued 213 executive orders, 54 presidential memoranda, and 107 proclamations—far outpacing his first term.

Official White House tallies and independent trackers like PolitiFact’s MAGA-Meter rate over 70% of his major 2024 campaign promises as “kept” or “in progress.”

His “Agenda 47” platform outlined over 20 core promises with dozens of specific policy pledges focused on securing borders, economic revival, energy dominance, and restoring American strength.
This thread breaks down every major fulfilled promise by category, with specific actions, outcomes, and verified results. (2/30) BORDER SECURITY - DAY ONE ACTION

Trump’s first promise: “Seal the border and stop the migrant invasion on Day One.”

DELIVERED: Executive Order 14001 (January 20, 2025) declared a national border emergency, suspended asylum claims at the southern border, and deployed 10,000 National Guard troops immediately.

RESULT: Within weeks, illegal border crossings dropped 98%, hitting historic lows with under 1,000 monthly apprehensions by June 2025.

This represents the lowest level of illegal immigration in decades and validates Trump’s “secure the border first” approach that critics said was impossible.

Before anybody gets triggered, let me make something perfectly clear:

Yes — I am a Christian.
Yes — I am an evangelical.
Yes — I am proudly pro-Israel.
Yes — I am the Zionist your group chats shake about.

And because of that, I already know exactly what’s coming.

The minute this thread goes up, the same people who accuse everyone else of being “NPCs,” “Zionist ops,” “globalist plants,” and “controlled opposition” are going to melt down like I’ve committed heresy.

Why?

Because I am about to give them a taste of their own medicine, the part they cannot handle:

Actual facts.
Actual receipts.
Actual history.

See, they love to weaponize lies against evangelicals.

They love to smear pastors, accuse widows, invent “ops,” and throw around words like “trafficking” with zero evidence.

But the second you turn the mirror around?

The second you apply their tactics back on them using true, documented cases?

Suddenly I’m the problem.
Suddenly I’m “hysterical.”
Suddenly I’m “obsessed.”

No, what’s actually happening is that the mask slips.

The response to this thread will prove, once and for all, that the loudest “truth-tellers” in “our”movement are the ones borrowing the exact same psychological warfare tactics the left uses:

– moral projection
– selective outrage
– emotional manipulation
– conspiratorial framing
– weaponized slander
– smearing entire churches
– exploiting tragedy for clicks
– accusing anyone who disagrees of being an “op”

And when their own rules are applied to them?

When you simply mirror their rhetoric with actual facts?

They will viciously attack me for it.

That’s fine.

I will be fake doxxed, called a criminal, they will post random peoples criminal histories, a Mossad agent, an Israeli bot, an account run by 246 people, part of the IDF, not really a stay at home mom, a grifter, and I can’t think of any other ones yet but the they will think of more ways to viciously attack me.

Because if you can’t respond to the message, the only thing you can do is attack the messenger and so I am OK with it. I will be the sacrificial lamb. I will be the one getting death threats. Its ok. I know how they operate now and I’ll take one for team America.

God calls us to bear witness not to be silent while wolves pretend to be sheep.

So if this thread makes you uncomfortable, good.

Sometimes the only way to expose what people are really doing is hold up a giant mirror and let bystanders watch what happens.

Now let’s begin. A certain self-anointed podcaster/arbiter of truth and justice is screaming that “MAGA churches” are Zionist ops, Calvary Chapel is a Hollywood trafficking ring, pastors are “secret Jews,” and Charlie Kirk was murdered to silence his “awakening.”

Okay.
If we’re “just asking questions”…
If we’re “following the pattern”…
Let’s actually do it.

Let’s ask some questions. I can’t possibly imagine how anybody could have a problem with documented court cases being listed, and very reasonable questions being asked I mean, unless of course, there are hypocrites who are just projecting and grifting right?

🧵🧵In the 1930s, Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist regime launched one of history’s most audacious religious experiments: to tear Christianity away from its Jewish foundation. The project, called Positive Christianity, aimed to purge every trace of Judaism from German religious life — to create a Christianity without the Old Testament, without Israel, without the Jewish Christ.

