Infections are known to trigger flares of autoimmune diseases in humans. Infection-mediated autoimmune bystander (non-specific) and antigen-specific mechanisms can contribute to autoimmunity. Several publications have shown this is the same for SC2.
This paper shows that prevalent new-onset autoantibodies against a wide range of antigens can emerge following severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in pre-infectious baseline samples and remain elevated for at least 12 months.
Some have no resemblance to SC2 proteins, others do.
3/10
There are no other infection controls: reducing conclusions about the specific effects of SC2 (see below).
The subjects included 32 healthcare workers (HCW) with self-reported symptoms post-COVID-19, and 16 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (severe).
4/10
Important context: autoantibodies are generated with most if not all infections. Many of us have autoantibodies, the level of which increases with age. Autoantibodies do not mean autoimmune disease, most will have no clinical symptoms.
Do these antibodies matter? They probably increase the risk of autoimmunity, although their overall impact may be modest. There is no impact on mortality.
There is a hypothesis and substantiating data that some autoantibodies may play a role in some of the long-term effects of infection, such as ME/CFS and #LongCovid. Since these antibodies are generated upon inflammation, this can also happen after vaccination.
7/10
Indeed, the authors confirm some symptoms correlate with particular antibody targets. This suggests that in some of us, cross-reactive (SC2 and self-protein), may contribute or cause longer-term symptoms. This part, the exact targets, is pathogen-specific.
8/10
Important to know, that the more severe the disease, the higher the risk of making these antibodies. Immune memory from previous vaccination or infection will limit the inflammatory response required upon re-infection and reduce subsequent secondary risks.
9/10
These autoantibodies are becoming a prime target and explanation for the diverse symptoms related to long-term post-infection effects, collectively called #Long COVID. Of note, they may be (temporarily) re-triggered upon re-infection or vaccination. That would be important.
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is not a simple question. For some viruses, there are multiple strains, e.g parainfluenza virus, influenza A and B strains, and HSV. Yet, SARS-CoV-2 has only variants. At least part of the answer is immunological niches: the space to divert enough to become a strain.
2/9
The authors address this knowledge gap by developing a pathogen invasion theory (PIT) based on modern ecological coexistence theory and testing the resulting framework. They conclude that strain development depends on sufficient susceptible hosts.
3/9
The pre-print makes use of genotyped data from 23andMe adult research participants: European (42,899 cases, 94,721 controls), Latinx (8,631 cases, 20,351 controls), and African-American (2,234 cases, 5,596 controls) genetic ancestry groups.
2/10
GWAS of LongCOVID identified three genome-wide significant loci (HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB, ABO, BPTF:KPAN2:C17orf58).
What does this mean? That is not so easy to digest as yet.
3/10
There are some posts discussing Influenza vs SARS-CoV-2. Is one worse?
The data is what matters. However, it is not easy to get the data, judge its accuracy and understand it. Important: let the data speak. Let's have a few take-home messages about what we observe.
1/10
Someone much better at crunching these numbers, @MichaelSFuhrer, made this graph, based on science and reasonable assumptions.
@MichaelSFuhrer This is the comparison of sequelae correlated with flu and COVID-19 of a specific cohort of elderly men with many underlying health issues, March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022:
Opinion does not matter; what does the data tell us?
3/10
There is this piece of nonsense going around claiming it is impossible to vaccinate, undoing over 200 years of practical evidence and a140 years of increasing detailed cellular and molecular insights.
Of course, this is false. Vaccines imitate an infection.
1/10
It concerns the work of Charles Richet, who was not a nice man. In 1913, he won a Nobel prize for his work on severe allergic reactions (a type-2 immune response), before we understood much of immunology. He did not receive it for finding out how to poison people!
2/10
The latter is conspiracy thinking. The video goes on about elites, the poor and "unclean", reproduction, eugenics, and even Bill Gates. The video abuses misunderstandings and the absence of knowledge to make anti-vax claims that are false.
3/10
There are a flurry of posts on SC2 and neurodegenerative (and other) diseases. This causes, understandably so, anxiety and fear among some. This is largely due to headlines and bad messages. It is critical to understand some context; SC2 is not unique or particularly bad.
1/10
Any infection (trauma) can, and often should, cause an inflammatory response. Some of the cells and soluble mediators act locally, but others systemically. This allows many organs to work together to combat the invader. e.g. your liver will get signals to increase body temp.
2/10
Your brain is a critical player, receiving signals and providing instructions. These can be inflammatory mediators and will impact the inflammatory response. In other words, your brain and other organs are actively involved in immune responses.
Pas op voor de waanzin die de Bruut post. Zoals bijna altijd zit het weer flink fout. Om met het laatste te beginnen: onderzoekers houden altijd de deur open voor meer informatie en schrijven standaard dat meer onderzoek nodig is. We gaan er nooit vanuit alles te weten.
1/10
Het gaat om deze publicatie. Lees om de titel heen. It dit een negatief? Nee, helemaal niet.
Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults
De studie laat juist zien dat vaccinaties een goede antilichaam reactie opwekken, en, boosters verbeteren dit! Zoals verwacht werkt het immuunsysteem in ouderen wat minder, deze groep heeft wat meer hulp nodig, en een booster zorgt daarvoor! Zeer goed.
3/10