Kamala Harris Falls Apart in Train-Wreck Fox News Interview
Kamala thought she was ready for Bret Baier—she was wrong. Two moments in particular were especially humiliating.
Here’s how it all went down.
🧵 THREAD
The conversation quickly went off the rails when Kamala Harris dodged Bret Baier's question on illegal immigration while simultaneously saying, “Let’s get to the point.”
You never see anything like this happen with any other candidate, and it’s so unusual that you literally can’t make it up.
BRET BAIER: “How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your administration has released into the country over the last three and a half years?”
KAMALA HARRIS: “Bret, let's just get to the point. Okay? The point is that we have a broken immigration system that needs to be repaired.”
The next question involved Kamala slurring her words, saying, "No future HURM would occur,” while blaming Trump for nursing student Laken Riley's death.
This was right after Bret Baier informed Kamala to her face that the illegal immigrant who murdered Riley came on her watch and before any bill negotiations were on the table.
Kamala then oddly flipped the script from “the border is secure” to the border has been insecure for a long time, and it started with Trump.
Bret Baier then reminded her that there were “90-plus executive orders that were rescinded in the first days. Many of those were Trump border policies.”
Kamala didn't know how to respond and was left speechless.
Kamala’s full-blown TDS overcame her further when Bret Baier played an ad that exposed her support for taxpayer-funded sex changes for prisoners.
The vice president responded by complaining about how much money Trump spent on that ad.
In typical Kamala Harris fashion, the vice president said her plan for the economy would “strengthen” it, and Trump's plan would “blow up our deficits.”
Kamala provided zero details on what her plan entails.
Things went from bad to worse when Kamala still could not come up with a single thing that she would do differently than Joe Biden.
Bret Baier asked, “So you're not Joe Biden, you're not Donald Trump, but nothing comes to mind that you would do differently?”
Instead of answering the question, Kamala rambled for a full minute while saying nothing of substance.
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one.
The most painful moment of the night occurred when Kamala Harris crumbled for two minutes straight on a question about why Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is moving in.
Kamala revealed that doesn't have one useful thing to say other than to belittle Donald Trump.
This moment was an absolute train wreck because it made Kamala look like an NPC that could only provide pre-programmed answers.
The conversation took an uncomfortable turn when Harris got angry talking about Donald Trump and the "enemy from within."
What she conveniently left out at the end is the perfect example of hypocrisy.
“This is a democracy. And in a democracy, the President of the United States, in the United States of America, should be willing to be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock people up for doing it,” Harris said.
But the Democrats literally use lawfare try and to lock Donald Trump before an election. That's about as anti-democratic as it gets.
Arguably, the most embarrassing moment of the night happened when Kamala fell for the most obvious trap ever.
Bret Baier seemingly empathized with Kamala's remarks about "unstable" Donald Trump and then used those same comments to ask her when she noticed Joe Biden's mental acuity was crumbling.
She didn't see this coming. Kamala's answer to the question was resorting to the only thing she’s comfortable with, which is sh*tting on Donald Trump some more.
The conversation concluded with a fitting end when Bret Baier softly reminded Kamala that she didn't say a single thing about herself and chose to spend her time sh*tting on Donald instead.
That's literally the theme of the entire interview. Kamala told viewers that if you want to learn anything about her, you have to go to her website instead.
Thanks for reading! If you found this post helpful, please do me a favor and follow this page before you go.
While you're here, don't miss these 10 shocking stories from today that the mainstream media completely ignored.
RED ALERT: Former COVID Task Force coordinator Deborah Birx is now calling for “widely available” PCR testing for Hantavirus, including in schools, and many people are noticing the exact same pandemic playbook that preceded the chaos of 2020.
The real red flag is not the virus itself. It’s watching the same fear infrastructure suddenly reactivate in real time—PCR testing, asymptomatic spread warnings, quarantine language, hazmat imagery, and nonstop media coverage telling the public not to panic.
Birx openly argued that viruses should be tracked through PCR testing instead of symptoms, the same testing system that used to inflate COVID case counts and justify lockdowns across the world.
At the exact same time, Fox News is now airing “deadly outbreak” coverage featuring quarantine centers, hazmat suits, and warnings about possible spread, while officials simultaneously insist there is “nothing to worry about.”
Watch @zeeemedia's report before this escalates any further.
Health insurance in America is broken. But it doesn't have to be that way.
Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.
Nearly 20% of the world’s population is being urged to return to COVID-style lockdowns, this time because of the global oil crisis tied to the Iran war.
Critics say this is how the next phase begins, not with force at first, but with emotional appeals about “patriotism,” sacrifice, and doing your part for the collective good before harsher measures eventually follow.
In a passionate national address, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on citizens to work from home, return to virtual meetings, avoid driving whenever possible, and use electric rail systems instead.
For many people, the messaging feels disturbingly familiar. During COVID, governments first framed compliance as a moral responsibility “for the common good.” Not long after came fines, surveillance, movement restrictions, and aggressive enforcement across much of the world.
Now, a growing number of critics are asking what happens when every major crisis, from pandemics to oil shortages to climate emergencies, becomes justification for the same systems of control.
The full report reveals why many people believe COVID was never the end of this agenda, only the beginning.
In 1982, an NBC affiliate station in Washington, D.C., produced a documentary called “DPT: Vaccine Roulette.”
It got such a huge reaction, the station re-aired it twice. The big NBC promoted it. It even won an Emmy.
All because it asked one vital question: Is the DPT vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself?
44 years later, a film like this would never win an Emmy, never be funded by mainstream television, nor receive positive media coverage. You can’t even watch the film on YouTube anymore.
The question we have to ask is: why?
Did the evidence change… or something else? 🧵
There was a time when vaccine injury wasn’t treated as a forbidden topic.
