🚨 THREAD: The Unholy Red-Green Alliance — America’s New Political Party 🧵

1/ A Marxist. An Islamist. And a Chinese propagandist walk into a ballot box.

It’s not a joke.

It’s the Red-Green Alliance, a coordinated, well-funded campaign to replace American institutions with an authoritarian fusion of socialism, Islamism, and foreign control.

Receipts below; 2/🔴 RED: The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America)
•Largest socialist group in the U.S.
•Builds slates of candidates for school boards, unions, city councils
•Runs massive volunteer ops (50,000+ in NYC alone)
•Uses tools like NGP-VAN & Mobilize
•Messaging: “Justice,” “Housing for All,” “Defund,” “Free Palestine”

But they’re not doing this alone.

🧵🧵The Unelected President: Neera Tanden, the NGO Cartel, and the Greatest Conflict of Interest in Modern American Politics

On June 24, 2025, the mask finally slipped.

Testifying before Congress behind closed doors, Neera Tanden, a longtime Democratic operative and former president of the far-left think tank Center for American Progress (CAP) she admitted to running the autopen for President Joe Biden. She didn’t just witness the signature process. She oversaw it. In some cases, she was the one signing the President’s name to executive orders and laws.

This wasn’t a technicality. This was a transfer of power. Joe Biden was not acting as President. Neera Tanden was.

And that’s only half the scandal. Follow the Money: From Washington to the NGO Empire

Before stepping into the West Wing, Tanden spent years at the helm of CAP, where she helped craft a quiet revolution in federal funding strategy:

•Traditionally, federal money flowed to state and local governments, empowering elected officials to implement policy based on local needs.

•Under guidance from CAP and its policy architects including Tanden that model was dismantled.

•In its place? A massive NGO distribution network.

Rather than giving money to mayors, governors, or county agencies, the Biden administration began funneling billions in taxpayer dollars directly to “approved” nonprofit groups, many of which were politically aligned with CAP and other progressive institutions.

These NGOs became the new gatekeepers of public money, funding everything from housing to education to public health. And they weren’t accountable to voters. They were accountable to bureaucrats, often the same people who helped build them.

🧵🧵The JCPOA Grift: How the Iran Nuclear Deal Enriched Elites, Empowered Terror, and Sold Out American Interests

When the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was signed in 2015, it was hailed as a landmark diplomatic success. The Obama administration framed it as a nonproliferation victory that would place Iran’s nuclear program in a box while opening the door to a more stable Middle East.

In reality, it became one of the most elaborate geopolitical grifts in modern history.

The JCPOA not only failed to stop Iran’s nuclear program but actively empowered its terror network, enriched a regime that brutalizes its own people, and created a sprawling international influence ecosystem that connected Western elites, think tanks, and multinational corporations to the Iranian economy and its global ambitions.

Billions of dollars flowed through banks, consulting firms, and policy organizations many of which were closely aligned with the architects and defenders of the deal. The Illusion of Compliance — How Iran Played the West

The JCPOA was built on a false premise: that Iran’s regime could be trusted to comply with international agreements in good faith. Instead, Tehran used the deal to bide time, refine its weapons capabilities, and play a dangerous game of deception with the West.

•Uranium Enrichment: While the JCPOA capped enrichment at 3.67% U-235, Iran retained its infrastructure. By 2020, it was openly enriching to 20%, and by 2022, to 60%—just below weapons-grade. The IAEA has repeatedly warned that Iran now possesses enough fissile material for several nuclear warheads if it chooses to weaponize.

•Advanced Centrifuges: Iran installed and tested next-generation IR-6 and IR-8 centrifuges—far more efficient than older models. These were banned under the deal, but Tehran claimed they were for “research” while spinning them in secret facilities.

•Inspections Loopholes: The JCPOA barred IAEA access to military sites—which were likely to house Iran’s most sensitive research. Iran exploited this gap, denying inspectors entry while sanitizing sites suspected of hosting nuclear weapons experiments.

•The Tehran Nuclear Archive: In 2018, Israel’s Mossad revealed a secret nuclear archive stored in Tehran, confirming Iran had lied about its nuclear weapons program. The documents showed detailed warhead designs, detonation calculations, and ongoing research long after the JCPOA was signed.

These weren’t technical violations. They were strategic betrayals, made possible by a weak deal and willful Western blindness.

🧵 THREAD: How Jeffrey Sachs Engineered America’s Open Borders Agenda with Help from Catholic Charities and Soros.

1/
Jeffrey Sachs isn’t just a soft-spoken economist.

