The House report on HHS covid propaganda is devastating. The Biden admin spent almost a billion dollars to push falsehoods about covid vaccines, boosters, and masks on the American people. If a pharma company had run the campaign, it would have been fined out of existence.
1/23
HHS engaged a PR firm, the Fors Marsh Group (FMG), for the propaganda campaign. The main goal was to increase covid vax uptake.
The strategy: 1. Exaggerate covid mortality risk 2. Downplay the fact that there was no good evidence that the covid vax stops transmission.
2/23
The propaganda campaign extended beyond vax uptake and included exaggerating mask efficacy and pushing for social distancing & school closures.
Ultimately, since the messaging did not match reality, the campaign collapsed public trust in public health.
3/23
The PR firm (FMG) drew most of its faulty science from @CDCgov's "guidance," which ignored @US_FDA findings on the vaccine's limitations, as well as scientific findings from other countries that contradicted CDC groupthink.
4/23
The report details the CDC's mask flip-flopping through the years. It's especially infuriating to recall the CDC's weird, anti-scientific, anti-human focus on masking toddlers with cloth masks into 2022.
5/23
President Biden's covid advisor, @ashishkjha, waited until Dec. 2022 (right after leaving government service) to tell the country that "[t]here is no study in the world that shows that masks work that well." What took him so long?
6/23
In 2021, former @cdcgov director, Rochelle Walensky rewrote CDC guidance on social distancing at the behest of national teachers' union, guaranteeing that schools would remain closed to in-person learning for many months.
7/23
During this period, the PR firm FMG put out ads telling parents that schools would close unless kids masked up, stayed away from friends, and got covid vaccinated.
8/23
In March 2021, even as the CDC told the American people that the vaxxed did not need to mask, the PR firm ran ads saying that masks were still needed, even for the vaxxed. "It's not time to ease up" we were told, in the absence of evidence any of that did any good.
9/23
In 2021, to support the Biden/Harris Admin push for vax mandates, the PR firm pushed the false idea that the vax stopped covid transmission. When people started getting "breakthrough" infections, public trust in pubic health collapsed.
10/23
Later, when the FDA approved the vax for 12 to 15-year-old kids, the PR firm told parents that schools could open in fall 2021 only if they got their kids vaccinated. These ads never mentioned side effects like myocarditis due to the vax.
11/23
.@HHSGov has scrubbed the propaganda ads from this era from its webpages. It's easy to see why. They are embarrassing. They tell kids, in effect, that they should treat other kids like biohazards unless they are vaccinated.
12/23
When the delta variant arrived, the PR firm doubled down on fear-mongering, masking, and social distancing.
13/23
In Sept. 2021, CDC director Walensky overruled the agency's external experts to recommend the booster to all adults rather than just the elderly. The director's action was "highly unusual" and went beyond the FDA's approval of the booster for only the elderly.
14/23
The PR campaign and the CDC persistently overestimated the mortality risk of covid infection in kids to scare parents into vaccinating their children with the covid vax.
15/23
In Aug. 2021, the military imposed its covid vax mandate, leading to 8,300 servicemen being discharged. Since 2023, the DOD has been trying to get the discharged servicemen to reenlist. What harm has been done to American national security by the vax mandate?
16/23
The Biden/Harris admin imposed the OSHA, CMS, and military vax mandates, even though the CDC knew that the delta variant evaded vaccine immunity. The PR campaign studiously avoided informing Americans about waning vaccine efficacy in the face of variants.
17/23
The propaganda campaign hired celebrities and influencers to "persuade" children to get the covid vax.
I think if a celebrity is paid to advertise a faulty product, that celebrity should be partially liable if the product harms some people.
18/23
In the absence of evidence, the propaganda campaign ran ads telling parents that the vaccine would prevent their kids from getting long covid.
19/23
With the collapse in public trust in the @CDCgov, parents have begun to question all CDC advice. Predictably, the HHS propaganda campaign has led to a decline in the uptake of routine childhood vaccines.
