I posted the below last night in an emotional mood. It was answered by many generous comments in remembrance of my lost Miranda, and I thank every commenter. Of course there were also some other comments. A thread about those....
I'll quote one of those "others," but it stands for many: "You’re voting for the abortion of your grandchild? How exciting!"
That phrase "your grandchild" came up again and again - as if my daughter's child, had she lived to have one, would belong to *me* more than to her.
My original post didn't reference abortion at all. I was not particularly thinking about abortion when I cast my vote as my daughter would have wished. I was thinking rather of the grim and resentful drive to police and control women that seems to animate Trump/Vance.
When I scroll through the "other" comments, I am struck by the assumption that the country is crowded with women who want to kill children - and therefore men must save those children by policing their mothers.
With my own three children ... by the time I noticed they were sneezing, their mother had already wiped their noses. If I thought about them every hour, she thought about them every minute. And so it is with almost every mother.
What arrogance to imagine that you, as a male voter, care more for a woman's pregnancy and child than she does. It would rip the breath from your body to feel as she does.
But unfortunately the mood that inspires the urge to control is not only arrogance. It is also anger.
Many men feel ill-used by the women in their lives. Those feelings may even be partly justified in particular cases. Women are people too, crammed like men with human faults.
But when such merely personal resentments flow into politics - you know, it's visible, right?
You think you are talking about the children my daughter will now never have. But the whole world can see that you are talking about your ex-wife, ex-girlfriend, estranged daughter, or resented mother. It's not a good look. It's not a good way to live.
When voters like me say, "I'm voting for my daughter's freedom," we're not thinking of abortion rights, exactly.
We are thinking of the lust to control that we see burning in the eyes of some men. We are voting to protect our daughters and granddaughters from THAT.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) It's the law. The Department of Defense and Secretary of Defense were so named by the National Security Act amendments of 1949. Only Congress has the power to change the name. nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/28655…
2) It's commonsense. Not all national security threats take the form of outright wars. EG the US is not at war with the Houthis of Yemen, but it does defend sea traffic against Houthi terrorism. (Or anyway it tries to, if only the SecDef would quit blabbing operational details.)
While I was on CNN at 1 pm predicting that the Trump administration would use the Charlie Kirk murder as an excuse to deploy government power against peaceful and legal political competition in 2026 ...
... Vice President Vance and other Trump officials were simultaneously on Charlie Kirk's podcast vowing to use the murder as an excuse to deploy government power against peaceful and legal political competition in 2026. nytimes.com/live/2025/09/1…
1) The Trump administration is corrupt on scale almost beyond comprehending. If they lose control of Congress in 2026, they face all kinds of legal jeopardy. nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/…
Government taking control of private companies ...
Supply shortages and price increases due to government attacks on free commercial exchange;
The government imposing huge fines on media corporations for First Amendment protected speech that displeased the president ...
Enormous tax increases imposed on Americans without any vote by Congress;
Violent convicted criminals released onto the streets because they directed their violence against persons the president targeted as his personal enemies ...
In a few minutes, @theAtlantic will release video of the episode of David Frum show featuring ex ambassador to Ukraine Bridget Brink. Audio is already posted on your favorite platform. (thread)
The interview with Ambassador Brink and the opening monologue were recorded before today's news of Trump cut-off of essential weapons of self-defense to Ukraine. But both were recorded in ominous awareness that Trump abandonment of Ukraine was imminent. 2/x
A point I make in opening: while Trump's Putin-subservient abandonment of Ukraine deserves as much anger and scorn as the non-Putin side of the political spectrum can muster ... a word also has to be said about Biden administration's lack of urgency to aid Ukraine in time. 3/x
The Benin artifacts previously delivered to Nigeria from UK and Germany have disappeared from public view. They are not on display in any museum. Some or all may have been sold into private markets. (Links in next tweet)
The late PJ O'Rourke had a great line: "Just as some things are too strange for fiction, other things are too true for journalism." The fate of artworks delivered to Nigeria is one of those subjects too true for journalism. Fiction and fantasy are reported as moral imperative.
In 2018, protesters against gasoline tax demonstrated in Paris. A radical few set fires near the Arc de Triomphe, creating scenes of chaos for social media platforms - like the iconic image below. (THREAD)
To the consumer of social media, it must have looked as if France hovered on the brink of revolution in 2018. Paris engulfed in flames! (2/x)
Here's how things looked to Parisians, though. Some agitator poured gasoline on a bike at a distance from the Arc, set it on fire, and then photographed the monument through the black smoke created by burning tires. (3/x)