I write much about the South Africanization of America and what it means for us
I think Orania is one of the most interesting and important stories for Americans from South Africa, as it shows how we can fight anarcho-tyranny in an entirely permissive environment🧵👇
For those who don't know about Orania, I really recommend checkout out @StrydomJoost's account; he's a great guy and very well-spoken, so you'll learn a lot from him
But, as a brief summary, it is an Afrikaner-only community in what's about a desert in the Northern Cape, an area far from the Mad Max-like cities and also far from the rich farmland the acolytes of the EFF and ANC want to take from the Boers, making it a somewhat less desirable target of government expropriation, as happened to the white farmers in Rhodesia
In any case, despite being small, despised, and in an effective desert, Orania is now a blossoming town. It has thousands of residents, thriving farms, its own community bank, its own solar farms which means it needn't rely on spotty Eskom electricity, and similar infrastructure investments that make it mostly self-sufficient and independent
Despite (or probably because of) its success, the EFF and often ANC rant about its existence, and Western media tends to be enraged when it finds out about it
But, more than just being prosperous, as many areas in the West and even some in South Africa are, the real draw of Orania is that it is 1) safe and 2) friendly to Afrikaners
Those are huge draws. South Africa has a higher per-capita violent crime rate than Somalia, after all, and farm murders occur weekly with farm attacks daily, with 95% of those going unsolved. And that's without touching the copper cable theft, the zama zamas (illegal miners), and so on.
Further, under the ANC, South Africa is incredibly hostile to the Afrikaners, doing everything from tearing down statues of Afrikaner heroes to chanting "Kill the Boer"
Orania is a refuge from both; there, the Afrikaner residents are free to celebrate their culture, and they are free from the crime that is otherwise omnipresent in much of South Africa
Critical to Orania's success, as Joost has noted, is that it creates facts on the ground rather than waiting for permission, and that its residents do their own word
They neither ask the government if they can do things, asking for permission from a regime that hates them, nor bring in outside labor that opens their community up to vulnerabilities of the sort that farmers in the country do by bringing in often poorly paid and hostile labor
I think there's a great deal of wisdom in that approach, and that Americans who are hostile to this regime would do well to learn
Particularly, I think there is much to be learned from the idea that one should do what is possible without begging a regime that hates them for permission to do something against its interests
That's not to say, of course, that the same exact strategy can be replicated; American Civil Rights law operates somewhat differently than South Africa's, at least in this instance. Additionally, South Africa lacks the state capacity and view of America toward private citizens organizing, something that @k9_reaper has noted in the context of private security
But, still, the same general mindset is a helpful one to have; the hostile regime is something to be overcome and its rules used against it rather than taken seriously
This is something that @DEI4WhiteGuys has noted often; many companies/institutions/etc. can be pressed to have groups that celebrate European heritage, something they obviously don't want to do, and which ends up either making a mockery of the DEI programs, leading to the organization ditching them, or leading to a way for like-minded European-Americans to organize and unite
Any of those outcomes is bad for the regime, and all the strategy requires is pretending to be earnest and weaponizing its views against it
Another example, more similar to Orania than hammering away at company DEI pillars from inside, is @UsaRidge, the attempt to build a community of like-minded people out in the Highland Rim
That's intelligent on a number of bases
One is that it's a way of bringing people together that's not a strange cult or similar entity, and so which doesn't provoke the government in the same ways
Another is that it helps with the creation of actual, real world networks that bring people together and get them used to organizing and working together, along with being part of a functional community with real bonds rather than the usually atomized suburbia
The third, and related way, is that it helps bring the resources and capital of those people into an area, much like Orania, that means the development of companies and jobs, both ones that service the community and area itself and ones which serve a broader market and draw in more capital, creating a self-growing base of capital to advance projects and help like-minded people
Fourth, by being in Kentucky and near Tennessee, it's in a friendly jurisdiction. Unlike Prospera, which now finds itself in an unfriendly foreign jurisdiction, or non-profits like the NRA or @vdare that found themselves in NY and so subject to lawfare from a hostile government, its in a deep red area that is somewhere between ambivalent and friendly to the project.
