Post

More from @DefiyantlyFree

Insurrection Barbie

May 29

🧵🧵 The House Judiciary Committee released a memorandum today, the second installment of an investigation into claims that the Biden-Harris administration funneled U.S. taxpayer money to non-governmental organizations that helped fund the 2023 protests against Netanyahu’s judicial-reform plan.

Biden’s government opposed Netanyahu out loud, used the exact intermediaries and the exact playbook a bipartisan Senate panel already caught in 2015, and funneled taxpayer money to the protest infrastructure and to a charitable network that bleeds into terror and then, looked away when its own inspectors warned it.

This isn’t the first time. It happened under Obama.

In 2015 it already happened, and a bipartisan Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (Portman-R, McCaskill-D) proved it.

The State Department gave the NGO OneVoice $349,000 “to support peace negotiations.” Soon after the grant period, OneVoice used the campaign infrastructure built partly with State Department funds a voter database, a social-media platform that doubled during the grant, and a network of activists recruited and trained under the grant to power V15, a campaign whose goal was to elect “anybody but Bibi.”

Most damning: OneVoice told the State Department about its anti-Netanyahu plans during the grant period, and the State Department did nothing.

US consulting firm 270 Strategies founded by Jeremy Bird, Barack Obama’s 2012 national field director.

American political operatives, trained on a US presidential campaign, were deployed to Israel to run a turnout operation against a sitting allied prime minister, on infrastructure US taxpayers helped build.

The 2023 operation is the same playbook at ten times the scale.

The same agencies (USAID, State) funneled money to the same kind of intermediaries.

Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors took in 50M in federal grants and, in the same window, fed PEF and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

PEF then routed 18M to Blue White Future the literal headquarters of the anti-Netanyahu protest coalition and bankrolled Standing Together, Darkenu, and the groups that ran Kaplan Street.

Federal records show RPA received its money shortly before the protests began.

Money is fungible: a federal grant for “Project A” frees the recipient’s other dollars for the protests. And two recipients didn’t even need the laundering Abraham Initiatives took 2M in US funds and openly “led the effort to oppose the judicial overhaul,” and Movement for Quality Government took State Department money and helped orchestrate the protests.

Read 5 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Apr 28

🧵🧵🧵What Is Bernie Sanders’ Wife Doing Trying to Undermine the United States in Latin America?

There is an organization most Americans have never heard of called Progressive International.

It was co-founded by Jane O’Meara Sanders, the wife of Senator Bernie Sanders, through her think tank The Sanders Institute, in partnership with a European far-left movement called DiEM25 led by former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis.

The two groups issued a joint call in November 2018 from Burlington, Vermont, and the formal launch came in May 2020.

The founding declaration, in plain English on their own website, says: “We aspire to eradicate capitalism everywhere.”

And in the last fifteen months, that organization has built a hemispheric political project explicitly designed to undermine the foreign policy of the elected government of the United States in Latin America.

They named it themselves. They call it “Nuestra América.” They call Trump’s hemispheric strategy the “Donroe Doctrine.” They are not hiding what they are doing. Most Americans simply just don’t know they are doing it.

Within weeks of Trump’s second term, his administration began executing the most aggressive Latin America strategy since the Reagan era.

Cuba was returned to the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. Tariffs and pressure went on Colombia after Petro initially refused U.S. deportation flights.

Sanctions tightened on Maduro and Ortega.

A $25 million reward was placed on Maduro’s head for narcoterrorism.

By September 2025, the U.S. military was striking Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean.

Progressive International watched the first year of this and then mobilized. On January 24 and 25, 2026, they convened what they called an “emergency hemispheric convening” in Bogotá, Colombia.

Ninety delegates from twenty countries attended. They adopted what they called the San Carlos Declaration. They named the project “Nuestra América,” which is Our America, a deliberate echo of José Martí’s anti-American essay from 1891.

They explicitly framed it as a counter-operation to the Monroe Doctrine and to Trump personally, coining the term “Donroe Doctrine.”

