In 2020 there was something called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP). It was a bunch of wargames that were set up by the most deep state Trump hating people you can imagine run by Rosa Brooks. Rosa Brooks is the former assistant to George Soros, she was a Pentagon official, she is Georgetown law professor, and she is a Democratic Party operative.
This nonpartisan TIP project was funded by Protect Democracy and United to Protect Democracy. Both of these were actually launched in January 2017 by former Obama administrative lawyers. One of those lawyers is former deputy White House Council Ian Bassin. They were formed as a resistance to the Trump administration.
In late June of 2020, TIP conducted a tabletop exercise using establishment democrats and the never Trump faction of the Republican party, such as Michael Steele to map out the realities of a potential coup by Donald Trump who would refuse to leave office.
This dark insidious project was documented and reported on by people like @RaheemKassam and @MikeBenzCyber and the war room but other than that, the mainstream media coverage of this was spotty at best.
The wargames were played out under the assumption that Donald Trump was a dictator who was going to consolidate power with his base of white supremacists who would need to be neutralized and eliminated after the election. Yes that was their language.
In the 2020 version of this exercise they prophetically predicted that the outcome of the 2020 election would not be decided on election day because of widespread mail in voting. There would be a red mirage where Trump would look like he was winning, but once the real votes were counted, he would lose to Biden. The rest of the wargaming exercises were how they were planning on getting Donald Trump out of the office if he refused to concede and leave.
There was five wargames and I’m going to summarize the overall gist. Donald Trump somehow remains in office. The options were to cause a rebellion and try to get specific states from seceding from the union. And no, I am not joking and all of this can be researched and verified.
There were only two variables in this wargame exercises, and that was how is the military going to respond and what control will the Democrats have over the street riots that would naturally ensue “organically” meaning well planned and funded by Soros.
On August 11, 2020, there was an article published in Defense One expressly calling for a military coup. When faced with backlash from that article, the Atlantic published the now infamous article about the fake suckers and losers hoax to deflect.
Due to the enormous amount of scrutiny, TIP received after the 2020 election, they have regrouped and renamed themselves to the Democracy Futures Project (DFP). The goal of this new project is to create a unified front of globalist foundations to subvert a second Trump presidency and the nationalist Maga movement. The funding for this comes from the Packard foundation, and Pierre Omidyar.
In May and June of this year they met in Washington DC and they made up teams of red and blue. The teams consisted of former senators and members of Congress of both parties, senior state officials, business leaders, retired flag military officers, trade union leaders, and former Trump administration officials who became never Trump. One such participant was Jamie Raskin.
There were five different wargames, but let me just focus on the one that is most pertinent because it’s the one I believe they’re going to deploy when Donald Trump wins. The main topic was that riots that would occur throughout the country as a result of Trump winning the election, Trump would go ahead and invoke the insurrection act, and they need to figure out how to subvert this. The second major part of their operation was they were going to stop Donald Trump from deporting the millions of illegal immigrants.
If you would like to read the details of these wargames, I have linked some articles from the Washington Post that discusse this. From those article once you start to deep dive into the names and players and organizations, you can see how dark and disturbing this is.
The wargames ended by concluding that they cannot use lawful means against Trump’s alleged anticipated actions because those lawful means would not work this time around . Because they could not use any lawful means to stop a duly elected president from taking office they decided that democracy would be over.
They discussed the article Robert Kagan, who is the husband of Victoria Newland wrote in the Washington Post last December, which pretty much made the case for the assassination of Donald Trump. You can read the article yourself and you can also listen to Steve Bannon’s The War Room because he covered this topic in depth after that article came out. This is just pure and total speculation, but it would seem to me that it’s possible that the assassination attempts that occurred after are once again prophetic.
One of the major participants of this project was David Roth, who is the editor of Foreign Affairs Magazine, and a managing Director of Kissinger Associates. He wrote a book called American American Resistance: The story of how the deep State save the nation. The book discusses the courage of the inside agents in the first Trump administration who worked to sabotage it at every turn.
