We're not done with me discussing how polling is absolute Hot Garbage, and that even the "high quality polls" have such serious issues in methodology that they are missing entire populations and are highly susceptible to skew (so stop panicking and work on GOTV)

1/x
So first off, this CBS/YouGov poll *again* is A SMALL pool, 2,719 registered voters--and of note, YouGov is a *PAID SURVEY GROUP*. You have to ACTIVELY sign up to YouGov to get polled, people are PAID to complete surveys for YouGov.

This will ALREADY skew results

2/x
Many, if not most, people will actively avoid paid online surveys (because they discover very quickly it's a scam, at the most you might get a little beer money) and YouGov polls are occasionally very skewed towards Republican candidates.

3/x
Younger people tend to not participate because of privacy concerns; the people who are most likely to participate in an opt-in, paid-focus-group survey on YouGov are STRONGLY in those demos likely to be "marks" and which trend R anyways

4/xthreadreaderapp.com/thread/1842984…
And so, yes, there's already heavy potential for Malarkey with this one, and this does appear to be one of those polls that has a population fairly heavily weighted towards R voters...and even THEN *Kamala Harris is ahead at 51%*

5/xcbsnews.com/news/trump-har…
Another hint we are dealing with a poll with a *heavy* population of conservatives is that "the economy", "the US/Mexico border", "Crime", and "Inflation" are ranked high, whilst only a few list "climate change" or the Gaza conflict or *ABORTION* (which is EXTREMELY sus)

6/x
And yeah, that "Abortion" being a "major factor" in 50% and "not a factor" in 22% is SUS AS FUCK because literally EVERY other "high quality" poll (including the NBC and NYT polls with their methodology issues) rank abortion as THE issue for under-30s. THE issue.

7/x
The YouGov poll listing *The Economy* as the primary issue, followed by "Inflation", "The state of democracy", and "Crime", "Gun Policy", and "The US/Mexico border" being the only polling issues above 50% as "Major Factor" practically SCREAMS "right wing focus group"

8/x
And ironically, we can say THAT because we CAN directly compare this to the phone polls--even as skewed as THOSE are, it's literally *those* same issues that pop out *only* for over 45s and Trump-leaning voters who are registered R

9/x
Another hint we're dealing with an extremely skewed polling group AND a poll is that the TOP answer to "As you see it, the biggest threat to the American way of life today comes from" listed as "Other people in America, and domestic enemies" (at 41%)

10/x
And again, indications of skew even show up in the "Where do you feel you get information that is true?" (primarily Friends and family, medical scientists, and then nothing over 50%--and a 42% for "Mistaken" for "religious leaders"

11/x
And (interestingly enough) conservative media figures are generally seen as "truthier" than liberal media figures

And, again, remember, this is a poll that is literally a *paid focus group* that *members opt in to join*, so plenty of opportunity to turn into a junk poll.

12/x
And in fact there's at least ONE clear indication that incels may have in fact joined YouGov en masse to bomb the polls. Specifically, the question on "do you think efforts to promote gender equality betwen men and women are..."

13/x
Literally the MAJORITY of answers (37%) were that gender equality efforts were "going too far", 30% at "are going about right so far", and 33% at "not going far enough"

Which. DEFINITELY shows the user base is skewed as hell

14/x
A comparable survey on gender equality issues by Pew Research shows that most Americans (including 57% overall, 49% of men overall, and 64% of women) don't think gender equality has gone far enough

And in NO spot do you see "go too far" as majority

15/xpewresearch.org/social-trends/…
In fact, the CLOSEST one gets is with "Rep/Lean Rep", where 33% show "not gone far enough", 48% "been about right", and 17% "gone too far"

And for Republican *men*, 28% "not far enough", 20% "gone too far", 51% "been about right"

16/x
So yeah, THAT's a bit of an indication right there something extremely sus is going on

(And even with THIS there is a higher perception of positive ratings for Kamala's speeches vs TFG's.)