It's not heritage-based in the manner Orania, as that would bring down the hammer of government, but otherwise is a way of bringing people and capital together in a way that advances their interests, and doesn't need to beg a hostile regime for permission
Altogether, I think the lesson of Orania is that it is possible to accomplish things that serve your people and their interests even in an extremely unfriendly jurisdiction, so long as one doesn't draw unnecessary scrutiny
Further, it shows doing so can obviate the failures of and problems with that host society, from creating prosperity in the place of poverty and safety in the place of crime-caused danger, as it brings together like-minded people and what capital they have while putting them in a situation where they must work hard and together if they're to hold on
There are various ways of doing that, from inside an existing organization like an SP500 company to creating a new community, but all eat away at the rotten structure and replace it with a better one, and don't require the permission of the rot. That's a good lesson to learn
One other thing I should have originally added: they are very particular about who they let in
Not just anyone, even an Afrikaner, can come in. Only those who should be, only those who add something and fit in.
That’s another valuable lesson. They want the cream of the crop, not any and everyone who wants in
Dissident politics and movements/organizations generally would do well to learn from that and to focus on the best, the helpful, those who help and fit in, not everyone who seems interested in joining and who carry much baggage with them
That’s a continual problem
It also applies to labor. The Oranians rely on each other for labor, not on cheap labor from the outside. That’s another thing we would do well to learn: much of the point is helping each other and building something beneficial, not cutting costs at the cost of the project itself
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In my opinion, FDR was one of the evilest men in American history, particularly since he bankrupted the British while simultaneously aiding the Soviets with no strings attached
The result was communism controlling half the world, killing tens of millions in the process🧵👇
First, FDR had used his power well before the Second World War to destroy old America
He not only was a class traitor whose own family despised him, as @NormanDodd_knew pointed out in a recent podcast, but used the "New Deal" to demolish non-leftist power and rule across the country
Particularly, he would ensure that funds were withheld from those jurisdictions and localities that were politically opposed to him, hindering relief and recovery for those who simply wanted to live like Americans ought rather than being part of some socialist hellhole.
He then directed the funds only toward New Dealers, ensuring that those who pushed his brand of socialism and Big Government, both of which were formerly abhorrent to Americans, and solidified the power of such thought in the country
And, of course, he destroyed the legitimacy of SCOTUS by browbeating it and threatening it with court packing to get it to go along with his unconstitutional, un-American agenda
As a result of FDR's firehose of money to socialists, Old America, a land of ordered liberty, small government, and little regulation, died
What replaced it was the bureaucratic state of today: a massive governmental apparatus, welfare and social aid programs, high taxes to pay for it, a predilection for relying on the national government rather than community members, and federal agencies that reach into every aspect of formerly private life
I think the Trump McDonald's visit hit home with so many is that it was a glimmer of nobility, of a time of hierarchy and noblesse oblige rather than the usual American politician thing of pretending to be a prole, as shown by what he wore
A short 🧵👇
This is actually something that Trump is quite good at
Unlike all the other American politicians who dress in flannel when they want to look like a country person, t-shirts when they want to look casual, and a suit when they want to look formal, Trump just wears his suit
He's not lower class. He's not middle class. He's not upper-middle class. He's a billionaire, the upper part of the upper class.