The Colombian government did not just allow this. They hosted it. The Colombian Foreign Minister, Rosa Yolanda Villavicencio, opened the summit alongside David Adler, the American who serves as PI’s Co-General Coordinator. Delegates met with Colombian President Gustavo Petro at Casa de Nariño, the presidential palace, on Saturday, January 24.

A sitting U.S. ally used its diplomatic and political resources to host an organization explicitly framed as resistance to U.S. policy.

The next Nuestra América summit is scheduled for Havana, Cuba.

Read 14 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Apr 8

THREAD: The NYT Iran war story wasn’t written for the left. It was written for MAGA. Here’s the proof including where the story’s own claims fall apart. 🧵

The only question I have left is which Eurasian slop peddler thought of this plan.

On April 7 hours before the Iran ceasefire the NYT dropped a 4,500-word story on how Trump went to war.

Bylined Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan.

Sourced entirely from anonymous officials.

A preview of their forthcoming book “Regime Change,” due June 23 from Simon & Schuster.
Every major outlet treated it as the definitive account.

The MAGA anti-war crowd treated it as scripture.

And that’s the tell.

The story’s core claims:

— Netanyahu gave Trump a “hard sell” in the Situation Room on Feb 11

— Ratcliffe called the regime change plan “farcical”

— Rubio said “in other words, it’s bullshit”

— Vance was the most vocal opponent warned of regional chaos and MAGA betrayal

— Trump decided on “instinct,” ignoring advisers

— Hegseth was the most enthusiastic

Zero named sources.

Every claim deniable.

Every official given an alibi.

Let’s test the claims against the public record.

Read 14 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Mar 21

🧵🧵 The Irrevocable Covenant

“For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” - Romans 11:29

The complete biblical case against replacement theology.

1. The Unchanging Character of God

Scripture repeatedly declares that God does not change His mind, break His promises, or abandon His covenant commitments.

“God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?” (Numbers 23:19)

“For I the LORD do not change; therefore you, O children of Jacob, are not consumed.” (Malachi 3:6)

If God promised Abraham that his descendants through Isaac would be an “everlasting people” with an “everlasting covenant” and an “everlasting land inheritance” (Genesis 17:7-8, 13, 19), then either: (1) These promises remain in effect for ethnic Israel, or (2) God lied.

There is no third option.

Replacement theology states that God’s “everlasting” doesn’t actually mean everlasting when it comes to Israel.

2. The Irrevocability of God’s Calling

Paul writes about this in Romans 11 specifically in the context of discussing Israel’s relationship with God.

The word “irrevocable”(ametamelēta) means “without regret” or “not to be repented of.” God does not regret choosing Israel. He has not taken back His calling. The gifts He gave them which are the covenants, the Law, the temple worship, and the promises remain theirs (Romans 9:4-5).

3. The Abrahamic Covenant

The covenant God made with Abraham was unconditional because it depended totally on God’s faithfulness, not on Abraham’s or his descendants’ obedience. This is shown through both the content and the ratification of the covenant.

In Genesis 15:9-21, God establishes His covenant with Abraham through an ancient Near Eastern covenant ceremony. Animals are cut in half, and the covenant parties walk between the pieces signifying “may I be torn apart like these animals if I break this covenant.”

Remarkably, only God passes through the pieces while Abraham sleeps. This unilateral ratification means the covenant’s fulfillment depends solely on God’s faithfulness, not on human performance. Otherwise Abraham would not have been unconscious the entire time.

Everlasting Promises

The word “everlasting” (Hebrew: olam) appears repeatedly in God’s promises to Israel:

• Everlasting covenant: “I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offspring after you.” (Genesis 17:7)

• Everlasting possession: “And I will give to you and to your offspring after you the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession, and I will be their God.” (Genesis 17:8)

• Everlasting people: “But my covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this time next year.” (Genesis 17:21)

This covenant line continues through Jacob/Israel as an everlasting nation.

Replacement theology must explain how ‘everlasting’ actually means ‘until the Church age’ or ‘conditional on behavior.’ This pretzel twisting gymnastics is necessary only because the plain meaning of the words contradict the replacement theology framework.

Read 11 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Mar 17

🧵🧵Understanding how you’re being manipulated is the first step to not being manipulated.