And there's another indication the poll got bombed by douchebros

17/x
The question regarding the VP debate shows that 35% "more likely to vote for TFG" (which would match a LOT of the incredibly misogynist sorts ranting for Vance on this hellsite), 30% more likely for Harris, and 35% "no impact"

(Most polls show most folks weren't swung)

18/x
And question after question on here shows they were polling an *extremely* conservative subset, including subsets that are being directly influenced by disinformation on hurricane relief efforts (with 46% saying FEMA funds were being diverted to undocumented immigrants)

19/x
And in fact 36% of respondents actually believe the Big Lie (in that they believe the 2020 election was illegitimate somehow for Reasons)

And Again we see the SAME SKEWS in polling of age groups as with EVERY OTHER POLL, as I'll note below

20/x
Only 417 people (in the 2,715) were under 30, again only around 15% (which again is a population that is *notoriously* unpollable, and yes, this is a point I am going to fairly continuously Harp On because that is also the largest pool of likely Harris/Walz voters)

21/x
Only 22.8% of respondents (621) were 30-44; again, over HALF the respondents were over 45 (61.7%, with 34.9% (949) being 45-64, and 26.8% (728) being over 65).

In fact, this is the STRONGEST skew for over-65s outside of phone polls in parts of Arizona and Florida

22/x
And again, the over-45 set also involved fully *88%* of the people responding to this poll who identified as "conservative", and with an EXTREMELY strong skew with over-65s (62% identifying as "conservative")

And again, remember--a fair number join YouGov for "beer money"

23/x
And to SHOW you just how badly this can skew a poll:

The under-30 numbers (the largely Unpollable) show a *67%* preference for Harris, 30-44 nums show *59%* pref for Harris, it's ONLY when you get into the above-45s that it starts swinging towards TFG, strongly with 65+

24/x
And interestingly--the same "deeper dive" also shows that *younger people ended up much more likely to vote for Harris based on the VP debate* (and the "more likely to vote for Trump" was almost ENTIRELY concentrated in the 45+ cohort).

25/x
And--interestingly--there was a definite pop specifically among *African-American* and *Hispanic* populations as well in that the VP debate made them more likely to vote for Harris, and an ESPECIALLY strong one for African-Americans

26/x
Most people under 45 believed that they would get better access to affordable healthcare under Harris, and *especially* African-Americans; Hispanics also were under impression affordable healthcare would improve under Harris

27/x
Most of the people who thought taxes would go up under Harris for them personally were, again, over 45 years of age, with a sharp rise in people over 65--a cohort that actually tends to pay the lowest taxes of any age demographic overall

28/x
But generally all signs are that this whole CBS/YouGov poll (which, again, is from *a pool of people who self-select to join YouGov, which is itself a pool of people who are "easy marks" and trend conservative anyways*) is from a Very Old, Very Conservative set

29/x
And as these polls come out, yes, I am going to point out these issues in methodology because people are working themselves into a Panic instead of seeing what bits ARE garbage, sifting through the trash to find *actual actionable insights*, and using THAT to GOTV

30/x
And what we have learned so far:

a) Polling almost 2/1 reaches 45+ populations, which skew R, and THAT is going to skew ANY poll R
b) There is really no functional way to correct for this (because people under 45 frankly don't trust random callers and paid focus groups)

31/x
So the best way to prepare for a post-polling world is to glean what few bits of usable info you CAN get regarding the likely "silent majority"--which isn't your "undecideds" (which largely don't exist), but young voters (polling groups still don't quite get this)

32/x
So you look at the polls and you see what is important to people under 45

Healthcare pops out. Abortion is THE Mother Of All Issues for those under 45, pointing at a SIGNIFICANT "Dobbs Effect" that is *NOT* being captured in polls for multiple reasons

33/x
And you remember polls don't vote, people do.

Let me repeat that louder for the people in the back:

POLLS DO NOT VOTE.