When Donald Trump wins, they are going to activate their paramilitary street army I like to refer to as WokeQaeda so that they can destabilize the country via riots and chaos in the streets while pretending that those riots and chaos are peaceful protests, we’ve already seen this entire playbook in 2020 with BLM. The full-blown color revolution that hit Ukraine and Serbia and other places in the world is coming to a street year you whenTrump wins.
If you think I’m making any of this up, feel free to read the Washington Post article and also feel free to look at the X account called Deep State Radio . They have a weekly podcast which I have listened to and let me tell you orwellian doesn’t even begin to describe it.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant and I hope that people will actually take this seriously because in 2020 when people like @RaheemKassam was talking about it nobody was paying attention, but then it happened exactly the way that little war game predicted.
There are so many other angles I want to look into but this is a good introduction of what to come now that it’s clear Donald Trump is dominating this race.
THREAD: The NYT Iran war story wasn’t written for the left. It was written for MAGA. Here’s the proof including where the story’s own claims fall apart. 🧵
The only question I have left is which Eurasian slop peddler thought of this plan.
On April 7 hours before the Iran ceasefire the NYT dropped a 4,500-word story on how Trump went to war.
Bylined Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan.
Sourced entirely from anonymous officials.
A preview of their forthcoming book “Regime Change,” due June 23 from Simon & Schuster.
Every major outlet treated it as the definitive account.
The MAGA anti-war crowd treated it as scripture.
And that’s the tell.
The story’s core claims:
— Netanyahu gave Trump a “hard sell” in the Situation Room on Feb 11
— Ratcliffe called the regime change plan “farcical”
— Rubio said “in other words, it’s bullshit”
— Vance was the most vocal opponent warned of regional chaos and MAGA betrayal
“For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” - Romans 11:29
The complete biblical case against replacement theology.
1. The Unchanging Character of God
Scripture repeatedly declares that God does not change His mind, break His promises, or abandon His covenant commitments.
“God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?” (Numbers 23:19)
“For I the LORD do not change; therefore you, O children of Jacob, are not consumed.” (Malachi 3:6)
If God promised Abraham that his descendants through Isaac would be an “everlasting people” with an “everlasting covenant” and an “everlasting land inheritance” (Genesis 17:7-8, 13, 19), then either: (1) These promises remain in effect for ethnic Israel, or (2) God lied.
There is no third option.
Replacement theology states that God’s “everlasting” doesn’t actually mean everlasting when it comes to Israel.
2. The Irrevocability of God’s Calling
Paul writes about this in Romans 11 specifically in the context of discussing Israel’s relationship with God.
The word “irrevocable”(ametamelēta) means “without regret” or “not to be repented of.” God does not regret choosing Israel. He has not taken back His calling. The gifts He gave them which are the covenants, the Law, the temple worship, and the promises remain theirs (Romans 9:4-5).
3. The Abrahamic Covenant
The covenant God made with Abraham was unconditional because it depended totally on God’s faithfulness, not on Abraham’s or his descendants’ obedience. This is shown through both the content and the ratification of the covenant.
In Genesis 15:9-21, God establishes His covenant with Abraham through an ancient Near Eastern covenant ceremony. Animals are cut in half, and the covenant parties walk between the pieces signifying “may I be torn apart like these animals if I break this covenant.”
Remarkably, only God passes through the pieces while Abraham sleeps. This unilateral ratification means the covenant’s fulfillment depends solely on God’s faithfulness, not on human performance. Otherwise Abraham would not have been unconscious the entire time.
Everlasting Promises
The word “everlasting” (Hebrew: olam) appears repeatedly in God’s promises to Israel:
• Everlasting covenant: “I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offspring after you.” (Genesis 17:7)
• Everlasting possession: “And I will give to you and to your offspring after you the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession, and I will be their God.” (Genesis 17:8)
• Everlasting people: “But my covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this time next year.” (Genesis 17:21)
This covenant line continues through Jacob/Israel as an everlasting nation.
