Vivian Kubrick Profile picture
Oct 13, 2024 1 tweets 2 min read Read on X
TO THOSE WHO THINK MY FATHER WOULDN’T HAVE WANTED #TRUMP TO USE FMJ FOOTAGE

Here are my thoughts: I agree in principle that an anti-war movie is incongruous with promoting the idea of a tough non-woke US military and thus war itself - however - these are very dangerous and strange times and thus using this footage is doubtless pure expedience.

Because I’m sure the irony of using FMJ footage is not lost on Trump or his team - Trump is always seeking to end wars and use peaceful methods. However, that’s primarily what FMJ is about, the shocking and complicated paradoxes of human nature.

And thus, on this tooth and claw planet, you need a very strong military - so I’m going to stick with the idea that FMJ footage was used primarily because of its powerful, realistic portrayal of boot camp, juxtaposed with the entirely demoralizing and inappropriate injection of WOKE ideology into the USA military. Which I agree with myself and which I’m certain my father would have agreed with.

Truthfully, I believe my father (who supported Reagan), would very much approve of saving America, indeed the world, from the highly destructive Globalist forces threatening to take over this planet. And if that footage from FMJ helps Trump make the point that the US military needs properly trained, super tough, focused, dedicated warriors, and not introduce the demoralizing effects of woke-ism, and attracting people to join up simply to have their sexual reassignments paid for, then Trump has my blessing.

Finally, knowing my father very well, I can assure you he had a profound grasp of how paradoxical human nature is! Which accounts for how at the same time he made anti-war films, he had a great passion for guns (self-defense not hunting) and he had quite a few!

My father had a great respect for life - his movies being unimpeachable evidence of his love for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness! So on that basis, I feel very confident he would be a Trump supporter and would forgive using FMJ incongruously, if it helps the cause of freedom!

Capisce?

@RealAlexJones @TuckerCarlson @GenFlynn @DanScavino @RobertKennedyJr @TulsiGabbard @EricTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr
#MAGA #MAGA2024

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vivian Kubrick

Vivian Kubrick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ViKu1111

Jul 16
BLAKE, ONCE AGAIN YOU TRY TO USE A PROPAGANDA TACTIC KNOWN AS “POISONING THE WELL”

Poisoning the well: Discrediting someone before they speak, so the audience interprets everything they say negatively.

Here’s ChatGPT’s analysis of your post Blake. It’s analyzing what you say bellow as compared to what Candace
@RealCandaceO actually said in this clip from her show 7/15/26.

CHATGPT

“Blake’s response is revealing—not because it answers Candace’s questions, but because it avoids them and attacks her instead.

“Poisoning the well” follows several well-documented persuasion techniques discussed in rhetoric, political communication, and propaganda operations.

• Frame the issue before people examine the evidence.

• Prime an emotional response.

• Redirect attention away from the substantive questions.

• Personalize the dispute by encouraging people to judge personalities rather than evaluate facts.

• Marginalize the original inquiry by making it appear unreasonable or malicious.

1. He changes the subject.
Candace asked why Charlie’s assistant offered CK a choice of T-shirts that morning but could not remember what the other choices were. She also asked whether anyone in her audience knows the vendor that produced that “FREEDOM” T-shirt Charlie wore 9/10/25. Blake answers neither question. Instead, he reframes the inquiry as: “Candace bullied a young assistant.”

2. He attacks Candace instead of addressing the evidence.
He offers no explanation for why the T-shirt, its origin, or its handling is irrelevant. Instead, he attacks Candace’s personality, motives, and professional reputation.

3. He invents an accusation Candace never made.
Blake complains that Candace provided “no evidence he [CK’s assistant] did anything wrong.” But Candace never accused the assistant of wrongdoing. She asked questions about who selected and handled an object of potential forensic significance. Blake rebuts an accusation she never made because it allows him to avoid the questions she actually asked.

4. He trivializes the failure of memory.
Candace did not claim that the assistant’s inability to remember the other T-shirts proves guilt. She identified a discrepancy: he remembers offering Charlie a choice but cannot remember what the other choices were. She then asked her audience to help identify the vendor that produced the “FREEDOM” T-shirt. Those are direct, factual questions about the origin and handling of potential evidence.