POLLS ARE SURVEYS OF SMALL SUBSETS THAT TREND OLD AND TREND REPUBLICAN.

A LOT OF FOLKS POLLERS WILL *NEVER* REACH ARE YOUR BEST HOPE FOR A HARRIS WIN.

34/x
So remember that People Vote, Not Polls. And we DON'T win if we DON'T COME OUT IN *NUMBERS*.

Check reg! vote.gov
Learn your options iwillvote.com
Make a plan to vote: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1763057…
Make a guide: threadreaderapp.com/thread/1800169…

AND VOTE.

35/x
And don't just vote. Make a voting buddy and make sure both of you come out to vote. Make voting guides and SHARE them with people (especially if you are in a state with school board or judicial elections and/or ballot initiatives). Work with GOTV efforts nationwide

36/x
It doesn't even have to be *phone banking*.

One of the ways that YOU can amplify the Dobbs Effect if you're a woman actually just involves a pen and Post-It Notes and your purse. (Yes, I'm serious!)

And there's even online resources to help with that

37/x
There's an ongoing "guerilla GOTV" campaign involving women writing reminders on Post-It notes a reminder that their vote is private, that nobody needs to know who they voted for, and encouraging them to vote Harris/Walz
nbcnews.com/politics/2024-…
msmagazine.com/2024/09/18/pos…

38/x
And Etsy and Amazon actually even have pre-printed Post-It Notes (etsy.com/listing/178757… and amazon.com/Harris-Kamala-…) but I'd actually encourage a single addition to these Post-It Notes reminding women that their vote is private.

39/x
On the Etsy link, you can actually add personalization, and I would encourage a link to Vote Without Fear AND their 1-800 number at 1 (888) 291-3027 (the latter is likely to be more helpful for some populations)

40/xvotewithoutfear.com
And this is a SIMPLE way that you can do your part to drive the Dobbs Effect, which is (again) something the polls do NOT catch, because women often won't answer polling questions if a MAGAt spouse might overhear

41/xsalon.com/2024/08/14/can…
And yes, this can even reach people who voted for Trump in 2020--there is a SIGNIFICANT sexual abuse scandal ongoing now in New Apostolic Reformation churches (including #ihopkc, #hillsong, and #bethel) as well as in the SBC, to the point #churchtoo IS occasionally a trend

42/x
And a lot of the women who are recent #exvangelicals, or who may be disturbed at some of JD Vance's comments about women, are DEFINITELY reachable (and the fact "Can my husband find out who I voted for" IS common is a sign of a potential shadow Dobbs Effect)

43/x
This is also a good thread to forward to people if they're concerned:

ALSO very useful for young #exvangelicals of voting age who are still forced to live with MAGAt parents or in Christian Nationalist colleges, too

44/xthreadreaderapp.com/thread/1821281…
And more resources to provide if you know people in that situation:

But yeah. Don't fret the polls (which are broken and likely to be more so).

Focus on the reachable. GOTV. Vote yourself.

Remember the assignment and get it done, y'all.

45/end
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with dogemperor (https://tinyurl.com/socials314)🐀

dogemperor (https://tinyurl.com/socials314)🐀 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dogemperor

Oct 15
@nerdzsaywhat @KamalaHQ Because of two or three primary factors:

a) A lot of skewed polls (yes, even the "high quality" polls are *significantly* skewed towards populations that tend to vote R):



1/x
@nerdzsaywhat @KamalaHQ b) There is a distinct belt of states (ranging from parts of the Midwest through the South and Appalachia, particularly in the "Bible belt") that upwards of 45% or more of registered and active voters are Christian Nationalists (either adherents or sympathisers)

2/x
@nerdzsaywhat @KamalaHQ Here is the PRRI study on Christian Nationalism and support in different parts of the US:

3/xprri.org/research/suppo…
Read 43 tweets
Oct 14
So it would in fact appear that the "third assassination attempt" is looking more and more like a deliberate false flag event, almost certainly meant to try to drive ammo (pun intended) for Trump to get that Personal Defense Army he's been demanding from DoD

A thread:

1/x
So this gets Spicy, and this IS going to require a BIT of backstory on players.

