1/13 Despite its full commitment, russia's year-long offensive has failed to meet its objectives. Progress is unlikely to become easier in the future as challenges continue to accumulate
2/13 This map by @Tendar illustrate the outcome of a year of continuous russian offensives. russia has achieved a net gain of approximately 0.1% of Ukrainian territory and has not met its objectives.
3/13 russia still has not fully captured Chasiv Yar, Toretsk, or Pokrovsk, despite planning to take control of the entire Donbas region by now.
4/13 Ukraine's ability to advance so swiftly in the initial days of the Kursk operation further demonstrates that russia is fully committed to this war. Its intense focus on offensives has left it unable to adequately defend its borders with Ukraine.
5/13 This was russia's best opportunity, as Ukraine began 2024 without US aid, facing a significant manpower shortage, shell shortage and inadequate fortifications. However, russia failed to fully capitalize on the situation.
6/13 The future doesn't appear promising for russia, as Ukraine has mobilized and received shells that were in short supply just a few months ago. At the current pace, it would take russia centuries to invade Ukraine.
7/13 russia is struggling with recruitment and has increased signing bonuses multiple times. It's now using north korean soldiers due to its strained economy hindering mobilization. While that's pitiful, the involvement of north korean troops complicates matters for Ukraine.
8/13 russia is losing equipment much faster than it can produce, relying on old Soviet stock to replace its losses. However, that supply is beginning to dwindle, which will create significant issues in 2025 and 2026.
9/13 russia's economy is overheating due to a labor shortage, rising public spending, and sanctions. As a result, the central bank is set to raise its key interest rate to 20% or higher in the coming days.
10/13 Despite fully committing to mobilization, utilizing prisoners, and suffering over 600,000 total casualties, russia has failed to invade any of the 23 regional capitals and cities with special status that it controlled at the onset of the full-scale war.
11/13 Having to fight on its own territory nearly three years into an invasion it initiated on its own terms is, at best, pathetic for russia.
12/13 Putin is aware that russia's best opportunity for significant results on the front began a year ago and will extend at least into part of 2025. However, as time passes, it will become increasingly difficult for him to achieve anything substantial on the front.
13/13 Sources:
The Economist - russia’s vast stocks of Soviet-era weaponry are running out
@Tendar
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/6 Look at the absolute disaster unfolding right now, and remember exactly who told you to vote for Trump in 2024.
The people who sold you this catastrophe should be discredited forever, and you should never listen to their political advice again🧵
2/6 Remember the tech oligarchs who threw their billions behind him.
Musk, Sacks, Andreessen, and Thiel used their massive wealth, influence, and/or platforms to push this disaster on the public.
They only cared about their own power, ignoring the cost to regular people
3/6 Do not forget the podcasters and influencers who laundered his campaign.
Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, Paul brothers, Bradley Martyn, Dave Smith, and others relentlessly promoted him to massive audiences, trading the country's stability for engagement metrics and access
Iran’s military has been incredibly unimpressive in this war, but it still managed to back Trump into a corner and keep the regime alive.
The war is existential for Iran, not the US, and when you combine this with Trump’s horrible planning, you get a disaster
2/5 Usually an underdog has to pull off a massive military upset to corner a superpower, as we have seen in places like Ukraine. That is not happening here.
Iran is failing militarily. They have lost almost every single ”battle,” yet they are still ”beating” the US
3/5 The reason is simple:
Tactical victories mean little when the enemy is fighting for survival and you aren't ready to go as far.
For Tehran, this fight is existential. For the US, it is not
Tech oligarchs have made themselves universally hated simply by revealing who they truly are and how little self-awareness they possess.
They are, actually, the best argument against themselves
2/6 Some have crossed the line from opportunistic greed into neoreactionary extremism, with figures like Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen leading the charge.
They insulate themselves from reality, and their absolute lack of self-awareness makes them dangerous
3/6 Andreessen recently gave an interview proudly admitting to having zero introspection.
We see the consequences of this daily.
When people wielding immense power refuse to ever look inward or question their motives, disaster inevitably follows