Ellie likes data Profile picture
Oct 18, 2024 16 tweets 6 min read Read on X
I've pointed out before the gross end goal of population doomers: they want more children having babies.
The CDC reports the birth rate of women 15-44 for consistency, but we've spent billions over the past decades trying to end teen pregnancy, and it's worked!
/🧵 Image
Missouri, Kansas, and Idaho have added a claim against the FDA trying to reverse mifepristone approval on the basis that it's lowering their state birth rates. This is dystopian reasoning, but it also has no basis in fact —
2/ Image
With the data saying fewer teens are having sex, (+lower STI rates), seems all the programs and efforts over the last few decades to reduce teen pregnancy worked. Births to teenagers have dropped dramatically. This isn’t a crisis, it's the goal we all agreed on!
3/ Image
Birth rates are extremely volatile, and easily influenced by pandemics, recessions, vibes— They’re also shaped by the size of the cohort of reproductive-age women at that time in history, which itself is shaped by birth rates from 15-44 years ago. It’s a cycle.
4/ Image
When you zoom out, you see births to adult women are pretty much on trend for the last 50 years (and women 30-44 are setting records). Overall, women are just waiting to have children. Any truly "missing babies" are from the drop in teen pregnancies, and that was the goal.
5/ Image
Image
Women in their 20's are waiting to have children, but older women are picking up the slack. The demographic cohort where this shift occurs is *currently* having children. The rates are inverting. Younger cohorts haven't caught up with the children they'll eventually have.
6/ Image
Total Fertility Rate or “replacement level” is just a math problem for stating consistent data, not a conclusion, and we came up with it while ~20% of births were to women under 20!
Like bad polling demographics, these births have too much weight.
7/
The population doomers (Elon) love linear progression fallacies. Just because birth rates declined at one point doesn’t mean they’ll keep falling forever. Birth rates ebb and flow. This isn’t new, it’s cyclical.
8/ Image
The U.S. population isn’t about to collapse.
Birth rates have dropped overall compared to the population, but so has infant mortality, so has under 5 mortality, and so has the likelihood you make it to 60.
1920s population ideas just don't make sense today.
9/ Image
In fact, what we do know from the data is that birth rates are heavily influenced by economics and even just vibes. Look at history: the Baby Boom was fueled by post-WWII growth, while busts of the '30s and '70s were tied to the Great Depression and stagflation.
10/ Image
We saw birth rates rising steadily again until 2006, then falling with the Great Recession. During Obama’s second term, birth rates started back up. But they began dropping again in 2017 (Trump?) and fell off a cliff during the pandemic, much like during the Spanish Flu.
11/
Fun fact: in 1959 the birth rate for women age 20-24 hit an all-time high, but they made up the smallest share of the reproductive-age population.
Huge federal tax incentives around this time to encourage births among that small cohort born in the 30s. Context matters.
12/ Image
The current lawsuits claim reproductive healthcare access is driving population decline. But the data shows it’s not about 'missing babies', women aren’t skipping childbearing, they're waiting.
Again, birth rates to women 30-44 are setting records:
13/ Image
Teen pregnancies that don't happen can result in the capacity to have more children later, so older cohorts pick up the slack.
Fertility tools (even just awareness) as well as paid leave also increase the number of births among older moms, in addition to the children delayed.
14/ Image
TL;DR : Elon is surprisingly bad at math.
A shift in when women have children is not a trend of linear prophecy to the new millennium. We don't have a population crisis in this country. Declining teen pregnancy and delayed childbearing is a good thing.
x/ Image
Image
@threadreaderapp please unroll my excel-lent (ha!) musing that should’ve been a substack but instead became a Twitter novel.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ellie likes data

Ellie likes data Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ellim992

Jun 7
My brother-in-law is blind.

He's blind because when his son was born, he moved to Arkansas for lower cost of living. He's T1 diabetic. He worked at Walmart, which did not provide health insurance. He made too much for Medicaid, but not enough to buy insulin.
1/
He could've quit and taken Medicaid, but it was during the period of time with work requirements—and how would he support his family?
Instead, he rationed insulin for nearly 3 years. He moved back to the Northwest for healthcare, but nothing could be done by then.
2/
Now, he's blind and on SSD. He can't work because of health policy choices the state of Arkansas and the last Trump admin made.

We know from the data that every $1 spent on preventative care can save $10 down the line. Medicaid cuts are expensive to the taxpayer.
3/
Read 8 tweets
Jun 2
In case you hadn't picked up on it, things aren't going well for the Right, so the Conservative™ movement is flooding the zone with as much bullshit about trans athletes as possible.
It hasn't been taken up by MSM because
1/ Image
they don't have any journalists following things like Council for National Policy (Heritage), which has explicitly stated they are going to draw as much media attention to trans athletes as possible.
The current panic isn't what they previously said—
2/
Abigail Shrier / Ben Shapiro type Conservatives recognized both the reality of a spectrum of intersex people (and those who don't know they are), as well as the historically well known phenomenon of very young boys stating, repeatedly, they are girls at an early age.
3/
Read 11 tweets
May 14
🚨The real scoop?
The Trump admin hand-picked a "refugee" who owns a lucrative granite mine, leads a right-wing party that courts gangs, runs an illegal grow op, and has social media full of a decade’s worth of Putin propaganda.
The Episcopal Church knows who these people are.
1/
The Episcopal Church is ending refugee resettlment contracts with the government over this issue.
That is a massive step, and the Bishop of the American Episocopal Church spoke out about it. This will unfortunately harm refugees and program workers.
2/
goerie.com/story/news/202…
A serious example of 'every accusation is a confession'. The Right ran a campaign calling refugees "gang members" so they could just import politically aligned gang members— but you're gaslit after pushing back against THEIR accusations for years.
3/
Read 6 tweets
Apr 17
RFK Jr. is misusing a surveillance report on autism to promote cruel conspiracy theories. What's worse is how the CDC failed to look at a public source to test their conclusions—special education data and placement.
This isn't an epidemic, it's a change in classification.
/🧵 Image
In 1972, a report to Congress found 1.75 million disabled children weren’t in school at all and millions more were underserved. There was bipartisan support for legislation for a right to education for disabled children — Ford signed the All Handicapped Children Act in 1975.
2/ Image
The Act only guaranteed services for children with specific disabilities: mentally retarded, hard of hearing, deaf, speech impaired, visually handicapped, seriously emotionally disturbed, crippled, health impaired, or with "specific learning disability".
3/ Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 18
Federal Agencies have made these beautiful annual data books with tables, charts, and their legislative authority since the start of our country— but they just sit and molder online now while people look at tiktok and think-tank blogs.
Journalists aren't even using them!
🧵/ Image
Image
Image
Image
You can find the annual FTE at the EPA, their budget, and all the programs they've had going back decades.
2/ Image
Image
Image
You can look at the official IRS Data Books from now going back to 1863.
They're incredible history, the copy was especially fun through various decades, and when it included what became the ATF.
3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 7
These have to be the stupidest people in history, anybody who trusts them is licking shit off the floor.
The signatures are from the Federal Register.
The Federal Register has used a reproduction signature for every presidential document since Nixon.
Total slop.
🧵/
The Federal Register has published 177 documents for Trump so far this term, every one with a reproduction signature.
2/ Image
Image
Every document from Biden, Trump, Obama, GWB, Clinton, GHWB, Reagan, Carter, and Nixon—100% of Federal Register Presidential Documents—has a reproduction signature!
GPO used to type them, since 1969 they stamped or digitally added. Clinton's first digital signature sucked!
3/ Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(