Sometimes, discomfort is very uncomfortable. Anybody can get occasionally tired of it, and then it can change fast, where it's comfort that disturbs you.
- Jim Harrison
I’d never been to New Hanover Co, NC or canvassed for a campaign prior to this week.
Last recap:
Why New Hanover County?
Not an arbitrary choice; NH is the 11th largest county in NC, ~quarter million votes, has had close POTUS election results each time since 2008 in a state which has also had close election results each time.
It is arguably the swingiest county in NC.
It is also a county with a wild mix of very wealthy beach towns, midsize city life & decidedly more working class towns further inland.
We surveyed a wide spread & I kept a diary with notes b/t visits that advanced to longer conversations & invited home visits. Ds, Rs & Indies.
I also waited, like when Ryan Gosling grew a beard in The Notebook, to check our canvassing results & my feelings about what I’ve observed vs. the Twitterverse of political science community posts.
A good guess is 5.5mm-5.8mm North Carolinians will vote in this election.
We met & spoke to hundreds of voters, some of whom have already cast their ballots.
General takes:
1. The gender gap of # votes as a % breakout is about the same as 2020. But that’s not the story…
The story is not the macro, the 9% to 11% run rate of more women voting vs. men, it’s the micro breakout.
You don’t see this in polls, but you absolutely do see & feel it on the ground.
At bottom, women are repulsed by Trump to a person, but the attribution to votes is complex.
We spoke to hundreds of women in each political set, Ds, Rs & Indies, & this is what we observed:
D women - Harris all the way. Some unsolicited concerns about the Biden admin’s handling of the war in Israel + some economically aggrieved, but no defectors to 3rd party or R.
Indep women - 85/15 favoring Harris. Quite honestly, this subgroup surprised me. A lot of Indies are preternatural net conservatives or net liberals every election voters who just don’t want to be bothered by parties for donations, so I always asked “what is your usual leaning?”
To my notes it was about 65/35 favoring self identify as net conservative.
So the indicia of have already voted or will vote Harris at 85% was a bit of a surprise.
The common theme was, quite plainly, contempt for Trump & Vance to a person. These are apolitical conclusions.
The 15% of Ind women to Trump had a common theme of disdain for Biden + a deep allocation of blame over inflation to the Biden admin, therefore favor Trump by default.
They each recognize a moral failing in supporting Trump, but see it as a least bad choice.
Interestingly,
One thing in my diary ledger that sticks out - the 15% of Ind women for Trump were all young, mostly young professionals in their 20s.
The R women breakout also surprised me some.
Again, the easy thing is to be cynical. GOP women will generally vote R no matter & what we observed does generally exhibit same.
But there is a slice of GOP women, heavily weighted toward older women, who’ve either voted already for Harris, will vote Harris or a leaning toward.
The breakout is about 1 in 8 who fit the “have/will/are considering a vote for Harris” categories.
I’d put it at an even split for this subgroup b/t “have/will vote” & “are considering”
But I do believe the “are considering” translates to will vote Trump, just embarrassed to
say it out loud. I don’t seek out to patronize them for it - is what it is.
But inside of this analysis is 1 in 16 R women we surveyed, or 6.25%, have or will vote Harris.
That’s material & significant, IMHO.
The men merit less analysis:
D men, 99%+ Harris.
We only met 1 registered D man who indicated he will vote Trump: a 44 y.o. black male, a successful small business owner. (More on him later)
Indep men, 60/40 net to Harris.
This group simply leaves me blank, particularly the strata of younger men.
If I wanted to learn all there is to obtain about fantasy football leagues, these guys.
Whatever, book it 60/40 net Harris. Onwards.
R men, 95%+ Trump.
The few objectors to Trump were each older, wealthier men. 2 grizzled ex-military guys + a few GOP lifers who’ve just had it w/ the Trump circus.
Doesn’t make them any less cast-iron Rs, just won’t play ball this time.
Pin me to a number, I say 2.5% Harris.
