I’m at UCLA and I just met Clementine, who recently detransitioned.
When she was 12, Johanna Olson-Kennedy at the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles put her on puberty blockers.
At 13, she was put on testosterone.
At only 14 years of age, she was given a double mastectomy!
Clementine had suffered sexual abuse, and that was the source of great trauma, and is why she didn’t want to be a girl.
Johanna Olson-Kennedy didn’t care about that. Within 30 minutes of her first appointment she was told she needed to go on puberty blockers, or she might kill herself.
Her parents were told they could have a dead daughter or a live son. This is standard practice at gender clinics. The only way they can justify this child abuse is to say that kids will die if they don’t do it.
Testosterone caused psychosis so Clementine went off it at 17.
She has now just turned 20, and can probably never have kids. She’s trying to get reconstructive surgery but insurance companies only want to pay for destruction of children’s bodies, not reconstruction.
I hope Clementine sues, and helps to bring down this industry, but mostly I’m incredibly thankful for her bravery in speaking up.
If you don’t believe this is happening. please listen to her story.
“And here’s the other thing about chest surgery. If you want breasts at a later point in your life, you can go and get them!” -Johanna Olson-Kennedy
No they can’t, Johanna, but they can help send you to prison.
Johanna Olson-Kennedy previously received a $5.7 million grant from the NIH for research into transitioning children.
This ‘research’ included giving cross-sex hormones to 8-year-olds!
For those wondering, Clementine simply misspoke when she said 17 in the first part of our chat. The double mastectomy was at 14, as she said later in the talk.
You can read more on her X account. Please give her some love. @clementine_fb
On a personal note, I had only been at UCLA for a couple minutes when I met Clementine, and I’m once again blown away by these ‘coincidences’ which keep happening.
I can’t even begin to explain them all. Those who know me know what I’m talking about.
Whatever it is, I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing until this child abuse is history.
If you would like to support my efforts, help is greatly appreciated at this time.
Congress is investigating the NIH and Johanna Olson-Kennedy, the gender doctor from Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.
Johanna was given $9.7 million to research puberty blockers on kids.
Nine years after the study began, she refused to publish the research because it showed puberty blockers didn’t help the 95 children being experimented on.
Dear Director Bertagnolli:
The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is conducting oversight of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant of $9.7 million to an ongoing research project titled, “The Impact of Early Medical Treatment in Transgender Youth.”
We are alarmed that the project’s principal investigator, Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, is withholding publication of the project’s research findings which cast doubt on the efficacy of the “gender affirming” model, because she believes the findings could be “weaponized” by critics of transgender medical interventions for children.
NIH is responsible for overseeing its extramural research projects to ensure supported researchers practice transparency, exemplify scientific integrity, and are proper stewards of taxpayer funds.
Therefore, in light of the NIH grantee’s unwillingness to release the research project’s findings, we ask that you provide documents and information to assist the Committee’s oversight of this matter.
One research study in this project, known as the Trans Youth Care (TYC) study, gave
medical puberty blockers to 95 children in the early stages of puberty and observed subsequent mental health outcomes over two years.
Nine years after the study began, Dr. Olson-Kennedy claims the TYC cohort did not report any mental health improvements after initiating puberty blockers.
Furthermore, Dr. Olson-Kennedy claims the TYC cohort’s mental health was “in really good shape” when the study began, implying that puberty blockers have no adverse clinical impacts on mental health.
However, a 2020 paper authored by TYC researchers conflicts with Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s account.
According to this paper, the children in the TYC cohort did experience troubling mental health symptoms when the study began. In addition to gender dysphoria, 51 percent of the TYC cohort reported elevated depression symptoms and 57
percent reported clinically significant anxiety.
Two-thirds of the children reported suicidal
ideations and one fourth of those with suicidal ideations reported at least one past suicide attempt.
A Christian, African-American, military family in Maryland have lost their autistic son to the state, because his parents refused to say he was a girl.
Following the recommendation of their son’s counselor on November 9, 2021, John and Jane took John III to Children’s National Hospitalfor help following a suicide attempt. It was the last day their son would ever be in their care.
Weeks before the suicide attempt, John III had been diagnosed with autism.
At the time, John told the Daily Caller, he did not realize Children’s National Hospital had a Gender and Autism Program for autistic and neurodivergent youth — a population that is overrepresented among gender distressed adolescents.
The executive director of the program, Dr. John Strang, is a co-author of the World Professional Association of Transgender Health’s (WPATH) clinical guidance that recommends gender-distressed children receive sex-change drugs and surgeries.
At the hospital, John and Jane were informed by staff for the first time of their son’s alleged gender dysphoria and told they must affirm his new female gender identity, according to a lawsuit filed by the parents against Children’s National. The lawsuit states that the Christian couple hold “traditional family values consistent with their evangelical Protestant faith” and would not affirm their son as a female, despite the hospital’s demands.
“They didn’t like the fact that we wouldn’t go along with what they were recommending,” John told the Daily Caller of the hospital’s reaction.
Children’s National Hospital filed a series of emergency holds preventing John III from leaving the facility and demanded the parents treat him as a girl, initiate sex-change interventions, and “convert to the ‘new Christianity’ by engaging in faith-conversion sessions” with the hospital’s non-binary, transgender chaplain, Lavender Kelly, according to the lawsuit.
John told the Daily Caller they were asked to stop reading certain passages of the Bible that affirm traditional sexual values and gender.
“We are Bible believers and you are telling me I can’t talk about Adam and Eve? Abraham and Sarah? The Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit? Essentially I can’t read my Bible.”
During a family meeting at the hospital, John says he and his wife were told to use their son’s “chosen” female name and new pronouns. When a gender distressed child chooses to identify as a different sex, they often choose a new name and refer to their birth name as their “dead name.”
The lawsuit describes the emotional pain John felt upon hearing a Children’s National Hospital staff member refer to his son’s name as his “dead name.”
“I share the same name with both my father and my son, and she spoke death over it. I was devastated to hear those words come out of her mouth. I followed up by asking. ‘What is a dead name?’ She barked, ‘It’s her legal name.’ This told me that she used the dead name terminology to hurt me. And she did just that,” the lawsuit describes.
The @eSafetyOffice ordered my post taken down partly because I called Teddy Cook a woman.
Now in the appeal, before anything has even really started, the judge says we can’t call Teddy Cook a woman.
I will not be complying with this. Teddy Cook is a woman. Find me in contempt. Arrest me at the hearing. Whatever. I’m not lying for an activist judge.
The eSafety office had 5 lawyers and their general manager there for a basic Directions Hearing.
My appeal is now officially linked with X’s appeal. This case is very important and I’m not giving an inch for a cultish ideology which is harming hundreds of thousands of kids.
The federal judge overseeing my case at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal also happens to be the President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.