Player 1 is Mike Flynn, NAR Christian Nationalist, Trump's likely appointee for Secretary of Defense, and purveyor of more QAnonsense than you can shake a bag of bats with diarrhea at

2/x
And there's a lot of good subject matter experts on Flynn, but stuff on him is easy enough to dig up.

But the big things we'll focus on are parties 2-4 here in our little dilemma.

So let us commence onward:

Player 2, the Sheriff.

3/x
Read 49 tweets
Oct 13
I am STILL. NOT. DONE in pointing out the methodology problems with these polls, and again this is ANOTHER poll (the ABC/Ipsos poll) that is based, again, on *paid survey pools* and which have the SAME methodolology issues as most online polling

Here we go

1/x
So we have to, again, dive for the actual PDF and I should note a bit more on Ipsos as a polling group.

Ipsos gets its polling pools from two sources: Its own paid polling, and redirects from various "paid survey" portals like Qmee

2/xlangerresearch.com/wp-content/upl…
As I noted back with the CBS/YouGov poll, paid-survey polls are *opt in* (as in, you actually have to join these), and they are PRIMARILY done by students and elderly seeking "beer money" and occasionally WAHM sorts, many of which trend R.

3/x
Read 40 tweets
Oct 13
So, again, I'm going to point out some reminders re those "scary polls" (and a friendly reminder that polls don't vote, people do, and a lot of the people that vote are simply *not being picked up in the polling*)

So sit your asses down and read the goddamn thread:

1/x
One: These polls are based on EXTREMELY LOW POOLS OF VOTERS.

The NBC pool that people are flipping their shit about is 1000 people NATIONWIDE. The NYT/Sienna cross-tab polls are 800 people on average per state

These pools are actually *shrinking*, too

2/x
I've written a rather extensive thread on the methodology problems in the NYT polls (including the fact they *STRONGLY* skew to pops over 45 and include people who hang up mid-survey)

And even in "high quality" polling these are common issues

3/xthreadreaderapp.com/thread/1845207…
Read 47 tweets
Oct 12
@ArseGrammatica @BeschlossDC a) A lot of Narrative Driving Polls (which are meant as Noise Polls to spread exactly this kind of FUD) are being pushed
b) There are entire demographics (18-29 set, women voting Harris with Trumpy husbands) who are LITERALLY unpollable by any means
c) Dobbs Effect

1/x
@ArseGrammatica @BeschlossDC d) Polling, in and of itself, has so many methodology issues that *even high quality polls* really shouldn't be considered trustworthy and should be considered to have significant margins of error

e) The only poll that matters at the end of the day is the ballot box

2/x
@ArseGrammatica @BeschlossDC f) Regarding that last one--apparently there are FAR higher numbers of both Dems that have requested early ballots and *Returned them* than at this same point in 2020 in Pennsylvania (we should absolutely NOT rest on our laurels, but THAT's something I trust more than polls)

3/x
Read 114 tweets
Oct 11
@AaronBlake Gentle reminder that it's being found, over and over again, that both MAGAt influencers *AND* the networks of *hundreds of thousands* of socks and bots are part of a Russian-operated influence network (assisted by owner of this hellsite who took it over in a hostile takeover)

1/
@AaronBlake I would implore everyone on here to read my primer on Russian influence ops, which actually extend substantially into meatspace and whose goal is complete disruption of the West and reformation of a Russian Empire and new Warsaw Pact

2/threadreaderapp.com/thread/1841159…
@AaronBlake In what is almost certainly only the *tip* of the iceberg, many far-right social media influencers have been found caught up in being *paid* to promote Russian disinfo (via TENET Media)
cjr.org/the_media_toda…
cnn.com/2024/09/04/pol…
washingtonpost.com/style/media/20…

3/
Read 69 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(