It was, in effect, an attempt to rewrite the Bible and redefine faith itself. From the earliest days of the Nazi Party, Hitler used the language of faith to win the confidence of Christian voters. The 1920 Party Programme declared that Nazism stood for “Positive Christianity” — a deliberately vague term that sounded pious while freeing the party from any specific doctrine.

“Positive Christianity” was never about theology; it was about control. It promised freedom for churches only if they aligned with “the moral feelings of the German race.” In practice, that meant silencing pastors, rewriting Scripture, and bending the pulpit to serve the Reich.

🧵🧵In August, a story broke that should have been everywhere. It wasn’t.

It barely made a sound.

The Washington Free Beacon reported that some of America’s biggest companies, including Amazon, Pfizer, and Walmart, were quietly funding a nonprofit that flies state attorneys general around the world for so-called “rule of law” trips. One of those destinations was Qatar. Yes, that Qatar, the one constantly criticized for human rights abuses and shady lobbying in Washington.

If you missed it, you are not alone. Almost nobody covered it. Which is unbelievable, because this is one of the most serious examples of quiet corruption we have seen in years. What Is Actually Happening

There is a group called the Attorney General Alliance, or AGA. On paper, it is a bipartisan nonprofit that helps state attorneys general share ideas and work with international partners. In reality, it looks more like a private club for people in power and the corporations that want to stay close to them.

Here is how it works. Big companies donate large sums of money to AGA. The group uses that money to host conferences and international trips for attorneys general and their staff. One recent trip took them to Doha, Qatar, where they stayed in luxury hotels, met with Qatari officials, and discussed issues like human trafficking and global justice.

It all sounds professional and educational until you realize that many of these same companies are under investigation by those very same AGs for things like antitrust violations, data privacy issues, and drug pricing scandals.

It is not technically illegal. But it looks a lot like influence.

Everyone thinks Trump’s new aggression toward Venezuela is about drugs, migration, or Maduro.

It’s not.

It’s about China — and who controls the Western Hemisphere. 🧵👇 Over the last two decades, China has poured more than $130 billion into Latin America, mostly into energy-rich nations like Venezuela, Brazil, and Ecuador.

Those weren’t loans in the traditional sense.

They were strategic footholds collateralized by oil, copper, lithium, and political loyalty.

Each “loan” was really an exchange: resources for influence.

Debt became diplomacy.
Interest became control.

🧵🧵Thread: The Danger of the Sarsour-Wahhaj-Mamdani Machine

1. Imam Siraj Wahhaj’s History and Extremist Connections

Imam Siraj Wahhaj was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing after serving as a character witness for Omar Abdel-Rahman (the “Blind Sheikh”), mastermind of the attack and leader of the Egyptian terrorist group Gama’a al-Islamiyya.

Wahhaj did not face charges, but federal prosecutors and retired FBI agents cite his history of defending terror plotters, fundraising for convicted jihadists, and hosting “radical preachers and gun-training circles” at his Brooklyn mosque, Masjid At-Taqwa.

Wahhaj’s platform has included explicit calls for an Islamic state in America, refusal to condemn violence by Islamist regimes, and statements highlighted by critics and some reformist Muslim leaders as fundamentally incompatible with pluralist democracy. 2. Linda Sarsour’s Strategic Elevation of Wahhaj

Linda Sarsour has openly called Wahhaj her “mentor” and brought him onto organizing stages at high-profile conferences, including her own Women’s March-related events and major Muslim-American activist rallies.

This partnership is strategic: Sarsour uses Wahhaj’s respected name within some Muslim communities to mobilize and build coalition power, especially in districts with large immigrant or Muslim populations.

Wahhaj’s endorsement and participation open doors for candidates and activist campaigns, often boosting turnout and fundraising.

Through vehicles like the Muslim Democratic Club of NY (MDCNY), the Working Families Party, and MPower Change, Sarsour channels his network’s resources, endorsements, and organizational know-how to support preferred candidates including Zohran Mamdani and allies aligned on issues of policing, Palestine, and multicultural equity.

