Porter Stansberry Profile picture
Oct 18, 2024 25 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Why is silver soaring? The banks are in trouble. These details are public: Berkshire (BRK) sold 260 million shares of $BAC at $41, for proceeds of $10.6B. But Berkshire still owns more than $30 billion worth of $BAC. But probably not for long: here's what's not public, yet.
Berkshire has also sold all of its commercial banks, except Citi, since early 2020. Sold 100% of its 346 million shares in $WFC; Sold 100% of its 150 million shares in $USB; Sold 100% of its 60 million shares in $JPM; Sold 100% of its 12 million shares in $GS.
And Buffett isn' the only well-connected asset manager to dump every American bank. Dalio's Bridgewater (the largest hedge fund in the world) dumped over $100 million of Bank of America and virtually every bank stock too, including: JP Morgan (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Bank of Hawaii (BOH), PNC Financial (PNC), Citizens Financial (CFG), and Capital One Financial (COF). Why?
The reason: there's a $1 trillion+ hole in the commercial banks' balance sheets. No one currently at the Fed Reserve is willing to talk about these issues, but here's what Thomas Hoenig, former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, said:
"Guys, I only want to know one question, how long before you fail? Not how complicated you can make the formula to confuse me and certainly confuse the public."
Hoenig is not just any central banker. He was the head of the St. Louis Fed for 20 years ('91-2011) and has long been among the 2-3 most respected central bankers, ever, at the Fed. What Hoenig warned about is: current regulations do not match economic reality.
"Risk-weighted capital flat-out misleads, the only thing a real bank investor wants to know is how much real equity capital is there. That tells the investor how prepared the bank is to absorb a shock, no matter where it comes from on the balance sheet."
Buffett is a “real” bank investor. So is Dalio. But, as you can tell by $BAC's share price, which is trading at near all-time high multiples, most of the public is not. In fact, NOBODY in the mainstream media has bothered to tell the public anything about the truly enormous scope of these problems. I wonder why...
How bad is it? Quoting from the St. Louis Fed's Bank Capital Analysis report of June 30, 2022: Since 2019, banks increased securities holdings by $2.0 trillion, increasing the share of securities as a percentage of total assets to 33.7% in the second quarter of 2022 from 17.8%
Let me make sure you understand what that means. It means that fully one-third of the reserves of our biggest banks are deeply “underwater.” That's because they bought $2 trillion worth of long-term bonds (and mortgages) at interest rates around 1%.
The real market value of these assets has plummeted because of rising interest rates. It was soaring losses on these assets, which led to the run on deposits in the spring of 2023 at Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank.
These banks didn't fail because they made bad loans. They failed because they owned long-dated Treasury bonds. Total losses on those bank failures were $40 billion. How in the hell did this happen? Mr. Hoenig explained:
"It's a political process. It's not a market process. The market no longer determines capital in the financial, especially in the banking industry. It's now politicians, lobbyists, and the regulators who have to battle it out among themselves."
"Therefore, you get these non-market solutions like risk-weighted capital. And banks are incentivized to increasingly leverage their balance sheets. And, thanks to the ‘financial repression' of the COVID era, when the Fed's bond buying binges took long term rates to below 1%, there was an enormous amount of interest rate risk in the U.S. bond market back in the summer of 2020."
To stem the run on the banking system, which threatened to spread and could have easily de-stabilized the entire system, the Federal Reserve created a new lending program, The Bank Term Funding Program, which offered loans of up to one year, against the banks bond holdings.
Key to the program: the loans were made against the face value of the collateral, not the market value. This made sure that the banks could meet redemption demands from depositors.
Loans under that program soared throughout 2023 and peaked in the spring of 2024, at over $160 billion. With the Feds handing out money, none of the big banks bothered to raise new equity to plug the holes in their balance sheets.
This was a "kick the can down the road" solution. Fingers crossed that interest rates will go back down and the banks balance sheets will be saved. But that didn't happen. In fact, when the Fed began to cut interest rates, long-term rates went higher!
And then there's this: in March of this year, the Fed announced that no more loans would be made under the program. As these 1-year loans expire, they most be repaid. The outstanding balances on the program are plummeting, down to $66 billion currently.
And interest rates keep rising, pushing the value of those 2020 bonds down. Of all the banks that took on interest rate risk in the summer of 2020, nobody took more risk than Bank of America, which purchased more than $500 billion (!) of long-dated bonds in 2020.
Today, Bank of America reports it has $86 billion in unrecognized “mark to market” losses on that bond portfolio. The bank has tangible equity (that is, real equity) of $200 billion. If rates go above 5%, I believe Bank of America's tangible equity would be wiped out.
It' not just $BAC either. The end of the Fed's BTFP will lead several major banks to raise more capital. But, if interest rates continue to rise, the bank runs we saw in the spring of 2023 will return – with Bank of America most at risk.
With $2 trillion in deposits, Bank of America's shareholders would, most likely, not survive a run on its deposits. Right now, the stock is trading at 15x earnings, which is in the top of its valuation range. And Buffett is dumping. ETF bag-holders unite!
If you want to learn more about why much higher interest rates are a virtual certainty (because of soaring Treasury issuance) please watch the Breaking Point video with @peterstongeph_d : porterandcompanyresearch.co/tbsew-rt3
Subscribe to my newsletter to receive unique market insight that's beyond the talking heads, and learn what drives investment returns... and how to protect your portfolio: members.porterandcompanyresearch.com/subscribe-1/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Porter Stansberry

