Male physical intervention into conflict escalates the conflict. The man she refers to was being rude and such, if a man intervenes to stop him, the subway harasser likely becomes *violent*
These women do not understand what that means....
2/ There is no "margine for error." Almost nobody (save for pro UFC fighters) has the strength, power, and skill set to easily subdue someone. A man who becomes criminally violent will often not stop until he is stopped by being knocked unconscious or severely wounded. And...
3/ The man who tries to stop a violent criminal may be killed if he doesn't use enough force and is overpowered by the criminal
And the gap between "getting killed because you didn't use enough force to stop the criminial" and "using so much force the criminal dies" is small...
4/ And no one is smart enough and skilled enough to calculate the exact amount of pushing, punching, choking, etc that will stop a violent harasser without hurting the violent harasser....especially during the chaos of a physical fight when your brain is in fight or flight mode.
5/ This means when a man intervenes physically against another man there is always the possibility of death or that someone gets severely injured.
Even a man who wins may be badly injured in the process because the margine for error is so small....
6/ Men know physical intervention might result in injury or death, and they will not donit if it means ending up catching an assault or murder charge.
This is why the Daniel Penny trial is such a big deal among men at the moment.
If you want men to intervene...
7/ You have to tolerate the consequences of that intervention.
What women can't do is demand men intervene, and then empathize with the criminal who gets hurt and demand the guy who intervened go to jail, cause that's how you get good men to stop protecting you from bad men.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ To understand what's happening today we need to understand how the 2007 housing crisis happened.
Once we do that I'll show you how what's going on in America's elite institutions today perfectly mirrors what happened in the housing market during 2007
Let's begin
3/ To begin, we need to know what a Mortgage-Backed Security (MBS) is.
The bank take mortgages from different markets, packages them together, and then sell them. The buyer makes money collecting the mortgage payments the bank makes a profit selling mortgages.
1/ A common move used by "Critical Social Justice" (woke) activists is that hide their views behind superfluous complexity.
This tactic is deployed in 2 ways. The first way it to ask bring up minute and irrelevant details, then dismiss anyone who doesn't know them as "ignorant"
2/ You see this in debates about gender where an activist will claim that if you cannot describe all of the biological mechanisms related to DNA, Chromosomes, and the devlopment of sex characteristics, you don't know what a woman is.
This is nonsense.
3/ I don't need to understand the intricacies of DNA to know what a woman is just lile I don't need to understand the detailed engineering principles at work in the construction of internal combustion engines to know what a car is.
1/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture says land management, greenspace, and Science are corrupted by Structural Racism, and the solution is (of course) *DEI*
Understanding what the woke mean by Structural Racism is key to decoding woke ideology
So, Structural Racism
A Thread🧵
2/ The woke have a different idea of what racism is than most people
Most people think racism is "prejudice against a person or group because of their race," and thus racism is a matter of peoples' conscious attitudes and beliefs.
This is *NOT* how the woke think about racism
3/ What the woke care most about is who gets to have power in society, and whose interests that power serves.
As such the woke typically use 2 definitions of racism:
1. Racism = prejudice + Power 2. Racism = Privilege + Power
Note: you can only be "racist" if you have *power*
1/ Gender Ideology is taking over your Churches, and it's worse than you think
This pastor and his wife say gender transition is "choose your own adventure" and discuss blocking their son's puberty and giving him estrogen
So, let's talk about Gender Ideology and the Church
A🧵
2/ The average Christian does not realize how bad things are.
Activists pushing Gender Ideology are brining it into Christian services (video 1), Christian leadership and Clergy (pic 2) and into the seminaries that train your pastors (pic 3)
It's everywhere in Christian circles
3/ As former "trans-kid" Chloe Cole explains here, the entire youth culture is soaked ing Gender ideology. It's in music, T.V. video games, and in Schools.
Going to church and sending the kids to Bible camp won't protect your kids from the influence of Gender Ideology.
1/ The Department of Agriculture researcher wrote a paper on "Whiteness in Forestry" and "Under-recognition of Latinx Bodies," with help from a Queer, Non-binary, researcher who uses "an embodied, feminist, postcolonial, and anti-racist approach."
Activists hijacked the USDA
/🧵
2/ This paper might seem silly, but what is happening here is nothing less then an attack on the scientific method and on objective knowledge and truth.
So I'll explain this paper to show you how relativism and attacks on objective truth get smuggled into government research.
3/ First, we have a statement of "positionality."
According to Critical Social Justice how you interpret the world is determined by your social position. As such, what you can known is a product of you social position and how that positions conditioned your thinking
1/ Social justice/woke academic disciplines (Critical Race theory, Critical pedagogy, postcolonial theory, queer theory, etc) have all the epistemological problems conspiracy theories have, and those disciplines are built into the institutional architecture of higher education
2/ The conspiricy is that a group (white males, capitalists, patriarchy, etc) ordered society for their own benefit.
This order is co-ordinated via systems or logics (IE: the logic of capitalism) and people are brainwashed to accept this via "cultural hegemony" and "discourses"
3/ Attempts to argue racism, patriarchy, capitalism, et are not the best explanation for social ills is viewed as the result of social forces so powerful they border on mind control (false consciousness, internalized racism, cultural hegemony, ideology operating subconsciously)