@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken Ah, Dr. Glaucomflecken. Fellow ophthalmologist.
I found the MASSIVE FLAW with the COVID vaccine back in January 2020. The lung barrier can stop water molecules of 18 Daltons. It will stop COVID IgG antibody molecules that are a massive 145,000 Daltons.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken I let my mentor who trained me in refractive surgery at USC/Doheny know of it. He was shocked. We've had many phone calls since. Dr. Peter McDonnell is currently the Director of Ophthalmology at Johns Hopkins and chief editor of Ophthalmology times.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken When I first told Dr. McDonnell about the lung barrier issue in May of 2020? he thought it was Nobel worthy. Not that I care. Just, so you know, an academic ophthalmologist at the top of his game took my information VERY seriously.
I sent this info to Fauci in SEP 2020.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken Fauci's team responded inadequately, of course, I have the perfect witness because Dr. McDonnell was cc'ed on it all.
I responded with a 73 page document that I even put a copyright on that leaves Dr. Anthony Fauci NO excuse for rolling out the COVID vaccine.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken I started sending this information to as many people as I could.
INCLUDING the Chief Editor of the NEJM. He REFUSED to even publish a "letter to the editor" from me.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken NEJM has accountability for REFUSING to take the ONLY correct scientific step, which is at least PUBLISH a letter to the editor for ANY of their COVID vaccine papers, but they REFUSED to.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken The ONLY hypothesis for the COVID mRNA vaccine in their FDA clinical trial?
WAS a "neutralizing antibody" in the lung air space that would bind the virus before the virus could infect a lung alveolar epithelial cell, lining the INSIDE of the lung barrier.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken The lung barrier issue DESTROYS their ONLY hypothesis.
In science? Having a hypothesis that is then destroyed? Is WORSE than NOT having a hypothesis.
Dr. Eric Ruben, NEJM's chief editor then (that was now 3 yrs ago, OCT 2021) refused to even print ONE letter.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken I even explain to them what their NEW HYPOTHESIS now must be, for how the COVID mRNA vaccine provides benefit, since it can't be via a neutralizing antibody in the lung air space.
My hypothesis is EXTREMELY good but explains this mRNA vaccine as a PRODRUG.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken All mRNA vaccines are known to induce the production of chemokines, including interferon, which is KNOWN to be anti viral in tens of thousands of papers.
Then, my hypothesis makes complete sense for HOW their COVID vaccine is "appearing to work."
The J&J was one shot, less IFN
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken only 50% efficacy.
The astrazenica shot was TWO shots, 80% efficacy.
The mRNA vaccines were two shots but then each time it went from mRNA (stimulates ifn) to spike antigen (also stimulates IFN production).
95% efficacy. based on how much IFN the pt produced.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken It makes perfect sense and the ONLY next step for any scientist, once this is known? To STOP the COVID vaccine roll out and to DO ANOTHER CLINICAL TRIAL to see if my hypothesis is correct.
I even explained how to set it up. Compare the COVID mRNA vaccine to the FLU SHOT.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken As a positive control. Remember, this was back in FEB 2021. All US copyrighted.
But it should be FOUR flu shots since each mRNA vaccine dose is as strong of an adjuvant as TWO conventional vaccine doses.
THAT is how science is done. Understanding HOW something works?
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken IS the very ESSENCE of science.
The HYPOTHESIS? Is TRYING to connect the "purported cause" to the EFFECT.
In science? WITHOUT a HYPOTHESIS? You are at HUGE RISK for being a victim to a FALSE CAUSE.
Which is HUGELY EMBARRASSING for any scientist.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken Essentially, their "EFFECTIVE" claims?
NOT POSSIBLE to have a COVID antibody in the lung air space provide BENEFIT when it can't get IN.
Then TWO YEARS after NEJM refused to cover this lung barrier issue? I find this STRING MECHANISM.
Which not only destroys the COVID vaccine
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken This STRING MECHANISM destroys (or will destroy)
1. EVERY COVID vaccine. 2. EVERY current and future mRNA vaccine. 3. MOST of the childhood conventional vaccines (e.g., DTaP vaccine).
4. MANY scientists reputations 5. MANY pediatricians reputations
6 KAMALA HARRIS.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken I've sent out a 100,000 posts, in ONE year, trying to find ANYONE to refute it. NO ONE CAN.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken I got kicked off of KERANET (my refractive surgery/cornea email professional forum) for asking HOW the COVID mRNA vaccine "works."
Stupidity. Even among my ophthalmology peers.
A dozen or so ganged up on me and nonstop bullied me and wrote disparaging remarks. Matt G.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken MERELY for asking "how does the COVID mRNA vaccine work?"
Because NONE OF THEM KNEW either.
Well, now, here's the STRING MECHANISM that will cause a massive paradigm shift in medicine.
The end of childhood vaccines.
And the NEJM is DEATHLY silent.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken After I inform PENN Medicine of all these flaws? After I inform the TWO Nobel Laureates for the mRNA vaccine technology about the STRING/PRECIPITIN issue and THEY can't refute it?
What more do I have to do BEFORE NEJM will raise the ALARM and help SAVE children worldwide?
