Post

More from @DefiyantlyFree

Insurrection Barbie

Jul 13

🧵🧵Why was our FBI protecting Clinton for 30 years but somehow allowed an asset of a foreign government to get blackmail material?

That makes no sense.

What does make sense is that they looked the other way this whole time because of Clinton.

Receipts below:

1. Travelgate and Whitewater

In 1993, shortly after taking office, the Clinton White House abruptly fired seven nonpartisan employees from the White House Travel Office. These staffers had served under multiple administrations and were responsible for managing press and presidential travel logistics. The Clintons replaced them with close Arkansas allies, including a cousin of Hillary Clinton. Hillary initially denied involvement, but a 2000 report by Independent Counsel Robert Ray concluded she had played a “significant role” in the firings and provided “factually inaccurate” statements during the investigation. Nothing happened to her.

To justify the firings, the White House referred the matter to the FBI, which launched an investigation into alleged financial mismanagement by the Travel Office. Critics including members of Congress and press associations viewed this as a politically motivated purge. The FBI’s decision to involve itself in what was essentially a personnel dispute enabled the Clintons to frame the firings as criminally necessary, rather than politically convenient. In the only criminal prosecution, longtime Travel Office director Billy Dale was accused of embezzling $68,000. However, the jury acquitted him in under two hours after no personal enrichment could be proven. The case highlighted the use of federal law enforcement to legitimize a politically charged action—and the FBI’s role in facilitating it without pushback.

Whitewater, meanwhile, began as a real estate investment in the 1970s between the Clintons and their friends Jim and Susan McDougal. The venture failed, but when Bill Clinton became president, the collapse of Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan—run by Jim McDougal—drew federal scrutiny. Dozens of Clinton associates, including both McDougals and former Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker, were indicted and convicted of fraud, conspiracy, and obstruction. However, despite emerging evidence and the discovery of previously missing Rose Law Firm billing records implicating Hillary Clinton, the Clintons themselves escaped prosecution.

According to FBI field agents involved in the Whitewater probe, promising leads were often ignored or sidelined by upper-level DOJ and Independent Counsel staff. Kenneth Starr, initially tasked with pursuing the Whitewater investigation, eventually redirected the focus of his probe to President Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky—a scandal that led to impeachment, but not accountability for the original financial misconduct.

Pattern Established: The FBI allowed itself to be instrumentalized—first by providing cover for Travelgate, and later by failing to insist on rigorous follow-through during the Whitewater investigation. This marked the beginning of a long institutional pattern of deferral, soft enforcement, and political calculus when dealing with the Clintons.

In 1996, during President Bill Clinton’s first term, it was revealed that the White House had improperly obtained and reviewed over 900 FBI background files on former Republican officials, many of whom had served in previous administrations. This included sensitive and private information gathered through security clearances—data that, by law, should never have been accessed without specific authorization and legitimate purpose.

The files were requested by Craig Livingstone, the Director of the White House Office of Personnel Security, a Clinton political appointee with no prior experience in handling classified records. Livingstone claimed that the request was made in error, citing an outdated Secret Service list. This explanation was quickly adopted by the Clinton White House as a “bureaucratic mistake.”

Yet the scale and nature of the breach raised alarm across Washington. The victims of the data breach included James Baker, John Sununu, Tony Snow, and even former Reagan-era cabinet officials—a who's who of Republican leadership. The fact that this treasure trove of political opposition research ended up in the Clinton White House without consequence prompted concerns of political espionage, misuse of intelligence, and a dangerous precedent of turning federal security mechanisms into partisan tools.

Despite the serious implications—unauthorized access to sensitive FBI files, potential violations of the Privacy Act, and improper handling of government records the FBI’s response was strikingly muted. The Bureau conducted an internal review but did not pursue charges against any White House officials. Instead, it allowed the administration’s narrative of “clerical error” to stand. Craig Livingstone ultimately resigned, but no one was prosecuted.

Congressional hearings led by Republicans were convened, and Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr was asked to review the matter. Starr concluded that although the actions were “grossly inappropriate,” there was insufficient evidence to prove criminal intent. Hillary Clinton, who many believed had recommended Livingstone for his position, denied under oath that she knew him prior to his hiring—a claim later challenged by several witnesses but never prosecuted as perjury.

Institutional Implication: The FBI’s decision not to pursue legal remedies despite a clear breach involving politically sensitive data demonstrated an early pattern of deference. Rather than challenge executive overreach, the FBI enabled the administration to control the narrative, framing an invasive political act as mere clerical mishap. In doing so, the Bureau signaled to future administrations that violations committed in the name of political preservation could be tolerated, or at least quietly buried.

