Heidi N. Moore Profile picture
Oct 13, 2024 11 tweets 6 min read Read on X
I saw a TikTok from a young woman about how she paid $1000 to go to a yacht event in Monaco and people invited her to parties on some yachts "because I was dressed to impress...you can dress to show you bring value to the yacht."

And I don't know if anyone will tell her that cute dresses are not why young women are invited to yacht parties.
She's getting cooked in the comments -- but only because other young women don't think the dress is cute, not because anyone is pointing out the obvious fact that inviting young women with no money onto yachts is the equivalent of "ladies night" at a bar. The young women -- in any dress -- are there to bring the old men in.Image
Image
Image
Image
I think this is what happens when young women are told that Old Money is an aesthetic you can buy through clothes, rather than a set of rigid and unspoken social codes that you instinctually understand.

It's also a result of the current nonsense that's been going around for years about "high-value women" or "high-value men" where "high-value" is a euphemism for how much money they have. There's no understanding that people are not their net worth.Image
Image
Image
Image
she ends up going down a narcissistic spiral of how her choice of a (mass-market) dress has marked her as worthy of being on a yacht, and that the key to being in "high-value spaces" is how women dress....

...when in fact she -- like so many other young women -- was just chosen as sexual chum for shady rich sharks. Who, by the way, are experts at reading people's social class no matter what they're wearing.

Anyway this is an eternal game (the Audrey Tatou movie "Priceless" is about this milieu in Monaco) but one eternal truth is that young women should not be paying $1000 for a ticket to be taken advantage of by the kind of people who go to yacht events.Image
Image
Image
Image
Here's the very basic dress and a hint of her behavior on the yacht, where she dances by stomping around and whipping her arms in the air like someone in a New Jersey bar (no offense to New Jersey bars!). The baseball cap was a welcome gift from the company selling yachts (which, again, wants young women there in the same way that car shows used to have young women) and she doesn't know not to wear it.Image
Naïveté is nothing new but I can foresee a lot of Zoomers getting scammed or taken advantage of because they don't know how to function away from their phones. People have agendas, bbs. Be careful out there.
By the way, the dress also costs close to $1000. It's great for a garden party in Westchester, but is not a look for Monaco or yachts.

Another indicator of how young people brought up on TikToks about the "Old Money Aesthetic" and "high-value women" can't
contextualize appropriate dressing or know that just because something is expensive doesn't mean it's appropriate in all social spaces.

It reminds me of the (great) movie Le Divorce, with Kate Hudson carrying her little red Kelly bag from her rich French lover to the grocery store and book readings, and he has to remind her that it has a certain place.Image
People make fun of fashion as a frivolous pursuit but the truth is that fashion is inextricably caught up with economics, finance, politics, class, social codes and social belonging, and so many people who think it's just about some fabric end up crashing head-first into that realization one way or another eventually.
We didn't roast the men of Monaco here but they also deserve some scrutiny
I should also point out, out of fairness, that no one in Monaco is "old money" anyway. It's a young country and a tax haven, and it attracts those who like brash displays of wealth. Another reason the "Old Money Aesthetic" flops there.
I think this is really smart and sums up the fundamental problem. No shame to anyone who is in sex work or "sugar daddy" situations, but telling thousands of regular TikTok followers to do these things to be "high-value" is fundamentally misleading them about what the point and the transaction is. It's also incredibly dangerous for young women, especially if they're alone as this creator was.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heidi N. Moore

Heidi N. Moore Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @moorehn

Jan 14
You do not, under any circumstances, have to hand it to Amanda Palmer.
I'm seeing some reluctance to attribute responsibility to Palmer, because her entire shtick is using feminism as a cover for her self-interest.

But now we have more information about how she moves. She is not a feminist.

She exploits other women financially, taking their labor and not paying them.

She earned their trust and swore to be their friend and advocate, then sent over a dozen women to a rapist who she knew to be a dark, abusive monster.

She is a rape survivor herself, and built her public image and her art around the pain from that -- but when a woman who was raped BY AMANDA'S HUSBAND came to her, she told her she was basically just one of 14 other women who had the same experience -- meaning Palmer knew Gaiman was an alleged serial rapist and an abuser -- and dismissively, dehumanizingly called her "another suicidal mass left on my doorstep."

Then she refused to talk to the police, so that the victim could never receive justice.

The allegations against Gaiman are that he's a rapist. Palmer would be the accomplice.

All this horror ...why? So that Palmer keep her social position and her big houses. Which she has now lost to the same rapist she spent years covering for and enabling.

Amanda Palmer is not a fucking feminist. Do not defend her on feminist grounds. She should be in jail.
Leave aside the fact that she knew her son would be in the same room as Gaiman when he was raping women, and her only fucking question about it was "was he wearing headphones."

