TO THOSE WHO THINK MY FATHER WOULDN’T HAVE WANTED #TRUMP TO USE FMJ FOOTAGE
Here are my thoughts: I agree in principle that an anti-war movie is incongruous with promoting the idea of a tough non-woke US military and thus war itself - however - these are very dangerous and strange times and thus using this footage is doubtless pure expedience.
Because I’m sure the irony of using FMJ footage is not lost on Trump or his team - Trump is always seeking to end wars and use peaceful methods. However, that’s primarily what FMJ is about, the shocking and complicated paradoxes of human nature.
And thus, on this tooth and claw planet, you need a very strong military - so I’m going to stick with the idea that FMJ footage was used primarily because of its powerful, realistic portrayal of boot camp, juxtaposed with the entirely demoralizing and inappropriate injection of WOKE ideology into the USA military. Which I agree with myself and which I’m certain my father would have agreed with.
Truthfully, I believe my father (who supported Reagan), would very much approve of saving America, indeed the world, from the highly destructive Globalist forces threatening to take over this planet. And if that footage from FMJ helps Trump make the point that the US military needs properly trained, super tough, focused, dedicated warriors, and not introduce the demoralizing effects of woke-ism, and attracting people to join up simply to have their sexual reassignments paid for, then Trump has my blessing.
Finally, knowing my father very well, I can assure you he had a profound grasp of how paradoxical human nature is! Which accounts for how at the same time he made anti-war films, he had a great passion for guns (self-defense not hunting) and he had quite a few!
My father had a great respect for life - his movies being unimpeachable evidence of his love for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! So on that basis, I feel very confident he would be a Trump supporter and would forgive using FMJ incongruously, if it helps the cause of freedom!
IT’S NOT ANTISEMITIC TO RECOGNIZE THAT ZIONISM HAS BEEN A SLOW GROWING CANCER WITHIN JUDAISM AND SOME BRANCHES OF CHRISTIANITY
My father was Jewish, I loved him with all my heart and soul. Half my family are Jews - I am definitely not antisemitic - but I am anti-psychopaths and I am 100% against genocide, apartheid and interference by a foreign government—Israel—in my country’s political and military policies. These are not controversial positions to take as a patriotic American citizen.
The Jewish faith is incredibly beautiful, sophisticated, and has produced a group of very exceptional, ethical, fantastically artistic, scientific, philosophical, honorable and loving people - of course Jews have their fair share of bad people amongst them—welcome to planet Earth!
The Jewish religion is not a nationality. The Jewish religion isn’t a race - go research the populations on Earth that are practicing Jews. What I do know is Jewish people are just as vulnerable to propaganda, PsyOps and being used, abused and deceived as the next human being.
Zionists hijacked Judaism - that’s my position. They use the Jewish people and their long history of persecution to protect themselves while they accomplish their various agendas. It’s now clear to me that Zionism and Zionists need to be exposed as a criminal outfit. I’ve no idea WHO they ultimately serve, perhaps just themselves, but it certainly isn’t for the benefit of Jewish people, or indeed, for the benefit of the rest of the human race.
I don’t even know anymore what Israel is - is it a country? Or is it a tool?
It certainly isn’t a safe haven for the Jewish people!
The fact that the Rothchilds and the British government were involved in Israel’s creation, should give us pause and cause us to spend some time thinking: what motivations, or indeed very devious plans, would drive the British Government/Rothschilds to create Israel? I wonder, I truly do wonder.
As an aside: It’s important to know that during WWII, Winston Churchill was shown hard evidence of the terrors, enslavement and nightmarish slaughtering going on in NAZI concentration camps, and was asked to bomb the railway tracks leading to these death camps. But Churchill chose to do nothing to destroy those railway tracks that led millions to these diabolical death camps. I wonder why??
It would’ve been a very small operation to bomb those railroad tracks, and to keep bombing them. And yet, Churchill never ordered this done.
You tell me if it isn’t possible that Churchill et al, knew that if they allowed millions of Jews to die, they would have the perfect excuse for creating Israel.