Replacement theology must explain how ‘everlasting’ actually means ‘until the Church age’ or ‘conditional on behavior.’ This pretzel twisting gymnastics is necessary only because the plain meaning of the words contradict the replacement theology framework.
🧵🧵Understanding how you’re being manipulated is the first step to not being manipulated.
These techniques are consistent across every one of the last eight Tucker episodes.
Once you see them, you cannot unsee them.
Technique 1: The Building
Every episode begins on solid ground. Free speech really is under attack. The Iraq War really was a disaster. American munitions could be depleted. Iran’s nuclear program really has been discussed for decades. This is the ground floor.
The technique is to use that solid ground as the entry point into a building whose upper floors are somewhere you would never go voluntarily. You enter agreeing with the claim on floor one. By the time you’ve climbed to floor five, you’re agreeing that Zionist billionaires control the financial system, that Israel deliberately engineers European demographic collapse, that Kennedy was killed to protect Israel’s nuclear program, and that your Christian faith has been weaponized against you by Jewish power.
No single step felt like a leap. Every step felt like a reasonable extension of the last. That’s the architecture. That’s how it works.
Technique 2: The Bait and Switch
Bait -
∙Free speech suppression (legitimate)
∙American soldiers dying in wars they didn’t choose (legitimate)
∙Foreign lobbying influence on American policy (legitimate)
🧵🧵🧵 OpenAI and Anthropic are building the AI products that threaten to displace millions of workers while simultaneously funding the research that quantifies that displacement, bankrolling the political candidates who propose government solutions like universal basic income, and lobbying for regulations that only the wealthiest companies can afford to comply with, which locks out competitors, consolidates their control over how the public accesses information, and ensures that taxpayers rather than tech billionaires absorb the economic fallout.
And they are trying to do it before midterms hoping they can swing the election to the democrats.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman personally funded the largest universal basic income study in American history through his nonprofit OpenResearch, giving $1,000 a month to 3,000 people over three years.
He did this before ChatGPT even launched, meaning he was building the case for government cash payments while simultaneously building the product he now says will destroy jobs.
Altman has publicly stated that many professions will “go away” and that “the world is not prepared.” He is the salesman and the arsonist selling fire insurance.
Anthropic spent over $3.1 million lobbying the federal government in 2025 on AI regulation, national security, export controls, and federal procurement.
Anthropic donated $20 million to Public First Action, a PAC backing pro-regulation candidates in both parties for the 2026 midterms.
Anthropic’s affiliated PACs have directly supported co-chairs of the House Democratic Commission on AI, including Reps. Valerie Foushee and Josh Gottheimer.
Anthropic published a major study on March 5, 2026, eight months before the midterms, mapping which jobs AI can replace, which Fortune framed as evidence of a coming “Great Recession for white-collar workers.”
Anthropic has stated that AI transparency regulation “should apply only to companies developing the most powerful AI models.” That means Anthropic and its handful of competitors. Every startup, every open source project, and every smaller company gets priced out of the market through compliance costs that only billion dollar companies can absorb.
. @LarryTaunton went to the Gaza border. With an M16 in his lap. Riding with IDF soldiers along the same roads where Oct. 7 happened. He wrote it up for The Federalist and it’s one of the most important pieces of journalism on this conflict I’ve read. But it hasn’t gotten nearly enough attention for the amazing reporting that was done. 🧵
The article is linked at the end of the thread and I hope everyone takes the time to read it. This is just a summary of its most important points.
1. He physically drove along “Burma,” the IDF code name for the fence road, with a 25-year-old IDF soldier named Mikaela and a Special Forces guide named Doron. He saw the destroyed surveillance towers. The mobile bomb shelters where families were slaughtered. The battlefields.