As such, he doesn't wear casual clothes. He wears what he should wear, a suit and tie with French cuffs and polished black shoes, at all times, unless he's playing golf or tennis, when the specific clothing for that sport is more appropriate
There are few people who still do that, the only real example is the old-title slice of the British peerage and the monarchy, along with some other aristocracies and monarchies abroad; you never see them in something other than a suit, unless it's more appropriate to be in something else
Because its history, as shown by the meme below (credit: @kunley_drukpa), stands as a massive rebuke to the entire liberal project and mode of thought
Rhodesia, in fact, is a testament to where liberalism/progressivism leads: perdition🧵👇
The difference between Rhodesia and "Zimbabwe" cannot be overstated
Rhodesia was prosperous and free, the breadbasket of Africa in which men could speak and live freely
Zimbabwe became a tyrant-run hellhole that was ruined by expropriation and genocide, leading to everything from hyperinflation to famine
And why did that change occur? Democracy and liberalism
As I have discussed before, Rhodesian national elections were largely determined by the "A" voter roll. To get on that roll, whether one was white, black, or otherwise, one had to show they owned a certain amount (which converts to about 60k modern USD) of Rhodesian property, with the property requirement mostly nixed if one had a college education
So, though there was voting, it was a real republic with property qualifications, not a mass democracy
The fact that Mr. Penny is even facing punishment, much less that he's very likely to face serious retribution by the state, is a huge issue
It's not just a travesty of justice, though it is, but also shows the sorry state of America, and from where our decay comes 🧵👇
Remember, this state-directed attack on those who defend themselves seems like "normalcy" because it is what we are used to, given how things went for Kyle Rittenhouse, for how the McCloskeys faced the full force of the state for standing up to the horde that broke into their neighborhood, and for how George Zimmerman faced ruin because he defended a thug who was beating him while he served on the neighborhood watch
It's what we're used to
But, though it's what we're used to, it is far from what is historically normal; in fact, it's quite the opposite
What is "normal" is, broadly, the state of things that existed on the American frontier; locals not only could but were expected to, whether as part of an unofficial group, a semi-official militia, or as official deputies of the local sheriff, defend their communities and exact retribution against wrongdoers, particularly violent ones
Whether it was fighting off an Indian raid or tracking down banditos, it was understood that free men have a right to defend themselves and their communities and that the law should largely protect them when they did so, unless their behavior was utterly unjustifiable
So, if some felon with a history of violence was threatening to murder people on a subway, it would be expected that a man in the community would at least try to restrain him, and if a death resulted it wasn't that big of a deal
The general concept of this fight is that on one side stand a view of greatness and achievement as an innate good
On the other endless money poured into the black pit of welfare in the name of a global favela world
This is the view championed in the awful song “Whitey on the Moon” (listen below): anything having to do with immense achievement is evil if it comes at the expense of freely feeding yeast life, helping those who won’t help themselves at immense costs to the taxpayer
And that sort of mindset can really be seen in everything now
Businesses can’t focus on profits…instead they have to focus on DEI and “inclusivity,” as if that has anything to do with dividends
NASA can’t focus on space exploration and settlement…instead it wants to wave rainbow flags outside its building (not even on the moon, notably) and tell about how it’s gonna land “Women of Color” on the Moon
But it can’t land them on the Moon because Boeing is busy worrying about promoting race communism instead of building rockets and capsules that work
Meanwhile the military Boeing builds fighter-bombers for is too busy worried about screening out “racism” and understanding “white rage” to win wars. So, now the Houthis can shut down Suez
It really is funny watching the hand-wringing over "democracy" from people who just don't get what's going on
Democracy's problem for most is that it failed in the ways that matter
So, they're looking for pragmatic people/policies that work, not the ideology of yesteryear🧵👇
One great example of this, just to begin, is Utah's Spencer Cox
He's supposedly a "Republican," yet he is here defending anti-white racism
That concern, the general perception that America is turning into South Africa, whether in terms of crime or society's anti-white bent, is what matters to most voters, even if they don't articulate it in those terms
They, broadly, don't want their kids transed by some insane teacher or screened out of opportunities because of their race. That's not really a shocking bill of goods, but it is one that Cox and his sort haven't been able to deliver on
He, for example, routinely sides with the trans stuff and sides with DEI/affirmative action policies, meaning he's doing everything his base doesn't want, for reasons of pulling obscenely woke, multi-national corporations into Utah or keeping them there
This isn't an American problem either. Mass "democracy" turned the Congo into the morass it now is, Rhodesia into Zimbabwe, and thriving South Africa into Mad Max
And the betrayal problem isn't new either. Take the below tweet, from a "Conservative" in England. What is being conserved if the concern is the opinion of "trans and non-binary communities"? Absolutely nothing. Yet the "Conservatives" applaud those of his sort as "the future"
It should be noted that, in England, as in America, the concerns are practical and personal. People want the Grooming Gangs gone, criminals in jail, lower personal taxes, and infrastructure maintained. Mass deportations that would decrease housing costs and social burdens would be nice too
But instead the "Conservatives" are focusing on making public restrooms friendly to "non-binary" people