🧵 THREAD: The Truth About the Senate Hearing on DOGE & the Social Security “Crisis”

1/ Today, the Senate held a high-profile hearing targeting the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under President Trump. Whistleblowers accused DOGE of causing tech failures & mismanagement at the SSA.

But here’s the part they aren’t telling you… 2/ The exact same types of SSA failures—site crashes, long wait times, data errors—occurred repeatedly between 2021–2024. Not only were these problems ignored, but no major oversight hearings were ever convened by Democrats to address them.

Receipts below:

🧵🧵Project ENDGAME, and the Dropped Lawsuit

1/ Background: Qatar hired Global Risk Advisors (GRA), led by ex-CIA officer Kevin Chalker, to enhance its global image, secure the 2022 World Cup, and sway U.S. policy. GRA’s alleged tactics included espionage, hacking, and covert ops. 2/ The Campaign: GRA ran projects like “Project Riverbed” and “Project ENDGAME” to target Qatar’s critics—FIFA officials, U.S. lawmakers (e.g., Sen. Ted Cruz), and those opposing Qatar’s Muslim Brotherhood ties. Methods included surveillance and “honeypot” schemes.

🧵🧵 Why do we fund the UN?

The United Nations: A Record of Scandal, Abuse, and Unaccountability

I. Financial Waste & Corruption

1. Oil-for-Food Program Scandal (1996–2003)

•Overview: Designed to allow Iraq to sell oil in exchange for humanitarian goods under sanctions.

•Fraud & Corruption: Saddam Hussein exploited the program, extracting $21.3 billion in illegal kickbacks and bribes from companies and governments.

•UN Complicity:
•Benon Sevan, head of the program, accepted bribes.
•The UN failed to monitor contracts, and the internal audit was buried until congressional pressure revealed it.
•Impact: One of the largest scandals in UN history — and a warning about giving international bodies unchecked power over economic flows.

2. Chronic Budget Mismanagement

•UN internal audits and reports repeatedly show:
•Inflated staff costs and redundancy
•Mission bloat in peacekeeping operations
•Buildings leased at above-market rates in Geneva and New York
•Despite these inefficiencies, the U.S. pays ~22% of the UN’s core budget and ~25% of peacekeeping costs, with minimal oversight on where that money goes. II. Human Rights Failures and Coverups

1. UN Peacekeeper Sexual Abuse Epidemic

•Haiti (2004–2017):
•UN troops ran child sex rings, trading food and medicine for sex with girls as young as 12.
•No prosecutions for over 100 implicated peacekeepers.
•Democratic Republic of the Congo:
•UN troops accused of raping hundreds of women and girls — often repeat offenders.
•Investigators found a pattern of “rotation” — where accused troops were simply reassigned.
•UN Response: Repeated promises of reform, but accountability remains virtually nonexistent.

2. Haiti Cholera Outbreak (2010)

•Introduced by Nepalese UN troops who dumped raw sewage into rivers.
•Result: 10,000+ Haitians dead, over 800,000 sickened.
•For years, the UN denied responsibility, until 2016 when it finally acknowledged a role — but never offered direct compensation to victims.

🧵🧵Harvard’s Free Speech Hypocrisy — Exposed

1/ Harvard says it’s a champion of “free speech” and “diverse ideas.”
But the record shows otherwise.
When the speech comes from conservatives, Christians, or critics of the left? Censorship. Smears. Cancellations.

To the left and the confused right who don’t understand what President Trump is doing, let me help you out: it’s called viewpoint neutrality.

This is not a free speech issue, and if this was a free speech issue, then Harvard should be chastised and admonished on a daily basis because the only freaking speech that they allow is speech that they agree with.

That is what President Trump is fighting.

So to all the people simping for Harvard, I don’t want my tax dollars to go to a university that only allows speech that it agrees with. Because speech that is about anything that has to do with conservatism has not been allowed at Harvard in decades. 2/Harvard’s Official Line:

“We uphold the free exchange of ideas. Even speech that is offensive or hurtful to some is protected.”

—Harvard Faculty of Arts & Sciences

Sounds good, right?

Now here’s what they actually do…

🧵🧵How George and Alex Soros–Funded Groups Are Behind the Legal War on Trump’s Immigration Agenda — Again

1/ Trump’s second term reignited a legal war over immigration — but the opposition isn’t organic. It’s driven by a network of Soros-funded NGOs that specialize in filing lawsuits to block enforcement, rewrite asylum policy, and dismantle ICE. 2/The same groups from Trump’s first term are back — and even more aggressive:

•ACLU
•National Immigration Law Center (NILC)
•American Immigration Council
•American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)
•Make the Road NY
•Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR)
•CASA de Maryland

All with documented Soros funding.

