Vivek Ramaswamy pulls a twist. At its height Buzzfeed was a highly gender affirmative and activist outlet, exceptionally popular, producing large amounts of drag/TQ content. This 👇was in 2015 by @PatrickStrud.
It also played a part in the silencing of BBC women on the issue 🧵
Three weeks after that piece was published, Buzzfeed took on Stuart Millar as its UK News Editor. He came from the Guardian, and was eventually to move on the BBC.
From its global and UK desks Buzzfeed continued to soak its content in pro-trans stories targeted at young people, often framing trans-identified people as victims.
Around this time resistance in the UK began to grow, and some BBC journalists were among those talking about it.
Then in 2018 this happened - just as the consultation over self-identification was launching.
There was a large BBC Women WhatsApp group, and some of the women in it dared to have a conversation about women’s rights and self-ID. And it was leaked.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/…
This piece of journalism by @MarkDiStef was conducted under the eye of Stuart Millar (A year later he’d be promoted to overall Buzzfeed Editor)
One of the statements leaked was that transwomen wouldn’t need maternity leave. We recommend you read it.
@MarkDiStef The result was that the sideshoot WhatsApp group (described in the piece) where the conversation had taken place was disbanded and deleted.
Conversations about self-ID on the main group weren’t banned, but there were now watchers, so they were rare and never progressed.
@MarkDiStef There was nowhere else for women at the BBC to discuss it. Comments on Women at the BBC’s Facebook page were deleted. Comments on Pride’s Facebook page were met with hostility. One contributor (now gone) threatened to report to HR anyone who said they wouldn’t support self-ID.
@MarkDiStef When women can’t talk, they can’t find each other, can’t communicate, can’t coordinate and can’t make joint representations. This all happened. There is still no sex equality network at the BBC: the women’s group is gender affirmative.
@MarkDiStef And two years later, the News Editor in place when Buzzfeed published those private, sensitive, women’s messages - Stuart Millar - was proudly announced as the BBC’s new Digital News Editor, and has since been promoted.
@MarkDiStef So why is it a twist from @VivekGRamaswamy ? The conservative activist has been in a fight since the early summer to get Buzzfeed to change its offer after buying up a big stake in it.
@telegraph on plans to manage ‘misogyny’, this time through extremism policy
Does any part of the media understand the problem of action against ‘misogyny’ when activists across the justice system believe that ‘women’ does not mean ‘female’?
/ telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/1…
More screenshots.
Maggie Blyth, for example, was national lead for violence and girls when police chiefs recommended that women who object to being strip-searched by a trans-identified male could be recorded as committing a hate incident.
Affirmative outlets have been known /
/to seize on pledges to criminalise misogyny, without using their platforms to explain that such a law would include some men, and so would likely disbenefit women.
Here’s the link to the strip search story exposed by @WomensRightsNet in 2022
The number of trans-identified men used as contributors on apparently random BBC stories has generated interest.
The BBC has its own contacts database but one resource it uses for stories/contributors is a company called NEON.
> neweconomyorganisers.org
NEON is the New Economy Organisers Network - consultants who ‘help social justice movements win’.
It routinely emails journalists, including lots of BBC journalists, offering story ideas and interviewees.
They also offer media training.
>
Emails from NEON will open with ‘we have five guests available today to discuss (insert story here)’.
As an example, they offer ‘social justice’ activists like Cleo Madeleine, a trans-identified male from Gendered Intelligence, who’s had airtime on the BBC several times.
>
Reporters don’t write headlines. ‘Gender identity’ is highly contested and should always have ‘’ or some other caveat.
Framing is fair though ‘single-sex’ has been replaced by ‘women-only’.
It *could* be for ease of understanding but the BBC is generally affirmative. 2/
It does go on to say ‘single sex’ straight after 👍
This ⬇️ is an improvement but still fundamentally inaccurate, as they are not women. If ‘trans women’ *must* be used, the clearest explanation would be - ‘who are male’ - .
A concerned member of the public sent the WPATH FILES release to Fergus Walsh, the BBC’s Medical Editor on 11th March 2024. Because nothing was reported by BBC Health, they followed that email 6 days later with a second email containing /1
/2 headlines of an interview with the author of the WPATH report, Mia Hughes @_CryMiaRiver including points about medics taking advice from non-medic transactivsts; no follow-up on castrations and blanket ‘gender affirming care’ approach, despite clear evidence of harms. Only /
@_CryMiaRiver /3 to discover Fergus Walsh had blocked their email account.