this is a fantastic and correct post, worth reading if you're young.
i probably would have had a very different life trajectory--i'm not necessarily saying better--if i'd bothered applying anywhere other than university of minnesota for undergrad.
it goes beyond school though. technical hierarchies at firms are different than business side hierarchies. management hierarchies are different than IC hierarchies; of course the possibilities for ascent are higher in the former, both in terms of rate and of peak
regional hierarchies are different than national. industrial hierarchies too; between industry, within industry
simple awareness of hierarchies outside of the ones you currently occupy is important for planning your personal trajectory
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've made it through Paglia's fantastic analysis of As You Like It, and of Rosalind. TLDR:
1. She understands the Hermetic exactly as I do, in fine detail. 2. She establishes Shakespeare's place as modernity's central Hermeticist 3. So why isn't this central to Sexual Personae?!
i count polimath a good friend and i think this is a (characteristically) virtuous thread but i've turned this specific tweet over and i don't agree with it
the reason is that gangs taking over apartment complexes is american as apple pie
those buildings are properly called "Riverside Plaza"
they were the result of midcentury american utopianism (my dad has stories about the visionaries) and great society era federal money, inspired by le corbusier's vision of tiling the world with concrete
i only learned the history later in the early 10s, about a decade after i lived a few blocks away in a west bank dorm during my freshman year at UMN
to me, as with many others, riverside plaza was always just the Crack Stacks
the first mode is secular. homeless people are people, in a material sense, with no notable moral valence independent of their other characteristics.
that said, their other characteristics tend to be repellent or annoying, so they're an irritant like criminals or teenagers
the second is characteristically christian and associated with dignity culture.
homeless people bear the imago dei. they are not intrinsic moral superiors but their plight is a shame to us because it denudes them of the dignity that should be theirs by right of their humanity.
1. at some scale it becomes economical to start altering the existing road infrastructure to facilitate automated driving
obvious case: start with beacons along interstates + full auto semis for long haul trips
maybe gas station attendants make a comeback outside NJ/OR?
2. i mention beacons (i'm thinking something tiny, just appended to the median and edges) because i assume snow is a much more challenging case than is rain
i'm not expecting much use outside west coast + south til this gets solved
no internal monologue means that you think entirely right brain. protean, preverbal, gnostic. no translation to awkward verbal concretization until the last moment. a direct line to the divine.
afaict my thought is mostly wordless rotation of abstractions that only collapses to language in the final stage when i think about expressing my conclusions
i can't prove this but i suspect this is very efficient
something like: imagine running a sequence of operations on data in your ram in one uninterrupted pass before dumping it to storage
internal monologue feels like it would be writing to disk after each operation