Read 16 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Jul 9

🧵🧵Pam Bondi’s Epstein Dilemma: The Legal Trap Behind the Withheld Files

When former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was appointed U.S. Attorney General, she promised a new era of transparency especially regarding the long-shrouded Jeffrey Epstein files. With public pressure mounting, Bondi announced that “tens of thousands” of videos and records existed, and that her Justice Department would make them public.

But that promise has quietly unraveled.

Instead of full disclosure, the DOJ has backpedaled. A recent memo claimed no “client list” exists. Bondi has delayed further releases. And the explosive evidence she once suggested was on the verge of public exposure remains sealed, redacted, or buried.

The reason, though unspoken, is now becoming clear(at least to me): Bondi is legally bound to defend the FBI in a civil lawsuit filed by Epstein’s victims and releasing the files could fatally damage that case.

The Florida Lawsuit That Changed Everything

In September 2024, eight women (six listed as “Jane Does,” plus Laura Newman and Sandra Ward) filed a civil suit against the U.S. government. The lawsuit alleges that the FBI received credible tips as early as 1996 about Epstein’s sex trafficking operation and failed to act. That failure, the plaintiffs argue, enabled two more decades of exploitation, abuse, and cover-up.

The suit was originally filed in Washington, D.C., but on June 30, 2025, a federal judge transferred it to the Southern District of Florida (the very heart of Epstein’s criminal empire and the jurisdiction where the FBI’s Miami field office oversaw the controversial 2006 non-prosecution deal).

That transfer wasn’t just procedural it was tactical. And I think that it changed everything.

Why Bondi Can’t Release the Epstein Files Now

1. She’s Legally Obligated to Defend the Government

As Attorney General, Bondi is the federal government’s top lawyer. In this case, the United States is the defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Her job is to defend the FBI and argue that it did not act negligently in handling the Epstein case.

That means her DOJ is responsible for filing:
•Motions to dismiss
•Claims of sovereign immunity
•Arguments that the statute of limitations has expired

Any public release of sensitive documents (emails, surveillance logs, case memos, or footage) could undermine those defenses. If the files confirm that the FBI knew more than it admitted or failed to act on specific tips, the plaintiffs’ case is strengthened and the government’s is fatally weakened.

Read 7 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Jul 8

🧵🧵I don’t like being lied to by the media. I don’t really care if the lies come from the liberal media or the conservative media lies are lies.

One of the biggest lies I’ve heard lately came not from a partisan blog or anonymous source, but during two high-profile interviews: the first between Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz, and the second between Carlson and the president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian.

In both cases, the claim was made that there is “no proof” that Iran tried to assassinate President Donald Trump.

That is a lie. A flat-out, documented, federally indicted lie.

And what’s more infuriating?

Even Biden’s own Department of Justice,an agency that has shown no love for Donald Trump,has confirmed that lie to be false.

In November 2024, Biden’s Department of Justice charged Farhad Shakeri, an Afghan national living in Tehran, with attempting to carry out a murder-for-hire plot. His target? Donald J. Trump.

According to recorded interviews with the FBI, Shakeri said he was personally tasked by an IRGC official to plan Trump’s assassination in October 2024—right before the presidential election. He even admitted the Iranians told him, “We’ve already spent a lot of money, money’s not an issue.”

This wasn’t abstract talk. Shakeri attempted to activate criminal contacts in the U.S. to carry out the plot. Two of them were arrested. And Shakeri himself was charged not just with conspiracy to commit murder-for-hire, but with providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization (the IRGC).

That’s not a Fox News chyron. That’s a federal indictment under President Biden’s Department of Justice.

A Second Case Points to Trump as a Target

Just three months earlier, in August 2024, the DOJ charged Asif Raza Merchant, a Pakistani national with ties to Iran, in a separate murder-for-hire plot targeting a high-profile U.S. political figure. Merchant tried to hire hitmen—who turned out to be undercover FBI agents—to carry out an assassination on U.S. soil.

Although the official indictment didn’t name Trump, a leaked intelligence document shared by Sen. Chuck Grassley indicated he was the intended target. Merchant had connections to an Iranian handler, detailed elaborate plans, and admitted to targeting a “political person” in the United States.

Read 6 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Jul 7

🧵 “DemocracyAID” Is the New Shadow Network Working to Undermine Trump from Within

1/A new group is quietly organizing to stop Trump’s second term from the inside.

