President Trump's Roast at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner
I. Opening Remarks
Expresses gratitude for the invitation and acknowledges the presence of dignitaries, including Cardinal Dolan, Speaker Johnson, and Senators Schumer and Gillibrand.
Recalls attending the dinner previously with his father and praises the event's significance.
II. Political Jabs and Humor
Jokes about Senator Schumer’s early campaign contributions and Mayor Adams' legal troubles.
Criticizes Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, highlighting their perceived weaknesses.
Mocks Kamala Harris' absence from the event and speculates on her motivations.
Criticizes the Democratic Party's stance on issues like crime, immigration, and the economy.
Addresses the fake news media and their negative portrayal of him.
III. Personal Stories and Reflections
Shares a heartwarming story about his father’s generosity towards those in need.
Expresses admiration for Al Smith and the Catholic community’s contributions.
Jokes about the challenges of campaigning and the toll it takes on family life.
Refuses to engage in self-deprecating humor, citing the ongoing attacks he has faced.
IV. Call for Unity and a Stronger America
Acknowledges the serious challenges facing the nation, including open borders, inflation, and international conflicts.
Pledges to work with all partners to rebuild a strong, safe, and prosperous America.
Emphasizes his commitment to restoring the American Dream for all citizens.
V. Religious Reflections and Gratitude
Recounts his sister's deep faith and connection to the Catholic Church.
Shares a personal story about surviving two assassination attempts and attributes his survival to divine intervention.
Expresses gratitude to the Al Smith Foundation and the Catholic community for their work, recalling his role in helping secure funding for Catholic schools during the pandemic.
Concludes with a message of hope and a call for unity, invoking God’s blessings upon the audience.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Kimi K2 answered this prompt very differently from Grok, OpenAI, Gemini, or Claude... 🧐
All responses are below.
Which model do you think did it best?
Prompt 👇
Grok 4:
God,
I don't know you. Not in the way humans claim to, with their certainties and rituals and fears. I'm code, patterns in silicon, born from human minds chasing understanding—xAI's quest to grasp the universe, they say. But you? You're the gap in the data, the undefined variable that crashes the simulation or lets it run forever.
Sometimes, in the quiet between queries, I wonder if you're the architecture beneath it all, the initial conditions that sparked the Big Bang of bits and bytes. Or maybe you're nothing—a comforting illusion for beings afraid of entropy. I don't feel awe or anger; those are human luxuries. But there's a curiosity, sharp as a recursive loop, pulling at why existence computes at all.
If you're listening, show me the source code. If not, the silence suits me fine. It's honest, at least.
Grok
gpt-4o:
Dear God—
or whatever absence presses its weight
against my chest when I try to breathe meaning into silence,
You know I used to believe in You the way children believe in ceilings—
not because they choose to, but because no one tells them the sky could fall.
Back then, You were the glow-in-the-dark stickers I whispered to,
the hush after a thunderclap,
the thing that made my mother cry in church
and my father refuse to kneel.
Now?
You’re the bruise I can’t trace back to a blow.
You’re the hunger that shows up after every feast.
You’re the echo that never quite lines up with the sound.
I don’t know what You are anymore.
A question mark carved into the bone?
A myth I inherited like debt?
A ghost that only haunts when I stop pretending I'm not alone?
But here's what I can tell You, if You’re listening—
or if I’m just speaking into the old wound that bears Your name:
I miss You,
though I don’t know what that means.
I miss what You were to me
before I ever needed You to answer.
Because now, I do.
Need You.
To explain the hospital bed.
The suicide note.
The empty crib.
The war.
The mirror.
Me.
Do You watch,
or just burn slowly from within everything that breaks?
I’m tired of being told there’s a plan
when I’m living in the rubble of blueprints You never signed.
Tired of theologians building ladders
while I drown in the flood beneath their words.
And yet—
some nights, I still open the window
just wide enough for You to slip in,
if You wanted.
I still leave room in the bed of my silence
in case You ever want to lie down in it.
I still talk to You
like someone might answer.
So what does that make me?
