Do you think somebody possibly has video of Trump mocking the handicapped, demeaning US prisoners of war, boasting about sexually assaulting women, praising Vladimir Putin, or urging a violent attack on the US Capitol? That would be huge.
Confessing that he spied on underage girls undressing? Promising to release his tax returns, but never doing it?
Reminiscing fondly about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein?
Publicly fantasizing about "dating" his own daughter?
Imagine if there were video of any of that.
Belittling the mother of a soldier who died in combat for the United States? Congratulating himself that for years he paid no income taxes to the United States? Exulting over swapping "love letters" with the dictator of North Korea? What if any of that was available to view?
Can you imagine if he denied the US citizenship of the first black president? Denounced an Indiana-born judge as untrustworthy because he was "Mexican"? Told a Jewish audience that they were uniquely shrewd with money and loyal only to Israel? What if that were on record?
What if Trump were proven to have paid hush money to a porn star - or to cheating people who enrolled in his scam university - or to defrauding banks who lent money to his company - or were fined half a billion dollars for a rip-off multilevel marketing scheme? Bombshells?
What if Trump raped a woman and then lied about it until he was hit with almost $90 million in damages? What if he stole ultra-secret government documents and shared them with foreign nationals? What if he offered the judge in that 2nd case an appointment as attorney general?
Trump supporters have developed a very robust system of moral immunity. It's very hard to imagine any video more shocking than the material they have already seen, condoned, accepted, and even justified.
So the story has dropped. It's appalling. It's disgusting. It's obviously true. But if sexually assaulting under-age girls is a deal-breaker for you, you were already a Never Trumper.
I should say, ANOTHER story has dropped. But sadly - if they cared about sexual assault, they would be Never Trumpers already
Does Trump habitually sexually assault unwilling women? It's a question he has answered in his own voice. If you're pro-Trump, you've already made your peace with that central aspect of his life and personality.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's not a settlement: There was no valid litigation because (as the judge said) Trump was suing himself.
On what basis is this money leaving the Treasury?
One branch of the Executive is ordering another branch to pay $1.8 billion to the president's friends with no authorization by Congress or courts - with a side order that president and his family henceforward set their own tax obligation on a purely voluntary basis, no scrutiny.
It's pure misappropriation, as if the president drove his truck to Fort Knox, loaded it with gold bars, and drove away.
In case you've forgotten, here are some of the things learned from the Trump tax returns leaked by a government contractor in 2020:
In 10 of the 15 years before Trump won the presidency, Trump paid no federal income tax. In 2016 and 2017, he paid $750. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
When Trump told voters in 2016 that he was "under audit," the audit concerned a $72.9 million tax refund that the IRS litigated as illegitimate. That litigation came to an end after Trump won the presidency. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Trump made much more money from TV shows and licensing deals than from his core businesses. "Ultimately, Mr. Trump has been more successful playing a business mogul than being one in real life." nytimes.com/interactive/20…
So many people quote the famous line from Thucydides - "The strong can do what they can, and the weak must suffer what they must" - and forget that the amoral imperialists who used that line in the end lost their war and their empire.
Thucydides does not offer the line, "The strong do what they can," as a neutral analysis of how international affairs operate. He offers it as an expression of the reckless arrogance that brought about the destruction of the Athenian Empire.
The lesson to take is that no power is strong enough to disregard justice and legitimacy. Arrogant and aggressive states, no matter how strong, conjure an even stronger coalition of enemies against them. See Charles V, Louis XIV, Napoleon, the Second Reich, the Third Reich.
1) It's the law. The Department of Defense and Secretary of Defense were so named by the National Security Act amendments of 1949. Only Congress has the power to change the name. nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/28655…
2) It's commonsense. Not all national security threats take the form of outright wars. EG the US is not at war with the Houthis of Yemen, but it does defend sea traffic against Houthi terrorism. (Or anyway it tries to, if only the SecDef would quit blabbing operational details.)
While I was on CNN at 1 pm predicting that the Trump administration would use the Charlie Kirk murder as an excuse to deploy government power against peaceful and legal political competition in 2026 ...
... Vice President Vance and other Trump officials were simultaneously on Charlie Kirk's podcast vowing to use the murder as an excuse to deploy government power against peaceful and legal political competition in 2026. nytimes.com/live/2025/09/1…
1) The Trump administration is corrupt on scale almost beyond comprehending. If they lose control of Congress in 2026, they face all kinds of legal jeopardy. nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/…
Government taking control of private companies ...
Supply shortages and price increases due to government attacks on free commercial exchange;
The government imposing huge fines on media corporations for First Amendment protected speech that displeased the president ...
Enormous tax increases imposed on Americans without any vote by Congress;
Violent convicted criminals released onto the streets because they directed their violence against persons the president targeted as his personal enemies ...