These efforts have tangible results. MDCNY, for example, explicitly works to increase Muslim-American voter turnout and shape candidate pipelines, with Wahhaj and Sarsour regularly referenced together in its promotional materials and at events.

MPower Change, Sarsour’s digital advocacy group, frequently invites Wahhaj to its webinars, using his influence to activate fundraising and lobbying initiatives.

The Working Families Party, New York’s most prominent left-wing independent power broker, has formed alliances with MDCNY and MPower Change to endorse candidates jointly, effectively mainstreaming Wahhaj’s ideological agenda within Democratic local primaries.

Within these circles, Wahhaj’s history, controversial to many outside observers, does not act as a barrier but as a badge of honor, allowing his ideas about social justice, Islamic law, and advocacy against “imperialist” U.S. policy to circulate among ambitious activists and policy staffers.

Sarsour’s approach, which frames Wahhaj’s legacy as “social justice leadership,” ensures that his platform and connections penetrate multiple verticals of New York’s Democratic political climate and influence candidate selection, messaging, and organizational partnerships well beyond the Muslim community.

muslims.brooklynhistory.org/narrators/lind…

nypost.com/2025/10/18/us-…

🧵🧵The “Rothschild-funded Scofield Bible” myth falls apart with one fact (in addition to the fact that there is not one iota of actual historical evidence the Rothschilds helped write or print that Bible).

Jesuit Francisco Ribera wrote his futurist theory of a future Antichrist in 1590, over 150 years before the first Rothschild was born. C. I. Scofield revived Ribera’s idea in 1909.

It was not Zionists who changed prophecy. It was a Catholic Jesuit, and conspiracy fans are just repeating his 16th century defense of the papacy.

As always, I bring actual receipts below. And yes I know the paid propagandists will never engage in a debate on the facts because they are impossible to refute. They will just say I am paid by Israel. And I will laugh. Francisco Ribera invented futurism in 1590

•Primary source: Francisco Ribera, In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentarij (1590).

This was his Latin commentary on Revelation. He proposed that:

•The Antichrist would be a single man who rules the world for 3½ literal years.

•The events of Revelation 4–22 were still future.

🧵 USS Liberty

Feel free to fact check this. Never take my word on anything. I never take anyone’s word, I fact check everything. But since this seems to be the top talking point for the IDS infected patients, let’s actually examine it.

The basic facts of the USS Liberty tragedy are not in dispute and have been examined by every relevant body on both sides. On June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War, Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked the U.S. Navy signals-intelligence ship USS Liberty in international waters, killing 34 Americans and wounding 171. Israel apologized and paid compensation. Multiple U.S. and Israeli reviews acknowledged severe failures but did not produce proof of a deliberate attack ordered with knowledge the ship was American.

What remains contested is INTENT. Below are the main claims about motive, followed by why each collapses on the evidence and on basic strategic logic. 👇 Claim 1: Israel attacked to stop U.S. intelligence collection that could expose Israeli operations

The theory. The Liberty was a SIGINT ship. Some argue Israel wanted to prevent U.S. intercepts about its battlefield plans, so it intentionally destroyed the ship and witnesses.

Why it fails.
First, there is no “smoking gun” order or verified intercept showing Israeli leaders knew they were striking a U.S. vessel. Declassified NSA and CIA records, along with the U.S. Navy’s inquiry, have never produced such proof. They document confusion, misidentification, communication failures, and grievous errors, not confirmed intent.

Second, the cost would have been catastrophic for Israel’s interests. Deliberately killing Americans would risk destroying the alliance with the United States, Israel’s most critical partner. The behavior after the incident, formal apologies, reparations, and acceptance of U.S. inquiries, is consistent with a tragic mistake, not a planned murder of an ally’s sailors.

Even if Israel had been trying to hide something, destroying a U.S. Navy ship full of American personnel would have been the least effective and most self-defeating way to do it. Killing thirty-four Americans would guarantee the very scrutiny, outrage, and international condemnation they would supposedly be trying to avoid. The idea collapses under its own logic: if the goal was secrecy, a public scandal was the worst possible outcome.