🧵🧵The 65 Project is a polarizing force in American politics, targeting conservative lawyers with ethics complaints and public shaming to deter representation of Trump and similar causes.

They operate just like the rest of the NGO mafia, they attack their opponents and try to debank, deplatform, disbar and destroy anyone who stands in their way.

Now that President Trump is in office, The 65 Project needs to be the subject of a DOJ investigation. 1/ What is the 65 Project?

The 65 Project is a campaign launched in 2022 under the umbrella of Law Works, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focused on promoting the rule of law. Its stated mission is to hold accountable lawyers who "undermine democracy" by filing frivolous lawsuits or engaging in efforts to challenge election results, particularly those tied to Trump’s 2020 election challenges.

The group is named after the 65 lawsuits filed by Trump’s legal team post-2020 election, most of which were dismissed.

Key Goal: The 65 Project seeks to file ethics complaints against attorneys, pursue their disbarment, and publicly shame them to deter future legal representation of similar causes.

Leadership: Michael Teter, an Utah-based attorney, serves as the director and has personally signed nearly 100 ethics complaints against Trump-aligned lawyers. He is also a well connected Democrat.

The project operates as a fiscally sponsored initiative of Law Works, meaning it doesn’t have independent nonprofit status but relies on Law Works for tax-exempt fundraising.

While the group claims to protect democracy, what they actually do is engage in "lawfare" to intimidate conservative lawyers, potentially chilling free speech and the right to legal representation.

🧵🧵The Islamist Infiltration of American Campuses — How SJP and MSA Channel the Muslim Brotherhood’s Ideology

1/ For decades, American universities have unwittingly hosted the Muslim Brotherhood’s soft-power machine, primarily through two student groups:

•Muslim Students Association (MSA)

•Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)

This isn’t just activism. It’s infiltration. 2/ Let’s start with the Muslim Students Association (MSA).
Founded in 1963 at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, the MSA was the first formal Muslim Brotherhood front in the U.S. It was seeded by Brotherhood members who migrated from Egypt and South Asia.

🧵🧵The Muslim Brotherhood’s Shadow Empire in America — Soft Power, Mosque Networks, and Terror Links

(1/) This isn’t just a thread about terrorism. It’s about how the Muslim Brotherhood built a parallel power structure inside the U.S. using soft power — education, real estate, nonprofits, and lawfare — to infiltrate and radicalize from within. (2/) What is “soft power”?

For the Muslim Brotherhood, it means:

•Controlling religious spaces
•Influencing youth identity
•Shaping political narratives
•Silencing moderates
•Operating under the protection of religious freedom laws

Not bombs. Not bullets. But control.

The 1991 Brotherhood Strategy Memo, uncovered by the FBI, spells it out:

“The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.”

It outlines a stealth war — by using the system against itself.

How do they do it? Easy, they use our infrastructure against us.

They built 3 key institutions:

•NAIT: Holds title to over 300 mosques in America
•ISNA: Provides national legitimacy, PR cover
•MSA: Recruits and indoctrinates youth on campuses

All were founded or led by Muslim Brotherhood-linked figures.

🧵🧵 Why EPIC in Texas is evidence of a more nefarious and calculated plan to infiltrate and subvert Western culture.

Le t’s start with the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial, wrapping up in 2008. Five leaders were convicted for funneling $12.4 million to Hamas, a Muslim Brotherhood (MB) offshoot, under the guise of charity. The big lesson? Radical Islamists can cloak agendas in legitimate fronts—here, a U.S.-based NGO. Evidence included the 1991 MB memo, “An Explanatory Memorandum,” outlining a “civilizational jihad” to erode Western culture from within via institutions, education, and settlement. It’s our anchor: a plan to shift perceptions and power, subtly, over decades. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Playbook - 1991 Memo Details
That memo, penned by MB operative Mohamed Akram, called for a “grand Jihad” to “destroy Western civilization” by infiltrating its systems—education, media, law. Tactics? Build organizations, educate Muslims, leverage democracy to “settle” Islam. Another document, “The Project” (1982), echoed this globally: use propaganda, alliances, and immigration. Over 25 years (2000–2025), these ideas morphed from theory to action, with NGOs and money as tools. It’s less about bombs, more about influence—Israel and the Middle East as key perception targets.

🧵🧵Highlights from the Cabinet Meeting today.

1. Brooke Rollins discusses the disastrous position the Biden administration has left farmers and those in agriculture. She explained that there has been a 30% increase in input costs and that the previous administration left them with a $50 billion trade deficit even though it was zero when Biden took office and so they are working on overcoming those issues so that we can be comfortable in the quantity and status of our food production 2. Pam Bondi highlighted some of the wins the Trump administration from the Supreme Court this week, which included allowing DEI to stop in our school systems, firing over 16,000 probationary government employees and continuing the deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

She also explained that they are pursuing the act of domestic terrorism, curled a Tesla and they should have another arrest coming down the pike this week.

