In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce a social media personality and TV presenter, Raisa Blommestijn (@rblommestijn). She’s best-known for her far-right rhetorics, spreading conspiracy theories, and spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives on Dutch television.
1/24
Raisa studied philosophy of law at Leiden University. The faculty is best-known for one of its professors, Paul Cliteur. He’s a member of the pro-Kremlin party Forum voor Democratie (FvD), where he is one of the leading figures.Cliteur is also known for supervising the FvD…
2/24
…founder Thierry Baudet’s doctoral thesis, and can be considered a central figure in this Dutch “anti-establishment” movement. While studying at Leiden, Raise also met her best friend forever, Eva Vlaardingerbroek:
Blommestijn obtained her PhD on “The Decline of the Weimar Republic”. In her work, she described “the downfall of democracy and its decay towards totalitarianism,” so you’d imagine she would be strongly against the totalitarian regimes like the ones in Russia.
4/24
But Raisa actually loves these kleptocracies, and she’s only outspoken against the Western “global elites”. For example, in 2023 she attended a “Science Summit – Uncensored” where she spoke about the conspiracy theory around the UN’s “Agenda 2030” project…
5/24
…focusing on sustainable development. Blommestijn has been steadily building her presence on other platforms that clearly steer towards conspiracy theories, such as Cafe Weltschmerz. On X, Raisa promotes herself as an opponent of “wokeness”, climate concerns…
6/24
…and COVID-19 mandates and vaccinations. This anti-establishment stance has made her a relatively popular voice opposing mainstream media, the government and the EU. While going through her tweets, it becomes evident that she blames EVERYTHING on the EU or the immigrants.
7/24
In late 2021, Raisa and Eva started working with Maes Law, bringing in legal cases connected to COVID-19. But Bart Maes, one of the partners, soon broke off their cooperation due to lack of results and massive backlash from both the pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine people.
8/24
And it was clear that Raisa had chosen her side, when she wrote on X that ‘The people with a Ukrainian flag in the bio, who boycott Russian products and send money to Ukraine. Virtuous people who do their “duty”. What an emptiness.’
9/24
On the conspiracy channel BlckBx, Blommestijn discussed the Russian invasion of Ukraine on its 4th day, sharing typical Kremlin viewpoints. While there, she falsely claimed that “a large part of the population is Russian and wants to belong to Russia.”
10/24
According to her, due to the “Western interference” in the elections, Russia had a good reason to invade. To my knowledge, Raisa hasn’t discussed Russia’s meddling and funding of politicians and separatist movements in Ukraine, but maybe I haven’t looked close enough.
11/24
As is tradition, Ms. Blommestijn argues for “de-escalation” & naturally blames the West for warmongering. She seems to ignore the fact that at no point the Kremlin has been interested in actual peace negotiations and that Russia has a tendency to break any truce they make.
12/24
If there’s one person who’s been constantly wrong about the war in Ukraine, that’s Douglas Macgregor. As it happens, Macgregor is also extremely biased against Ukraine, which is probably why Raisa loves sharing Dougie’s analysis so much.
Following propagandist Tucker Carlson’s interview with Putin, Blommestijn praised the Russian dictator on her show: “He has a clear picture of history and self-identity, unlike our leaders.” This same rhetoric was parroted by her BFF, Mrs. Vlaardingerbroek.
14/24
Blommestijn is one of those Western pro-Kremlin propagandists who has been able to break into the mainstream - she works as a presenter for Ongehoord Nederland,a Dutch show that claims to give a voice to those “who do not feel represented in the current politics and media.”
15/24
Ongehoord (meaning “unheard”) was launched (among others) by Arnold Karskens and Joost Niemoller, and it started broadcasting just a few days before Russia launched their barbaric full-scale invasion against Ukraine. Raisa ended up fighting with Mr. Karskens…
16/24
…over her online behavior, and was told to leave X but refused. Raisa then had to leave Ongehoord in early 2024. Six months later, a new tribal battle ensued. Karskens lost this one, and Raisa returned to the screen.
17/24
Recently, Raisa was struck with a lawsuit for using the terms ‘toddler f*cker’ (defamation) and ‘n*groid primates’ (group defamation).
What a beautiful human being!
According to court journalist @chrisklomp, the case will be heard on 21 Nov 2024.
18/24
Despite Ongehoord paying Raisa an annual salary of 93,000 EUR, she has solicited personal donations from her supporters several times. She raised money for herself after being kicked out of Ongehoord and after she was being struck with a lawsuit.
19/24
Besties Raisa and Eva share a very similar far-right worldview. They see the Dutch right-centrist VVD party is the far-left. Both also rub shoulders with the right wing of the US Republicans, as well as parties like the Flemish Vlaams Belang & Órban’s Fidesz.
20/24
Both of them also fall into the category of “relatively attractive young women simping for Putin”, of which I have spoken about in previous soups. Raisa is sort of a “dollar store” version of Eva and has failed to garner as much international fame than her best friend.
21/24
Blommestijn uses the standard rhetoric of alarmism about the Russian war in Ukraine. Everyone is getting poorer because of it, nuclear escalation is imminent, and we have nothing to do with Ukraine anyway. Those who stand up for Ukrainian freedom are framed as “warmongers”.
22/24
Under the facade of defending freedom of speech and a fight against curbing freedoms, Blommestijn regularly promotes the ideas of authoritarian leaders. Pretty rich coming from someone who wrote her thesis on the “erosion of democracy” and “rise of totalitarianism”.
23/24
Raisa is a useful pawn for the Kremlin because she amplifies and legitimises ideas from the far-right, which are then seasoned with crazy conspiracy theories and populism. This is nothing new, but Raisa has managed to bring this type of BS to Dutch national television.
24/24
My book titled “Vatnik Soup - The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” has been published, you can order it here:
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5
In this first (and maybe last?) Basiji Soup, we’ll look at… the Islamic Republic of Iran, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, how it sells its atrocities as virtue and its repression as morality, how it serves the Kremlin, and the current protests against it.
1/20
Basijis are members of the most fanatical part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). In a broader sense: Iranian regime loyalists & propagandists. They may be fewer than vatniks or wumaos, but the goal is the same: destabilize the West to protect a brutal regime.
2/20
The regime oppressing Iran is a “theocratic” authoritarian state around a “Supreme Leader” hiding behind religion to justify its crimes: censorship, repression, executions, torture and terror — similar to Russia and its “holy war” against Ukraine.