Israel’s subsequent behavior reinforces that point. It immediately admitted responsibility, issued formal apologies, cooperated with U.S. investigations, and paid compensation to the families of the dead and the U.S. government for the loss of the ship. Those are not the actions of a state that planned an intentional strike and then sought to bury it they are the actions of a government scrambling to repair an alliance after a catastrophic mistake.

🧵THREAD: How $2.4 Billion in Dark Money, Foreign Training in Cuba, and NGO Fronts Are Fueling a Domestic Insurgency in America

Cuba trains. China props. Arabella funds. NGOs deploy.
America burns.
👇 AT THE TOP: Cuba’s Revolutionary Export Machine

• ICAP (Institute for Friendship with the Peoples)
• Venceremos Brigade
• May Day Brigade
• Cuba’s Communist Party (PCC)

These train foreign radicals under the guise of “solidarity.”
U.S. activists attend.
They’re trained in tactics, not tourism.

Origins: Soviet Antisemitism Disguised as “Anti-Zionism”

The anti-Zionist propaganda campaign was a Cold War information operation engineered by the KGB and Soviet ideological departments beginning in the late 1940s, intensifying in the 1950s–1980s.

Key motives:

•Political: To undermine Western influence in the Middle East by painting Israel (a Western-aligned state) as a colonial, racist project.

•Ideological: To reframe antisemitism as a moral stance against “Zionism,” which they redefined as imperialism.

•Strategic: To win over Arab nationalist movements (especially Egypt, Syria, the PLO) and gain access to regional allies and resources.

After 1967’s Six-Day War, when Israel’s stunning victory embarrassed Moscow’s Arab clients, the KGB and Soviet bloc intelligence began a sustained campaign to delegitimize Israel on the global stage. Construction: How the KGB Designed the Narrative

The KGB’s Department for Disinformation (Service A of the First Chief Directorate) crafted a narrative architecture that deliberately blurred Zionism, racism, and imperialism — making “Zionist” synonymous with “Western evil.”

Core propaganda lines they developed:

1.“Zionism = Racism” – culminating in UN Resolution 3379 (1975), which declared Zionism a form of racism. Soviet diplomats and intelligence officers lobbied heavily for this resolution through coordinated disinformation.

2.“Israel = Apartheid South Africa” – a linkage designed to turn the anti-colonial Third World against Israel.

3.“Jews control U.S. finance and foreign policy” – a revival of czarist antisemitic tropes from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, repackaged in Marxist anti-capitalist language.

4.“The Holocaust was exaggerated to justify imperialism” – pushed through fringe Western leftist publications and the Arab press to delegitimize Jewish suffering.

This messaging was tailored differently depending on the target audience:

•In Arab states, it was religious and nationalist: portraying Israel as a Western Crusader state.

•In Western leftist movements, it was ideological: portraying Israel as a capitalist, colonial oppressor.

•In the Global South, it was moral: framing anti-Zionism as part of the broader anti-racist, anti-colonial struggle.

🧵🧵Debunking “Blackmail, Bribes, and Fear”: How Tucker Carlson and Jeffrey Sachs Repackage Old Soviet Propaganda for the Multipolar Age

The Setup: Manufactured Outrage and Selective Facts

In his episode “Blackmail, Bribes, and Fear: Netanyahu Claims He Controls Donald Trump and America,” Tucker Carlson presents an explosive thesis: that Israel, a “tiny” and “insignificant” country, controls U.S. politics through manipulation, humiliation, and bribes.

The rhetoric is cinematic, filled with insinuations of betrayal and blackmail, but when examined against verifiable data, it collapses under the weight of exaggeration, omission, and emotional engineering.

Carlson’s framing is simple: Israel is not an ally but a master, and America is its puppet. It is the perfect formula for populist resentment, mixing partial truths with loaded emotion, but the structure of the narrative follows a far older and more cynical tradition. Step 1: Framing and Emotional Manipulation

From the outset, Carlson uses loaded adjectives such as “tiny,” “insignificant,” and “humiliating” to create an emotional distance between Americans and Israel. This is not analysis. It is psychological priming. It suggests that the very idea of supporting Israel is irrational because it violates a basic sense of national pride.