It’s called DemocracyAID—and it’s not a nonprofit, a think tank, or a PAC.

It’s a covert network of ex-USAID & State Department operatives who are using the color revolution tactics they deployed in Belarus, Venezuela and other places to start a “revolution.”

Apparently all roads lead to USAID. The Daily Caller did an expose on them. The article is linked below after my deep dive.

2/ At the center is Rosarie “Ro” Tucci, former Deputy Director of USAID’s Democracy, Rights & Governance bureau.

She now runs the DRG Center at SID-US and is spearheading an effort to retool fired democracy-aid professionals into domestic political organizers.

“Ro Tucci” mentioned in initial reports, posted on LinkedIn about a group called democracyAid (all lower-case, but context aligns). She wrote:
“democracyAid is working to do something similar! It’s ALL HANDS ON DECK! … protecting and reimaging our democracy”

3/The movement appears to involve ex-USAID and State Department personnel who lost roles when Trump halted ~90% of democracy funding in January 2025.

Many were from Office of Transition Initiatives or similar units supporting elections, civil society, and media worldwide

Read 11 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Jun 27

🚨 THREAD: The Unholy Red-Green Alliance — America’s New Political Party 🧵

1/ A Marxist. An Islamist. And a Chinese propagandist walk into a ballot box.

It’s not a joke.

It’s the Red-Green Alliance, a coordinated, well-funded campaign to replace American institutions with an authoritarian fusion of socialism, Islamism, and foreign control.

Receipts below;

2/🔴 RED: The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America)
•Largest socialist group in the U.S.
•Builds slates of candidates for school boards, unions, city councils
•Runs massive volunteer ops (50,000+ in NYC alone)
•Uses tools like NGP-VAN & Mobilize
•Messaging: “Justice,” “Housing for All,” “Defund,” “Free Palestine”

But they’re not doing this alone.

3/🟢 GREEN: Muslim Brotherhood-Aligned Orgs (CAIR, SJP, MPAC, ISNA)
•Operating through soft fronts like CAIR & SJP
•Promote Islamist worldviews under civil rights cover
•Target campuses, swing states, and local politics
•Use “Islamophobia” claims to silence critics
•Linked — provably — to Muslim Brotherhood funding

How do we know?

Read 11 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Jun 25

🧵🧵The Unelected President: Neera Tanden, the NGO Cartel, and the Greatest Conflict of Interest in Modern American Politics

On June 24, 2025, the mask finally slipped.

Testifying before Congress behind closed doors, Neera Tanden, a longtime Democratic operative and former president of the far-left think tank Center for American Progress (CAP) she admitted to running the autopen for President Joe Biden. She didn’t just witness the signature process. She oversaw it. In some cases, she was the one signing the President’s name to executive orders and laws.

This wasn’t a technicality. This was a transfer of power. Joe Biden was not acting as President. Neera Tanden was.

And that’s only half the scandal.

Follow the Money: From Washington to the NGO Empire

Before stepping into the West Wing, Tanden spent years at the helm of CAP, where she helped craft a quiet revolution in federal funding strategy:

•Traditionally, federal money flowed to state and local governments, empowering elected officials to implement policy based on local needs.

•Under guidance from CAP and its policy architects including Tanden that model was dismantled.

•In its place? A massive NGO distribution network.

Rather than giving money to mayors, governors, or county agencies, the Biden administration began funneling billions in taxpayer dollars directly to “approved” nonprofit groups, many of which were politically aligned with CAP and other progressive institutions.

These NGOs became the new gatekeepers of public money, funding everything from housing to education to public health. And they weren’t accountable to voters. They were accountable to bureaucrats, often the same people who helped build them.

The Circular Scam: Tanden’s Role on Both Ends

This is where the conflict of interest becomes undeniable and explosive.

•As head of CAP, Tanden helped design the policy architecture that gave preferred NGOs outsized control of federal money.

•Later, as Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, she wielded executive authority over how those policies were implemented.

•Now, in sworn testimony, we learn she also signed the documents via autopen that activated the very programs and funding models her allies stood to profit from.

This is not just a revolving door. It’s a closed loop of power and money.

Neera Tanden wasn’t just advising on policy. She was authoring executive orders, overseeing disbursements, and enabling unaccountable NGOs to control billions of dollars—while holding the pen with Joe Biden’s name on it.

Read 7 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Insurrection Barbie

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @DefiyantlyFree

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!