He’s the quiet architect behind the ideological machinery pushing open borders, weaponized migration, and globalist anti-sovereignty policies. 2/
In the 1990s, Sachs gained fame as a “fixer” of collapsing economies in Latin America and Eastern Europe.

His tool? Structural adjustment gut national protections, flood the labor market, and let NGOs take over the social safety net.

Sound familiar?

🧵🧵 Let’s do a deep dive into 50501 (the supposed decentralized grassroots organization that has organized all of these protests during the second Trump term).

50501 was the organizer for the Anti-Tesla protests and this No Kings protest yesterday.

And while the Democrats and the media are trying to tell you this is a group that was started by some Reddit user that is completely decentralized. Nothing could be further from the truth. The 50501 name first appeared on Reddit earlier this year.

User “Evolved Fungi” called for protests in every state first on Feb 5, then again on President’s Day and then this No Kings day.

What followed wasn’t chaos. It was coordination.

The branding? Unified.
The messaging? Tested.
The rollout? Seamless.

🧵🧵Neville Singham: CCP, Iran and the destabilization of America.

I have been doing threads on this guy for over a year but since he’s back in the news here is one large thread that encompasses his involvement in all things pro-CCP, pro-Iran, anti-America and anti-West. Singham (ex‐CEO of ThoughtWorks, now Shanghai-based) and wife Jodie Evans have funneled money via dark‐money nonprofits (e.g. United Community Fund, Justice Education Fund) to groups like the Party for Socialism and Liberation, ANSWER Coalition, People’s Forum.

All of these groups were highly involved in organizing the college campus protests against Israel and now the anti-ICE protests.

He shares office space with CCP-linked Maku Group; his network backs BreakThrough News—a media platform that promotes pro-Chinese government narratives through carefully curated content designed to echo Beijing’s global messaging strategy.

🧵THREAD: How the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrated America’s leftist movement and why it matters now more than ever.

This has been a slow march through academia, civil rights, and immigration activism since the 1960s.

The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna. It’s long game?

A global Islamic state ruled by sharia. But not by force alone by infiltration.

Civil society. Culture. Law.
They called it Dawah—ideological warfare.

And that is exactly what they have been doing with their until alliance with the leftist Marxists. 1. Build U.S. front groups.
2. Use “civil rights” as a shield.
3. Exploit open societies to weaken them.

1991 Muslim Brotherhood strategy memo uncovered by the FBI found as follows:

“A kind of civilization-jihad in America… a process of settlement… to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within.”

🧵 THREAD: How Biden’s Justice40 Agenda Is Bankrolling the Anti-ICE/Anti-America protests in LA.

Biden’s Justice40 was sold as a “climate equity” plan. In reality, it’s a multi-billion-dollar redistribution scheme sending federal money straight into the pockets of leftist NGOs, many of which have deep ties to activist networks and “community organizers” who end up fueling street unrest. On paper: 40% of all federal climate/infrastructure money must benefit “disadvantaged communities.”

In practice: money is laundered through “environmental justice” groups that double as activist nonprofits, many with political agendas far removed from infrastructure.

Funds don’t go directly to roads or clean water. They go to “intermediary” organizations—nonprofits with progressive missions that then subcontract to “partners,” “youth coalitions,” or “local leaders” who push woke ideology and organize “community resistance.”

🧵🧵THREAD: Let’s talk about the love affair the Democratic Party has with communist Cuba.

And let’s talk about the link no one is talking about… the Democratic Socialists of America.

Oh and let’s discuss how Cuba actually uses our NGO structure to subvert American politics. 1. Karen Bass – Mayor of Los Angeles
In the 1970s, Bass traveled to Cuba as part of the Venceremos Brigade, a Marxist group that sent young Americans to Cuba to receive ideological and practical training under the Castro regime.
The FBI and CIA monitored the Brigade due to suspected ties to Cuban intelligence.

🧵🧵 How did a communist become Mayor of the second largest city in America.

Let’s do a deep dive into Karen Bass. She had destroyed Los Angeles because that’s what she was trained to do. In the 1970s, Bass was deeply involved with a pro-Cuban group called the Venceremos Brigade, which sent young Americans to Cuba to train under Fidel Castro’s communist regime.

This wasn’t tourism. This was political indoctrination.

Founded in 1969, the Venceremos Brigade was created by U.S. leftists aligned with revolutionary Marxist ideals. The group’s mission was to show solidarity with Cuba’s communist revolution by organizing trips where American youth would work alongside Cubans, often in sugar cane fields, and participate in political indoctrination programs.

THREAD: How USAID Became a Pipeline to Fund Leftist NGOs and CIA Black Ops — With Your Tax Dollars 🧵

Let's shatter the fake narrative and the sob stories about USAID money being used to fight for poverty and that cutting off USAID money will result in the death of 300,000 children.