2. Remember that border fence? $1.1 billion. Three years to build. 40 miles long. Israel’s defense minister called it a “wall of iron” in 2021. The IDF chief of staff said “what happened in the past won’t happen again.” Less than two years later, ~7,000 Hamas fighters breached it in 109+ locations.
3. This wasn’t a random terrorist attack on a music festival. That’s the narrative Western media sold us. Taunton lays out that it was a coordinated military operation by land, sea, and air. Fighters came on motorcycles, boats, paragliders, even golf carts. They carried AK-47s, RPGs, anti-tank missiles, .50 cal machine guns. 50 battle sites. 600 square kilometers. 50 hours.
4. A senior Israeli law enforcement official retired IDF lieutenant colonel told Taunton something chilling. Hamas fighters carried maps with exact locations. They knew where every kibbutz was, who lived where, even who had a dog. How? Work visas.
5. The Biden administration pressured Israel to issue work visas to Gazans. Netanyahu refused. His successors Bennett and Lapid issued them by the thousands. Over 20,000 Gazans got access. Hamas used them as intelligence-gathering operations. They scouted police stations, military bases, homes. They hid weapons inside Israel.
6. By the time Netanyahu returned to office in Dec 2022, it was too late. Cancel 20,000 visas and risk riots + US backlash, or maintain the status quo. The fox already knew the layout of the henhouse.
7. It gets worse. Taunton was handed a dirty, unopened foil package found in a captured Hamas pickup truck. Antibiotics Amoxicillin. Stamped UNRWA. Paid for by US tax dollars. Hamas fighters carried UN-funded medical supplies into battle.
🧵🧵 Your quick guide on the Demolition Project underway in the conservative right.
The End Goal
The end goal is the replacement of the American constitutional republic with a post-liberal political order rooted in a specific religious and cultural authority.
Not conservatism as it has existed.
Not the Judeo-Christian framework that undergirds the founding.
Something fundamentally different that uses Christian language but operates on pre-Christian, pre-constitutional principles of centralized authority, enforced orthodoxy, and hierarchical control.
Everything else is a means to that end.
The Architecture
Think of it as a building with multiple floors. Each floor serves a specific function. And most of the people operating on any given floor don’t see the full building. They think they’re engaged in their own fight. But every floor feeds upward to the same penthouse.
Floor One: Destabilize Trust
This is the foundation of everything. Before you can replace a system, you have to make people lose faith in it.
Tucker, the populist influencers, the alternative media ecosystem, they all serve this function.
Question every institution.
Question every source of information.
Question every alliance.
Question every norm.
Some of this is legitimate. Institutions have failed. Media has lied. Politicians have betrayed trust. The grievances are real. But the function of this floor isn’t to reform institutions. It’s to create a vacuum.
When people trust nothing, they become desperate for something to trust.
And desperate people don’t evaluate what they’re offered. They grab whatever feels solid.
Floor Two: Sever the Judeo from the Christian
This is the theological floor and it’s the most critical one. The Judeo-Christian framework is the intellectual and spiritual foundation of the American experiment.
Religious liberty, the dignity of the individual, the limitation of state power, the idea that government exists to protect God-given rights rather than to define them.
All of this flows from a theological tradition that is irreducibly Jewish and Christian together.
To replace the American system, you have to replace its foundation.
And that means severing the Judeo from the Christian.
Joel Webbon putting “Judeo-Christianity” in quotes. Anyone saying “Israel is the Church.”
The revival of replacement theology. Tucker accusing Jewish commentators of practicing magic.
The groypers normalizing antisemitism within conservative spaces.
Each of these is a different tool doing the same job.
Disconnecting Christianity from its Jewish roots so it can be reconnected to a different foundation, namely the Catholic integralist or Christian nationalist framework that predates and opposes the American founding. And I would argue Christianity and Catholicism.