Major Voter Registration Fraud Operation Uncovered in Pennsylvania
Lancaster County’s District Attorney Heather Adams and three county commissioners have announced a major voter registration fraud operation in Pennsylvania.
"On Tuesday afternoon, I was contacted by Christa Miller, who is our Chief Clerk of Elections regarding potentially fraudulent voter registration applications that had recently been received by her office."
"At that time, she informed me that the elections office received approximately 2,500 applications at or near the deadline for registering to vote. While preparing to process these applications, staff noticed that numerous applications appeared to have the same handwriting, were filled out on the same day with unknown signatures, and some were previously registered voters, and the signatures on file did not match the signatures on the application."
"So before I begin to summarize our preliminary findings, I must remind everyone that this is an ongoing investigation, and for that reason I will be limited in the details that I can provide. Lancaster County detectives began investigating the voter registration applications and immediately found applications that were indeed fraudulent."
"Indicators of fraud included inaccuracies with the addresses listed on the applications false personal identification information, as well as false names. A number of the applications also contained names that did not match the provided social security information. In some cases, applications contained correct personal identification information such as the correct address, correct phone number, date of birth, driver's license number, and social security number."
"But the individuals listed on the applications informed detectives that they did not request the form. They did not complete the form and verified that the signature on the form was not theirs. At this point, it is believed that the fraudulent voter registrations are connected to a large scale canvassing operations for rotor registrations that date back to June. However, the majority of the applications received are dated August 15th, and after those canvassing for voter registrations were employed and paid to obtain voter registration applications."
"The majority of the applications were from residents in the City of Lancaster. However, applications were also received from residents in Columbia, Elizabethtown, Mount Joy, Akron, Ephrata, Stevens Strasburg, as well as other locations across Lancaster County. The canvases themselves took place at various shopping centers, parking lots of grocery stores and businesses, sidewalks and parks. During this preliminary investigations, detectives were able to verify some of the applications were indeed legitimate. In these instances, the applicant verified that they did information to a canvasser for these applications. We will immediately advise voter registration and that we confirm that they are legitimate requests and voter registration will process that application."
"Thus far of the investigations that we have completed, we have determined that 60% have been fraudulent..."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you haven’t been following the Climate United Fund scandal, then buckle up, because it’s one hell of an electric vehicle ride on the corruption superhighway.
In a major update, it was reported today that the "Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund" program was the subject of an “ongoing criminal investigation,” per @juliekelly2:
- The FBI recommended placing a 30-day administrative freeze on eight slush fund recipients in light of “credible information” of possible criminal violations.
- EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin called for the financial agreement with Citibank be terminated and the grant funds immediately returned.The EPA Inspector General has opened an investigation.
- Further, as Zeldin reported last night on X, he has terminated all agreements with the grant recipients--so-called climate "nonprofits" including one started by Stacey Abrams last year.
If you’re not up to speed, here are the basics on this developing scandal.
The green slush funds the Biden administration hastily disbursed before exiting stage left were among $370 billion overseen by Clinton hatchetman John Podesta.
As will be discussed below, one of the most scandalous aspects of the Climate United Fund scandal is that it is tied to foreign interests, and potentially, China.
In April 2024, the Biden administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) awarded nearly $7 billion to a newly formed nonprofit called the Climate United Fund (CUF).
This hastily constructed nonprofit with deep Democratic ties, little transparency, and a vague spending plan was somehow able to obtain the largest grant of its kind.
The founders of this “popup NGO shell” claim it was intended to support “clean energy initiatives.”
🧵The Shadow Government: New Evidence the Biden Presidency Was Almost Entirely Run by 'Autopen'
“I'm going to get in so much trouble for saying all this. But these are the people who ran our country for the last four years.”
The shadow government is being dragged into the light. The disturbing developments about where our money has been going are flooding in on a daily basis.
But less forthcoming is the answer to a question that has been on Americans’ minds about a four-year absence of leadership that looks absolutely vacuous in relief to the vigorous and unrelenting Trump presidency: Who actually ran the Biden presidency?
A tantalizing lead has surfaced, courtesy of a report by the Heritage Foundation’s @OversightPR.
"Whoever controlled the autopen controlled the presidency. We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency. All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year. Here is the autopen signature."
