Vivian Kubrick is the daughter of film director Stanley Kubrick, she wrote the film score for FULL METAL JACKET and made The Making of THE SHINING documentary.
Jul 16 • 4 tweets • 5 min read
BLAKE, ONCE AGAIN YOU TRY TO USE A PROPAGANDA TACTIC KNOWN AS “POISONING THE WELL”
Poisoning the well: Discrediting someone before they speak, so the audience interprets everything they say negatively.
Here’s ChatGPT’s analysis of your post Blake. It’s analyzing what you say bellow as compared to what Candace
@RealCandaceO actually said in this clip from her show 7/15/26.
CHATGPT
“Blake’s response is revealing—not because it answers Candace’s questions, but because it avoids them and attacks her instead.
“Poisoning the well” follows several well-documented persuasion techniques discussed in rhetoric, political communication, and propaganda operations.
• Frame the issue before people examine the evidence.
• Prime an emotional response.
• Redirect attention away from the substantive questions.
• Personalize the dispute by encouraging people to judge personalities rather than evaluate facts.
• Marginalize the original inquiry by making it appear unreasonable or malicious.
1. He changes the subject.
Candace asked why Charlie’s assistant offered CK a choice of T-shirts that morning but could not remember what the other choices were. She also asked whether anyone in her audience knows the vendor that produced that “FREEDOM” T-shirt Charlie wore 9/10/25. Blake answers neither question. Instead, he reframes the inquiry as: “Candace bullied a young assistant.”
2. He attacks Candace instead of addressing the evidence.
He offers no explanation for why the T-shirt, its origin, or its handling is irrelevant. Instead, he attacks Candace’s personality, motives, and professional reputation.
3. He invents an accusation Candace never made.
Blake complains that Candace provided “no evidence he [CK’s assistant] did anything wrong.” But Candace never accused the assistant of wrongdoing. She asked questions about who selected and handled an object of potential forensic significance. Blake rebuts an accusation she never made because it allows him to avoid the questions she actually asked.
4. He trivializes the failure of memory.
Candace did not claim that the assistant’s inability to remember the other T-shirts proves guilt. She identified a discrepancy: he remembers offering Charlie a choice but cannot remember what the other choices were. She then asked her audience to help identify the vendor that produced the “FREEDOM” T-shirt. Those are direct, factual questions about the origin and handling of potential evidence.
5. He substitutes character assassination for rebuttal.
Calling Candace “demanding,” “unpleasant,” and “projecting” does not disprove a single point she raised. These attacks serve to discredit the questioner rather than answer the questions.
6. He introduces an irrelevant claim about their friendship.
Whether Candace and Charlie remained close after 2018 has no bearing on the origin of the T-shirt, who handled it, what other T-shirts were offered, or who produced it. The claim is a diversion.
Final assessment: Blake does not rebut Candace’s inquiry. He evades it. Rather than addressing her questions about the origin, selection, and handling of Charlie’s T-shirt, he reframes the discussion around Candace herself.
That is not evidence. It is deflection. Personal attacks do not answer factual questions.”
IT’S NOT ANTISEMITIC TO RECOGNIZE THAT ZIONISM HAS BEEN A SLOW GROWING CANCER WITHIN JUDAISM AND SOME BRANCHES OF CHRISTIANITY
My father was Jewish, I loved him with all my heart and soul. Half my family are Jews - I am definitely not antisemitic - but I am anti-psychopaths and I am 100% against genocide, apartheid and interference by a foreign government—Israel—in my country’s political and military policies. These are not controversial positions to take as a patriotic American citizen.
The Jewish faith is incredibly beautiful, sophisticated, and has produced a group of very exceptional, ethical, fantastically artistic, scientific, philosophical, honorable and loving people - of course Jews have their fair share of bad people amongst them—welcome to planet Earth!
The Jewish religion is not a nationality. The Jewish religion isn’t a race - go research the populations on Earth that are practicing Jews. What I do know is Jewish people are just as vulnerable to propaganda, PsyOps and being used, abused and deceived as the next human being.
Zionists hijacked Judaism - that’s my position. They use the Jewish people and their long history of persecution to protect themselves while they accomplish their various agendas. It’s now clear to me that Zionism and Zionists need to be exposed as a criminal outfit. I’ve no idea WHO they ultimately serve, perhaps just themselves, but it certainly isn’t for the benefit of Jewish people, or indeed, for the benefit of the rest of the human race.
I don’t even know anymore what Israel is - is it a country? Or is it a tool?
It certainly isn’t a safe haven for the Jewish people!
The fact that the Rothchilds and the British government were involved in Israel’s creation, should give us pause and cause us to spend some time thinking: what motivations, or indeed very devious plans, would drive the British Government/Rothschilds to create Israel? I wonder, I truly do wonder.
As an aside: It’s important to know that during WWII, Winston Churchill was shown hard evidence of the terrors, enslavement and nightmarish slaughtering going on in NAZI concentration camps, and was asked to bomb the railway tracks leading to these death camps. But Churchill chose to do nothing to destroy those railway tracks that led millions to these diabolical death camps. I wonder why??
It would’ve been a very small operation to bomb those railroad tracks, and to keep bombing them. And yet, Churchill never ordered this done.
You tell me if it isn’t possible that Churchill et al, knew that if they allowed millions of Jews to die, they would have the perfect excuse for creating Israel.