5. He substitutes character assassination for rebuttal.
Calling Candace “demanding,” “unpleasant,” and “projecting” does not disprove a single point she raised. These attacks serve to discredit the questioner rather than answer the questions.

6. He introduces an irrelevant claim about their friendship.
Whether Candace and Charlie remained close after 2018 has no bearing on the origin of the T-shirt, who handled it, what other T-shirts were offered, or who produced it. The claim is a diversion.

Final assessment: Blake does not rebut Candace’s inquiry. He evades it. Rather than addressing her questions about the origin, selection, and handling of Charlie’s T-shirt, he reframes the discussion around Candace herself.

That is not evidence. It is deflection. Personal attacks do not answer factual questions.”

@JackPosobiec @AndrewKolvet @TPUSA @baroncoleman @IanCarrollShow @jimmy_dore @RealAlexJones @leahfiles @joekent16jan19 @LionelMedia @JohnMappin @ImMappin
#CharlieKirk #CandaceOwens #TPUSA #Israel #Propaganda #TylerRobinson
LEARN TO RECOGNIZE MANIPULATION TECHNIQUES Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Dec 22, 2025
IT’S NOT ANTISEMITIC TO RECOGNIZE THAT ZIONISM HAS BEEN A SLOW GROWING CANCER WITHIN JUDAISM AND SOME BRANCHES OF CHRISTIANITY

My father was Jewish, I loved him with all my heart and soul. Half my family are Jews - I am definitely not antisemitic - but I am anti-psychopaths and I am 100% against genocide, apartheid and interference by a foreign government—Israel—in my country’s political and military policies. These are not controversial positions to take as a patriotic American citizen.

The Jewish faith is incredibly beautiful, sophisticated, and has produced a group of very exceptional, ethical, fantastically artistic, scientific, philosophical, honorable and loving people - of course Jews have their fair share of bad people amongst them—welcome to planet Earth!

The Jewish religion is not a nationality. The Jewish religion isn’t a race - go research the populations on Earth that are practicing Jews. What I do know is Jewish people are just as vulnerable to propaganda, PsyOps and being used, abused and deceived as the next human being.

Zionists hijacked Judaism - that’s my position. They use the Jewish people and their long history of persecution to protect themselves while they accomplish their various agendas. It’s now clear to me that Zionism and Zionists need to be exposed as a criminal outfit. I’ve no idea WHO they ultimately serve, perhaps just themselves, but it certainly isn’t for the benefit of Jewish people, or indeed, for the benefit of the rest of the human race.

I don’t even know anymore what Israel is - is it a country? Or is it a tool?

It certainly isn’t a safe haven for the Jewish people!

The fact that the Rothchilds and the British government were involved in Israel’s creation, should give us pause and cause us to spend some time thinking: what motivations, or indeed very devious plans, would drive the British Government/Rothschilds to create Israel? I wonder, I truly do wonder.

As an aside: It’s important to know that during WWII, Winston Churchill was shown hard evidence of the terrors, enslavement and nightmarish slaughtering going on in NAZI concentration camps, and was asked to bomb the railway tracks leading to these death camps. But Churchill chose to do nothing to destroy those railway tracks that led millions to these diabolical death camps. I wonder why??

It would’ve been a very small operation to bomb those railroad tracks, and to keep bombing them. And yet, Churchill never ordered this done.

You tell me if it isn’t possible that Churchill et al, knew that if they allowed millions of Jews to die, they would have the perfect excuse for creating Israel.

@realDonaldTrump @JDVance @SecWar @SecRubio @DNIGabbard @SecKennedy #Israel @netanyahu @IDF @CIA @NSAGov @GCHQ @TuckerCarlson @RealCandaceO @RealAlexJones @joerogan @jimmy_dore @megynkelly @RedactedNews @ukcolumn @_AdvanceUK @benhabib6 @RupertLowe10 @MikeBenzCyber @GenFlynn @PatrickByrne @patrickbetdavid @JohnMappin @davidicke @garethicke @JaymieIcke @MontgomeryToms @KTHopkins @TRobinsonNewEra
#MAGA #AmericaFirst
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(