According to newly released evidence, nearly every document in the federal register bearing Joe Biden’s signature during his presidency was not signed by the man himself—but by an autopen.
The only known autopen exception? Biden’s letter announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race.
As you can see, the signature is not only different, but underlined.
You might recall that the letter itself was a bizarre hodgepodge of statements cobbled together into a “resignation letter” that did not fit the moment of a president who was about to lose his chance at re-election, as well as incur damage to his legacy.
So, did Joe Biden actually sign his resignation letter? Or was it signed for him? We may never know the truth. But it does raise the possibility that it is a forgery.
There could be serious legal ramifications if Joe Biden’s signature was “forged” by autopen to make presidential authorizations in name only.
We will unpack the legal ramifications of the development, including a consideration of whether such “executive decisions” are constitutional; delve into the historical background on the autopen and its use by U.S. presidents; and dig up extremely suggestive leads on who was actually running the Biden presidency in absentia via autopen.
My extended analysis of the signatures of “Joe Biden” at the federal register is that the claim that the Biden administration was largely run by “autopen” appears to hold up.
You can survey former President Joe Biden’s signatures at the Federal Register.
Here are samples taken at random for each year of Biden’s presidency.
2025
Partial Revocation of Executive Order 13961
2024
Investing in America and Investing in American Workers
2023
Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees and Amendments to Other Executive Orders
2022
Promoting the Arts, the Humanities, and Museum and Library Service
House Oversight Project finds the "Biden presidency" was almost entirely run by autopen signature.
"We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency," says @OversightPR.
"All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year. Here is the autopen signature."
This is criminal. The Biden "presidency" didn't have a real president. People should go to jail for this.
@OversightPR Don't give me the "but Trump does it too!"
Here is what it looks like when Trump signs major pieces of legislation or executive orders. Get the difference?
I would contend that any Biden staffers who USURPED presidential authority (carried out major executive functions without explicit or documented presidential authorization) should go to prison for treason against the United States.
The American people did not elect STAFFERS to run the United States. They elected a president and deserved one. But that is exactly what they did not get under the sham Biden "presidency." It is ELECTION FRAUD.
America and the European Union are at a crossroads.
The European Union needs America. But America does not need the European Union.
But it's not just U.S. taxpayer support for NATO that the European Union needs to provide for its own security. It needs America's military presence and warfighting ability.
The great majority of Europeans are unwilling to fight in wars to defend their nations from foreign aggressors.
One reason is because the EU has imported millions of migrants who have no loyalty to the governments or interest in preserving national cultures.
If you compare non-EU European states with EU member states you'll find a shocking difference: 61% of the former are willing to fight in wars, as opposed to just 32% in the latter, according to 2024 Gallup polling.
Popular support for EU member states is crumbling. This is why the European Union needs an external enemy to focus on, such as Russia, to "rally around the flag."
But in the EU's case, it is the Ukraine flag. That cause is wearing thin.
While many believe Russia is a strong and united foe that threatens Europe, this is a false perception. Only 32% will say on the record that they will fight in wars, while 20% say they won't and 48% say 'they don't know.' (It should be noted that it is illegal in Russia to say that you won't fight in a war. This is one cause for discrepancies you might find on Reddit and elsewhere that shows higher support in Russia.)
The United States has been experiencing its own collapse in popular support, which the Trump administration is attempting to reverse. Support for fighting in wars has been dropping in the U.S. since the first Gulf War, but it fell even further under Biden. Gallup polling shows that only 41% of Americans would be open to fighting in wars.
This has led to a crisis in military morale and a drop in recruitment. It will be a major challenge for the Trump administration to restore America's willingness to fight.
The Trump administration has a chance to accomplish this task because it is rejecting the disastrous path that the European Union has taken.
By securing the border and limiting foreign migration, reforming the military so that it focuses on warfighting, respecting the constitutional rights of citizens, and seeking a foreign policy of "peace through strength," the Trump administration can return America to its rightful place as a strong and great nation.
Ed. Note: In addition to summarizing EU-US relations, this post attempts to clarify posts misrepresenting Russians' willingness to fight in wars. These "polls" tend to grossly overestimate support and tend to falsely lionize Russia.
Secondly, there are a number of articles, such as by CNN, that seek to downplay America's support for NATO. These stories attempt to reject President Trump's claims that the US pulls the weight for NATO by arguing the US only pays a small percentage of the defense budget — namely, 15.8%.