🧵🧵 Kash Patel released the Manifesto for the Nashville sh**ter.

On April 7, 2025, Kash Patel made a significant move toward transparency by releasing over 1,000 pages of writings from Audrey Hale, the individual responsible for the tragic shooting at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, on March 27, 2023. The documents, shared exclusively with Megyn Kelly and provided to the House Intelligence Committee, shed a disturbing light about the motives behind the attack that claimed the lives of three 9-year-old students and three adult staff members. Audrey Hale, a 28-year-old former student of the Christian elementary school, left behind a collection of notebooks, journals, and digital files that authorities initially described as a “manifesto.”

However, the Metro Nashville Police Department (MNPD) and the FBI resisted releasing these materials, citing an ongoing investigation and concerns from victims’ families about publicizing the shooter’s thoughts.

Lawsuits from media outlets, including The Tennessee Star, and public pressure from figures like Kash Patel—then a Trump administration nominee—failed to dislodge the documents during the Biden administration.

🧵🧵 1. Tariffs Are a Strategic Tool to Rebuild Manufacturing

From 1870 to 1913—the golden age of American industrial growth—the U.S. ran on high tariffs. These protectionist policies allowed American manufacturers to flourish by shielding them from foreign price manipulation and dumping. The U.S. became the world’s industrial powerhouse during this time—not through free trade, but by strategically protecting its domestic base.

Trump’s tariff agenda was a return to this proven model. By imposing tariffs on foreign competitors—especially Chinese state-backed firms—Trump created an environment where American producers could finally compete fairly, sparking reshoring efforts in key industries like steel, autos, and semiconductors. 2. Tariffs + Tax Cuts + Deregulation = Industrial Renewal

Trump’s policy isn’t just about tariffs—it was a three-pronged strategy:

📍Tariffs to protect U.S. industry

📍Tax cuts to lower the cost of doing business

📍Deregulation to free up innovation and expansion

This mix gives manufacturers powerful incentives to invest at home. Combined, these policies echoed the formula that built modern America in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

I really think it’s time for the FBI who now has @dbongino as the Deputy Director to investigate GBI Strategies, Nessel and the persecution of Matt DePerno.

In October 2020, a Tennessee-based voter registration firm allegedly dropped off 8,000–10,000 voter registration applications to the Muskegon, Michigan, clerk’s office. City Clerk Ann Meisch flagged them as suspicious—some had forged signatures, fake addresses, or other errors. Michigan State Police (MSP) investigated, finding a mix of legit and “clearly fraudulent” forms.

GBI Strategies, funded by Democratic groups like Biden’s 2020 campaign (over $450,000 per FEC filings), was raided by MSP that month. Reports mention burner phones, prepaid cash cards, and legally owned firearms found at their Southfield office. MSP handed the GBI case to Dana Nessel’s office by mid-2021. She says it was referred to the FBI due to its “national scope,” but GOP figures claim she buried it—no FBI referral happened, they say. Nessel’s team insists the system worked: no fraudulent votes got through. Still, the lack of prosecution fuels suspicion.

No FBI follow up ever and no prosecution from Nessel, despite boards of evidence…

I was curious as to how the United States can continue to engage in proxy wars without an official war declaration from Congress so I finally did the research.

THREAD 🧵🧵

You’ve heard of the CIA’s covert ops.

But you may not know about Section 127e—the Pentagon’s shadow authority to fund, arm, and direct foreign proxy forces with almost no oversight. And it’s how the U.S. runs wars you never hear about. What is Section 127e?
It’s a legal authority buried in the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
Full name: 10 U.S. Code § 127e – Support of Special Operations for Irregular Warfare.

Passed after 9/11 and expanded under Obama, Section 127e allows U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF) to:
•Fund and train foreign militaries or militias
•Embed with them in combat
•Launch joint operations
•With almost zero transparency

I am not at all surprised that the Senate armed services committee had the DOD IG launch an investigation into signal gate.

The deep state isn’t just hidden in the CIA or NSA.
The Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC)—a legislative body—is where secrecy meets bipartisan consensus.
Under Obama, it became the place where covert war, surveillance, and unaccountable power were legalized in plain sight.

🧵🧵SASC SASC controls:
•Pentagon policy oversight
•Defense budget approvals (including the black budget)
•Nuclear arsenal policy
•Cyber and drone operations
•DoD intelligence coordination

It’s meant to provide oversight.
Instead, since 2009, it’s become the legal shield of the security state.