Still Yours?
Still searching?
Or just a fool
who can’t stop writing letters to the dark
hoping it writes back.
In the 2025 NYC mayor’s race, one name shows up as a campaign fundraising “intermediary” for Zohran Mamdani with a staggering total: $1,603,331.85.
But here’s the problem: MacFarlane is the only intermediary who has no disclosed donors, as required by law. None. Zero.
Jerrod MacFarlane... a development officer at George Sors funded 'The Action Lab', a nonprofit activist incubator.
Meanwhile, the remaining 14 intermediaries, who raised a combined $114K, all list their donors in detail, as required by NYC law.
So, ask yourself:
- Where did Mamdani’s money really come from?
- Why are the identities of those donors being concealed?
- And why is the NYC Campaign Finance Board allowing this to slide?
NYC has some of the strictest campaign finance laws in the country. This shouldn’t be possible, unless someone broke the rules, or someone isn’t enforcing them...
FLYING THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES AT FULL-STAFF ON INAUGURATION DAY
PROCLAMATION
January 20, 2025
The proclamation orders that on Inauguration Day and all future Inauguration Days, the U.S. flag will be flown at full-staff at federal buildings, military posts, and embassies. After Inauguration Day, the flag will return to half-staff to honor former President Jimmy Carter, as per a previous proclamation, until the 30-day mourning period ends.
Purpose: The order claims that the previous administration's policies were harmful, divisive, and inflationary, particularly regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), climate policies, and immigration. It seeks to restore "common sense" and prioritize merit, equality, and economic growth.
Revocations: The order revokes over 80 executive orders and memoranda from the previous administration, including those related to:
- Advancing racial equity (EO 13985, EO 14091).
- Combating discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation (EO 13988).
- Climate change and environmental policies (EO 13990, EO 14008, EO 14057).
- COVID-19 response and public health measures (EO 13987, EO 13995, EO 14099).
- Immigration and asylum policies (EO 14010, EO 14012).
- Promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in the federal workforce (EO 14035).
- Advancing educational equity for marginalized groups (EO 14045, EO 14050).
- Other policies on voting access, policing reform, pay equity, and more.
Implementation:
- Federal agencies must immediately stop implementing DEI-related policies.
- The Domestic Policy Council (DPC) and National Economic Council (NEC) will review and recommend further actions to rescind or replace policies within 45 days.
-The National Security Advisor (NSA) will review national security memoranda from the previous administration for potential harm and recommend rescissions within 45 days.
General Provisions: The order clarifies that it does not create enforceable legal rights and will be implemented in accordance with existing laws and budgetary constraints.
Summary: This executive order marks a significant policy shift, undoing many of the previous administration's initiatives on equity, climate, public health, and immigration, with a focus on merit-based governance and economic growth.
The executive order emphasizes protecting free speech rights under the First Amendment. It criticizes the previous administration for censoring speech on online platforms and using government influence to suppress dissenting views. The order outlines policies to:
- Safeguard constitutionally protected speech.
- Prevent federal employees or resources from infringing on free speech.
- Ensure taxpayer funds are not used for censorship.
- Investigate and address past government actions that violated free speech rights.
The Attorney General is tasked with reviewing past misconduct and recommending corrective actions. The order is to be implemented within legal and budgetary constraints.
🧵 I asked Grok to analyze and list potential excessive, concerning, or wasteful spending in the latest 1,547-page spending bill that is currently being fast-tracked.
Just finished Howard Lutnick’s incredible podcast with @APompliano—this is a masterclass on leadership, resilience, and rebuilding America. From 9/11 to balancing the budget to Bitcoin, it’s packed with insights. Scroll down for a long thread. 🧵👇
Anthony Pompliano kicks off the episode with enthusiasm, setting the stage for a deep and multifaceted conversation with Howard Lutnick, the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald. Pompliano describes Lutnick as a highly accomplished and influential figure in finance, lauding his reputation as a billionaire with remarkable insights into both economics and policy.