This is the first rule of propaganda: reframe alliances as servitude. In the 1970s, the Soviet Union perfected this tactic, painting Eastern European allies as “prostitutes of Washington” and “puppets of Zionist imperialism.” Tucker’s episode mirrors that approach, only inverted. Now the U.S. is cast as Israel’s colony.

By calling the relationship “humiliating,” the episode invites an instinctive reaction: shame. But shame is not proof, and emotional resonance is not evidence.

🧵🧵The Propaganda Century: How the Woke Left and Woke Right Recycled a 1920s Invention

In the 1920s, propaganda became an industry. In the 2020s, it became everyone’s side hustle.

I. The Birth of the Manipulated Mind

Propaganda did not start with Hitler or Stalin. It started with advertising executives in Manhattan boardrooms.

After World War I, Western governments discovered that mass persuasion could move entire populations. Posters, slogans, and patriotic newsreels had convinced millions to fight, ration, and sacrifice. When peace returned, those same tools migrated into civilian life.

The man who codified it was Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and the father of modern public relations. His central idea was breathtakingly cynical: democracy could survive only if an “invisible government of men” managed the masses. Voters were too emotional to be trusted with reality, he said; they had to be guided through symbols, stories, and desire.

Bernays built an empire on that principle. He sold soap by organizing child-friendly sculpture contests. He made women smoking in public a feminist milestone. He even persuaded Americans that breakfast should include bacon and eggs by getting doctors to sign a pre-written “study.”
He did not just sell products; he sold the illusion of choice.

By the end of the 1920s, the formula was clear: repetition plus emotion plus moral simplicity equals mass obedience. The century of persuasion had begun. II. The 1920s Playbook

Propaganda of that era operated through a set of recognizable levers:

1.Repetition and saturation – Say it often enough and it becomes true.

2.Simplification and scapegoating – Reduce complexity to “us vs. them.”

3.Emotional contagion – Anger, pride, and shame override logic.

4.Authority laundering – Wrap the message in expert validation.

5.Spectacle and symbolism – Make politics feel like belonging.

6.Manufactured events – Create “news” instead of reporting it.

Fascists and communists adopted these methods. So did advertisers and democracies. The propaganda of the 1920s did not just shape regimes; it created the psychological infrastructure for consumer capitalism and modern media alike.

🧵Information Warfare and How to Spot It:

(I am not suicidal. Is that how this emotional terrorism works, where is MTG when you need her 🤣)

I am going use a 30 second opening monologue from Tuckers show with Sachs and show you how he is using psychological warfare that combines KGB tactics as well as tactics you would see in our own military today to prime his audience. If I was good at AI or way smarter and faster I would do a whole episode so people can really be shocked but I suck. Sorry guys.

1. Create an information vacuum

“There’s a lot going on in the world … but if you’re on social media … you know there’s only one story going on, and it’s Israel.

He begins by asserting that everyone online is obsessed with Israel. That primes you to see your own feed as proof and to think the conversation is monolithic and inevitable. In reality, social media is fragmented and algorithmically driven. But by declaring a “single story,” he simplifies a complex landscape into one emotionally loaded topic.

Why it’s manipulative: It conditions the audience to treat his framing as reality. It also subtly suggests censorship or agenda (“only one story allowed”), which creates suspicion and heightens emotions. 2. The Strawman “Two Camps” Frame:

“Probably the more aggressive side are the deranged Taliban-level ethnonarcissists … Then on the other side, a group every bit as obsessed with Jews …”

He sets up two extremes a pro-Israel “deranged Taliban-level ethnonarcissists” and anti-Israel “people who hate Jews.”

This is a false binary. Most people do not occupy either extreme. But the binary allows him to:

•Discredit support for Israel by associating it with “deranged Taliban” zealotry.

•Discredit criticism of Israel by associating it with “blood hatred” of Jews.

•Position himself as the lone reasonable voice between two irrational mobs.

This is a rhetorical technique called triangulation. By caricaturing both sides, he presents himself as the only sane actor the “truth teller” in a world of fanatics.