The last punch point is we were surprised by the high volume of GOP voters who disclosed they’d already voted. It was about an equal percentage to Ds who disclosed same.
There won’t be any shock & awe net red or net blue wave of volume on Election Day. It’s happening now.
I’m glad I did this for a great many reasons.
I believe this is a very important election & electing Harris is, or at least SHOULD BE, an urgent high order calling to a conscience for all Americans.
Selfishly, I did what I came looking for: hope.
And confidence + less anxiety.
I appreciate each of you for following this journey.
I found a little piece of my better self in New Hanover County this week. I’ll never forget this place.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Superbad Heresy in New Hanover County - what I learned on the plights of the indigenous American men-of-a certain-age, deep fried chicken livers & the 44 year-old black male Trump voter.
🧵 drop, & sorry seems to be the hardest word.
Every schoolboy wants to be cool. In my era every schoolboy needed a well worn pair of Jodhpurs boots to be like Mick, Keith in the Stones or George Harrison.
And as we learned from the Kavanaugh hearings, the idiocy of male teens youth in the 80s was cool like Jeff Spicoli vs.
not cool. In our minds our dreams are real for a short while.
These were, of course, the imaginary worlds of boyhoods.
Sometimes there are times when it is easy to be cynical & feel discouraged. At times, today was like that…we canvassed majority working class/white collar hardscrabble middle class slices of New Hanover Co, NC.
Notably younger, decidedly more Trump true believers.
I don’t live in an imaginary world - I realize & accept there are Trump true believers, regardless of all else.
But I started the day earlier than planned because I had a rough time last night on reflections from Day #1. I wanted to touch base early w/ 1 woman I’d met yesterday.
7:30am is too obnoxious to knock or ring, but I sighted her watering plants in front.
Oh, you again.
Yes.
She’s 77. I said delighted to meet & thanks for the hospitality yest, but I’m stuck on something: could I mention your story, sans personal deets, to others when I canvas?
Quick 🧵 on a few tax policy gotchas for laypersons to look for tomorrow night.
First, every politician promises tax cuts for the working class. That’s just political lollipops & pony rides.
Second, every politician has a policy that will (supposedly) make you happier.
Well…
No. Just no.
Neither of these 2 candidates are credibly going to offer you, Mr. & Mrs. Average Hard Working American Layperson, a meaningful tax advantage + then deliver on it.
That won’t happen.
Instead focus selfishly on WHAT YOU WANT at the buffet line. Health care, child
tax credits, more (or fewer) agrarian economy or clean energy subsidies?
There’s something you want. Next consider it costs something & the federal government has to pay for it via tax revenues.
So what is the real problem we all share? It is obviously that the public equities
THE PROJECT 2025 INITIATIVE MODULE ON THE FEDERAL RESERVE
Finally. The foundational🧵s 1 through 4 established how & why the modern Fed is an apolitical, independent & high functioning unit of the federal govt.
Project 2025 attempts to contest this framing.
In quick sum, the Project 2025 module critical of the Fed is the very definition of a partisan political policy institute white paper.
It’s authors + 3 named contributors are well known conservative movement economists & academic theorists.
None of the 4 have any background experience in the financial sector or in the federal public service at the OMB, Treasury or Fed.
Most of the citations in the 2 page bibliography circle to other conservatives policy institute think pieces, most notably Cato Institute & AEI.
Prior to today the Federal Reserve was defined as a benevolent overlord & the leadership patterns of modern Fed chairs was established.
Today we cover train wrecks. There are myriad inglorious ways investment banks die.
The 1st way is garden variety tomfoolery.
Excessive risks, reckless use of leverage or internal fraud causes institutional cardiac arrests &, at bottom, the Fed chooses a *DO NOT RESUSCITATE* order.
1987
The historically true part of Wolf of Wall Street: cocaine fueled L.F. Rothschild listed equities desk traders went on a reckless leveraged risk bender during the stock market crash & lost hundreds of millions in less than 6 hrs & a 2 century old institution died that day.