this is a fantastic and correct post, worth reading if you're young.
i probably would have had a very different life trajectory--i'm not necessarily saying better--if i'd bothered applying anywhere other than university of minnesota for undergrad.
it goes beyond school though. technical hierarchies at firms are different than business side hierarchies. management hierarchies are different than IC hierarchies; of course the possibilities for ascent are higher in the former, both in terms of rate and of peak
regional hierarchies are different than national. industrial hierarchies too; between industry, within industry
simple awareness of hierarchies outside of the ones you currently occupy is important for planning your personal trajectory
it's often understood to be crass to even consider this, or at least you may have a feeling of revulsion about it
this is reasonable and often noble. strategic behavior in many social contexts is rightly stigmatized. in the context of friendships, it is sociopathic
but many aspects of one's public life _ought_ to be viewed strategically, in furtherance of one's personal goals.
the broad curve of your professional life, as your means of providing for yourself or your family, is one such case
i'm not suggesting that people ought to stab their coworkers or companies in the back, but *your employer or your school is not your friend,* and you can bet that their relationship to you is ultimately a strategic matter from their perspective
what i am suggesting is that you should make an effort to develop and maintain cognizance of what hierarchies exist, how they are shaped, what the implications of occupying a given position in hierarchical space, and what actions you might take to reach some position you desire
this is a hard lesson for smallville kids, if those even exist anymore
their awareness of hierarchy and adult social strategy tends to be blunted by their existence in the midwest's aggressively egalitarian cultural ethic, flat hierarchies, and relatively functional institutions
i have to imagine children growing up in the coastal cities' brutal contrast of extreme wealth and poverty, visible national and global power, and indifferent or predatory institutions have, here, an educational advantage over their sheltered midland peers
but of course it's been a long time since i was really young, and i might be describing a world that's already departed without my knowing.
sic transit sal terrae
yeah i want to be really clear here, i'm not advocating anything like maxing out any given social hierarchy. this is usually insane actually.
i only think people should be agentic in charting their life course and develop awareness of paths and tradeoffs.
occasional reminder that regression to the mean is a regression to the mean of a reference population and the "population" of (eg) the united states contains some extremely interesting microstructure and we're probably a few generations into heavy assortative mating on iq
basically regression to "the" mean is real as described but the specific mean to which the kids of a given american couple is regressing is not necessarily 100
id guess empirically, regression in the US is lower than a population estimate would predict
I've made it through Paglia's fantastic analysis of As You Like It, and of Rosalind. TLDR:
1. She understands the Hermetic exactly as I do, in fine detail. 2. She establishes Shakespeare's place as modernity's central Hermeticist 3. So why isn't this central to Sexual Personae?!
i count polimath a good friend and i think this is a (characteristically) virtuous thread but i've turned this specific tweet over and i don't agree with it
the reason is that gangs taking over apartment complexes is american as apple pie
those buildings are properly called "Riverside Plaza"
they were the result of midcentury american utopianism (my dad has stories about the visionaries) and great society era federal money, inspired by le corbusier's vision of tiling the world with concrete
i only learned the history later in the early 10s, about a decade after i lived a few blocks away in a west bank dorm during my freshman year at UMN
to me, as with many others, riverside plaza was always just the Crack Stacks
the first mode is secular. homeless people are people, in a material sense, with no notable moral valence independent of their other characteristics.
that said, their other characteristics tend to be repellent or annoying, so they're an irritant like criminals or teenagers
the second is characteristically christian and associated with dignity culture.
homeless people bear the imago dei. they are not intrinsic moral superiors but their plight is a shame to us because it denudes them of the dignity that should be theirs by right of their humanity.
1. at some scale it becomes economical to start altering the existing road infrastructure to facilitate automated driving
obvious case: start with beacons along interstates + full auto semis for long haul trips
maybe gas station attendants make a comeback outside NJ/OR?
2. i mention beacons (i'm thinking something tiny, just appended to the median and edges) because i assume snow is a much more challenging case than is rain
i'm not expecting much use outside west coast + south til this gets solved