Anyone peddling that ridiculous claim is just lying to you.

USAID is a massive funnel of taxpayer money flowing straight into the pockets of left-wing NGOs, activist networks, and globalist institutions.

Let’s follow the money. Again. Receipts and examples below. USAID’s largest grantees include:

– National Democratic Institute (NDI)
– International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL)
– Freedom House
– Open Society Foundations' partners
– George Soros-backed groups in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe
– Tides Foundation affiliates
These groups push progressive reforms, gender ideology, abortion access, and electoral interference—all abroad, with U.S. money.

USAID gave over $2 billion in 2022 to NGOs alone. USAID’s public grants database reveals that billions in taxpayer funds are awarded to nonprofit organizations with explicitly left-leaning missions, often under the language of “humanitarian aid,” “democracy support,” or “sustainable development.”

Of the top 50 recipients, nearly all promote:

– “Democracy reform” (read: election meddling)
– DEI initiatives
– LGBT advocacy abroad
– Climate change mandates
– Opposition to “right-wing extremism” (often defined as traditionalist/nationalist movements)

🧵🧵THREAD: How “Responsible Statecraft” Is Functionally Aligned With the Muslim Brotherhood Agenda

Responsible Statecraft is the media arm of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a think tank co-founded in 2019 by George Soros and Charles Koch.

This is the anti-war think tank that appeals to progressives and is now all the sudden cited by conservatives. Knowledge is power. In order to understand if the information you are getting is tainted, it is good to examine who is presenting it and what their motivations might be. So let's the rip the band aide off of the foreign policy that has taken hold not just in Obama circles but also in conservative circles. For some reason Responsible Statecraft is Anti-Israel. Anti-Gulf. Anti-American exceptionalism.

Why would Koch and Soros fund a foreign policy think tank. You would think their agenda is not aligned.

Well you would be wrong. If your goal is dismantling American influence abroad then these two people have a lot in common.

The Quincy Institute pushes a doctrine of "restraint." But in practice, it repeatedly:

– Defends Iranian proxies
– Undermines Abraham Accords
– Attacks U.S. alliances with Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia
– Normalizes Islamists under the guise of “diplomacy”

Why should you care about this? Because Responsible Statecraft presents itself as “mainstream” foreign policy analysis but subtly launders Islamist-aligned narratives through an “anti-war” filter.

It’s not peace journalism. It's not about restraint. And it is not about anti-war. It’s proxy influence.

Responsible Statecraft’s rhetoric often mirrors Qatari state media, especially Al Jazeera English and Middle East Eye which both known for Brotherhood-friendly slants.

It’s not accidental. Many of their experts are the same people.

🧵THREAD: How the 2013 Smith-Mundt Modernization Act Opened the Door to U.S. Government Propaganda at Home and What Followed

In 2013, a quiet change occurred. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, was tucked into the NDAA, and it repealed the long-standing ban on domestic dissemination of U.S. government-produced propaganda. Few noticed when it happened and even fewer understood what it would unleash.

The original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 explicitly prohibited the U.S. government from targeting American citizens with psychological operations or state-sponsored media campaigns. Its purpose was to prevent wartime propaganda tools from being deployed on the American people. But with the 2013 update that protection was erased.

What was the impact of that? Well... The modernization language allowed content that was created by agencies like the State Department, the DOD, and the CIA for foreign audiences to be available "on request" to U.S. audiences.

This legislative change created a gray zone that the intelligence community, the defense contractors, and the affiliated NGOs tripped all over themselves to occupy. All the sudden there were no boundaries between news, influence operations and controls on the narratives.

In 1948, the US Government could create propaganda for foreign audiences only. They did this through institutions like Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, etc. but they were explicitly forbidden from distributing that content to Americans, under the premise that government propaganda at home undermined democracy.

After 2013 there was no longer a dissemination ban on materials produced by the State Department, the Defense Department, or other agencies for foreign influence.
All of this became accessible “on request” domestically. In reality, this became a de facto legalization of domestic propaganda, because:
1. Agencies could now upload content online where it would naturally reach U.S. audiences.

2. Journalists, NGOs, and social media influencers could cite, amplify, and repackage government narratives without restriction.

3. Third-party “public-private partnerships” enabled mass influence through contractors and platforms creating distance between government fingerprints and public perception.

⚖️ Major Supreme Court Decisions Expected in June 2025

1. U.S. v. Skrmetti – Gender Affirming Care for Minors

•Issue: Constitutionality of state bans on gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors.

•Background: Challenges to Tennessee and Kentucky laws that prohibit puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and related treatments for minors.