The Obama years were pivotal.
Why? Because he gave the Bush-era war machine liberal credibility—and SASC institutionalized it.
They didn’t fight it.
They sanitized it.

🧵🧵What is The Resistance Lab—and why is it one of the most dangerous organized forces resisting Trump 2.0?

A look inside the movement, its training programs, tactics, and why it poses a serious threat to the Constitutional Republic.

The wink-wink nod-nod to nonviolent resistance is a cover for what they actually do, which is what we have seen happen all across the country at Tesla locations .

I would just like to remind everybody if Democrats get power, they will not go after Teslas, they will go after you and me. The Resistance Lab is a project launched by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), now expanding nationally. Its mission: to train thousands of Americans in “nonviolent resistance” to fight back against the second Trump presidency.

The Lab partners with Harvard’s Nonviolent Action Lab, led by political scientist Erica Chenoweth—a global expert on civil resistance.

Again, the word nonviolent is Orwellian on purpose.

🧵🧵How a network of activist legal orgs worked to stop Trump’s border and immigration agenda — and how they’re already doing it again. During Trump’s first term, a coordinated legal resistance formed to challenge nearly every aspect of his immigration agenda. The coalition included:
•ACLU
•American Immigration Council
•AILA (Immigration Lawyers)
•National Immigration Law Center (NILC)
•RFK Human Rights
•CASA

🧵🧵 Let’s review color revolutions. Since we are in the middle of one, I think it’s time to brush up on the tactics.

At its core, the purpose of a color revolution is to create division and disruption. What’s a color revolution?
It’s a mass protest movement that overthrows a regime—usually after a disputed election.
But it’s rarely organic. These movements are engineered with foreign backing and a toolbox of psychological and social warfare.

🧵🧵 The actual constitutional crisis has absolutely nothing to do with President Trump, but because people don’t know their history, they don’t even understand how our constitution works.

The constitutional crisis started with Woodrow Wilson. And from there every other progressive democratic leader has slowly but surely ripped it apart more and more.

Donald Trump is actually returning us back to what it means to be a constitutional republic. Not the other way around. It didn’t start in the 1960s. It started with Woodrow Wilson, the first president to openly reject the Founders’ vision. He believed the Constitution was outdated and that government should evolve with the times—“living Constitution” ideology begins here.

Wilson despised the checks and balances system. He called the Founders’ framework “mechanical” and obstructive to “efficient” governance. In other words: too much constraint on centralized power.

Under Wilson, we got the Federal Reserve (1913) and the income tax (16th Amendment)—two massive shifts away from decentralized government and individual economic liberty.

🧵🧵 The Global Judicial Insurrection: How the Left Captured Courts in Brazil, Israel, as a trial run and is now working the U.S.—With Help from NGOs and USAID

Across the globe, the political Left has developed a powerful and repeatable strategy: when electoral victories are uncertain, capture the courts. Through a mix of litigation, media campaigns, international pressure, and vast NGO funding networks—often backed by U.S. taxpayer money—left-leaning elites are using judicial institutions to override democracy, impose ideological agendas, and insulate power from voters.

We saw the blueprint for this coordinated attack in Brazil, and Israel first, and now it’s being applied in the United States. Here’s how it works—and who’s funding it. Brazil: Lawfare and Judicial Censorship

In Brazil, the Supreme Federal Court (STF) has become a hyper-political institution, operating well beyond its constitutional role. Under the leadership of figures like Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the court has:
•Prosecuted political opponents without due process
•Shut down media accounts critical of the Left
•Imprisoned Bolsonaro supporters for “disinformation”
•Interfered in elections and barred candidates from running

This is no longer about the rule of law—it’s about lawfare.

Behind this transformation is a well-funded network of NGOs and civil society groups. Major funders include:
•Open Society Foundations (George Soros)
•Ford Foundation
•USAID and other U.S. State Department affiliates

These groups have funded training for judges, legal education initiatives, and activist infrastructure that frame opposition as “fascist” or “anti-democratic.”

The result: Brazil’s highest court now operates as a de facto ideological enforcer.

🧵🧵ICA, USAID, the CIA, Obama and Signal Gate

Either the contents of this thread are just a total coincidence or we have a serious problem. 1955: The U.S. creates the International Cooperation Administration (ICA)—a foreign aid agency meant to “win hearts and minds” in the developing world.

But ICA wasn’t just building schools and roads. It was a cover for covert power.

The CIA used the ICA as a tool of influence.

Aid missions often doubled as:
•Election interference
•Regime stabilization (or destabilization)
•Covers for U.S. intelligence officers

“Technical assistance” became political manipulation.