20/23
The report makes several recommendations, including formally defining CDC's core mission to focus on its core mission of disease prevention, forcing HHS propaganda to abide by FDA's product labelling rules, and revamp the process of evaluating vaccine safety.
21/23
Probably the most important recommendation: HHS should never again adopt a policy of silencing dissenting scientists in an attempt to create an illusion of consensus in favor of CDC group think.
22/23
You can find a copy of the full House report here. HHS must take its findings seriously if there is any hope for public health to regain public trust.
23/23 d1dth6e84htgma.cloudfront.net/We_Can_Do_This…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, public health can impose draconian public health measures at scale without good evidence and in the absence of informed consent from the public, but researchers cannot test if the measures 'work' because it is impossible to gain informed consent.
The Stanford Pandemic Conference last Friday was an enormous success. Experts who supported early school closures reasoned together with those who didn't. Experts who oppose the lab-origin theory of covid reasoned with people who support it.
Empaneling civil discussion on the vital issues of the day -- topics on which experts differ -- should be a key function of universities. I am proud that @stanford has embraced its motto, "Let the winds of freedom blow."
And yet, there has been a subculture of scientists and journalists -- none of whom attended the conference -- who have taken it upon themselves to denigrate and dehumanize anyone who attended or supported the conference. 3/n
In Murthy v. Missouri, the Sup Ct ruled I did not have standing to sue the Biden-Harris Admin over censoring my speech online. They reasoned, in part, that there was no evidence of ongoing harm.
On Monday, @YouTube censored a podcast on my new channel, @SciFrTheFringe.
1/7
Last week, on the @SciFrTheFringe channel, @aya_velazquez, @VBruttel, and @BBarucker discussed the RKI files, a major scandal in Germany that exposed political manipulation of scientific speech to fool the public about lockdowns and mandates. 2/7
On Monday, @YouTube flagged the discussion as "medical misinformation" and pulled the video. I appealed, and they affirmed their decision without pointing to any particular fact discussed as factually incorrect. 3/7
1. it's not true that all the evidence supports natural origin. That is simply false, and the key papers that support the idea have fallen apart.
2. Regarding myocarditis in young men via the vaccine, the estimate you cite is an order of magnitude too low. The reasoning misses the key point that since the vax does not prevent infection, any myocarditis risk from it is additive.
Happy to discuss in detail. I have cites in the piece you invited me to write for Skeptic.
@michaelshermer Here is the crux of the lab leak argument. Lots of detailed facts underneath it but @WashburneAlex meme is the high level summary.
@michaelshermer @WashburneAlex And here is a pointer to some of the evidence on the myocarditis evidence. It is key to have set and age specific evidence because the rate in young men is so much higher than in other age and sex groups.
In the covid era, public health and the media made it a virtue to create panic about being infected. This was gross malpractice on the part of the media and public health, distorting people's demand for lockdowns that harmed children, the poor, and the working class.
1/4
In April 2020, a @USC Understanding America Study found that respondents thought one in four people who got covid would die from infection. These numbers were two orders of magnitude greater than the true infection fatality risk. No wonder people panicked. 2/4
Even by the end of June 2021, the perceived infection fatality risk had only dropped to one in eight, still orders of magnitude too high, and this is after most elderly Americans had been vaccinated and a large fraction of the country had immunity gained from covid recovery. 3/4
The Supreme Court just ruled in the Murthy v. Missouri case that the Biden Administration can coerce social media companies to censor and shadowban people and posts it doesn't like. Congress will now need to act to enforce the Constitution since the Sup. Ct. won't.
This now also becomes a key issue in the upcoming election. Where do the presidential candidates stand on social media censorship? We know where Biden stands since his lawyers argue that he has near monarchical power over social media speech.
The court ruled that the plaintiffs (Missouri and Louisiana, as well as me and other blacklisted individuals) lacked standing to sue. This means that the Administration can censor ideas & no person will have standing to enforce the 1st Amendment. Free speech in America, for the moment, is dead.