However, this is only counting DIRECT spending and it is not accounting for INDIRECT spending that supports NATO's mission. The U.S. has by far the largest military budget of any NATO member and has extensive military operations in Europe.
More background: NATO's constant expansion beyond its foundational mission of promoting freedom and defending Europe from the former Soviet Union.
NEW: @ElonMusk really has George Soros figured out.
"George Soros is a systems hacker. He is a genius arbitrager. He figured out that you could leverage a small amount of money to create a non-profit then lobby politicians to send a ton of money to that non profit so you can take what might be a $10M donation and leverage it into a $1B NGO."
"Then the government continues to fund it every year, and it will have a nice sounding name like 'The Institute for Peace,' but really it's a grafting machine."
A State within A State: The Progressive Left's 'Shadow Government' Revealed
"The system of NGOs, charities, and trusts constitutes an unaccountable 'parallel government' designed to transform the US into a globalist fiefdom run by privileged elites." thekylebecker.com/p/a-state-with…
‘A State within a State.’
That’s what Mikhail Gorbachev called the KGB, the Russian version of the “deep state,” after the August coup of 1991.
The former Soviet premier invoked the term with the triumphal declaration: “There will no longer be a state within a state.”
Such were the heady times of the early 1990s in Russia after the formal demise of the U.S.S.R.
But the people’s victory was short-lived. The KGB, led by the ‘Grey Cardinal’ Col. Vladimir Putin himself, was staffed with survivors who were bent on adapting and eventually conquering the fledgling Russian ‘democratic’ state.
In the 1970s, the United States had its own version of ‘perestroika’: The “Halloween Massacre.” That’s when the Carter administration conducted a mass purge of CIA personnel on October 31, 1977, led by Admiral Stansfield Turner, the new Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
The new administration pared down 20% of the U.S. human intelligence (HUMINT) assets in the Intelligence Community’s workforce. This included 649 jobs cut through attrition, 154 forced retirements, and 17 outright firings. The layoffs targeted seasoned covert officers—some with roots back to the CIA’s 1947 founding—earning the event its grim moniker from the press and outraged insiders.
Seem familiar?
The Trump administration came into office with a whirlwind. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), under the stewardship of tech billionaire Elon Musk, has shined a bright light on the “shadow government” that was running the United States during the ineffectual and disastrous Biden administration.
DOGE’s forced transparency has unleashed unparalleled caterwauling in the establishment press, which has only furthered suspicions of the deeply embedded shadow government that subsists on waste, fraud, and abuse in the U.S. government.
More provocative than the line items DOGE has singled out for elimination, such as funding Sesame Street in Iraq and transgender surgeries in India, is the astounding realization that the entire U.S. system of NGOs, charities, and trusts constitutes an unaccountable “parallel government” that is designed to engineer consensus and transform the United States into a globalist vassal state run by privileged elites.
@DataRepublican, who runs an outstanding website where citizen journalists can research the vast web of corruption between U.S. agencies and so-called Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), put it this way:
“I’ve said it again, I'll say it again. Taxpayer-funded NGOs function as a parallel government. Even worse, many sitting members of Congress are directly involved in them. They see themselves as the real government, prioritizing debates with other bureaucrats on the global stage over serving the people they represent. This is why critical issues like healthcare, education, and help for Helene victims are consistently neglected.”
This is a point I’ve made repeatedly as well: If you want to stop the transition of the United States into a post-constitutional oligarchy run by unelected elites and bureaucratic apparatchiks, stop the U.S. government’s funding and sheltering of billionaire trusts, fraudulent “charities,” and so-called Non-Governmental Organizations.
The Origin of the ‘Shadow State’ in the United States
If you want to trace the origin of the “shadow government” in the United States, it is imperative to start with the Wilson Administration.
Woodrow Wilson, a former Princeton president and progressive idealist, entered office in 1913 with a vision to remake America—and the world—through centralized control and expert rule. His administration marked a pivot from constitutionally limited government to a system where unelected insiders dictate public policy in the shadows and engineer public “consensus” to gain an ill-gotten stamp of imprimatur.
If we want to understand the development of the “parallel government” in America, let us take a look at the premier “Non-Governmental Organizations” that have led to the growth, development, and installation of a “state within a state.”