•Potential Impact: A ruling could set a national precedent affecting transgender healthcare rights. 2. Trump v. CASA – Nationwide Injunctions & Birthright Citizenship

•Issue: Whether individual federal judges can issue nationwide injunctions against executive orders.

•Background: Stemming from challenges to an executive order redefining birthright citizenship, the case examines the scope of judicial authority.

•Potential Impact: Could redefine the power of federal courts in checking executive actions.

🧵🧵The Middle East Forum (MEF) just came out with a new report detailing Qatari influence in America since 2012.

A country of 300,000 people have spent $40 Billion dollars in America. $33.4 billion dollars in real estate and business ventures, $6.25 to American universities and $72 million dollars for lobbyists.

This thread is a summary of the findings of Middle East Forum. The article/research paper is linked at the end of the thread. US Businesses, Real Estate, and Investment Firms

Qatar has made strategic investments in American businesses totaling at least $33.4 billion. QIA opened New York City offices in 2015 to help facilitate its U.S. investments, and in 2015 the Gulf emirate committed to investing $45 billion in American businesses. Doha likely reached or surpassed this goal in recent years based on QIA’s growth trajectory and total assets.

But the true value of Qatar's real estate empire is hard to ascertain. In addition to direct ownership of properties, QIA holds shares of real estate companies and often does business through spinoffs and affiliates. One estimate suggests the Qataris have spent tens of billions on properties that amount to ten million square feet of prime real estate in Manhattan.

The Qatari flag actually flies above the entrance of the Plaza Hotel in New York City.

They entered the real estate market in Washington DC in 2010 and California in 2016 with a 1.34-billion-dollar joint venture in 4 class office buildings in Los Angeles.

🧵🧵 Global Color Revolutions at a 50,000 foot view (“Nonviolent Resistance Movement”)

1/. The Strategists

Gene Sharp:

•Role: Founder of the Albert Einstein Institution (AEI)

•Contributions: Sharp authored From Dictatorship to Democracy and compiled the “198 Methods of Nonviolent Action,” providing a comprehensive guide for nonviolent resistance.

•Impact: His work has influenced numerous movements worldwide, including those in Serbia, Ukraine, and Georgia.

Robert Helvey:

•Role: Retired U.S. Army Colonel and strategist

•Contributions: Helvey collaborated with Gene Sharp to train activists in nonviolent strategies, notably assisting the Serbian group Otpor! in their efforts against Slobodan Milošević.

Erica Chenoweth:

•Role: Political scientist and researcher

•Contributions: Chenoweth’s research introduced the “3.5% rule,” suggesting that nonviolent movements engaging at least 3.5% of the population have a high success rate.

Peter Ackerman:

•Role: Founding Chair of the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict (ICNC)

•Contributions: Ackerman co-authored A Force More Powerful and supported global nonviolent movements through education and strategy development. 2/ Training Hubs and Institutions

Albert Einstein Institution (AEI)
•Founded: 1983 by Gene Sharp
•Mission: To advance the study and use of strategic nonviolent action in conflicts worldwide.

CANVAS (Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies)
•Founded: 2004 by Srđa Popović and Slobodan Đinović
•Activities: Provides training and resources to activists in over 50 countries, promoting nonviolent resistance strategies.

International Center on Nonviolent Conflict (ICNC)
•Founded: 2002 by Peter Ackerman and Jack DuVall
•Focus: Supports the study and practice of nonviolent conflict to advance rights and freedoms globally.

🧵THREAD: Ehud Barak, Erica Chenoweth & the Engineered Chaos of Color Revolutions

1/ What do an ex-Israeli Prime Minister, a Harvard political scientist, and waves of “people-powered” uprisings have in common?
👇 It all ties back to modern regime change—engineered, refined, and often anything but organic. In fact the similarities between the protests in Israel over judicial reform just made their way to college campuses.

Why? Because the thing is never about the thing. It’s always about the globalist revolution. 2/ Ehud Barak—Israel’s former PM, ex-IDF Chief, and elite commando. But he’s more than a military man. Barak is deeply tied into globalist circles, tech elites, and has maintained disturbing links to Jeffrey Epstein—visiting his homes even post-conviction.

He has spoken in the US praising mass uprisings to “protect democracy.”

🧵🧵 Debunking the myth that Israel has committed war crimes with facts. The Geneva Convention:

The Geneva Conventions (1949) and their Additional Protocols (1977) set international humanitarian law (IHL) standards for armed conflicts, including non-international conflicts like Israel’s fight with Hamas in Gaza. Key rules include:

• Distinction (Article 48, Additional Protocol I): Parties must distinguish between combatants and civilians, targeting only military objectives.

