The Harris Tweed Act of 1993 doesn't stop other people from producing tweed. It only regulates who gets to use the Harris Tweed Orb logo, which is a trademarked symbol. Let me give you some examples. 🧵
Below is Donegal tweed, which is called so because it's produced in the Donegal county of Ireland. Donegal tweed is most known for its signature flecks, which are created by spinning yarn with bits of felted wool, which glob onto the yarn like gum on a piano string.
My favorite Donegal tweed producer is Molloy & Sons, a father-and-son team that produces for some of the best English, American, and Japanese brands, as well as bespoke tailors around the world. I love the fabric for its story as much as its physical qualities.
The nice thing about a Donegal tweed is that, much like a solid-colored grenadine tie, it adds visual interest to plain-colored outfits but won't clash with patterned ones. The tiny flecks sit somewhere between "patterns" and "solid colors." Great for sport coats.
The problem with Donegal tweed is that the term is also used to describe any tweed with flecks. I believe the outfit on the right, while great, is made from an Italian-woven "Donegal tweed." The video on the right shows a Scottish-woven "Donegal tweed."
Again, all of those are great but what if you want something woven in the county after which the fabric was named? Oftentimes, it's hard to know where the fabric is from or who made it. When you're in a store, you only see the jacket.
That's where the Harris Tweed Orb comes in. In order to bear these labels, you have to meet three criteria: fabric was handwoven in the Outer Hebrides, finished in the Outer Hebrides, and made from wool dyed & spun in Outer Hebrides.
No one is "banning" competition. You can weave tweed right now in anywhere in the world, but you can't place that logo on it because it's regulated by the Harris Tweed Authority, much like slapping a Chanel logo on a bag.
Why should you care where something is made, assuming it was made under ethical conditions? There's no reason you HAVE to. But some people care about provenance and regional craft traditions.
For instance, I love the craft of handsewn moccasins made in Maine. When I heard the owner of Arrow Moccasins passed away some years ago, I bought a few more from other craftspeople, knowing this a disappearing craft.
Video from Yuketen:
I also like that you can still get handknitted Arans from the Aran islands and Fair Isle sweaters made on the Fair Isles (those are produced on flat-bed knitting machines).
Pics via Old Stone Trade, Fair Isle with Marie, and Fair Isle Made in Fair Isle
Such labeling connects consumers with specific craftspeople, which helps those regional traditions survive. When the market is flooded with all sorts of things and you have no idea how something was made, this doesn't help producers or consumers.
About fifteen years ago, I wanted to get hand-knotted tassels for a dressing gown, as I loved the versions that English tailors used to make for customers. Most dressing gowns nowadays have no tassels (pic 1). Or the tassels are attached by machine (pic 2).
I called every bespoke shirtmaker on Jermyn Street (where these things were historically made). Budd Shirtmakers was the only one who had any left. Apparently, the last woman that made them had just retired and she had no apprentices. She made small box of em for future customers
Perhaps someone has gone back to making them (I don't know, although demand for this sort of stuff is low). If you love certain crafts, particularly as they connect to regional traditions, it's worth trying to protect them, which is the point of stamping fabric with this orb.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Someone asked if I could tell them where to buy a pair of good chinos. In this thread, I will tell you, but my answer is not simple. On the upside, I think this is a better approach when shopping for clothes and you can apply it to any kind of item. 🧵
A simple answer will go something like this: "Such-and-such makes the highest quality chinos." Or "this brand provides the best value." While potentially useful in some respects, I don't think this gives you the fullest picture.
Instead, let's start at the beginning.
During the 1898 Spanish-American War, US troops stationed in the Philippines wore sand-colored pants made from a heavy cotton twill woven in China. Since the Philippines had been under Spanish colonial rule at this time, the locals call these "pantalones chinos" (Chinese pants).
One day, "It" will happen, by which I mean sudden and unexpected news that you want to celebrate. In such cases, you will want the right outfit. 🧵
What do I mean by "It?" I mean that joyous moments are not always something you can plan for. Perhaps you received a pay raise or got accepted at a waitlisted school. Perhaps a loved one is now cancer-free. Such moments can be sudden and unexpected — and you want to be prepared.
Of course, you can always celebrate in the same clothes you wear to bed. But IMO, this diminishes the moment. Thus, it's nice to special outfits for "It," even if you don't wear them all the time. It's similar to toasting a special glass of champagne and drinking water.
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.