Porter Stansberry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @porterstansb

Sep 30
If you're trying to understand why gold is going parabolic, please read this thread. This is also why the 52% of Americans who do not own financial assets are being destroyed. What is the real rate of inflation? And, absent the Fed, what would interest rates be...? A 🧵👇
The Chapwood Index tracks the real-world price fluctuations of 150 consumer items in the 50 largest U.S. cities. Unlike the government's CPI, the Chapwood Index avoids hedonic adjustments and substitution biases. It's a real index, not propaganda. As an example, the CPI rose 3.5% in 2023. But in Boston, the Chapwood Index shows that the real cost of living increase was 13.6%.
The Federal Reserve targets a 2% inflation rate to balance growth and price stability. The federal funds rate is set to influence borrowing costs and cool or heat the economy. A common framework for "what the rate should be" is the Taylor Rule, a formula proposed by economist John Taylor in 1993.
r=r∗+π+0.5(π−π∗)+0.5(y−y∗)r = r^* + \pi + 0.5(\pi - \pi^*) + 0.5(y - y^*)r=r∗+π+0.5(π−π∗)+0.5(y−y∗)
Read 9 tweets
Sep 25
I believe we’ll see a major bankruptcy within the next 5–7 years at the retailer Target (NYSE: TGT, $87.28). A 🧵
Why does anyone go to Target anymore? Amazon provides virtually everything Target sells, typically for less—and delivers it free to Prime members. For bulk items like furniture and for fresh groceries, Costco consistently beats Target on both quality and price. And for basic, immediate needs, Walmart still undercuts Target.
But that’s not the only problem. Even bigger is the erosion of Target’s in-store experience, once a key competitive advantage. Target used to be a pleasant place to shop: clean, organized, and staffed by knowledgeable, friendly employees. Today, the stores feel increasingly “ghetto-ized.” Shelves are locked up, the parking lots attract loiterers, and employees appear disheveled and demoralized. The store atmosphere is reminiscent of K-Mart in the mid-1990s, right before its irreversible decline.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 13
My personal portfolio is currently up 46% year-to-date. But that's not what matters. What matters is how it's up 46%. Over the past month, I've only had one down day. Just one. (See the portfolio's daily value chart, below.) I want to teach you exactly how to build a portfolio like this. This is especially important if you believe that stocks are too risky for you. They're not -- but only if you know how to do this. A 🧵Image
Last fall, I introduced the concept of a "permanent" portfolio to the subscribers of my newsletter. This strategy was taught to me in the mid-1990s by my friend and mentor, the libertarian philosopher, Harry Browne. He pioneered the idea of using non-correlated assets in single portfolio, to produce "permanent," consistent returns no matter what's happening in the markets, or the world.
According to Harry, a portfolio's core assets should be, in equal measure: stocks, bonds, gold, and cash (short-term T-bills). His reasoning was simple: in an inflationary world, value will constantly be stolen by governments via fiat monetary inflation. That process necessarily involves the inflation of these core assets.
Read 16 tweets
Apr 24
Philip Morris ($PM) has created more profits for investors than any other company in the history of capitalism. Most people know why the company is doing so well now - Zyn - but they don't understand how $PM works.
Let me show you. 🧵👇
$PM has been one of my research company's top three picks since September of 2022. It's up over 100% in our portfolio; it's up over 70% year over year; it's up 40%+ year to date. Today it reported shipments of Zyn rose 53% (!) year-over-year as it expanded capacity.
Revs are up 5.8% and profits rose 16%, to $3.5 billion in the 1Q. $PM is transforming from a tobacco company in secular decline, to a nicotine branding business that's growing fast. That's why the company is doing well, but it's not how. And the how is incredible...
Read 13 tweets
Apr 8
Someone should ask Trump if he remembers the Irish Potato Famine. A 🧵to explain the dark side of tariffs. 👇
In 1845 roughly 1m Irish peasants died because their main domestic food source, the potato, was wiped out by phytophthora infestans, an algae that causes potatoes to rot and die. While the immediate cause of the famine was a pathogen, that's not why a milllion people died.
The famine was caused by tariffs. Irish peasants worked on British estates. Their wealthy owners ensured high prices for their crops with "Corn Laws" (tariffs) to restrict importing grains, while selling their production overseas. How'd that happen? See if this sounds familiar...
Read 22 tweets
Feb 25
@WarrenBuffett should retire and Berkshire must be restructured. A 🧵

You'll recall in Buffett's legendary speech about the SuperInvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville that, despite buying different companies, all of the value investors outperformed the market by a wide margin.
The SuperInvestors had a real edge: they had both informational advantages and a better mental model. And so, on average, they beat the market easily. Warren Buffett was the best of this generation of investors and, for decades, he too beat the market easily. But lately?
Since the GFC in 2008, Berkshire has made six major acquisitions: Precision Cast Parts ($32.7B), BNSF ($26.5B), Pilot Flying J ($14B), H.J. Heinz ($12.1B), Dominion Energy ($9.7B), and Lubrizol ($9.2B). Total initial invested capital: $104B
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(