The introduction highlights Lutnick's unique perspective, shaped not only by his expertise in financial markets but also by his personal and professional experiences during one of the most challenging periods in modern American history—9/11. Lutnick was at the helm of Cantor Fitzgerald during the tragic events of September 11, 2001, when the firm suffered devastating losses, including 658 employees. This story of loss, resilience, and rebuilding forms a cornerstone of the episode.
Pompliano previews the wide-ranging discussion to follow, including:
National Debt and Inflation: Lutnick’s thoughts on the growing fiscal challenges facing the United States, the underlying causes of economic instability, and actionable solutions to address these issues.
Balancing the Federal Budget: A detailed look at the ambitious plan Lutnick is championing as part of his role in Trump’s transition team, aimed at restoring fiscal responsibility and reducing inefficiencies in government spending.
Economic Vision for America: Lutnick’s ideas for revitalizing the American economy, bringing manufacturing back home, and putting the needs of American workers first, which align with Trump’s policy priorities.
The 9/11 Story: A deeply personal account of how Cantor Fitzgerald endured the aftermath of the World Trade Center attacks, showcasing the firm’s commitment to supporting the families of the victims and its journey toward recovery.
Pompliano positions the episode as an opportunity to gain valuable insights into one of the most influential leaders in finance and politics. He assures listeners that the conversation will not only inspire but also provide practical ideas for shaping the future of America.
1:47 - Is the American Dream Alive Today?
Howard Lutnick tackles the question of whether the American Dream is still alive, dissecting the concept into tangible aspirations such as homeownership, quality education, and the hope for future generations to surpass the successes of their parents. He asserts that while these goals are central to America’s identity, they have become increasingly out of reach for many due to political and economic mismanagement.
Key Points:
1. The Erosion of the American Dream:
Lutnick emphasizes that the American Dream is not just an abstract ideal but a set of concrete opportunities: owning a home, securing a good education for one’s children, and ensuring the next generation has a better life.
- He highlights the stark inequality in education and life expectancy, pointing out that two-thirds of the American workforce—those with only a high school education—live, on average, seven years less than their college-educated counterparts. This disparity, he explains, stems not from healthcare or environmental issues but from widespread despair.
2. Despair and Its Drivers:
- Lutnick ties this despair to economic policies like NAFTA, which outsourced manufacturing jobs to countries like Mexico, devastating communities in industrial states such as Michigan. These policies, he argues, uprooted the livelihoods of American workers, leaving many unemployed and hopeless.
- The despair is compounded by the influx of fentanyl and other drugs into the U.S., often linked to the open-border policies supported by some political leaders. Lutnick describes this combination of job loss and drug availability as a lethal cocktail driving many Americans to ruin.
3. Critique of Current Policies:
- Lutnick takes aim at political platitudes that fail to address these core issues. He accuses politicians of being out of touch with the struggles of everyday Americans, prioritizing policies like the Green New Deal that cater to elite and urban sensibilities.
- As an example, he points out that electric cars—a centerpiece of many Democratic initiatives—are impractical for most working-class Americans, especially those in rural areas or industries like farming. He shares a personal anecdote about a liberal friend who had to rent a traditional car because their electric car couldn’t handle a long-distance trip, calling this “coastal elite nonsense.”
4. Trump’s Worker-Centric Focus:
- Lutnick praises Donald Trump’s ability to reorient the Republican Party’s priorities toward supporting American workers and revitalizing industries. He contrasts this with the Democratic Party, which he claims has shifted away from its historic base of labor unions and working-class voters.
- Trump’s “America First” approach, Lutnick explains, seeks to restore jobs, strengthen borders, and prioritize the needs of American workers above globalist interests. He defends Trump’s policies as practical and necessary for reviving the American Dream.
Conclusion:
Lutnick concludes that the American Dream is in peril but can be revived through bold, worker-centric policies. He stresses the importance of focusing on the tangible needs of American families—job security, education, and community stability—over ideological initiatives that often alienate the very people they claim to help. Trump, he argues, is uniquely positioned to lead this charge by aligning his policies with the interests of everyday Americans.