These techniques are consistent across every one of the last eight Tucker episodes.

Once you see them, you cannot unsee them.

Technique 1: The Building

Every episode begins on solid ground. Free speech really is under attack. The Iraq War really was a disaster. American munitions could be depleted. Iran’s nuclear program really has been discussed for decades. This is the ground floor.

The technique is to use that solid ground as the entry point into a building whose upper floors are somewhere you would never go voluntarily. You enter agreeing with the claim on floor one. By the time you’ve climbed to floor five, you’re agreeing that Zionist billionaires control the financial system, that Israel deliberately engineers European demographic collapse, that Kennedy was killed to protect Israel’s nuclear program, and that your Christian faith has been weaponized against you by Jewish power.

No single step felt like a leap. Every step felt like a reasonable extension of the last. That’s the architecture. That’s how it works.

Technique 2: The Bait and Switch

Bait -
∙Free speech suppression (legitimate)

∙American soldiers dying in wars they didn’t choose (legitimate)

∙Foreign lobbying influence on American policy (legitimate)

∙The Iraq War’s catastrophic consequences (legitimate)

∙Christian theological integrity (legitimate)

The switch is always the same: and the people responsible for all of this are Jewish/Israeli people.

Not: complex institutional failures, bipartisan political capture, the military-industrial complex, historical American strategic miscalculation.

Only fault is: Israel. Bibi. The neocons (Jewish-coded). Zionist billionaires. The dual citizens. The Epstein class.

Technique 3: The Just-Asking-Questions Method

Tucker Carlson almost never states the most explosive claims outright. He asks questions that contain them.

∙“If you can’t criticize a foreign country, then that country’s in charge, right?”

∙“Where did the targeting come from? That’s the question.”

∙“Is it beyond imagination that one of those missiles hits the Dome of the Rock and we’re told the Iranians did it?”

∙“How does a tiny country with 9 million people convince the world’s greatest superpower to fight its wars?”

∙“Same with Jeffrey Epstein. Not very bright. Wound up with a billion dollars and an island. How does that work, actually?”

Each question contains its answer as a premise.

The question mark provides deniability.

The audience supplies the answer Carlson has pre-loaded through context.

When confronted, he can say: I didn’t say that. I just asked.

Read 6 tweets

Insurrection Barbie

@DefiyantlyFree

Mar 13

🧵🧵🧵 OpenAI and Anthropic are building the AI products that threaten to displace millions of workers while simultaneously funding the research that quantifies that displacement, bankrolling the political candidates who propose government solutions like universal basic income, and lobbying for regulations that only the wealthiest companies can afford to comply with, which locks out competitors, consolidates their control over how the public accesses information, and ensures that taxpayers rather than tech billionaires absorb the economic fallout.

And they are trying to do it before midterms hoping they can swing the election to the democrats.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman personally funded the largest universal basic income study in American history through his nonprofit OpenResearch, giving $1,000 a month to 3,000 people over three years.

He did this before ChatGPT even launched, meaning he was building the case for government cash payments while simultaneously building the product he now says will destroy jobs.

Altman has publicly stated that many professions will “go away” and that “the world is not prepared.” He is the salesman and the arsonist selling fire insurance.

Anthropic spent over $3.1 million lobbying the federal government in 2025 on AI regulation, national security, export controls, and federal procurement.

Anthropic donated $20 million to Public First Action, a PAC backing pro-regulation candidates in both parties for the 2026 midterms.

Anthropic’s affiliated PACs have directly supported co-chairs of the House Democratic Commission on AI, including Reps. Valerie Foushee and Josh Gottheimer.

Anthropic published a major study on March 5, 2026, eight months before the midterms, mapping which jobs AI can replace, which Fortune framed as evidence of a coming “Great Recession for white-collar workers.”

Anthropic has stated that AI transparency regulation “should apply only to companies developing the most powerful AI models.” That means Anthropic and its handful of competitors. Every startup, every open source project, and every smaller company gets priced out of the market through compliance costs that only billion dollar companies can absorb.

Read 9 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Insurrection Barbie

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @DefiyantlyFree

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!