Amanda Palmer is not a feminist. She's an abuser of women. She earned their trust specifically in order to lead them to physical harm. That is the behavior of a misogynist and a woman-hater, not (ever) a "feminist." Let's get that part VERY straight.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 8
Indigenous Americans -- Navajo and Apache -- created an effective way to limit wildfires. It worked for centuries.

Their method would have addressed the same conditions that led to the Palisades fires: Overgrown brush from several wet years becoming tinder in a dry year.

The U.S. government has never adopted their methods.Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 1
I think the way New Orleans officials are emphasizing the safety of tourism while several local citizens died is gross. But I also understand where their fear comes from. After Katrina, New Orleans was completely abandoned by the government and by tourists for years. It made it that much harder, and took that much longer, to rebuild and repair the city. The trauma of being financially abandoned is really strong in that city, and it's for a reason imo.
Tourism brings about $10 billion a year to New Orleans, and accounts for around 75,000 jobs there. It's close to half the city's overall revenue -- an enormous percentage. A drop in tourism would be catastrophic for many New Orleans residents who work directly in hospitality -- and that's before you get to store owners, who are mostly mom-and-pop shops especially in the French Quarter.

bizneworleans.com/tourism-is-eco…
After Katrina, there was the same intense focus on bringing back tourism above all, because so many people's livelihoods depend on it. This document below, hyping up tourism in NOLA, is from 2006.

But I can tell you that the first time I ever went to New Orleans (and fell in love with its soul instantly, harder than I'd fallen for any city except Paris) it was 2008, and the city was JUST getting back on its feet. I stayed at the Sheraton downtown for something like $89 a night. (Prices were usually more like $300 a night, and they're currently closer to $400 for the kind of room I had on an upper floor, overlooking the Mississippi).

In 2008 there were still water marks from the flooding on the buildings on Canal Street. Conferences (and festivals) were JUST again getting organized there. The houses in the Bywater and other parts of the city still were physically broken down and had Xs on them to mark how many dead were found inside. Three long years later. Because the city's economy was so devastated by the lack of money being spent there. The city was, in every way, still very much haunted and struggling.

By 2012, New Orleans was fully back on its feet and tourists from the rest of the South. But that was 7 long years later. Everything took longer because tourism had stayed soft for so many years after the disaster.

Now, a terrorist attack is obviously not the same as a major collapse of the city's infrastructure. But the attack today was right at the center of the French Quarter, the hub for all tourism in the city. Most tourists never leave the French Quarter. Especially Bourbon Street and the area around the St. Louis Cathedral, where the attack happened.

New Orleans has spent years portraying and marketing the Quarter as a kind of Disneyland, a place of soft edges that is totally cozy and safe. (Even as crime proliferated in other parts of the city during many years). So that's why the officials are being so desperate imo. Just something to keep in mind. New Orleans has never, at its core, stopped seeing itself as that city abandoned after Katrina.

neworleans.com/articles/post/…Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 18, 2024
I just want to editorialize here and say that choosing this route will backfire on them. They chose terrorism so they could increase the murder charge, but what that does is also bring up the ideology behind the shooting. And if they're going to try to defend healthcare insurance abuses on ideological grounds, they will absolutely create a far worse situation in public opinion than already exists.
If prosecutors are planning to defend the healthcare insurance system on ideological grounds...good luck
Leave aside how difficult it's going to be for them to maintain their credibility while redefining as a "state actor" a corrupt CEO accused of with insider trading and being investigated by the DOJ itself.

Prosecutors for the Manhattan District Attorney's are going to have to dismiss the powers of the DOJ which had identified Thompson as a target of investigation. The justice system is cannibalizing itself with this one.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 9, 2024
I'm sorry but I am deeply skeptical that a guy who planned out an audacious killing to the second, wearing imperceptible clothing, was caught at a McDonald's with a manifesto and the same fake ID he used at a hostel. Come onnnn.
It's not that people don't make mistakes, it's that a guy who plans an audacious assassination with almost no evidence is not a guy who's going to carry around a manifesto with him
I'm going to believe that hostel guy was an accomplice and a decoy until there's convincing evidence otherwise
Read 9 tweets
Nov 6, 2024
Because it revealed who she really is. Disrespectful, snotty, deeply unserious. It exposed her frivolity and her arrogance completely. A total lightweight, unprepared to deal with serious issues. Zero gravitas. Just ego.
People who are reflexively dismissive about accountability and apologies are deeply dangerous and unworthy of holding a high position. It tells you EVERYTHING about a person.
It was "I'M SPEAKING" that exposed her in an instant. Before that I thought there was a chance she could learn to lead. But after I saw that moment of pure snotty contempt from her towards her own voters, I realized that she is total trash. Even if she disagreed with the protesters there's a way to handle that with gravitas. Being a disrespectful snotty dipshit is a choice, and it was clear that she had made that choice many times before so it was easy for her. Absolutely no understanding of what's at stake.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(