It was treated as news.
NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, CNBC, local stations, talk shows, and even European broadcasters aired lengthy segments about paralyzed children, neurological injury, conflicts of interest, hot lots, mandates, regulatory failure, and more.
Most people forgot about it or don’t even know that used to be the norm.
Today, a single skeptical segment about vaccine safety can be framed as reckless and even deadly misinformation.
But for decades, mainstream TV interviewed injured families, challenged officials, and aired data the agencies did not want discussed.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc
For all the sources and details, read the full report below:
The same question gets asked every time another massive AI data center is announced: what exactly are they building this for?
Most people are just using AI to search the internet faster, summarize emails, or generate memes. Yet governments and corporations are racing to build infrastructure that consumes staggering amounts of land, energy, water, and computing power, as if the future depends on it.
The official explanation doesn’t seem proportional to the scale of what’s being built. And once you watch @zeeemedia connect the dots on Digital Twins, it all starts to make sense… 🧵
People already know they’re being tracked.
Your searches, your location, your purchases, your viewing habits, even the amount of time you stop on a video, all of it is constantly being collected. But @zeeemedia's new report highlights something much bigger than ordinary surveillance: the creation of a digital version of society itself.
The report points to the Department of Energy’s new “Genesis Mission,” designed to accelerate the AI computing revolution. Maria immediately noted the symbolism. Genesis is the story of creation, and critics believe these systems are moving toward recreating human behavior inside centralized AI networks.
Digital Twins are publicly marketed as tools for engineering, infrastructure, and disaster prevention. The concern begins when the technology shifts from modeling bridges and cities to modeling people themselves, including their habits, routines, movements, preferences, and decisions.
Maria described futurists openly discussing a world where physical interaction becomes less necessary, where you “hug” family members through holograms while embedded technology simulates touch itself.
Once behavior, movement, emotion, and interaction are being mapped in real time, the technology stops feeling like a simple convenience tool.
Maria tied Digital Twins directly into the wider infrastructure already being built around smart cities, CBDCs, AI surveillance, climate systems, and digital ID.
Once you understand that, the scale of the global data center explosion starts making a lot more sense.
History shows when money can be created without limits, purchasing power tends to go one direction, down.
That’s the system most people are in today, and it’s why more families are looking at gold and silver as a way to protect what they’ve built.
Over 40 million Americans take statins, not realizing they’re depleting the “most vital nutrient for the heart.”
Statins are pushed to reduce cholesterol, but they also severely deplete CoQ10, a critical compound for energy.
And when the body is starved of CoQ10, your cells begin struggling to produce energy. Muscles weaken. Fatigue sets in. And the heart itself can start losing the fuel it depends on to keep beating efficiently.
Dr. Stephen Sinatra was a “choir boy for cholesterol” until a 1993 study exposed the unsettling CoQ10-depleting effects of statins.
“Didn’t make any sense,” he said.
“How could the most vital nutrient for the heart be knocked out of the box? The heart requires COQ10 for survival.”
In his own practice, Dr. Sinatra began to notice that he “wasn’t seeing a correlation of heart problems with higher cholesterol.”
He eventually concluded everything he thought he knew about cholesterol was a “myth.”
“Cholesterol is not the villain of heart health” we’ve been told. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
The more you dig into modern medicine, the more you realize how often “settled science” isn’t actually settled. It’s simply been rigged to build an industry.
In the 1960s and ’70s, two scientists squared off over the cause of heart disease.
John Yudkin pointed to sugar while Ancel Keys blamed saturated fat and cholesterol.
Keys won the battle, and his seven countries study became gospel.
But Yudkin didn’t just lose. He was ridiculed into obscurity.
This 75-year-old man, who’s been blind since birth, suddenly regained his eyesight after using DMSO to treat sinusitis.
It cleared his sinuses “instantly,” Murray says, but what it did to his sight was “unbelievable.”
For the first time in his life, he was finally able to see color in his left eye.
And when he kept using DMSO, his vision kept improving: He could make out details and even count fingers, something he “could never do before.”
It might sound like a coincidence, but DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can’t solve, like blindness, macular degeneration, floaters and cataracts.
It’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. And it’s hiding in plain sight for just $20 a bottle. 🧵
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below:
A registered nurse with 30 years of experience treating chronic pain says she saw “TEN TIMES” the positive effects after mixing DMSO with castor oil to treat her peripheral neuropathy.
Castor oil on its own has anti-inflammatory effects, but adding the DMSO is where she says it “got interesting.”
That’s because DMSO “isn’t just a treatment, it’s a carrier,” Danielle Minetti explained.
“It can pull medications and nutrients right through the skin barrier deep into the body.”
That’s why when Danielle mixed DMSO with castor oil, she saw “ten times” the positive results.
Because DMSO acts as the delivery system, carrying the castor oil deeper into the areas where she needs relief most.
DMSO is a naturally occurring compound that is primarily derived as a byproduct of the wood pulp and paper industry, which makes it widely and affordably available.
But that also creates a problem...
Because if a treatment can’t be patented, Big Pharma can’t profit.
And that simple reality is where the DMSO story takes a dark turn.
So what happened to DMSO, and why is a substance that is so medically promising still relatively unknown to this day?
Let’s take a closer look. 🧵
The real story isn’t whether or not DMSO worked.
The real story is how a low-cost, widely available substance became an early case study in medical distrust.
Regulators suddenly restricted it. Doctors dismissed it.
But patients kept using it.
And once that happened, official medicine no longer controlled the story.
DMSO was discovered in 1866 by a Russian chemist, then largely forgotten.
In the 1950s, the paper industry needed new solvents. Dimethyl sulfide from wood pulping could be oxidized into DMSO.
That industrial turn set up one of the most unusual medical controversies of the 20th century!