• Proportionality (Article 51(5)(b), Additional Protocol I): Attacks must not cause excessive civilian harm relative to the military advantage gained.

• Precautions in Attack (Article 57, Additional Protocol I): Attackers must take feasible precautions to minimize civilian harm, including warnings unless circumstances preclude them.

• Protection of Civilians (Article 3, Common to All Conventions): Civilians and hors de combat (e.g., surrendered fighters) must not be targeted, tortured, or subjected to inhumane treatment.

• Prohibition of Human Shields (Article 51(7), Additional Protocol I): Using civilians to shield military objectives is forbidden.

• Respect for Protected Objects (Article 53, Additional Protocol I): Hospitals, schools, and cultural sites must not be targeted unless used for military purposes.

Israel, as a signatory, is bound by these rules. Hamas, as a non-state actor, is also obligated under customary IHL and Common Article 3, applicable to non-international conflicts.

🧵Israel/ Palestine:

I have had multiple people in the last couple of days tell me they are confused about this topic and worried that it will irrevocably divide Maga. So here is my best attempt to lay it all out. For whatever that is worth. Historical Context: The Jewish Connection to Israel and the Conflict’s Origins

The Jewish people’s connection to the land of Israel spans over 3,000 years, rooted in biblical history, archaeological evidence, and a continuous presence despite centuries of exile. The Torah and historical records document Jewish kingdoms in the region, with Jerusalem as their spiritual and political center. Even after Roman expulsion in 70 CE, Jewish communities persisted in the land, enduring Byzantine, Ottoman, and British rule.

The modern conflict began in the late 19th century with the Zionist movement, a response to centuries of anti-Semitic persecution, including pogroms in Eastern Europe and expulsions from Arab lands. Zionism sought to reestablish a Jewish homeland in the ancestral land of Israel, then under Ottoman and later British control. The Balfour Declaration (1917) and the League of Nations’ Mandate for Palestine (1920) recognized Jewish rights to a national home, affirming international legal support.

In 1947, the UN Partition Plan (Resolution 181) proposed two states: one Jewish, one Arab. Israel accepted, but Arab leaders rejected it, refusing any Jewish state. On May 14, 1948, Israel declared independence, and five Arab nations invaded, launching the first Arab-Israeli War.

Israel’s victory secured its survival but displaced approximately 700,000 Palestinians, many fleeing due to Arab leaders’ calls to evacuate. Meanwhile, 800,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries, absorbed by Israel.

Subsequent wars: 1967’s Six-Day War and 1973’s Yom Kippur War were defensive responses to Arab aggression. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem in 1967, offering land for peace, as seen in treaties with Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994). These conflicts underscore Israel’s consistent pursuit of security amid existential threats.

🧵🧵Why it is so important to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization

The Muslim Brotherhood is not merely a religious movement, instead it is a global political operation that has inspired terrorist organizations, infiltrated national institutions, and weaponized soft power to achieve its goal: replacing democratic institutions with Islamist governance.

While many U.S. allies have designated the MB as a terrorist organization, the United States has not. This policy gap has enabled MB affiliated entities to operate domestically under the guise of civil rights and religious outreach often receiving taxpayer funding through nonprofit exemptions. In 2013, Egypt designated the MB a terrorist organization for inciting violence after they ousted President Morsi.

In 2014, Sudi Arabia designated the MB as a terrorist organization linking them to terrorism, destabilization and ideological extremism.

In 2014, the UAE also designated the MB and its 80 affiliates as terror groups.

In 2014, Bahrain also designed them a terrorist organization because they were viewed as a political threat and a subversive actor.

In 2003, Russia designated the MB citing national security concerns.

In 1980 Israel designated them a terrorist organization.

In 2021, Austria also designated them the MB as a terrorist organization as part of a crackdown on foreign influence.

🧵 THREAD: Iran, China, and the ANC — How South Africa’s Alliances Threaten U.S. Security Interests

1/ The ANC’s foreign entanglements with authoritarian regimes aren’t just ideological, they’re dangerous and not just to the region but to us as well.

South Africa’s ruling party has deepening ties to Iran and China. These relationships now threaten not only regional stability but also U.S. national security. 2/ Iran’s Shadow Legacy: From Apartheid Ally to Revolutionary Backer

Under the Shah, Iran was apartheid South Africa’s #1 oil supplier.

After 1979, the Islamic Republic pivoted cutting ties with the white minority regime and backing the ANC’s liberation efforts.

It looked noble. But it was strategic. Iran wanted influence in post-apartheid Africa. And they knew the way to do it was to pay for and fuel Marxism.