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken If the TWO Nobel Prize winners for mRNA vaccine technology can't refute this STRING MECHANISM, then shouldn't the WORLD KNOW that the COVID mRNA vaccine is DEADLY???
And isn't that YOUR JOB NEJM?
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken PENN MEDICINE. Not a SINGLE physician at PENN MEDICINE can REFUTE this MASSIVE FLAW with childhood vaccines.
This ALSO outs KAMALA HARRIS as having KILLED over a 100,000 Americans with her COVID vaccine mandate.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko The PREP ACT provides you with vaccine activity legal immunity. However, it also includes a major exception. If you are involved in "willful misconduct" by acts of OMISSION OR COMMISSION, your "vaccine legal immunity will be negated
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko So, blocking me or muting me? Is a COVER UP of the most massive mistake in medical history and that act will constitute willful misconduct (obviously) and your organization can then be sued directly by patients harmed by the vaccine.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko I have done SUFFICIENT vetting of this String Mechanism for you to PUBLISH it.
To NOT alert the world to this fact? That the GENIUS Nobel Laureates for the COVID mRNA vaccine? That THEY CAN NOT REFUTE the String Mechanism/ vaccine to PRECIPITIN formation mechanism.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko To NOT alert the world to this MASSIVE fundamental flaw with MOST vaccines?
Is an ACT OF OMISSION and will COST the NEJM their vaccine activity legal immunity provided by the PREP ACT.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko If NO ONE can refute this BREAKING DISCOVERY that vaccines have the MAIN EFFECT of creating PRECIPITINS in the blood of patients?
Then to NOT alert the world of this massive flaw JUST so you can provide PROTECTION for KAMALA HARRIS for the next 10 days?
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko The AMERICAN PEOPLE and the WORLD has a RIGHT TO KNOW that they are VOTING for a candidate, HARRIS,
who mass killed over a 100,000 Americans with her COVID vaccine mandate and that NO ONE, including the TWO NOBEL Laureates for mRNA vaccine technology, can REFUTE THIS STATEMENT.
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko Covid antibody in blood. Spike antigen in blood.
BOTH, in the blood from the vaccine.
Who could POSSIBLY argue that the ANTIBODY and the ANTIGEN in the blood do NOT stick and KEEP sticking?
They bind. It's even in THEIR immunology textbooks......
@NEJM @DGlaucomflecken @kkariko NEJM, you have ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE not to IMMEDIATELY alert the WORLD to this MASSIVE FLAW with the COVID mRNA vaccine.
You can EASILY VET my information by DIRECTLY requesting KARIKIO and Dr. Drew Weissman to REFUTE the STRING MECHANISM. They can not.
NO EXCUSE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vaccines create PRECIPITINS in the blood of patients that BLOCK blood flow and INJURE/KILL.
Which means? KAMALA KILLED a 100,000+ Americans with her COVID vaccine mandate.
@JohnFetterman @AdamKinzinger @Scranton_Mayor @KamalaHarris The PREP ACT provides you with vaccine activity legal immunity. However, it also includes a major exception. If you are involved in "willful misconduct" by acts of OMISSION OR COMMISSION, your "vaccine legal immunity will be negated
@JohnFetterman @AdamKinzinger @Scranton_Mayor @KamalaHarris So, blocking me or muting me? Is a COVER UP of the most massive mistake in medical history and that act will constitute willful misconduct (obviously) and your organization can then be sued directly by patients harmed by the vaccine.
The PREP ACT provides you with vaccine activity legal immunity. However, it also includes a major exception. If you are involved in "willful misconduct" by acts of OMISSION OR COMMISSION, your "vaccine legal immunity will be negated
@Penn So, blocking me or muting me? Is a COVER UP of the most massive mistake in medical history and that act will constitute willful misconduct (obviously) and your organization can then be sued directly by patients harmed by the vaccine.
@Penn WEBMASTER at PENN UNIV/University communications.
DO NOT BLOCK ME without a PERFECT papertrail from the BOARD OF TRUSTEES of PENN UNIVERSITY.
Because there will be MASSIVE LAWSUITS between you two for HUGE LIABILITY for this action.
The COVID mRNA vaccine is FATALLY FLAWED and this DISCOVERY that the vaccine has the MAIN EFFECT of creating PRECIPITINS that BLOCK BLOOD FLOW and damage/kills?
CAN NOT BE REFUTED by the NOBEL PRIZE WINNER, Dr. Drew Weissman.
@ScottHalpernMD @PennMedicine Scott. here's your first HUGE NON HYPOTHETICAL Medical ethical nightmare.
It involves the most MASSIVE DISCOVERY about vaccines, that they have the MAIN EFFECT of creating PRECIPITINS in blood that then cause ischemic damage.
@ScottHalpernMD @PennMedicine What is the ONLY ethical next step?
I'm sure you know what the correct answer is and I think you should have an AUDIENCE.
@Penn The PREP ACT provides you with vaccine activity legal immunity. However, it also includes a major exception. If you are involved in "willful misconduct" by acts of OMISSION OR COMMISSION, your "vaccine legal immunity will be negated
@Penn So, blocking me or muting me? Is a COVER UP of the most massive mistake in medical history and that act will constitute willful misconduct (obviously) and your organization can then be sued directly by patients harmed by the vaccine.